💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc3905.gmi captured on 2022-04-29 at 00:30:24. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Keywords: ipr
Network Working Group V. See, Ed.
Request for Comments: 3905 Microsoft
Category: Informational September 2004
A Template for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
Abstract
This document describes a proposal for one form of a template for
IETF patent disclosures and licensing declarations. The optional use
of this template is meant to simplify the process of such disclosures
and licensing declarations and to assist disclosers in providing the
necessary information to meet the obligations documented in RFC 3668.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction................................................... 1
2. The Patent Disclosure and Licensing Declaration Template....... 2
3. Commentary on Terms Used in the Template....................... 5
4. Security Considerations........................................ 7
5. Normative References........................................... 7
6. Acknowledgments................................................ 7
7 Editor's Address............................................... 8
8. Authors' Addresses............................................. 8
9. Full Copyright Statement....................................... 9
1. Introduction
RFC 3668 [RFC3668] documents the current IETF policies and
obligations with respect to disclosure of patents and patent
applications. It also documents the information requested in
licensing declarations for IETF specifications. In the interest of
making these patent disclosure and licensing declaration processes
simpler, this document proposes a patent disclosure and licensing
declaration template that may be optionally used as one method for
IETF participants and patent holders to comply with patent disclosure
requirements and licensing declaration provisions under RFC 3668.
See, Ed. Informational [Page 1]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
This proposal also may be optionally used as a model by the IETF
Secretariat for Web-based disclosure and licensing declaration tools;
however, the intent of this document is informational and is not
meant to suggest that this is the only method that could be used by
IETF participants for disclosure of patents or for licensing
declarations. For the latest information on how to submit a patent
disclosure or licensing declaration, please see
http://www.ietf.org/ipr-instructions.
IPR disclosures should be submitted in English, since this is the
working language of the IETF. Names of persons and companies should
be presented in the way they are usually presented in an English-
speaking context.
2. The Patent Disclosure and Licensing Declaration Template
START OF TEMPLATE
This document is an IETF Patent Disclosure and Licensing Declaration
Template and is submitted to inform the IETF of a) patent information
regarding the IETF document or contribution listed in Section IV, and
b) a Patent Holder's intention with respect to the licensing of its
necessary patent claims. No actual license is implied by submission
of this template. Please complete and submit a separate template for
each IETF document or contribution to which the disclosed patent
information relates.
I. Patent Holder/Applicant ("Patent Holder")
Legal Name:
II. Patent Holder's Contact for License Application
Name:
Title:
Department:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
See, Ed. Informational [Page 2]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
III. Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal
Belief Triggered the Disclosure in this Template (Optional)
Name:
Title:
Department:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
IV. IETF Document or Contribution to Which Patent Disclosure Relates
Title:
RFC Number or I-D Tag:
Other Designations:
V. Disclosure of Patent Information (i.e., patents or patent
applications required to be disclosed by Section 6 of RFC 3668)
A. For granted patents or published pending patent applications,
please provide the following information:
Patent, Serial, Publication, Registration, or Application/File
number(s):
Date(s) granted or applied for (YYYY-MM-DD):
Country(ies):
B. Does your disclosure relate to an unpublished pending patent
application?
Select one: Yes ______ No ______
See, Ed. Informational [Page 3]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
C. If an Internet-Draft or RFC includes multiple parts and it is not
reasonably apparent which part of such an Internet-Draft or RFC is
alleged to be covered by the patent information disclosed in Section
V(A) or V(B), it is helpful if the discloser identifies here the
sections of the Internet-Draft or RFC that are alleged to be so
covered.
VI. Licensing Declaration
The Patent Holder states that its position with respect to licensing
any patent claims contained in the patent(s) or patent application(s)
disclosed above that would necessarily be infringed by implementation
of the technology required by the relevant IETF specification
("Necessary Patent Claims"), for the purpose of implementing such a
specification, is as follows (select one licensing declaration option
only):
a) ___ No License Required for Implementers
Check here if commitment to forgo a license is limited
solely to standards-track RFCs ___
b) ___ Royalty-Free, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory License to
All Implementers
Check here if this commitment to license is limited solely
to standards-track RFCs ___
c) ___ Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All
Implementers with Possible Royalty/Fee
Check here if this commitment to license is limited solely
to standards-track RFCs ___
d) ___ Licensing Declaration to be Provided Later (implies a
willingness to commit to the provisions of a), b), or c)
above; otherwise, the next option - "Unwilling to Commit to
the Provisions of a), b), or c) Above" - must be selected)
e) ___ Unwilling to Commit to the Provisions of a), b), or c)
Above
NOTE: The individual submitting this template represents and warrants
that he or she is authorized by the Patent Holder to agree to the
above-selected licensing declaration.
