💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc1714.gmi captured on 2022-04-28 at 23:10:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Obsoleted by:
Keywords: White, Pages, Directory
Network Working Group S. Williamson
Request for Comments: 1714 M. Kosters
Category: Informational Network Solutions Inc.
InterNIC
November 1994
Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois)
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memo describes version 1.0 of the client/server interaction of
RWhois. RWhois provides a distributed system for the display of
hierarchical information. This system is hierarchical by design,
allowing for the reduction of a query, and the referral of the user
closer to the maintainer of the information.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction................................... 3
2. RWhois Client Model............................ 5
2.1 Directives: Client to Server Interaction ... 6
2.2 Required Directives ......................... 6
2.2.1 <query>.................................. 6
2.2.2 RWhois................................... 7
2.3 Optional Directives ......................... 7
2.3.1 load..................................... 7
2.3.2 limit.................................... 7
2.3.3 schema................................... 8
2.3.4 xfer..................................... 8
2.3.5 quit..................................... 9
2.3.6 status................................... 9
2.3.7 cache.................................... 9
2.3.8 holdconnect..............................10
2.3.9 forward..................................10
2.3.10 soa.....................................11
2.3.11 notify..................................11
2.3.12 register................................13
2.3.13 object..................................14
2.3.14 define..................................15
2.3.15 private.................................15
2.3.16 X-......................................16
Williamson & Kosters [Page 1]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
2.3.17 directive...............................17
2.3.18 display.................................17
2.3.19 language................................18
2.4 RWhois Client Model .........................18
3. RWhois Server Model............................20
3.1 Output Display and Restriction Keywords .....20
3.2 Responses: Server to Client Interaction ....21
3.3 Required Responses ..........................22
3.3.1 RWhois...................................22
3.3.2 referral.................................22
3.3.3 ok.......................................24
3.3.4 error....................................24
3.4 Optional Responses ..........................25
3.4.1 see-also.................................25
3.4.2 load.....................................26
3.4.3 soa......................................26
3.4.4 status...................................28
3.4.5 xfer.....................................29
3.4.6 schema...................................30
3.4.7 define...................................32
3.4.8 object...................................32
3.4.9 directive................................33
3.4.10 info....................................34
3.4.11 display.................................34
3.4.12 X-......................................35
3.4.13 language................................35
3.5 Query Reduction .............................36
3.6 Determining Authority .......................36
3.7 Secondary Server Interaction ................37
3.8 Registration Process ........................38
3.9 Out-of-Service ..............................38
4. Interaction: Client Directives and Acceptable
Server Responses...............................39
4.1 General ......................................39
4.2 On Connection ................................39
4.3 <QUERY> ......................................39
4.4 -RWhois ......................................40
4.5 -load ........................................40
4.6 -limit<SP>< value > ..........................40
4.7 -schema<SP>[object] ..........................40
4.8 -xfer<SP>[object] ............................40
4.9 -quit ........................................40
4.10 -cache<SP><on/off> ..........................40
4.11 -status .....................................40
4.12 -forward ....................................40
4.13 -soa ........................................40
4.14 -notify .....................................41
4.15 -register ...................................41
Williamson & Kosters [Page 2]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
4.16 -holdconnect ................................41
4.17 -object .....................................41
4.18 -define .....................................41
4.19 -X- .........................................41
4.20 -display ....................................41
4.21 -language ...................................41
5. Error Codes....................................42
5.1 Error Code List .............................42
6. Attribute Format...............................43
6.1 Format Specification Macros .................44
7. Quick Query (RWhois using UDP).................45
8. References.....................................46
9. Security Considerations....................... 46
10. Authors' Addresses.............................46
1. Introduction
Early in ARPANET development, the SRI-NIC established a centralized
whois database that provided host and network information about the
systems connected to the network and the E-mail addresses of the
users on those systems. The ARPANET experiment has evolved into a
global network with countless people and hundreds of thousands of end
systems. Given the sheer size and effort needed to maintain a
centralized database, an alternate, decentralized approach to store
and display this information is desired.
The Internet portions of the DDN NIC have been transitioned to what
is now known as InterNIC Registration Services (RS). The charter for
InterNIC RS has been reduced to maintain information only for IP
networks, top-level domains, Autonomous System Numbers, and the
points of contact for each of these particular entities. In
addition, the InterNIC, in its role as an Internet Registry (IR), has
delegated IP block assignment authority to Regional Registries such
as the RIPE NCC for Europe and the APNIC for the Asian Pacific
region, while retaining authority for North America and all non-
delegated regions. This has led to a fragmentation of whois service
to the Internet user.
Several different solutions have been proposed and developed by the
various regional IR's. Two solutions have been worked on
extensively: the Shared Whois Project (SWIP) and X.500.
The SWIP project has a common exchange format that can be parsed by
the various IR's for input and output. Thus, one can synchronize
their databases with information obtained from the other IR's. This
project is showing promise and is now operational. However, this
approach still requires a centralized database for store and display.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 3]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
The InterNIC has also been involved in the use of X.500 for display
of registration information. Among other things, this included
defining schemas and Directory information tree structures for the
purpose of distributing information amongst the various IR X.500
Directory Service Agents (DSA). Unfortunately, X.500's complexity,
resource utilization, and lack of Internet support has made a search
for an alternative solution necessary.
