💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 185.gmi captured on 2022-06-12 at 00:59:51. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
By Chris Hogg
BBC News, Tokyo
Japanese lawmaker Kan Suzuki's office in Second Life
This Japanese politician's office in Second Life is closed temporarily
Now the campaign for the upper house election in Japan has started, tough rules
on how politicians can canvas for votes have come into force.
Surprisingly, in a country with some of the fastest broadband speeds and a wide
internet penetration, it is now illegal for candidates to create new websites
or update existing web pages between now and election day, 29 July.
So instead, the loudspeaker vans are out on the streets again. The candidates
sit inside, waving regally wearing white gloves, smiling and politely asking
for votes.
Prof Phil Deans, who works at Temple University in Tokyo, describes it as
"almost a throwback to the 1950s".
"Cars with speakers on the roof, the use of posters, leafleting, and the almost
complete absence of electronic media to communicate political messages, is one
of the most startling things about the way elections are conducted here," he
says.
Kan Suzuki wants to change all that. He is a lawmaker who wants to modernise
the way elections are fought here.
Japanese lawmaker Kan Suzuki
In my constituency, I can only distribute enough [leaflets] for 3% of voters
Kan Suzuki
He has built an office in Second Life, the virtual world where you can work,
play and interact with others.
Here, he says, he can get his message out to people who do not normally listen
to politicians.
But now that the campaign has started, he has had to close the office
temporarily.
"Basically, the election law was drawn up in the 1950s," he says.
He is also critical of another old-fashioned rule, limiting the number of
posters and leaflets that a candidate can give out.
"In my constituency, I can only distribute enough for 3% of voters to get a
leaflet from my party. So 97% of voters can't. How can I reach them?"
Little support
Usually Japan allows its politicians to use the internet to communicate with
voters.
But as soon as an election campaign starts - the time when you might well think
you would really want to communicate with them - the use of electronic media
for campaigning is banned.
Instead it is on the traditional media where politicians hold court - for
instance, on ponderous political TV discussion shows that sometimes look like
they have not changed in 20 years.
YouTube is more casual... but if the government or any politicians are on the
web it doesn't feel right
Kentaro Shimano, student
Prof Yasunori Sone, a political analyst from Keio University in Tokyo, says
Japanese election law is very strict.
"There are many rules and prohibitions. But many parties want a strict law to
contain other parties' political activities," he says.
"Some of us are trying to get the law changed. But the number of supporters for
a change in the law is very small."
One group you would think would be keen to see the internet used in campaigning
is young voters.
In Japan, 95% of people in their 20s surf the web, but only a third of them
bother to vote.
Some, though, do not seem keen on politicians using the web to try to win their
support.
"I believe that internet resources are not very official," says Kentaro
Shimano, a student at Temple University in Tokyo.
"YouTube is more casual; you watch music videos or funny videos on it, but if
the government or any politicians are on the web it doesn't feel right."
Haruka Konishi agrees.
"Japanese politics is something really serious," she says. "Young people
shouldn't be involved, I guess because they're not serious enough or they don't
have the education."
There cannot be many places in the world where students feel their views should
not count. Perhaps it is really a reflection of the reality - that they do not.
Here in Japan, it is seen as important to treat politicians with respect.
But such is the deference paid to them, it is hard for anyone to challenge them
to try new ways to make the political system better.
Comments:
That's the difference!
(Score:5, Insightful)
by jforest1 (966315) on Friday July 13, @10:01PM (#19855753)
...between Japanese and American students. American students think they know
everything and people care what they have to say. Japanese students know
everything--including that nobody cares.
--josh
[ Reply to This ]
Re:That's the difference!
(Score:5, Informative)
by kklein (900361) on Saturday July 14, @02:58AM (#19857219)
Um, I teach university here in Japan. I've also taught university in the
states. So believe me when I say:
These kids are dumb as rocks. Really, really dumb.
The argument for these people being smart and this education system being good
is predicated on test scores. As an educator and an assessor, I can't tell you
how dumb that is. Basically (and I speak from experience in the K-12 education
system here) no one does any learning in school until a few weeks before a big
test, and then everyone crams FOR THE TEST. They don't actually learn anything;
they just learn how to take the test. The most immediate place you can see this
is by trying to talk to any Japanese college graduate in English. These people
have all had about 10 years of English. They should be able to carry on a basic
conversation, right? But you'll find that they can only spit out a few words,
horribly mispronounced, and usually lacking any kind of syntactic structure.