VII. Contact Information of Submitter of this Form (if different from
IETF Participant in Section III above)
See, Ed. Informational [Page 4]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
Name:
Title:
Department:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
VIII. Other Notes:
END OF TEMPLATE
3. Commentary on Terms Used in the Template
Section III requests contact information for the Patent Holder's IETF
participant whose personal belief that necessary patent claims are
implicated by an IETF document or contribution caused this template
to be filed. This is an optional section. However, if Section III
is not completed, then Section VII must be completed. Even if
Section III is completed, Section VII must still be completed if the
submitter of this template is different from the IETF participant
identified in Section III.
The "Other Designations" field in Section IV may be used to identify
an IETF contribution (oral or written) other than an Internet-Draft
or RFC to which a disclosure is related.
Here is an explanation of the licensing declaration options in
Section VI of the template:
a) No License Required for Implementers: The Patent Holder does not
require parties to acquire any license to its Necessary Patent
Claims in order to make, have made, use, import, offer to sell,
sell, or distribute technology that implements such an IETF
specification.
b) Royalty-Free, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory License to All
Implementers: The Patent Holder is willing, upon request, to grant
a license to its Necessary Patent Claims to all persons on a
royalty-free basis (i.e., no royalty or other fee) and under other
reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions, to make,
See, Ed. Informational [Page 5]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
have made, use, import, offer to sell, sell, and distribute
technology that implements such an IETF specification.
c) Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All Implementers with
Possible Royalty/Fee: The Patent Holder is willing, upon request,
to grant a license to its Necessary Patent Claims to all persons
under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions
(which may include a royalty/fee), to make, have made, use,
import, offer to sell, sell, and distribute technology that
implements such an IETF specification.
d) Licensing Declaration to be Provided Later: The Patent Holder is
willing to commit to the provisions of a), b), or c) above, but
wants to defer its specific selection of one of these licensing
declaration options until a later point in time (or when asked for
this information by the IESG). This option may not be selected if
the Patent Holder is unwilling to commit to the provisions of a),
b), or c) above. In that case, the Patent Holder must select
licensing declaration option e) - "Unwilling to Commit to the
Provisions of a), b), or c) Above."
e) Unwilling to Commit to the Provisions of a), b), or c) Above: The
Patent Holder indicates an unwillingness to commit to the
provisions of any of options a), b), or c) described above.
Options a), b), and c) above also allow the Patent Holder to indicate
(with a check) whether its licensing declaration is limited solely to
standards-track RFCs. If left unchecked, the Patent Holder's
licensing declaration will be deemed to apply to any implementation
of the relevant IETF specification, including non-standards-track
documents and Internet-Drafts. However, the Patent Holder may list
other conditions or restrictions on its commitment to forego a
license (option a)) or on its commitment to license (options b) and
c)) in Section VIII - "Other Notes." This standards-track qualifier
is not relevant to licensing declaration options d) and e), because
under d) the Patent Holder has not yet indicated its specific
licensing intention and under e) the Patent Holder has indicated a
general refusal to commit to the provisions of any of options a), b),
or c) above.
Section VIII in the template, "Other Notes," may be used for any
additional information a discloser or Patent Holder wishes to
provide. For example, a Patent Holder may use the "Other Notes"
Section to indicate any other conditions or restrictions on the
licensing declaration option selected in Section VI (e.g., 1)
reciprocity, or 2) that a license will only be made available for
implementations of any RFC (standards-track or non-standards-track),
but not for implementations of Internet-Drafts or other documents).
See, Ed. Informational [Page 6]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
4. Security Considerations
This document relates to the IETF process, not any particular
technology. There are security considerations when adopting any
particular technology, regardless of whether patent or patent
application disclosures or licensing declarations are implicated by
such technology. A working group should take those security
considerations into account as one part of evaluating the technology,
but there are no security considerations per se with these IETF
processes.
5. Normative References
[RFC3668] Bradner, S., "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF
Technology", BCP 79, RFC 3668, February 2004.
6. Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the thoughtful contributions of Harald
Alvestrand and Scott Bradner to this document.
See, Ed. Informational [Page 7]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
7. Editor's Address
Valerie See
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052 USA
EMail: vsee@microsoft.com
8. Authors' Addresses
Robert Barr
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134 USA
EMail: rbarr@cisco.com
Scott Brim
Cisco Systems, Inc.
146 Honess Lane
Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
EMail: sbrim@cisco.com
Paul Gleichauf
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134 USA
EMail: phg@cisco.com
Allen Lo
Juniper Networks
1194 North Mathilda Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
EMail: alo@juniper.net
See, Ed. Informational [Page 8]
RFC 3905 Patent Disclosures and Licensing DeclarationsSeptember 2004
9. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/S HE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in IETF Documents can
be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
See, Ed. Informational [Page 9]