The information that the various IR's maintain is inherently
hierarchical in nature. (Examples: hammer.nic.ddn.mil is under the
nic.ddn.mil domain which is under the ddn.mil domain which is under
the .mil domain. 198.41.0.21 is part of network 198.41.0.0/24 which
is part of the block 198.41.0.0/16 which is part of the block
198.0.0.0/8) The InterNIC may not have the information, but will at
least be able to reduce the query and point or refer the users closer
to their goal. This has led to the development of a referral whois,
and the corresponding RWhois protocol.
The underlying premise for this project has been to retain the basic
functionality of the whois server and client, making all of the
extensions optional. The server must respond to the original whois
client, currently included with many operating systems. The RWhois
client must also interact with RFC 954 [RFC-954] whois servers.
RWhois has been designed as an extensible protocol to ensure that
many uses can be accommodated. Public extensions to the protocol
should be documented as RFCs. Private extensions can be used with
agreement left up to the client and server.
If extensions are not implemented at the server in question, an
appropriate error message must be sent. The use of extended error
message is outlined in Section 5 - Error Codes.
Throughout this document the following notations will be used to
describe the RWhois server/client interaction:
<SP> space
[arg] optional argument
<arg> required argument
(<arg>) conditional required argument
([arg]) conditional optional argument
{format} format of item
\ continued on next line
The words should and must are significant in this document. If
should is used, the implementor has the option to follow the advice
of this document. If must is used then it is a required part of the
protocol. Implementations without this functionality may not
Williamson & Kosters [Page 4]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
interact correctly with other RWhois servers.
The format descriptions throughout this document use macro
definitions described in Section 6.1. Refer to that section for
clarification.
The RWhois protocol specified in this document can be extended to
accommodate such applications as NetHelp and ZoneGen (DNS zone
generator).
2. RWhois Client Model
The RWhois design requires compatibility with the current Whois and
Whois++ servers. Therefore, the RWhois client must wait or have
knowledge of server type to determine if the server contacted is an
RWhois server. The user should have control over the time the client
waits, since this will vary based on network congestion and capacity.
If after the wait the server does not respond with the %RWhois
response, the client must not send any RWhois extended directives.
In this case, the client should only send the query. We realize that
the server identification feature may mean that the identity of an
RWhois server may be missed. However, it will allow the RWhois
system to utilize the current Whois and Whois++ infrastructure.
Referrals from RWhois can be directed toward a Whois or Whois++
server. These non-RWhois servers must be placed as a leaf on the
hierarchical tree. These servers represent a mesh structure from the
RWhois perspective. This restriction should not discourage the use
of these servers in building the RWhois structure.
The RWhois server must remain connected until a query is received.
If the client wishes to make multiple queries it must send the
-holdconnect directive. In this mode, once the client has sent the
last query and received either an answer or the error code indicating
that no records were found, it must issue the -quit directive. If
the client only wishes to issue directives, then upon completion the
-quit directive must be sent. If it is not sent, the server will
wait until it receives non-directive input from the client.
Considering the requirement for compatibility with the original
whois, the RWhois client in default mode must operate exactly like
the current Whois client. However, in the enhanced mode, the RWhois
client can do much more based on information received from the RWhois
server.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 5]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
2.1 Directives: Client to Server Interaction
The RWhois client sends directives to the RWhois server. These
directives are prefaced with the `-' character always at the start of
a new line. However, for compatibility with older Whois clients, the
query is not prefaced with the `-' character. Only after the client
is certain that the server is an RWhois server should these
directives be sent. Compatibility with RFC 954 [RFC-954] whois
servers is required. All directives must be terminated by <LF><CR>.
2.2 Required Directives
The following are required RWhois client directives.
2.2.1 <query>
The query is generally the final directive sent to the server. It is
the only directive that does not start with a `-'. The query is the
question that the client wants the server to answer. The qualifiers
that may proceed the query are addressed in Section 3.1 - Output
Display and Restriction Keywords.
Format for use:
[display format]<SP>[query restriction]<SP><query>
[Display format]{%s} This optional pre-query directive allows
the requester to select the format of
the returned data. Details of the
allowable values can be found in Section
3.1.
[Query restriction]{%s} This optional pre-query directive allows
the requester to limit the area in which
the servers search for a specific
object.
Example of use:
dump domain netsol.com
Williamson & Kosters [Page 6]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
2.2.2 RWhois
The -RWhois directive identifies the client as an RWhois client
allowing the server to operate using the RWhois protocol exclusively.
Format for use:
-RWhois<SP>V-<spec version #><SP>[imp identifier]
<Spec version #>{%2d.%2d} This required argument identifies
the specification version that the
client is built to conform with.
Clients that are built in
accordance with this document are
V-1.0. This argument will be used
by the server to determine if
features introduced in subsequent
releases of the protocol document
may be used.
[Imp identifier]{%s} This optional argument identifies client
implementation information. It is
recommended that the implementor maintain a
version number separate from the
specification version.
