💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc2176.gmi captured on 2022-04-28 at 23:27:22. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Updated by:
Keywords: IPV4-MAPOS
Network Working Group K. Murakami
Request for Comments: 2176 M. Maruyama
Category: Informational NTT Laboratories
June 1997
IPv4 over MAPOS Version 1
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Authors' Note
This memo documents a mechanism for supporting Version 4 of the
Internet Protocol (IPv4) on Version 1 of the Multiple Access Protocol
over SONET/SDH. This document is NOT the product of an IETF working
group nor is it a standards track document. It has not necessarily
benefited from the widespread and in-depth community review that
standards track documents receive.
Abstract
This document describes a protocol for transmission of the Internet
Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) over Multiple Access Over SONET/SDH (MAPOS)
version 1. MAPOS is a link layer protocol and provides multiple
access capability over SONET/SDH links. IP runs on top of MAPOS. This
document explains IP datagram encapsulation in HDLC frame of MAPOS,
and the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).
1. Introduction
Multiple Access Protocol over SONET/SDH (MAPOS) [1] is a high-speed
link-layer protocol that provides multiple access capability over
SONET/SDH. Its frame format is based on the HDLC-like framing [2] for
PPP. A component called "Frame Switch" [1] allows multiple nodes to
be connected together in a star topology to form a LAN. Using long
haul SONET/SDH links, the nodes on such a "SONET-LAN" can span over a
wide geographical area. The Internet Protocol (IP) [3] datagrams are
transmitted in MAPOS HDLC frames [1].
This document describes a protocol for transmission of IP datagrams
over MAPOS version 1 [1]. It explains IP datagram encapsulation in
HDLC frame of MAPOS, and ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) for
mapping between IP address and HDLC address.
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 1]
RFC 2176 MAPOS June 1997
2. Frame Format for Encapsulating IP Datagrams
An IP datagram is transmitted in a MAPOS HDLC frame. The protocol
field of the frame must contain the value 0x0021 (hexadecimal) as
defined by the "MAPOS Version 1 Assigned Numbers" [4]. The
information field contains the IP datagram.
The information field may be one to 65,280 octets in length; the
MTU(Maximum Transmission Unit) of MAPOS is 65,280 octets. Although
the large MTU size can suppress the overhead of IP header processing,
it may cause fragmentation anywhere along the path from the source to
the destination and result in performance degradation. To cope with
the issue, Path MTU discovery [5] may be used.
3. Address Mapping
This section explains MAPOS ARP and the mapping of special addresses.
3.1 ARP cache
Each node on a MAPOS network maintains an "ARP cache" that maps
destination IP addresses to their corresponding 8-bit HDLC addresses.
Entries are added to this cache either manually or by the Address
Resolution Protocol described below. Entries are removed from this
cache manually, by the UNARP mechanism, or by ARP cache validation
mechanism. An implementation must provide a mechanism for manually
adding or removing arbitrary ARP cache entries.
3.2 Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)
This subsection describes MAPOS ARP protocol and its packet format.
3.2.1 Overview
The MAPOS ARP is similar to that for ethernet. Prior to sending an
IP datagram, the node must know the destination HDLC address
corresponding to the destination IP address. When its ARP cache does
not contain the corresponding entry, it uses ARP to translate the IP
address to the HDLC address. That is, it broadcasts an ARP request
containing the destination IP address. In response to the request,
the node which has the IP address sends an ARP reply containing the
HDLC address. The returned HDLC address is stored in the ARP cache.
3.2.2 ARP Frame Format
The protocol field for an ARP frame must contain 0xFE01 (hexadecimal)
as defined by the "MAPOS Version 1 Assigned Numbers" [4]. The
information field contains the ARP packet as shown below.
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 2]
RFC 2176 MAPOS June 1997
+-------------------------+------------------------+
| Hardware Address Space | Protocol Address Space |
| (25:MAPOS) | (2048 in Dec) |
| 16 bits | 16 bits |
+------------+------------+------------------------+
| Hard Addr | Proto Addr | Operation Code |
| Length (4) | Length (4) |(1:Request 2:Response) |
| 8 bits | 8 bits | 16 bits |
+------------+------------+------------------------+
| Sender HDLC Address 32 bits |
+--------------------------------------------------+
| Sender IP Address 32 bits |
+--------------------------------------------------+
| Target HDLC Address 32 bits |
+--------------------------------------------------+
| Target IP Address 32 bits |
+--------------------------------------------------+
Figure 5 ARP packet format
Hardware Address Space (16 bits)
The hardware address space for MAPOS ARP is 25 in Decimal as
assigned by IANA [6].
Protocol Address Space (16 bits)
The protocol address space for IP is 2048 in Decimal.
Hardware Address Length (8 bits)
The hardware address length is 4.
Protocol Address Length (8 bits)
The protocol address length for IP is 4.
Operation Code (16 bits)
The operation code is 1 for request and 2 for response.
