💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 150.gmi captured on 2022-06-12 at 01:01:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

RIAA inconvenient truth #1

inconvenient truth #1

(Score:5, Insightful)

by brunascle (994197) on Tuesday June 05, @01:33PM (#19399797)

it is entirely possible that my actions are unfairly hurting the recording and/

or motion picture industry. and i couldnt care less.

[ Reply to This ]

You, sir, are an ass.

(Score:5, Insightful)

by paladinwannabe2 (889776) on Tuesday June 05, @01:43PM (#19400015)

If the MAFIAA provides a valuable service to you, and expects money in

exchange, it seems reasonable that you should give them money. If they aren't

providing a valueable service, then don't pirate their garbage. Jerks like you

give the rest of us who oppose the current copyright regime a bad name.

[ Reply to This | Parent ]

o

Re:You, sir, are an ass.

(Score:5, Insightful)

by Sciros (986030) on Tuesday June 05, @01:57PM (#19400271)

That's the thing, though, isn't it? That the SERVICE THEY ARE PROVIDING isn't

very valuable. It's crippled by DRM, it has even gone so far as to prevent

people from creating guitar tabs by ear and sharing them. Such service might be

worth *something* monetarily, but far less than consumers are being charged. It

is not that they are providing garbage per se, more that the *manner* in which

they are providing music/film/etc. is unsuitable for many people.

[ Reply to This | Parent ]

+ 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

o

Re:You, sir, are an ass.

(Score:5, Interesting)

by Fozzyuw (950608) on Tuesday June 05, @02:52PM (#19401233)

If the MAFIAA provides a valuable service to you, and expects money in

exchange, it seems reasonable that you should give them money. If they aren't

providing a valueable service, then don't pirate their garbage.

Interesting point. However, what your point lacks is quantity/quality. If it's

worth money, how much is it worth? Pirating isn't being done by the masses to

give the F-You to the record company and "the man" just because they are a big

company, but because they do not believe the product/service they supply is not

worth the value they're presenting it at.

Simply put, if pirates could buy brand a new movie on a standard DL-DVD without

a box (toss it in a paper slip) for $4-$5, pirates would probably buy it oppose

to copying. However, $15-$25 for a new DVD film is not worth it for most

people. They probably already paid $10 to see it in the theater or can pay $2-4

to rent it and watch it as many times as they want in the week they have it.

A long time ago, I mentioned this 'dream' of mine. Big box retails (Wal-Mart,

Best Buy, etc) getting a high quality DVD burning machine. You walk up to the

counter, ask the person for the film you want, they'll punch in the movie id

into their computer and the machine plops out a fresh high-quality burned DVD

with sticker art. The clerk tosses the DVD into a paper slip and charges you

$4. Maybe you rested a DVD case, and he charges you an extra $2 and prints out

the DVD case insert, pulls a plastic DVD case off the shelf and inserts the

slip art.

The consumer walks out the door with a $6 DVD, the store doesn't need to bother

about inventory space, besides the machine and computer containing the DVD

image catalog. Movie houses don't need to spend the time and money running DVD

making machines, paying truckers and shippers to drop it off at distribution

centers, etc. All they do, is download it into their customers DVD Making

machine computers on release day. They can even setup a distribution network

(hello bit-torrent), so they only have to upload it into the central Big Box

Store system and Big Box Store can be responsible for the band-width for

uploading it into all it's stores.

The cost is still more than DIYers but low enough to entice those who might

pirate to just buy instead. They don't have to go out and buy a stack of DVD

media. They probably get better quality DVD since they're not compressing the

image, or removing audio tracks to fit onto a non DL-DVD. They also get a nice

fancy art-work sticker, instead of just scrawling the name on with a sharpie

marker.

The only way to fight the pirates is to offer the service at the value that

it's worth. I think that, in general, people feel the cost of watching a movie

isn't what it use to be in a world where entertainment is at your finger tips

anywhere you go, from portable video game players, to cell phones, to the

internet.

Movie theaters are not the only place one can go to 'escape' reality, anymore.

Since the prices continue to climb along with entertainment competition, it's

only natural to see demand drop off. It goes for saying that I often won't see

a film in the theater anymore (unless it's a blockbuster or I'm a fan) and even

then, I make every effort to go the the cheaper matin e. It's now 'wait until

DVD' because I can rent it for $1-3. The same philosophy probably goes to those

who use to buy DVD's for their collection. However odd it is, that such a crime

is fairly socially acceptable.

Cheers,

Fozzy