Example of use:
-RWhois V-1.0 [InterNIC B.0.9.7]
2.3 Optional Directives
The following are OPTIONAL RWhois server directives.
2.3.1 load
The -load directive allows the client to make a quick decision about
presenting the query to the current server. If the client determines
that another server can better serve the query, then control may be
transferred to the server with the lower load and better connection.
This directive has no arguments.
2.3.2 limit
The -limit directive will allow the client to request the server
allocate enough space to collect more responses than would currently
be collected by the server.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 7]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-limit<SP><value>
<Value>{%d} This required argument is the new limit requested by
the client. If the limit exceeds the limit set by
the server administrator, the client must receive an
error message. It is recommended that if the client
receives an error for exceeding the servers upper
limit, it should cut the request in half and resend
the request until an acceptable level has been
negotiated.
Example of use:
-limit 2000
2.3.3 schema
One of the shortcomings of X.500 was the requirement to know the
schema of an object before making a query. RWhois allows the client
to request the schema for an object without knowledge of the object
by using the -schema directive.
Format for use:
-schema<SP>[object]
[object]{%s} This optional argument identifies the objects for
which the schema is being requested. If this
argument is not sent, the schemas for all objects
contained in the server will be sent.
Example of use:
-schema domain
2.3.4 xfer
The -xfer directive is used to transfer all data from a server. This
method of transfer has no limit on the number of records that can be
transferred to the client application. This directive is primarily
used to transfer data contained in an authority area for caching at a
secondary server.
Format for use:
-xfer<SP>[object]<SP>[authority area]<SP>[SOA]
Williamson & Kosters [Page 8]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
[Object]{All|%s} This required argument identifies the
object to transfer. If the keyword all
is sent, all objects contained in the
server will be transferred. Otherwise,
only the object specified will be sent.
[Authority area]{%s} This optional argument contains the
authority area of the object to send
further limiting the data transfer.
[SOA]{%d} This optional argument notifies the server
to send everything that has been updated
since this SOA number.
Example of use:
-xfer domain netsol.com
-xfer domain netsol.com 19940818141259
2.3.5 quit
The -quit directive will inform the server that the client is
finished. The server and client should close the connection. This
directive has no arguments.
2.3.6 status
The -status directive is used to poll the server for its status.
There are seven required responses to this directive. Additional
attributes may be sent in the response. The client should ignore all
unknown attributes. This directive has no arguments.
2.3.7 cache
The RWhois server can hold data that it has no authority over. If
the server sends this data to a requester, it is considered a non-
authoritative response. The holding of this data is called caching.
The physical data for these objects is not contained on the system
hosting the server. The -cache directive allows the client to
instruct the server whether or not to send cached data. The RWhois
client should start with the cache turned off. The server must start
with the cache turned on in order to function like the RFC 954 [RFC-
954] whois server. Because of the server's default, the client
should send the -cache off directive during initial session setup if
cached data should not be sent. Details on expiration of cache data
can be found in section 3.4.3, %soa response.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 9]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-cache<SP><mode>
<mode>{on|off}
on: Turns caching on.
off: Turns caching off.
Example of use:
-cache on
2.3.8 holdconnect
The RWhois server must close the connection after the response to a
query has been received. The query is the final exchange between the
client and server. However, this characteristic can be modified with
the -holdconnect directive. If this directive is issued to the
RWhois sever, it will remain connected until the -quit directive is
received. Once the -quit directive is received, both the server and
the client must close their connection.
Format for use:
-holdconnect<SP><mode>
<mode>{on|off}
On: Turns holdconnect on.
Off: Turns holdconnect off.
Example of use:
-holdconnect on
2.3.9 forward
During normal sever operation the server will send %referral or
see-also responses to the client, expecting the client to redirect
the query to the server identified in the response. If the client is
located behind a firewall or is poorly connected, having a server
make the query may improve query performance or allow a query to be
satisfied. The -forward directive will instruct the server to
operate as a forwarding server. Whether or not this directive should
be allowed should be a configuration parameter of the server.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 10]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-forward<SP><mode>
<mode>{on|off}
On: Turns forwarding on.
Off: Turns forwarding off.
Example of use:
-forward on
2.3.10 soa
The identification of authority area is an important part of the
RWhois design. The -soa directive is used to question the server's
authority for a specific area. A positive response will include the
administrative parameters for the authority area as detailed in
section 3.4.3. If the server does not contain an SOA for the
authority area requested, it must send an error message to the
client.
Format for use:
-soa<SP>[authority area]
[Authority area]{%s} This optional argument identifies the
authority area being requested. If this
argument is not sent, information about
all authority areas contained in the
server must be sent.
Example of use:
-soa netsol.com
2.3.11 notify
The -notify directive is used to notify a server of a bad or
recursive referral or a change in a primary server's data.
