💾 Archived View for privacy.flounder.online › article_de_wm_comparison.gmi captured on 2022-06-11 at 22:37:52. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-01-08)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

DEs, WMs And Their RAM Usage (2021)

This is a simple home-made research about how efficient desktop environments (DEs) and window managers (WMs) can be (usage of RAM).

How this study was done:

The base install was EndeavourOS Atlantis 21.4 XFCE (offline install) inside a virtual machine (8GB RAM).

1) I installed the DE/WM, then rebooted and logged in via lightdm.

2) I closed all welcome messages (if those appeared).

3) I ran "htop" program.

4) I repeated this procedure multiple times in order to verify the result.

Note: Full screen (1920x1080) was scaled automatically.

Results

Window managers (WMs)

IceWM		135 MB			

Fluxbox		155 MB

JWM		160 MB

Openbox		170 MB

i3		220 MB

Desktop environments (DEs)

Enlightenment 	205 MB

LXDE		220 MB

LXQt		310 MB

Budgie		350 MB

MATE		375 MB

XFCE		395 MB

Gnome		440 MB

KDE Plasma	480 MB

Cinnamon	600 MB	

Analysis

I've seen these kind of comparisons elsewhere and their rankings differ a little bit from this one. However, the big picture is the same. Given these facts, I wouldn't spend much time on details, because the real issue is the relative size of DEs/WMs. Window managers consume about 1/2 or 1/3 of the RAM compared to full-featured DEs. This is important, because it gives an old laptop a second chance to run smoothly for years to come.

Among the measured WMs, IceWM is the most newbie-friendly alternative, because it doesn't need much (or at all) customization to work out-of-the-box. It has good/full mouse support, mostly due to its pre-configured toolbar and start menu.

The biggest underperformer is Cinnamon. It is very basic desktop environment, but it requires more than Gnome and KDE Plasma, which are more fancy/modern.

____________________________

Last updated: 20.12.2021

Return to homepage