💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5771.gmi captured on 2022-06-04 at 00:00:33. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Match Your Motivational Tactic to the Situation

Juliana SchroederAyelet Fishbach

January 08, 2016

How do you know if you are selecting the right motivational strategies to

convince your employees, peers, and even yourself to work smarter and harder?

Behavioral scientists have been researching the different ways people motivate

themselves and others for decades. Their experiments have shown, for instance,

that people work harder when they get feedback, set ambitious goals, and are

given incentivizes.

But after recently conducting a review of more than 150 scientific articles on

motivation, we found that each of these motivational tools can also

unexpectedly backfire. For example, positive feedback can lead recipients to

relax their effort, overly ambitious goals can cause employees to give up, and

incentives can undermine intrinsic interest.

Chances are that you (at least sometimes) are using the wrong tools under the

wrong circumstances. We propose a set of guidelines for when and how to use

different types of motivational tactics, so that you can better understand how

to effectively motivate yourself and others.

Feedback

There are two primary forms of feedback: positive and negative. Neither one is

better than the other. In some circumstances, positive feedback can be more

effective for motivation because it increases people s commitment and

confidence. In others, negative feedback can be more effective because it

signals that more effort is needed.

You and Your Team

Improving Yourself

Take charge of your own development.

Because positive feedback enhances personal commitment, it works best when

recipients are questioning their commitment to a task. That s why novices or

people who are disengaged are best served by positive feedback. A new employee

is likely to thrive under positive feedback, but wilt under negative feedback.

In contrast, negative feedback is ideal for people who are already committed to

achieving their goals, but just need a push to reach them. Feedback that

emphasizes their lack of progress increases their motivation. So people with

expertise in a particular domain, such as professional speakers, not only

respond better to negative feedback, they also seek more negative feedback.

Goal Setting

To increase performance, it is often useful to set challenging and proximal

deadlines (e.g., finish reading a professional magazine in the next 30 minutes

). People even animals tend to work harder and faster when approaching a

finish line.

Typically, a shorter distance between you and your goal is more motivating than

a longer one. It feels within reach, and it s easier to feel that you re making

progress. This means people should set closer targets or sub-goals. So instead

of telling yourself or your employees to finish a project in the next month,

focus on achieving certain milestones by the end of each week.

Research also shows that when beginning to pursue a goal, people should focus

on the progress they ve made rather than on the progress they still have to

make. Only when they re closer to the finish line should people focus on the

remaining distance between them and their goal. Focusing on the least amount of

distance either from the start or from the end of your project is more

motivating.

For example, consider loyalty programs that use buy 10, get one free cards.

These can focus consumers on either accumulated progress (by stamping the card

for each purchase) or remaining progress (by punching a hole in the card). A

study showed that those who are farther from the reward are more motivated when

they receive stamps, because the card highlights how much progress they have

already made. Conversely, those who are close to the reward are more likely to

keep buying when holes are punched in the card, because that method highlights

what is still between them and their reward.

People are also particularly conscientious of their work when they are just

beginning to pursue a goal and when they ve nearly reached it. Research has

found that people are more likely to slack off or behave unethically around the

middle of a project. Since people will produce their highest quality work as

they re getting started or about to wrap up, it might be useful to re-frame

their goal pursuit by setting smaller goals, for example so that people don t

feel stuck in the middle.

Another common mistake with goal setting is choosing the wrong means or

approach for achieving your objectives. Research has shown that it s more

effective to tailor your approach based on one specific goal you re trying to

reach than to apply a one-size-fits-all approach that could work for any goal.

For example, if you want to have more productive staff meetings, it may help to

choose an office space that is only used for important group meetings, rather

than one that people also associate with one-on-ones or lunch breaks.

Incentives

Incentives can be categorized into three types: immediate (vs. delayed),

certain (vs. uncertain), and extrinsic (vs. intrinsic).

Immediate incentives are psychologically more appealing than delayed

incentives. People will work harder for incentives they can get sooner even if

they are smaller than those they would get after waiting longer. The lesson

here is simple: To motivate people, use immediate incentives.

People similarly prefer incentives of a certain value over those of an

uncertain value. For example, compared to a promotion that offers shoppers an

uncertain reward (e.g., $30 or $50 off if you spend over $200 ), one with a

certain reward (e.g., $40 off if you spend over $200 ) would more likely fare

better.

However, there are times when uncertain incentives can be more motivating. If

they offer a higher potential value, for instance, people may be optimistic and

more motivated to pursue them. They can also be exciting, leading some to work

harder. In one experiment participants evaluated a series of print

advertisements in return for a prize of either a certain amount or an uncertain

amount. In the certain conditions, participants expected a bonus of 50% of

their base pay. In the uncertain condition, the bonus could either be 20% or

50% of their base pay (to be determined by a lottery). People who expected a

bonus of 50% of their base pay worked less hard than those who weren t sure

what their bonus would ultimately be, which suggests that mystery rewards

(i.e., of uncertain value) can be exciting and push some to work harder.

Incentives can also be extrinsic (e.g., money, perks, etc.) or intrinsic (e.g.,

satisfying work). Some activities offer both: a paying job can also be

satisfying. However, adding extrinsic incentives often leads people to see less

intrinsic benefit. In one study, children were less willing to consume food

when it was framed as healthy (extrinsic benefit), because they then perceived

the food as being less tasty (lower intrinsic benefit).

People also seem to value intrinsic incentives more when they are in the middle

of pursuing a goal than when they have not yet started. This is why when people

are selecting a job, they often put relatively less emphasis on things such as

interest in the task and employee morale, compared with extrinsic benefits like

salary. But when going to the job each day, people care relatively more about

these intrinsic incentives. Thus, tangible incentives should be emphasized in

advance, while more intrinsic ones should be used to motivate employees already

working toward something.

Just as people fail to recognize the value of intrinsic incentives for

themselves, they also underestimate its importance for others. People tend to

believe interesting work tasks and morale are more important to them than to

their colleagues. As a result, when motivating others, people may choose to use

fewer intrinsic incentives than they would for themselves.

---

How to Motivate Yourself or Someone Else

Use Two Types of Feedback

Solicit positive feedback when you are getting started on your goals; solicit

negative feedback once you are nearing the finish line

Learn the Art of Goal Setting

Set reachable and close goals

Focus on what you ve done near the beginning; focus on how much more you have

to do near the end

Choose a method for achieving your goal that is unique to that goal

Understand How Incentives Work

Immediate rewards (like a bonus as soon as a target is met) are more

motivating

Focus on certain and clear incentives when getting started on a goal; employ

uncertain or mystery rewards once you re pursuing it

Use extrinsic incentives to motivate yourself at the beginning; focus on

intrinsic incentives to help yourself persist

---

All of this behavioral research can provide guidance on how to better motivate

yourself and others. There are three key conclusions to keep in mind. First,

apply positive feedback to enhance commitment and negative feedback to

highlight slow progress. Second, set near-term goal targets; people work faster

and better at the beginning and end than in the middle. Finally, do not

underestimate the value of immediate, certain, and intrinsic incentives but

also recognize when they might fail. Selecting the best motivational tool is

not just an art it s a science.

Juliana Schroeder is an assistant professor in the Haas Management of

Organizations Group at the University of California, Berkeley.

Ayelet Fishbach is the Jeffrey Breakenridge Keller Professor of Behavioral

Science and Marketing at The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business.