💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc3727.gmi captured on 2022-04-29 at 00:23:54. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Keywords: [--------|p], lightweight directory access protocol
Network Working Group S. Legg
Request for Comments: 3727 Adacel Technologies
Category: Standards Track February 2004
ASN.1 Module Definition for the
LDAP and X.500 Component Matching Rules
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document updates the specification of the component matching
rules for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500
directories (RFC3687) by collecting the Abstract Syntax Notation One
(ASN.1) definitions of the component matching rules into an
appropriately identified ASN.1 module so that other specifications
may reference the component matching rule definitions from within
their own ASN.1 modules.
1. Introduction
The structure or data type of data held in an attribute of a
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [LDAP] or X.500 [X500]
directory is described by the attribute's syntax. Attribute syntaxes
range from simple data types, such as text string, integer, or
boolean, to complex data types, for example, the syntaxes of the
directory schema operational attributes. RFC 3687 [CMR] defines a
generic way of matching user selected components in a directory
attribute value of any arbitrarily complex attribute syntax.
This document updates RFC 3687 by collecting the Abstract Syntax
Notation One (ASN.1) [ASN1] definitions of RFC 3687 into an
appropriately identified ASN.1 module so that other specifications
may reference these definitions from within their own ASN.1 modules.
Legg Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3727 Module for Component Matching February 2004
2. Module Definition for Component Matching
ComponentMatching
{iso(1) 2 36 79672281 xed(3) module(0) component-matching(4)}
-- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This version of
-- this ASN.1 module is part of RFC 3727; see the RFC itself
-- for full legal notices.
DEFINITIONS
EXPLICIT TAGS
EXTENSIBILITY IMPLIED ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MATCHING-RULE,
RelativeDistinguishedName
FROM InformationFramework
{joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1)
informationFramework(1) 4} ;
ComponentAssertion ::= SEQUENCE {
component ComponentReference (SIZE(1..MAX)) OPTIONAL,
useDefaultValues BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE,
rule MATCHING-RULE.&id,
value MATCHING-RULE.&AssertionType }
ComponentReference ::= UTF8String
ComponentFilter ::= CHOICE {
item [0] ComponentAssertion,
and [1] SEQUENCE OF ComponentFilter,
or [2] SEQUENCE OF ComponentFilter,
not [3] ComponentFilter }
componentFilterMatch MATCHING-RULE ::= {
SYNTAX ComponentFilter
ID { 1 2 36 79672281 1 13 2 } }
allComponentsMatch MATCHING-RULE ::= {
ID { 1 2 36 79672281 1 13 6 } }
directoryComponentsMatch MATCHING-RULE ::= {
ID { 1 2 36 79672281 1 13 7 } }
-- Additional Useful Matching Rules --
rdnMatch MATCHING-RULE ::= {
Legg Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3727 Module for Component Matching February 2004
SYNTAX RelativeDistinguishedName
ID { 1 2 36 79672281 1 13 3 } }
presentMatch MATCHING-RULE ::= {
SYNTAX NULL
ID { 1 2 36 79672281 1 13 5 } }
END
The InformationFramework ASN.1 module from which the MATCHING-RULE
and RelativeDistinguishedName definitions are imported is defined in
X.501 [X501].
The object identifiers used in this document have been assigned for
use in specifying the component matching rules by Adacel
Technologies, under an arc assigned to Adacel by Standards Australia.
3. Security Considerations
This document collects together the ASN.1 definitions of the
component matching rules into an ASN.1 module, but does not modify
those definitions in any way. See RFC 3687 [CMR] for the security
considerations of using the component matching rules.
4. References
4.1. Normative References
[CMR] Legg, S., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and
X.500 Component Matching Rules", RFC 3687, February 2004.
[X501] ITU-T Recommendation X.501 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-2:1994,
Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - The
Directory: Models
[ASN1] ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (07/02) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002,
Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One
(ASN.1): Specification of basic notation
4.2. Informative References
[LDAP] Hodges, J. and R. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (v3): Technical Specification", RFC 3377, September
2002.
[X500] ITU-T Recommendation X.500 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994,
Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - The
Directory: Overview of concepts, models and services
Legg Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3727 Module for Component Matching February 2004
5. Author's Address
Steven Legg
Adacel Technologies Ltd.
250 Bay Street
Brighton, Victoria 3186
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 3 8530 7710
Fax: +61 3 8530 7888
EMail: steven.legg@adacel.com.au
Legg Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3727 Module for Component Matching February 2004
6. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78 and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
described in this document or the extent to which any license
under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it
represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to
rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention
any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other
proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required
to implement this standard. Please address the information to the
IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Legg Standards Track [Page 5]