💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc8602.txt captured on 2022-06-03 at 23:59:29.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Arkko Request for Comments: 8602 Ericsson Updates: 3219 T. Hardie Category: Standards Track July 2019 ISSN: 2070-1721 Update to the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) IANA Registry Rules regarding Postal Addresses Abstract This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses be included in contact information. This memo updates RFC 3219. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8602. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 8602 TRIP Registry Update July 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Introduction This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses be included in contact information. No use for the addresses is identified, and omitting this information provides a privacy benefit. This memo updates RFC 3219. 2. IANA Considerations This memo updates the registration rules [RFC8126] for TRIP Attributes ([RFC3219], Section 13.2) and TRIP IP Telephony Administrative Domain (ITAD) Numbers ([RFC3219], Section 13.5) as follows. The IETF no longer requires IANA to collect postal address information when adding TRIP registry entries. Additionally, IANA has removed previously collected postal addresses from the registries. 3. Security Considerations No security impacts of this change have been identified. 4. Normative References [RFC3219] Rosenberg, J., Salama, H., and M. Squire, "Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP)", RFC 3219, DOI 10.17487/RFC3219, January 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3219>. [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 8602 TRIP Registry Update July 2019 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Michelle Cotton, Alissa Cooper, and Jonathan Rosenberg for interesting discussions in this problem space. The authors would also like to thank Carlos Pignataro, Russ Housley, Abdussalam Baryun, and Paul Wouters for feedback. Authors' Addresses Jari Arkko Ericsson Kauniainen 02700 Finland Email: jari.arkko@piuha.net Ted Hardie Email: ted.ietf@gmail.com Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 3]