Why? Because they've never been expected to DO anything based on what they
studied; they were only asked to pass tests. And they do. But they have zero
real-world language--or any other kind of--proficiency, unless they've become
involved in something in their careers.
Companies here fill the role we in the Western world give to schools. Now, I
have many CS friend who bemoan the fact that they didn't really learn how to
program well until they hit the corporate world, but that's not even what I'm
talking about. What I'm talking about is that some of my English major students
walk out of here into programming jobs--with no prior experience or education
or even an interest in programming. Why? Because when they interviewed for the
company (and you interview for COMPANIES here--not jobs--the company then will
decide if they want you and where you should go and what you should do), they
looked like the kind of person who'd make a good programmer.
So if that's the case, what is the impetus to learn anything in school? If it
has no bearing on your employability, save the name of the school, why bother
actually learning about politics, history, language, ANYTHING? Answer: none.
There is no reason whatsoever to learn anything, unless you just happen to be
interested. So my boys are interested in drinking and getting laid (nothing
wrong with either, mind you), and my girls are interested in Prada and Louis
Vuitton (and I have no problem with brand goods, either--although I'm a
Gaultier man myself). Very few, however, are interested in anything we'd call
"important."
Of COURSE there are exceptions. Of course. But the sick and sad thing that I
see over and over is that the exceptions--the people who really did learn
things and really are aware of their surroundings--do not fare any better than
their benighted colleagues. They don't get better jobs. I'm sure that wherever
they end up working, they do a better job, but they still get the same kind of
generic jobs with the HORRIFYING starting salaries as the idiots around them.
Japan is not a meritocracy, and it shows. They have done very well for
themselves by refusing to compete domestically and by keeping foreign entities
on a short leash in Japan. But the lack of sound Japanese leadership has had a
lot of repercussions that it seems most people don't realize. Look into who
runs Nissan. Who has controlling stakes in Mazda. Mitsubishi. Who runs Sony.
Etc. These "Japanese" companies--the companies we point to to say "Japan is
amazing"--haven't been run by Japanese people for a long time. The exceptions,
of course, are Toyota and Honda, and they're big ones. But still.
PLEASE stop buying the Japan hype, people. If you came over here and lived for
a few months, you'd be just like every other gaijin, saying "I always thought
Japan was X, but it's actually Y!" It is nothing like what you imagine. It is a
silly place.
Posted: 2007531@689.40
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Summary
Japan Bans Use of Web Sites in Elections
Posted by Zonk on Friday July 13, @09:49PM
from the defeats-the-point-a-bit dept.
The Internet Politics
couch_warrior writes with a BBC article about Japan's choice to restrain
political speech in the 21st century. The nation of Japan bans the use of
internet sites to solicit voters in its upper house elections. Based on
election laws drawn up in the 50s, candidates are restricted in the ways they
can reach their constituents. Candidates are even restrained from distributing
leaflets that will reach more than 3% of the voters. What's more, people who
are trying to change the laws are failing. Despite heavy internet usage and a
strong installed base of high-speed connectivity, young people just don't feel
involved in politics. "In Japan, 95% of people in their 20s surf the web, but
only a third of them bother to vote. Some, though, do not seem keen on
politicians using the web to try to win their support. 'I believe that internet
resources are not very official,' says Kentaro Shimano, a student at Temple
University in Tokyo. 'YouTube is more casual; you watch music videos or funny
videos on it, but if the government or any politicians are on the web it
doesn't feel right.' Haruka Konishi agrees. 'Japanese politics is something
really serious,' she says. 'Young people shouldn't be involved, I guess because
they're not serious enough or they don't have the education.' There cannot be
many places in the world where students feel their views should not count.
Perhaps it is really a reflection of the reality that they do not."
Posted: 2007531@691.71
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Breaking the apathy
(Score:5, Insightful)
by alvinrod (889928) on Friday July 13, @10:07PM (#19855777)
'Young people shouldn't be involved, I guess because they're not serious enough
or they don't have the education.'
I'm not up to date on the civics education in Japan, but I feel that in America
it's sorely lacking and really explains why we have such poor turnouts for our
elections. I didn't have Civics (American Government, or whatever you may have
had instead) until Senior year in high school, and by then it was obvious that
most of the students in my class didn't care. It seemed as though most were
content to sleep or slack off during the class or agonize the teacher with
idiotic questions or annoying answers.
