💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 327.gmi captured on 2022-06-12 at 00:55:12. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

global warming

Are you a climate scientist?

(Score:5, Informative)

by Izaak (31329) on Friday October 12, @10:31AM (#20953547)

(http://www.gridslammer.org/)

there's always been change in climate and we have dealt with it, changes which

have been far more then small.

it's just alarmist nonsense your pushing there.

You got your degree in climate science where? You've been studying this topic

for how long?

I actually have friends doing research on the topic, both in the lab here in

the US on the global climate model an in the field in the Antarctic. They are

more alarmed about current trends than is filtering through to the media. The

rate at which permafrost and glaciers have begun melting recently is sending

shock waves through the scientific community. We are now only beginning to

discover environmental feedback mechanisms that likely mean the scientists have

UNDERESTIMATED the rate and impact of global warming, not overestimated it.

We used to talk about the climate problems our children and grandchildren will

be dealing with. Guess what, the bill came early. Now YOU will likely be

suffering the consequences. We are seeing the leading edge of it now with

shifting weather patterns and encroachment of invasive species... just as the

models predicted, only sooner. Because of climate deniers like you, it is

probably now too late to stop it, but we still must do everything we can to

slow the change and give our society and economy time to adapt.

Alarmist? Hardly. If anything the message from the scientist has been overly

softened and toned down.

BTW, the friends I mentioned work at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

[whoi.edu] and on the global climate model at Argonne National Laboratories

[anl.gov], in case anyone is curious.

Posted: 2007778@711.87

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

stranger

Re:Surprising with recent controversy

(Score:5, Informative)

by meringuoid (568297) on Friday October 12, @09:29AM (#20952487)

British schools ordered to provide balance when showing the movie.

Did you actually read what the judge said? Or did you only read what Fox News

said?

The Times [timesonline.co.uk] covered this in rather good detail. The parts of

the film that were considered unfounded:

That sea levels could rise seven metres 'in the immediate future'
That atolls in the Pacific had already been evacuated
That CO2 levels and temperatures are 'an exact fit' - this, said the judge,

overstated the case

That the drying of Lake Chad, the disappearance of snows on Kilimanjaro, and

Hurricane Katrina can be directly attributed to global warming

That polar bears are known to be drowning as a result of melting ice
That coral bleaching is due to climate change

Note what the judge did not dispute: he agreed 'that climate change is mainly

attributable to man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide

('greenhouse gases').' He further agreed that 'global temperatures are rising

and are likely to continue to rise, that climate change will cause serious

damage if left unchecked, and that it is entirely possible for governments and

individuals to reduce its impacts'.