💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3818.gmi captured on 2022-06-11 at 23:00:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Globalization: Progress Or Profiteering?

February 04 2012 | Filed Under Economics

Globalization is the tendency of investment funds and businesses to move beyond

domestic and national markets to other markets around the globe, allowing them

to become interconnected with different markets. Proponents of globalization

say that it helps developing nations "catch up" to industrialized nations much

faster, through increased employment and technological advances, and Asian

economies are often highlighted as examples of globalization's success.

Critics of globalization say that it weakens national sovereignty and allows

rich nations to ship domestic jobs overseas, where labor is much cheaper. What

is the real story on globalization? It largely depends on your personal

perspective. In this article, we'll examine the issue from both sides.

SEE: Economics Basics

The View from the Penthouse

For business leaders and members of the economic elite, globalization is good.

Cheaper labor overseas enables them to build production facilities in locations

where labor and healthcare costs are low, and then sell the finished goods in

locations where wages are high. (For related reading, see What Is International

Trade?)

Profits soar due to the greatly reduced wages for workers, and Wall Street

rewards the big profit gains with higher stock prices. The CEOs of global

companies also get credit for the profits. Their rewards are usually generous

compensation packages, in which company stock and stock options figure

prominently. Institutional investors and wealthy individuals also take home the

big gains when stock prices increase.

The View from the Street

But globalization doesn't only affect CEOs and high-net-worth individuals.

Competition for jobs stretches far beyond the immediate area in a global

marketplace. From technology call centers in India, to automobile manufacturing

plants in China, globalization means that workers must compete with job

applicants from around the world.

Some of these changes arose because of the North American Free Trade Agreement

(NAFTA). NAFTA sent the jobs of U.S. autoworkers to Mexico, a developing

country, where wages are significantly lower than those in the U.S. A few years

later, some of those same jobs were relocated to third-world countries in East

Asia, where wages are even lower.

In both cases, the auto manufacturers expected U.S. consumers to continue

buying those products at U.S. prices. While critics of globalization decry the

loss of jobs that globalization can entail for developed countries, those who

support globalization argue that the employment and technology that is brought

to developing countries helps those populations toward industrialization and

the possibility of increased standards of living.

The View from the Middle Ground

In the globalization battleground, outsourcing is a double-edged sword.

On the one hand, low wages in foreign countries enable retailers to sell

clothing, cars and other goods at reduced rates in western nations where

shopping has become an ingrained part of the culture. This allows companies to

increase their profit margins.

At the same time, shoppers save money when they buy these goods, causing some

supporters of globalization to argue that while sending jobs overseas tends to

lower wages, it may also lower prices at the same time.

Lower-income workers also enjoy some of the benefits of stock price

appreciation. Many workers have mutual funds holdings, particularly in their

401(k) plans. When companies outsource jobs and get rewarded with rising share

prices, mutual funds with those shares also increase in value.

The Effects of Globalization

The ever-increasing flow of cross-border traffic in terms of money,

information, people and technology isn't going to stop.

Some argue that it is a classic situation of the rich get richer while the poor

get poorer. While global standards of living have risen overall as

industrialization takes root in third-world countries, they have fallen in

developed countries. Today, the gap between rich and poor countries is

expanding, as is the gap between the rich and poor within these countries.

Homogenization of the world is another result, with the same coffee shop on

every corner and the same big-box retailers in seemingly every city in every

country. So, while globalization does promote contact and exchange between

cultures, it also tends to make them more similar to one another. At the market

level, linked global financial markets propel local issues into international

problems, such as meltdowns in Southeast Asia and the 1998 Russian debt

default.

Advertisment - Article continues below.

What Lies Ahead?

Deviation from the status quo on this issue is likely to be minimal. The

massive outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing jobs that began decades ago continues

today. White collar jobs, such as call center workers, medical technicians and

accountants have also joined the outsource parade, leaving many to argue that

those profiting from the arrangement have little incentive to change it, while

those most impacted by it are virtually powerless.

Politicians have latched onto the idea of the disappearing middle class as a

political issue, but none of their income redistribution schemes are likely to

have any immediate substantial impact. (For related reading, see Losing The

Middle Class.)

The Bottom Line

Public scrutiny of CEO compensation has encouraged business leaders to begin to

see that a rising tide doesn't necessarily lift all boats. In many cases,

low-wage workers get hurt the most because they don't have transferable skills.

The concept of retraining workers is on the radar, but it's easier said than

done and decades too late for the American manufacturing industry. (To learn

more, see Evaluating Executive Compensation.)

Until a better solution is found, education, flexibility and adaptability are

the keys to survival. So far, the only answer that politicians and business

leaders agree on is the value of an educated, flexible, adaptable workforce.

(At the individual level, you can take action on this issue if you Invest In

Yourself With A College Education.)

by Lisa Smith