I think if we would have had the class at a much younger age and a teacher who
promoted the importance of voting and participating in government, more
students would have been interested in their government and the political
process, perhaps to the point that they would research candidates on their own
and make informed political decisions or have intelligent political discussion
beyond "Bush is a Nazi!"
Looking back on my education as a child, I really wished that there would have
been more classes like this at a younger age or just more schooling in general.
I look at the other countries where children receive more schooling than here
in America and wonder why this isn't something that we as a country aren't
attempting to emulate.
Posted: 2007531@694.24
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Japan at Election Time
(Score:5, Interesting)
by BillGatesLoveChild (1046184) on Friday July 13, @11:55PM (#19856275)
I've been in Japan at election time. There's a distinct lack of information to
go off:
candidates. These show the candidate grinning or looking stern, their name and
a 'Vote for Tanaka'.
Please Vote for me. I am Tanaka. I am Tanaka. Please Vote for me. I am Tanaka.
I am Tanaka. Please Vote for me.' These annoy the crap out of everyone.
get nothing from the above. If you watch NHK's News Hour you will get some
reasonably intelligent analysis, but for local issues you have to rely on the
local stations and they do next to no politics. If your household watches the
variety show or the kids want to watch anime channels instead, you'll get no
information at all.
apart from one glitch (quickly) corrected the LDP have always held power.
(Don't get too cocky: In the US the Republicans and Democrats are pretty
similar. Last Election both Pro-War and Pro-Big Business.)
difference. They try and carve out a living and hope the politicians leave them
alone (Again don't get cocky. The hours you spend sitting around shooting the
breeze with your buddies might feel good, but ultimately makes no difference
either.)
paying out more than is coming in. This has been known for 20 years, but no one
has had the guts to do anything about it. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's plan to
Save Japan? He's going to make sure children know how to use chopsticks. Other
than that, he's done nothing. How did Abe get elected? He didn't. The LDP
appointed him. His Grandpa was an important politician and now it's "his turn".
Posted: 2007531@696.40
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Re:definitely not!
(Score:5, Insightful)
by Gogl (125883) on Friday July 13, @11:24PM (#19856145)
(http://www.polisciapplied.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 08, @05:46PM)
And the 60 year old is going to be an intelligent voter? They're not going to
blindly vote for any asshole who promises "morality" and "the good old days"?
Face it, all ages of voters have the potential to be (and often are) stupid.
Frankly, I've talked to some pretty damn thoughtful 12 year olds. I'm not
saying that newborns should vote, but 18 sure as hell is an arbitrary line in
the sand. Some people grow up before then, and some never do.
Posted: 2007531@696.75
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Re:definitely not!
(Score:5, Insightful)
by rolfwind (528248) on Saturday July 14, @12:30AM (#19856493)
agreed. i'm 27 soon and i've only just grown a brain in the last few years.
before age 24, I just had no fucking clue, and worse yet i THOUGHT i did just
like others my age.
Have you maybe though that this is you and a fraction of the rest of the
population? I am tired of someone's experience being expanded onto applying to
everyone as a quasi-universal experience.
I know people over 50 that still act and think like teenagers. And I know
teenagers that have it together without acting like they are the masters of the
world.
That said, advocating passiveness of the original parent is about the dumbest
idea I have ever heard of. For one, if I wanted to learn how to cook - do I
stay back, observe for years, and wait to do anything? No, I absorb one thing
at a time, and then try it myself. I might fail the first few times, but I will
become infinitely better much sooner than somebody who becomes an armchair cook
watching Rachael Ray all day.
Second, passiveness and complacency is precisely the problem with politics. Let
the more experienced people take care of it. Well, we have let others take care
of it. Look at our country today - two big sides of "experienced" adults mostly
with rigid adherence to "their" political party despite all else, our nation
with neck up in debt with several looming financial disasters in the future our
politicians believe they can either borrow their way out of or don't care since
they'll be long gone by then, etcetera.
Yeah, I'd rather have people in as early as possible. Yeah, they will make
mistakes early on. But I figure someone inexperienced at 18 making mistakes
will recover and be more willing to change their opinions than someone who is
35, observationally experienced and practically inexperienced, and set in their
ways.
Let's not forget, many of the "experienced" senior citizens are also voting to
look out of their interests. It could and should be counterbalanced.
who supports a particular political party in this day and age, particularly one
of the big 2, has not learned anything of value from their so-called
experience. There are good people in both parties, but that is inspite of the
party's best trying otherwise. Since most people of any age fall in this
category, a lot of experience is not being put to use anyway. I refer you all
to George Washington's farewell address.