Format for use:
-notify<SP><action><SP><information>
<action>{badref|recurref|update|inssec|delsec}
Williamson & Kosters [Page 11]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
badref When a client receives a %referral response that does
not work, it must report the bad referral to the server
that issued the referral. The referral is bad only if
the referred server does not contain the SOA record for
the authority area in question. It is not considered a
bad referral if the server does not have an answer to
the query, but responds positively to the -soa area
directive. This merely means that there is not an
answer to the query. When a -badref is sent to the
referring server; it should log the bad referral so the
administrator of that server can remove the reference
if it is no longer correct. This action should only be
taken after receiving a negative response to the query
and the SOA request.
recurref When a client receives a referral that results in a
recursive action, the referring server must be
informed. The -recurref directive must be sent
identifying the recursive loop. This directive should
only be sent to the server one level back, even if
multiple server were involved in the referral.
update An RWhois primary server must be aware of its
secondary servers. If the data in the primary server
changes, the primary server may choose to notify the
secondary servers. This allows the secondary servers
to quickly reflect changes in the primary server's data.
inssec This action will inform the authority server that the
server indicated in the argument will be a secondary
for its authority area. The server receiving this
directive must determine if the secondary is
acceptable. If it is, the server should be added to
the update list so that it will be informed if data in
the authority area changes.
delsec This action will inform the server that the server
indicated in the subsequent arguments will no longer be
a secondary. The server receiving this action must
determine if the server is a secondary and if so,
remove it from the update list.
<information>{action=badref|recurref <<server>:<query>>
action=inssec|delsec|update
<<server>:<object>:<authority>>}
Williamson & Kosters [Page 12]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
<server>{%Mserver} This required argument identifies the server
that contained the recursive or bad referral,
or has data that changed.
<query>{%s} This required argument identifies the query
that was sent to the server that gave a
recursive or bad referral.
<object>{%s} This required argument identifies the object
that changed.
<authority>{%s} This required argument identifies the
authority area where the object that changed
currently resides.
Example of use:
-notify recurref netman1.netsol.com:4343:scottw@netsol.com
-notify badref nic.ddn.mil:43:abc.af.mil
-notify update netman1.netsol.com:4343:domain:netsol.com
-notify inssec dmeister.internic.net:4343:domain:netsol.com
-notify delsec dmeister.internic.net:4343:domain:netsol.com
2.3.12 register
This directive allows the client to add, modify, or delete
information that exists or should exist in the server's database.
During the exchange, all attributes of an object must be sent. The
client must wait to send the registration data until the %ok response
is received from the server.
Format for use:
-register<SP><mode><SP>(on:<action><SP><e-mail contact>
<SP><authority info>)
<mode>{on|off}
on: This required argument starts the
registration process.
off: This required argument ends the registration
process.
The following arguments are only required if the mode argument is
sent with the value on:
(<action>){add|mod|del}
Williamson & Kosters [Page 13]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
add: This conditionally required argument
indicates that the object being sent should
be added to the server's database.
mod: This conditionally required argument
indicates that the object being sent should
be modified and should already exist in the
server's database.
del: This conditionally required argument
indicates that the object being sent should
be deleted from the server's database.
(<e-mail contact>){%Memail} This conditionally required
argument identifies the sender of
the registration information.
(<authority info>){%s} This required argument contains
information used to authenticate
the person sending the registration
information. The method used must
be identified using the -private
directive. Work must be done to
identify usable authentication
methods for unsupervised
delegation. This is beyond the
scope of this document. However,
the authors have made an effort to
allow flexibility in the
implementation of an authentication
system.
Example of use:
-register on add scottw@netsol.com
Object-type:referral
Referral:netman1.netsol.com:4343
Domain-Name:netsol.com
IP-Network:192.153.247.0
IP-Network:198.41.0.0
-register off
2.3.13 object
RWhois data is a collection of objects with defined attributes. The
attributes for an object can be acquired by issuing the -schema
directive. Each object must at a minimum define the attribute
object-type. This attribute identifies the name of the object that
Williamson & Kosters [Page 14]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
will be displayed in response to the -object directive. This
directive can be used by a client to verify that a server contains
the desired object. Another possible use may be to gather all of the
objects contained on a server and display them to the user in the
form of a menu for selection.
Format for use:
-object<SP>[object]
[object]{%s} This optional argument identifies the object
requested. If no argument is sent, all objects
contained in the server will be returned.
Example of use:
-object domain
2.3.14 define
Format strings describing the format of an object's attribute may
include format macros. More information about definitions of format
macros can be found in Section 6. The -define directive allows the
client to request the definition of a format macro.
Format for use:
-define<SP>[macro name]
[macro name]{%s} This optional argument identifies the name of
the macro to display. If no arguments are
sent, the server must return the definition
of all macros contained in the server.
Example of use:
-define server
2.3.15 private
The -private directive allows the client to identify the
authentication method to be used. More research needs to be done
with respect to client authentication. This directive will allow
more experimentation.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 15]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-private<SP><action><SP><method><SP>[data]
<action>{auth|encr} This required argument identifies the action
the directive is taking. Currently the value
for this argument can be auth for
authentication or encr for encryption.
<method>{%s} This required argument contains the name of
the method to be used. The value must be
recognized by the server or an error will be
sent. It is beyond the scope of this
document to identify the possible method to
be used.