Sender hardware (HDLC) Address (32 bits)
Contains the sender's HDLC address in an ARP request, and the
target HDLC address in an ARP response. The 8-bit HDLC address is
placed in the least significant place of the 32-bit field. The
remaining bits should be zero.
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 3]
RFC 2176 MAPOS June 1997
Sender Protocol (IP) Address (32 bits)
Contains the sender's IP address in an ARP request, and the target
IP address in an ARP response.
Target hardware (HDLC) Address (32 bits)
Contains unknown target HDLC address (all zeros) in an ARP request,
and sender's HDLC address in an ARP response. The 8-bit HDLC
address is placed in the least significant place of the 32-bit
field. The remaining bits should be zero.
Target Protocol (IP) Address (32 bits)
Contains the target IP address in an ARP request, and the sender's
IP address in an ARP response.
3.3 UNARP
An implementation MUST provide an UNARP mechanism to flush obsolete
ARP cache entries. The mechanism is similar to the ARP extension
described in [7]. When a node detects that its port has came up, it
MUST broadcast an UNARP packet. It forces every other node to clear
the obsolete ARP entry which was created by the node previously
connected to the switch port. An UNARP is an ARP clear request with
the following values:
Hardware Address Space : 25
Protocol Address Space : 2048
Hardware Address Length : 4
Protocol Address Length : 4
Operation Code : 23 (MAPOS-UNARP)
Sender hardware (HDLC) Address : HDLC address of the node
Sender Protocol (IP) Address : IP address of the node
Target hardware (HDLC) Address : all 1
Target Protocol (IP) Address : 255.255.255.255 (broadcast)
Hardware Address Space (16 bits)
The hardware address space for MAPOS ARP is 25 in Decimal as
assigned by IANA [6].
Operation Code (16 bits)
The operation code is 23 for MAPOS-UNARP in Decimal as assigned by
IANA [6].
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 4]
RFC 2176 MAPOS June 1997
The node MUST send three UNARP packets at 30 seconds intervals. The
receiving node of the packet MUST clear the ARP cache entry
associated with the Sender Protocol (IP) Address, if and only if the
corresponding Hardware (HDLC) Address is not equal to that contained
in the UNARP packet. That is, if both the Sender Hardware (HDLC)
Address and the Sender Protocol(IP) Address match those of the cached
entry, the entry is left unchanged.
3.4 ARP Cache Validation
An implementation MUST provide a mechanism to remove out-of-date
cache entries and it SHOULD provide options to configure the timeout
value [8]. One approach is to periodically time-out the cache
entries, even if they are in use. This approach involves ARP cache
timeouts in the order of a minute or less.
Furthermore, when the link is lost on an interface, all ARP cache
entries associated with the interface MUST be removed immediately.
Causes for link loss includes conditions such as loss of carrier and
out-of-synchronization.
3.5 IP Broadcast and multicast
In broadcast and multicast frames, the most significant bit of the
HDLC address must be 1 [1]. In addition, the least significant bit
must always be 1 to indicate the end of the field [1].
In the case of IP broadcast, the remaining six bits of the HDLC
address must be all 1s. That is, it should be mapped to the HDLC
broadcast address 0xFF (hexadecimal).
In the case of IP multicast, the remaining six bits of the HDLC
address must contain the lowest-order six bits of the IP multicast
group address. It resembles IP multicast extension for ethernet
described in [9]. Exceptions arise when these six bits are either
all zeros or all ones, in which case they should be altered to the
bit sequence 111110.
4. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 5]
RFC 2176 MAPOS June 1997
References
[1] Murakami, K. and M. Maruyama, "MAPOS - Multiple Access Protocol
over SONET/SDH, Version 1," RFC-2171, June 1997.
[2] Simpson, W., editor, "PPP in HDLC-like Framing," RFC-1662,
July 1994.
[3] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol (IP)," RFC-791, September 1981.
[4] Maruyama, M. and K. Murakami, "MAPOS Version 1 Assigned
Numbers," RFC-2172, June 1997.
[5] Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU Discovery," RFC-1191,
Nov. 1990.
[6] IANA, "IANA-Assignments",
http://www.iana.org/iana/assignments.html
[7] Malkin, G., "ARP Extension - UNARP," RFC-1868, November 1995.
[8] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication
Layers," RFC-1122, October 1989.
[9] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting," RFC-1112,
August 1989.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions and
thoughtful suggestions of John P. Mullaney, Clark Bremer, Masayuki
Kobayashi, Paul Francis, Toshiaki Yoshida, and Takahiro Sajima.
Author's Address
Ken Murakami
NTT Software Laboratories
3-9-11, Midori-cho
Musashino-shi
Tokyo-180, Japan
E-mail: murakami@ntt-20.ecl.net
Mitsuru Maruyama
NTT Software Laboratories
3-9-11, Midori-cho
Musashino-shi
Tokyo-180, Japan
E-mail: mitsuru@ntt-20.ecl.net
Murakami & Maruyama Informational [Page 6]