💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1261.gmi captured on 2022-06-12 at 00:24:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Life without men

Scientists claim to have grown human sperm in a lab, and columnists and

bloggers are musing on the possibility of a world where men are no longer

needed.

is not looking forward to the prospect of a world that doesn't need men.

But if - and it is still a big if - scientists could one day use cells from

female embryos to produce sperm, or perhaps even DNA extracted from an adult's

skin or cheek-lining cells, then we truly would be living in a terrifying new

era.

The

says men are redundant but worth keeping for menial tasks.

Yet I feel compelled - and not just as the mother of two small boys - to make

a spirited defence of the weaker sex. Where would I be without my husband to

read 80 pages of a car manual, in French, to find out how the back

windscreen-wiper works? Who would tug the dried lumps of excrement from our

cat's backside? Who would explain the rules of cricket to an American? Who

would clear a blocked drain of unspeakable clotted matter? Who would take hours

to demonstrate the dreadnought manoeuvres at the Battle of Jutland, armed only

with salt cellars and jam jars? Without men, there would be no one to read

Joseph Conrad or Norman Mailer, to remove spiders from the bath, or (important

one, this) to tell women they're pretty.

The editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics

says in the Independent that he sees nothing wrong with exercising choice but

the real ethical issue isn't about the prospect of a world without men.

Women have many ways of trying to do without men. They don't need men - they

just need their sperm. Sperm is a notoriously renewable resource and it is

plentiful. There is always the turkey baster option for women who want to get

pregnant but do not see the need to get a man... The real ethical issue here is

that we do not foreclose the beneficial possibilities of research through

prejudice or fear.

can only think of one useful man and that's scientist Karim Nayernia, who

conducted the sperm research:

Women have always known that men are a bit of a waste of space Now British

scientists have proved how unnecessary blokes truly are by creating the first

human sperm from stem cells. And as if that's not a big enough problem for

fellas everywhere, the expert behind this revolutionary move is a man.

And

says despite the scientific developments, men should be kept around as

play-things.

That means men can become redundant in the human productive cycle and the end

of male infertility. But for the ladies, I think we should keep a few of them

around just for fun. And for those anti-gay, it is an efficient way to cure

male homosexuality: abolish men.

Karen on the

hints at how complex the politics of parenting may become by linking to the

The definitions are more than 5,000 words long. On the same blog Last Man on

Earth says:

WE MUST CRUSH THIS! Take away their funding, burn all evidence, delete all

records, kidnap and kill those who made the discovery and then bury this entire

story under some celebrity scandal. Men can't become irrelevant!

In the

Bill Muehlenberg is concerned the advances may leave men with nothing to do:

what they are really about is the end of man - both as the male gender, and

as humanity A number of problems come to mind, including the obvious: if

scientists can now manufacture sperm, that simply makes males even more

redundant than they already are. This is really parthenogenesis, or procreation

by one sex alone. This might be good for amoebas, but it is not good for human

beings, and certainly not good for the children who come about by such a

process.