[data]{%s} This optional argument must be supplied if
required by the method identified in the
previous argument.
Example of use:
-private auth pass1 xxjdk998uu
The above example is a simple password exchange. It is beyond the
scope of this document to determine the authentication technique that
would best suit this protocol. Development is underway to determine
the authentication needs and to experiment with potential solutions.
2.3.16 X-
This directive is the preface to extended directives, mutually agreed
to between the client and server. The client and server must have
knowledge of the extended directives to use. Extension can
accommodate other uses such as NetHelp, white pages, and many others.
If the extensions are public, they should be documented in an RFC and
available through the -directive directive.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 16]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-X-<directive name><SP>[directive arguments]
<directive name>{%s} This required argument identifies the
name of the directive being issued.
[directive arguments]{?} This optional argument is dependent upon
the required or optional arguments of
the extended directive. There may be
multiple directive arguments.
Example of use:
-X-date
2.3.17 directive
Directives allowed by a server may vary. The client can issue the
-directive directive to determine if the server allows a specific
directive or to obtain a list of all acceptable directives for that
server.
Format for use:
-directive<SP>[directive]
[directive][%s] This optional argument identifies the directive
being requested. If no arguments are sent, all
of the directives accepted by the server must
be sent.
Example of use:
-directive X-date
2.3.18 display
The -display directive is used to set the display mode of the server
or to identify display modes the client is capable of. If this
directive is sent without arguments, the server will return all
available display methods.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 17]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
-display<SP>[action]<SP>[method]
[action]{activate|capable}
The `activate' setting enables a certain
display mode, while a `capable' setting sends
the display mode the client is capable of.
[method]{%s} This optional argument indicates the display
method desired by the client.
Example of use:
-display swip
-display mime
2.3.19 language
The -language directive is used to set the language mode of the
server or to identify language modes the client is capable of. If
this directive is sent without arguments, the server will return all
available languages.
Format for use:
-language<SP>[language]
[language]{%s} This optional argument indicates the language
desired by the client.
Example of use:
-language german
2.4 RWhois Client Model
Server <-------> Client
START:
<------ Connection (record time to connect)
If no server type...Wait up to specified
time for------> "%RWhois" response
(recommend wait of at least 5 seconds)
if "%RWhois" is not received from server, assume that it is
not an RWhois server
goto QUERY:
Williamson & Kosters [Page 18]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
else if "%RWhois" is received from server
<------- send "-RWhois -VX.X"
--------> receive "%ok"
DIRECTIVE: if directive for server
<------- send directive
-------> receive server response
if "%ok" received
goto DIRECTIVE:
if "%error" received
process error then goto DIRECTIVE:
else if no more commands for server
goto QUERY:
QUERY:
<-------- send query
--------> Receive and display response
PROCESS: if "%referral" received
if first referral
restart server list
else
add to server list
if "%see-also" received
insert server into server list
if in holdconnection mode
goto DIRECTIVE:
if no directive (%)
goto END:
goto PROCESS:
END:
server will disconnect
if more servers on Queue and multi or referral mode active
goto START:
Every time the RWhois client receives a %referral or %see-also
response from the RWhois server it must compare the host:port:query
with those already executed. If the client discovers that it is
being directed to repeat the same query to a server that it has
already visited, it must not repeat that query. As an example, the
prototype RWhois client maintains a server trail and compares each
new directive with the entire list. If a recursive act is about to
occur, the client will notify the user and exit. The original Whois
client opens a TCP connection, sends the query, and displays the
response. The RWhois client must be more robust in order to handle
multiple server queries, servers that do not exist, and recursive
referrals. The client must also remain connected while sending
directives and receiving responses. All of these features have been
incorporated into the experimental RWhois client.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 19]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
3. RWhois Server Model
This section describes the functionality of the RWhois server.
3.1 Output Display and Restriction Keywords
The RWhois server will behave similarly to the original whois server
in terms of display formats and restrictions. The following are
required in the RWhois server.
Display Format Keywords
EXPand (*) Expand
~ no sub displays
SUBdisplay (%) sub displays
SUMmary ($) Give a short summary for the query on one to
many hits (defaults on multiple hits).
Full (=) Give the full record output on one to many
hits (defaults on one hit only).
The following was added to whois post RFC 954 [RFC-954] and is part
of the RWhois requirements:
dump (#) Display the record in a parsable format.
In addition to the above, the RWhois server must accept additional
pre-query directives such as Boolean queries and attribute=value
query combinations. The capability to perform partial matches are
requested by post fixing a `*' or `.' at the end of the search item
for unknown characters. This capability is required for an RWhois
server.
Example: last-name=williamson and first-name=scott
Data Restriction Format Keywords
Williamson & Kosters [Page 20]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
The following restriction keywords are found in the RFC 954
[RFC-954] whois server:
!(handle) Query on Handle only
mailbox Query on all records for person
person Query on User records only
host Query on Host records only
domain Query on Domain records only
network Query on Network Records only
asn Query on Autonomous System Numbers only
The RWhois server must allow restriction of search to any object
contained on that server. With the exception of the `!' restriction
format keyword, the above listed restriction keywords represent
defined objects. In the prototype software, each of these objects
are defined in configuration files, not hard-coded into the server.
