💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc669.gmi captured on 2022-06-04 at 03:50:54. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Updates:
Updated by:
Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
Request for Comments: 669 BBN-TENEXA
NIC: 31435 December 4, 1974
November, 1974, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers
Two months have elapsed since our last survey, and the appearance of
additional New-Protocol servers has progressed at the usual snail's
pace. The changes in this list are (with host numbers in octal):
SRI-AI (102) now has a New-Protocol server;
SDC-LAB (10) is back on the net and the list;
SDC-CC (110) is coming on the net but status is as yet unknown;
USC-ISI (126) and USC-ISIB (226) (formerly ISI-DEVTENEX) now have
New-Protocol servers;
SDAC-44 (32) has been removed -- no longer classed as a server host;
HAWAII-500 (344) is coming on the net, status presently unknown;
LONDON (52) has been added;
BBN-TENEXD is now host 162 (formerly 205).
What follows is an update of the summary and tabulation that appeared
in RFC #702.* Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
total server hosts 37 100%
no New-Prot server 19 51%
unknown status (new host) 2 6%
total New-Prot implem. 16 43%
New-Prot on socket 27,
Old on socket 1 (2) 9 24%
New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16%
New-Prot on 1 only (3) 1 3%
Notes:
* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run
at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data.
What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen
by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 4 Dec. 1974.
(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to
all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.
(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-
Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt
to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs
according to what control sequences are received.
Dodds [Page 1]
RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974
Tabulation of server status for all server sites:
Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options
No. Name 1 27 Implementation (if any)
101 UCLA-CCN Old X
201 UCLA-CCBS Old X
2 SRI-ARC Old X
102 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3
3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X
4 UTAH-10 Old X
105 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3
305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3
106 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3
206 MIT-AI Old X
306 MIT-ML Old X
7 RAND-RCC Old X
10 SDC-LAB Old X
110 SDC-CC ? ?
11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3
12 LL-67 Old* X
112 LL-TX-2 Old X
13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3
15 CASE-10 Old X
16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3
116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3
17 I4-TENEX Old X
217 KI4B-TENEX Old X
20 AMES-67 New New None
126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3
226 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3
27 USC-44 Old X
327 USC-ECL Old X
37 CCA-TENEX Old X
40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3
344 HAWAII-500 ? ?
52 LONDON Old* X
53 OFFICE-1 Old X
54 MIT-MULTICS New New None
61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3
162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3
Dodds [Page 2]
RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974
Key: X No server at this socket
? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host
I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #")
O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #")
(# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented
by anyone are:
0 Transmit-Binary
1 Echo
3 Suppress-Go-Ahead
6 Timing-Mark )
Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option
requests.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 2/2000 ]
Dodds [Page 3]