💾 Archived View for freeside.wntrmute.net › log › 2021 › 20210210.gmi captured on 2022-06-11 at 20:50:40. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
now listening: Our Place in the Stars - New Arcades - Proximity
This is a rough draft on some thoughts about exocortices that has been simmering in the back of my mind lately. The catalyst for writing it was reading Stephen Wolfram's (with all caveats that come with reading his posts) entry "Seeking the Productive Life: Some Details of My Personal Infrastructure".
Seeking the Productive Life: Some Details of My Personal Infrastructure
An exocortex is "a hypothetical artificial information-processing system that would augment a brain's biological cognitive processes." I have made many attempts at building my own, including
Each of these has their own shortcomings that don't quite match up with my expectations or desires. An exocortex must be a personalized system adapted to its user to maximise knowledge capture.
Succinctly put, the goal of an exocortex is to collect artifacts and notes (including daily notes), organize them, and allow for written summaries of current snapshots of my knowledge. Put another way, "artifacts + notes + graph structure = exocortex". Note that a folder hierarchy is a tree, which is a form of directed graph. Symlinks inside a folder act as edges to notes outside of that folder, refining the graph structure.
This writeup is an attempt at characterising and exploring the exocortex problem space to capture my goals, serve as a foundation for the construction of such a system, and, through discussion of the problem space, tease out the structure of the problem to discover a closer approximation to the idealized reality of an exocortex system.
Wiktionary definition of exocortex
The elements of an exocortex, briefly touched on above and expanded below, include
An artifact is any object that is not a textual writeup by me that should be referenceable as part of the exocortex. A copy of a paper from ArXiV might serve as an artifact. Importantly, artifacts must be locally-available. They serve as a snapshot of some source of knowledge, and should not be subject to link decay, future pay-walling (or loss of access to a pay-walled system), or loss of connectivity. An artifact should be timestamped: when was it captured? When was the artifact created upstream? An artifact must also have some associated upstream information --- how did it come to be in the repository?
An artifact may be relevant to more than one field of interest; accordingly, all artifacts should exist in a central repository. This repository should support artifact histories (e.g. collecting updates to artifacts, where the history is important in capturing a historical view of knowledge), multiple formats (a book may exist in PDF, EPUB, or other formats), and a mechanism for exploring, finding, and updating docs. The repository must capture relevant metadata about each artifact.
A note is a written summary of a certain field. It should be in some rich-text format that supports linking as well as basic formatting. The ideal text format appears to be the org-mode format given its rich formatting and ability to transition fluidly between outline and full document; however, this may not be the final, most effective format. A note is the distillation of artifacts into an understandable form, providing avenues to discover specifics that may need to be held in working memory only briefly.
A structured format allows for fast and efficient knowledge lookups. It grants the researcher a starting place with a set of rules governing where and how things may be found. It imposes order over chaos such that relevant kernels of knowledge may be retrieved and examined in an expedient manner. The metaphor that humans seem to adapt to the most readily is a graph structure, particularly those that are generally hierarchical in nature.
The exocortex and the artifact repository both require a query interface; they may be part of the same UI. A query UI allows a researcher to pose questions of the exocortex, directly looking for specific knowledge.
The four interfaces (query, exploration, presentation, and update) may all be facets of the same interface, and they may benefit from a cohesive and unified interface; however, it is important that all of these use cases are considered and supported.
The exploratory interface allows a researcher to meander through the knowledge store, exploring topics and potentially identifying new areas to push the knowledge sphere out further.
The presentation interface allows a set of notes to be shared with others; it should be possible to include some or all artifacts associated with these notes. For example, it may not be appropriate to share a copy of a book with the presentation, but it may be appropriate to share a copy of some of the supporting papers.
The update interface is where knowledge is added to the exocortex, whether through capturing an artifact or writing notes.
An exocortex must be localized to the user, with the full repository available offline. Quick input or scratch pad notes might be available, but realistically, the cost of cloud storage and the transfer sizes mean that having the full exocortex available is unlikely. Instead, a hybrid model allowing quick captures of knowledge available remotely combined with a full exocortex on a local system presents the probably best solution.
An exocortex represents the sum of the user's knowledge. There aren't separate exocortices for different areas. Everything I know should go into my exocortex.
In order to map out the structure of an exocortex, it's useful to review what has worked and what hasn't. Each alternative presented will consider what worked and what didn't to clarify what an effective exocortex looks like.
At a high-level, wikis like Gitit and folders of plain-text (including org-mode) data are roughly equivalent; the differences lie primarily in how they are presented. Neither approach works well for indexing or organizing artifacts, and while some approaches like a scanner that adds notes to a SQLite database (for improved search performance).
Using a folder of org-mode notes is probably one of the better note-taking interfaces that I have found; however, there is no notion of an artifact repository without considerable manual work.
The main downsides to this approach are the lack of good query and exploration UIs, along with the lack of a useful artifact repository. The upsides are good updates and presentation interfaces.
Evernote (and also notion) provide a unified, searchable interface across multiple machines. Evernote in particular has a usable artifact repository, although information about upstream sources isn't available, nor are metadata about the object or the idea of multiple formats and history.
Evernote is a paid service, and neither is particularly extensible to a user's needs. Exploring the exocortex is difficult, as there's no notion of an entry point. Presenting nodes is met with some success, albeit limited.
Quiver is an excellent note-taking application; however, it is MacOS-only. It does have some ability to import web pages, but in general it lacks any idea of an artifact repository. The ability to intersperse different cell types is good.
Jupyter notebooks provide an excellent interface for interspersing computational ideas with prose; there is no notion of an artifact repository, however. Linking notebooks isn't supported, and there is no overall structure besides manual hyperlinking and a directory structure.
The artifact repository is one of the two pillars of the exocortex; it stores the "first hand" sources of knowledge.
The first part of an artifact repository is a central index that provides
An artifact entry in the index contains, at a minimm,
The artifact identifier is used to associate all related artifacts (e.g. previous revisions, different formats, etc.)
An artifact consists of multiple components:
The metadata header for an artifact should contain, at a minimum, fields for
Each artifact can have zero or more blobs associated. For example, a physical book reference might not have a blob associated; an ebook might have multiple blobs corresponding to different formats; and a webpage snapshot may have mulitple blobs representing revisions to the page.
A blob header stores
The headers should probably be stored in a database of some kind; SQLite is a good example for the first iteration. Blobs themselves will need to be stored on disk, probably in a format related to a hash of the blob contents, such as in a content-addressable store (CAS).
The exocortex consists of a graph database that links notes. At a broad level, it should probably start with a root node that points to broad fields. The update interface should allow manipulation of nodes as graph nodes in addition to allowing for adding and editing notes. A node might be thought of as "type node = Note | ArtifactLink". That is, a note can link to other notes or to artifacts. A proper node title is the sum of the paths. For example, consider the following structure linked below:
Different possibilities for naming note3 include:
Personally, I prefer the arrow notation with equal sign. Each note can be shortened to a partial path; e.g. "note2=>note3". The title for each note can be stored in a metadata entry.
A first step is to start constructing an artifact repository. Once this is in place, a suitable graph database (for example, cayley) should be identified, and an exocortex core developed. User interfaces will necessarily be developed alongside these systems.