New objects, and therefore restriction keywords, should be easily
designed with no code change necessary to the server.
3.2 Responses: Server to Client Interaction
Responses are sets of data that servers send in response to a client
directive. Responses from an RWhois server must be prefaced with the
`%' character at the start of a line. Responses are divided into two
groups: those that are required to provide minimal RWhois
interaction and those that are used to achieve the desired
characteristics of a fully functional distributed system. A server
must respond with an error message indicating that a directive is not
available on the server and therefore does not have the required
responses.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 21]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
3.3 Required Responses
The following sections describe the required RWhois server responses.
3.3.1 RWhois
The %RWhois response is used to identify a server as an RWhois
server. Clients that treat RWhois servers differently will need this
response to enable the RWhois capabilities.
Format for use:
RWhois<SP>V-<Spec version #><SP><server name><SP>[imp name and
version #]
<Spec version #>[V-%2.2f] This required response indicates
the version number of the RWhois
protocol specification that the
software is capable of handling.
The version described in this
document is V-1.0.
<server name>[%s] This required response is the host
name of the computer hosting the
RWhois server.
[imp name and version #][%s] This optional argument contains
information about the server
implementation. It is recommended
that the version number of the
software be indicated. This
version may differ from the
specification version number.
Example of use:
%RWhois V-1.0 rs.internic.net (Network Solutions V-1.6)
3.3.2 referral
The %referral response instructs the client to query another server
(which could be a whois, RWhois, or whois++ server). Referrals are
cumulative. The first referral received during a session must
replace the default server list. Any subsequent referrals received
must be appended to the end of the server list.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 22]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
In the non-Uniform Resource Location (URL) response format below, the
authority area equals the reduced query. There are three types of
referral. The type can be determined by the client evaluating the
authority area which is part of the %referral response.
If the authority area received from a referral response is equal to
the original query, then it is a link type referral. If the
authority area is not equal to the query, then it is a reduction type
referral. If no authority area is sent, then it is a punt type
referral. (Punt means the server is not a root and cannot answer the
query and therefore is referring the client to a level up the tree or
to a server that can better answer the query.) [NOTE: the punt type
referral may be used to direct a client into the whois++ mesh type.]
The client may receive multiple referrals from a single query. If
the SOA for each of these referrals is the same, then the first
referral is the primary server and all subsequent servers are
secondary. Each of the servers will report the SOA for the authority
area in question.
Format for use:
%referral<SP><server>[:type]<SP>[authority area]
%referral<SP>url:<url>
<server>{%Mserver} This required argument identifies the
server that the client should re-connect
with.
[type]{%Mstype} This optional argument identifies the
server type. This could save wait time for
the client trying to identify a server
which is non-RWhois.
<authority area>{%s} This optional argument identifies the
authority area that caused the referral for
the query in question. Using this value as
the argument for the -soa directive to
the referral server should result in a
positive response. If this is not the
case, the referral is considered bad.
<url>{%Murl} This required argument defines the Uniform
Resource Location (URL) string that points
to the resource containing the information
desired.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 23]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Example of use:
%referral nic.ddn.mil:43 .mil
%referral url:http://www.netsol.com/
3.3.3 ok
The %ok response must be sent by the RWhois server at the completion
of every task or to positively acknowledge a directive.
Format for use:
%ok
3.3.4 error
The %error response is used to indicate an error condition to the
client. Refer to Section 5 for details on the error reporting
scheme. It is important to note that only the error number will be
used to determine the client's action. The text message will only be
used to make the error readable by humans connected using telnet or
an old whois client. The only exception to this rule is the error
message used to indicate problems with registration transactions.
The format for these message can be found in Section 5.
Format for use:
%error<SP><error number><SP>[error text]
<error number>{%d} This required argument is the error number
identified in Section 5. The client can use
this number to categorize errors.
[error text]{%s} This optional argument is the text that
describes the error message. This message
must be consistent for each error. Variables
should not be added to this message. This
message is only to make the error message
human readable. Message sent following an
error code associated with the registration
process will contain the line number of the
attribute that is incorrect.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 24]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Example of use:
%error<SP>400<SP>Invalid Server Directive
3.4 Optional Responses
The following are optional RWhois server responses.
3.4.1 see-also
The %see-also response instructs the client to contact another server
for additional information about the current query. See-also servers
should be inserted into the server list just after the current
server. If multiple see-alsos are received from a single query, each
subsequent see-also should be inserted after any other see-alsos
previously received. See-alsos should be additional information
related to the current query.
One example use for the see-also response is to display autonomous
system information relating to an IP network number or router
interface information relating to an IP host number.
Format for use:
%see-also<SP><server>[:type]:<query>
%see-also<SP>url:<url>
<server>{%Mserver} This required argument identifies the server
the client should reconnect with.
[type]{%Mstype] This optional argument identifies the server
type. This could save wait time for the
client trying to identify a server which is
non-RWhois.
<query>{%s} This required argument sets the query that
must be sent to the referred server. The
query may be different from the original
query sent to the referring server.
