gemini - kennedy.gemi.dev

💾 Archived View for gemini.spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › politics › SPUNK › sp000153.txt captured on 2022-04-29 at 02:20:48.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Interview with Noam Chomsky

[Excerpts from Feb 14, 1992 appearance on _Pozner/Donahue_]  
 
CHOMSKY: ...that's why if you look at the *ideology* of the founding 
fathers -- not what they actually *believed* -- but at the doctrines 
that they professed, which is something quite different, they were 
opposed to centers of power and authority. In the 18th century that 
meant they were opposed to the feudal system, and the absolutist state 
and the church and so on. 
 
Now those *very* same doctrines apply to the 19th century and the 20th 
century and they *should*, if we take them seriously, make *us* 
opposed to the patterns of authority and domination that exist *now* 
-- like for example *corporate capitalism*, which is a system of 
authoritarian control that Jefferson never *dreamt* of. Or the 
powerful 20th century state *linked* to the corporate elite, which, 
again, is a system of power and domination on a scale that, say, 
Jefferson couldn't have *imagined*. But the same *principles* would 
lead us to be opposed to *them*. 
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
| From CALL-IN section:                                          | 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
QUESTION: ...What's the difference between your [Anarchist] views and 
the Libertarian Party? 
 
[This, among four other back-to-back call-in quations (see below)] 
 
CHOMSKY: Well let me begin with the question about the Libertarian Party. 
The Libertarian Party is familiar here -- unknown elsewhere. There's a 

	long* tradition of Anarchism, Libertarian thought outside the United 

States, which is *diametrically* opposed to the positions of the 
Libertarian Party -- but it's unknown here. 
 
That's the *dominant* position of what's always been considered 
Socialist Anarchism.  Now, the Libertarian Party, is a *Capitalist* 
Party. It's in favor of what *I* would regard a *particular form* of 
authoritarian control. Namely, the kind that comes through private 
ownership and control, which is an *extremely* rigid system of 
domination -- people have to.. people can survive, by renting 
themselves to it, and basically in no other way. 
 
So while I share a lot of..there's a lot of shared ground with the 
special, U.S. right-wing anarchism, which really exists only here (and 
in fact have plenty of friends, and so on), I do disagree with them 

	very* sharply, and I think that they are not..understanding the 
	fundamental* doctrine, that you should be free from domination and 

control, including the control of the manager and the owner. 
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
(Another caller asked in response to Chomksy' subscribing to Anarchy, 
that sure there are abuses but wouldn't Anarchism be furtile ground 
for dictatorship?) 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
CHOMSKY: ..As to whether Anarchism could lead to dictatorship -- first 
of all, let's distinguish Anarchism from "anarchy"; I'm not in favor 
of everybody doing anything they feel like -- Anarchism as *I 
understand it* is a highly democratic system, it's a system -- and in 
fact a highly organized, and structured system -- it's just structured 
and organized *from the bottom up*. It's organized through voluntary 
association, agreement, federation, up to the world [level] if you 
like -- it could be a highly structured system. But's it's going to 
have to come out of popular involvement. *Could* it lead to 
dictatorship, well, you know -- 
 
Pozner: Is it a system in which people are truly responsible, as you 
understand it? 
 
NC: It would have to be -- 
 
Pozner(?): Because otherwise you'd have "anarchy" -- 
 
NC: I mean if people do *not* want -- It's based on an assumption: 
that assumption is that human beings want to be *free*. Now if that's 
wrong, if human being want to be slaves, there's no hope in 
Anarchism... 
 
[...] 
 
[The number on the screen, may or may not still be vaild, for 
transcripts: 1-800-777-TEXT (note date of Chomsky's appearance on 
_Pozner/Donahue_ at top)] 
 
[Chomsky's address: Prof Noam Chomsky, Dept of Linguistics and 
Philosophy, MIT, Cambrige, Mass]