💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4180.gmi captured on 2022-06-11 at 22:48:00. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The summer Davos blues - Global movers and shakers are worried about China

Sep 15th 2012 | from the print edition

THE World Economic Forum is a conference for optimists. Take Ashish Thakkar, a

young businessman whose family fled Uganda in 1972 when Idi Amin expelled all

the Asians and grabbed their shops. The Thakkars went to Britain, patiently

rebuilt their fortunes and moved back to Africa in 1993. To Rwanda, as ill-luck

would have it. The next year, during the genocide, they lost everything again.

Most people would have given up on Africa at this point. Not Mr Thakkar. His

companies now employ 7,000 people there, manning call centres and running farm

projects. At the World Economic Forum in Tianjin in northern China this week,

he eagerly touted Africa as a new frontier of growth (though he runs his

empire from Dubai these days).

For decades the great and good of business and politics have gathered every

winter in Davos, a Swiss ski resort, for the World Economic Forum, where they

swap ideas about improving the state of the world and break ankles on icy

pavements. More recently the forum has spawned mini-Davoses on other

continents. The most successful is the summer Davos held annually in China

since 2007. It is a great opportunity for big cheeses from the rest of the

world to get to know their Chinese peers. In Tianjin, captains of industry

slurped noodles with cabinet ministers, charity bosses bent plutocratic ears

and young global leaders partied. But the mood was unmistakably gloomy.

Part of the problem is the euro crisis. But the biggest concerns are about

China itself: its magnificent growth machine is slowing. Companies that had

become used to double-digit GDP expansion must make do with 7.5% this year, if

the official target is met. Imports in August actually fell, by 2.6% year on

year. Behind closed doors, Chinese bosses fretted about bad debts and looming

lay-offs. One warned of a wave of brand elimination in China s car industry,

as early as next year. People are accustomed to grim news from Europe; from

China it is shocking.

What is all the fuss about? Annual growth of 7.5% is still pretty darn good. It

alarms Davos Man, for two reasons. First, with growth nugatory or negative in

the rich world, firms have come to depend on surging emerging markets,

especially China, to keep expanding. Second, no one knows whether Chinese

statistics are true. Is growth merely shifting down a gear. Or is it heading

for a crash? In a one-party state, if the central government sets growth

targets, local officials may view them as commands. To what extent do they

falsify the numbers to please their superiors? The answer is as clear as the

Tianjin skyline on a smoggy day.

Consider one indicator: electricity output. As Chinese statistics go, this is a

fairly reliable one. Only a few companies generate electric power, and it can

be metered in a way that dodgy cash transactions cannot. So here s the bad

news: in June China s electricity output did not grow at all. In the two months

before that, it grew by a feeble 2.7% and 0.7% respectively, year on year. Over

the same period, industrial value-added was growing at a cracking 9%, said the

statistics. Is it really possible for a manufacturing-heavy economy like China

s to grow at a decent pace when electricity is not? asks Nate Taplin of GK

Dragonomics, a research firm, in a paper called The Electricity Conundrum,

Revisited .

The numbers might be accurate. Mr Taplin notes that China s heavy industries,

such as steel, cement, and chemicals, use lots of power but generate only

meagre profits. So the gap between electricity growth and industrial

value-added is not in itself enough evidence for large-scale data

manipulation. But the fact that serious economists are even asking this

question points to a worrying truth: no other important country is as murky as

China.

Foreigners have always been mystified by it, of course. Often this is simply

because they haven t done their homework. Late one night this week, your

columnist met a young global leader who, after a happy drinking session, had

wound up outside the wrong hotel. He had no Chinese cash and, speaking no

Chinese, couldn t make the taxi driver take him to a cash machine. Schumpeter

paid his fare.

Out of sight

The real problem with China is not only that it is difficult for outsiders to

understand. It is that it is difficult for locals, too. The big news story this

week concerned Xi Jinping, the man who is set to become China s leader in a few

weeks. He has not been seen in public since September 1st. He cancelled

meetings with Hillary Clinton and Singapore s prime minister, citing back pain.

Rumours are swirling that something is amiss (see Banyan). The businessfolk at

summer Davos would like to know what is going on. Yet when Wen Jiabao, the

prime minister, addressed the forum on September 11th, he didn t mention the

subject and took no questions from the floor.

The free flow of information fuels progress. Companies listen to their

customers complaints in order to improve their products. Politicians in

democracies listen to voters complaints and strain mightily to appease them.

In China, by contrast, the most important grumbles are voiced only in private.

Why, asked one young, foreign-educated entrepreneur, is China ruled by old men

rather than laws? Why are Chinese people not allowed to choose between

political parties? Why do officials with modest salaries wear such expensive

watches?

As long as living standards keep rising, China will probably remain stable. The

incredible growth engine will keep running, albeit at a slower pace, for years

to come. The capitalists gathered in Tianjin salivate at the prospect of

pushing beyond China s richer coastal provinces and into the hinterland, where

hundreds of millions of new consumers would love to buy a fridge and fancy food

to put in it. They fear, though, that if growth stalls, all bets are off. And

they worry that they won t see the crash coming.

http://www.Economist.com/blogs/schumpeter

from the print edition | Business