<url>{%Murl} This required argument defines the Uniform
Resource Location (URL) string that points to
the resource containing the information
desired.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 25]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Example of use:
%see-also prmd.merit.edu:43:handle=xxx
%see-also url:http://www.netsol.com/
3.4.2 load
The %load response returns the current and average load of the
computer hosting the RWhois server. We realize that the measurement
may be different depending on the implication of the system's load
mechanism. This directive/response was implemented to allow
experiments with sorting preferred servers to deliver better results
to the user.
Format for use:
%load <SP><current><SP><average>
<current>{%2.2f} This required argument delivers the current
load on the system hosting the RWhois server.
<average>{%2.2f} This required argument delivers the average
load on the system hosting the RWhois server.
Example of use:
%load 5.68 1.32
3.4.3 soa
The %soa response delivers information about the authority area in
question. If the server does not contain the authority for the area
in question, it must respond with the appropriate error message. The
SOA data must never be cached. SOA records must originate on the
server giving the answer. The increment and refresh attributes are
used to provide for incremental updates of the secondary server.
Deleted data will remain in the secondary server's cache until the
refresh time has been reached. This will reduce the amount of data
transferred and not require the primary server to retain deleted
data. The following are the minimum attributes required for the soa
object:
object-type
authority
ttl
serial
refresh
increment
Williamson & Kosters [Page 26]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
retry
tech-contact
admin-contact
hostmaster
primary
Format for use:
%soa<SP>authority:<SP><authority area>
%soa<SP>ttl:<SP><ttl>
%soa<SP>serial:<SP><serial>
%soa<SP>refresh:<SP><refresh>
%soa<SP>increment:<SP><incremental>
%soa<SP>retry:<SP><retry>
%soa<SP>tech-contact:<SP><tech-contact>
%soa<SP>admin-contact:<SP><admin-contact>
%soa<SP>hostmaster:<SP><hostmaster>
%soa<SP>primary:<SP><primary>
<authority area>{%s} The authority name of the SOA. (Example:
internic.net or 198.41.0.0/24)
<ttl>{%d} The time to live for data within this
authority area that another server may cache.
The server caching the data should consider
the data expired after storage for the number
of seconds identified by this attribute.
<serial>{%Mserial} Serial number of the data contained in the
authority area. The serial number must be
incremented every time data in the authority
area has changed. It must be numeric.
<refresh>{%d} The time to completely remove cached data and
transfer all data from the primary server.
<increment>{%d} The time to wait before checking for
incremental updates from a primary server.
<retry>{%d} The time to wait before retrying connection
to a server that appears to be out-of-service.
<tech-contact>{%Memail} E-mail address of the person or role
account responsible for the operation of
the server.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 27]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
<admin-contact>{%Memail} E-mail address of the person or role
account responsible for the data
contained on the server.
<hostmaster>{%Memail} E-mail address to which changes of the
server's data should be sent. A data
edit tool can automatically send changes
to update the data on the server via e-mail.
<primary>{%Mperm} Primary server for authority area.
Example of use:
%soa authority: netsol.com
%soa ttl: 7200
%soa serial: 19940606203030
%soa refresh: 7200
%soa increment: 60
%soa retry: 1200
%soa tech-contact: markk@netsol.com
%soa admin-contact: stanb@netsol.com
%soa hostmaster: hostmaster@netsol.com
%soa primary: netman1.netsol.com:4343
%ok
3.4.4 status
The %status response returns the status of several important flags or
values. The response must contain the following elements.
Limit: Current limit set on the server. This value may
be changed using the -limit directive. This is
not the maximum limit of the server. This value
is not disclosed to prevent clients from
automatically setting the highest limit possible,
causing degradation in performance of the server.
Load: This is the current load of the host system.
Cache: Current status of the cache flag. (on or off)
Holdconnect: Current status of the holdconnect flag. (on or
off)
Forward: Current status of the forward flag. (on or off)
Authority records: Number of authority records in server's
database.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 28]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Cached records: Number of records in the server's cache
database.
Display: Indicates the types of display modes the
server is using.
Format for use:
%status<SP>limit:<SP><current limit>
%status<SP>load:<SP><current load>
%status<SP>cache:<SP><cache>
%status<SP>holdconnect:<SP><holdconnect>
%status<SP>forward:<SP><forward>
%status<SP>Authority:<SP><SOA number>
%status<SP>Cached:<SP><cached number>
%status<SP>Display<SP><mode>:<SP><type>
See above for the description of these values.
<current limit>{%d}
<current load>{%2.2f}
<cache>{on|off}
<holdconnect>{on|off}
<forward>{on|off}
<SOA number>{%d}
<cached number>{%d}
<mode>{single|multi}
<type>{%s}
Example of use:
%status limit: 1500
%status load: 1.23
%status cache: off
%status holdconnect: on
%status forward: off
%status Authority:25
%status Cached:200
%status display multi: summary
3.4.5 xfer
The %xfer response will send all instances of an object. This is in
response to the -xfer directive. The transfer may be limited by the
arguments to the directive. If there are no arguments, the server
must send all of the objects in the database. Cached data must not
be transferred using this method unless caching is turned on.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 29]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Each object instance is sent with a blank %xfer response between
instances.
Format for use:
%xfer<SP>[<object>:<attribute>:<value>]
These arguments are not required if the current response is an object
instance separator.
<object>{%s} This required argument represents the name of
the object being transferred.
<attribute>{%s} This required argument identifies the attribute
being sent.
<value>{%s} This required argument contains the value of the
attribute. If blank, the attribute value is
blank.
Example of use:
%xfer user:last-name:Kosters
%xfer user:first-name:Mark
%xfer user:organization-phone:703-555-1212
%xfer
%xfer user:last-name:Williamson
%xfer user:first-name:Scott
%xfer user:organization-phone:703-555-1212
%xfer
3.4.6 schema
The %schema response is used to describe the attributes of an object.
This is in response to the -schema directive.
Each attribute is sent with a blank %schema as a separator.
Format for use:
%schema<SP><object>:attribute:<attribute name>
%schema<SP><object>:format:<format string>
%schema<SP><object>:description:<descriptive string>
%schema<SP><object>:indexed:<indexed>
%schema<SP><object>:required:<required>
%schema<SP><object>:multi-line:<multi-line>
%schema<SP><object>:type:<type>
%schema<SP><object>:primary:<primary>
Williamson & Kosters [Page 30]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
%schema
These arguments are not required if the current response is an
attribute separator.
<attribute name>{%s} This required argument identifies the
name of the attribute being described.
<format string>{%s} This required argument describes the
allowed format for the attribute.
<descriptive string>{%s} This required argument describes the
attribute's use.
<indexed>{on|off} This required argument identifies
attributes that are indexed.
<required>{on|off} This required argument identifies
attributes that are required.
<multi-line>{on|off} This required argument indicates whether
the attribute can span multiple lines.
<type>{text|MIME|see-also|PostScript}
This required argument identifies the
type of the attribute.
<unique-key>{on|off} This required argument indicates whether
the attribute is a unique key.
Example of use:
%schema user:attribute:Object-Type
%schema user:description:Name of the object
%schema
%schema user:attribute:Email
%schema user:format:[%Memail]
%schema user:description:RFC-822 compliant Email address
%schema
%schema user:attribute:Organization-Phone
%schema user:format:[%3d[0-999]-%3d[0-999]-%4d[0-9999]]
%schema user:description:Work phone number
%schema
Williamson & Kosters [Page 31]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
3.4.7 define
The %define response describes format macros to the client. All
format macros used in the schema format definition string must be
available to the client through the -define directive. Format macros
may be nested. It is the client's responsibility to request all
format strings that are unrecognized from a server. If the format
strings change on a server, the serial number of the schemas that use
the format must change.
Format for use:
%define<SP><macro name>:<[format string]>
[NOTE: The brackets around the format string are required to ensure
that spaces contained in the format string are interpreted correctly
by the client.]
Example of use:
%format server:[%s:%16Bd]
%format email:[%s@%s]
3.4.8 object
All visible objects on an RWhois server must be identified in
response to a -object directive. The %object response either
confirms the existence of an object or returns a complete list of all
objects available to the currently connected user.
A blank %object line serves as an object separator.
Format for use:
%object
%object<SP><object name>:description:<object description>
%object<SP><object name>:restrict:<restriction words>
<object name>{%s} This required argument is the name of
the object.
<object description>{%s} This required argument is a description
of the object identified.
<restriction words>{%s} This required argument is a list of
words used to restrict a search to this
object.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 32]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Example of use:
%object user:description:user records for entity POC
%object user:restrict:user
%object user:restrict:person
%object user:restrict:mailbox
3.4.9 directive
The %directive response is used to display directives allowed on the
connected server. The directive name, description and syntax
attributes must be sent for each directive. If information about a
single directive is requested then only information about that
directive must be returned.
A %directive response with no arguments must be sent between
directives.
Format for use:
%directive<SP>directive:<directive>
%directive<SP>description:<description>
%directive<SP>syntax:<format>
%directive
The arguments below are required except when separating directives.
<directive>{%s} This required argument indicates the name of
the directive.
<description>{%s} This required argument describes the
directive.
<format>{%s} This required argument defines the format of
the directive.
Example of use:
%directive directive:schema
%directive description:displays schema attributes
%directive syntax:schema<SP>[%s]
%directive
%directive directive:xfer
%directive description:transfer all object[authority area]
%directive syntax:xfer<SP>[%s]<SP>[%s]
Williamson & Kosters [Page 33]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
3.4.10 info
The %info response is used to give the user of the client a message.
This response is not initiated by any directive. The information
between the %info on and the %info off should be presented to the
user of the client. An ideal use of this response is to present a
Message of The Day (MOTD) to the user.
Format for use:
%info<SP><mode>
<mode>{on|off}
on: Turns the passthru mode on.
off: Turns the passthru mode off.
Example of use:
%info on
As of 3/24/1994 at 9:00 EST this server will no longer be in
service. If you have this server in your configuration file we
recommend that you change it to rs.internic.net:4343. You will
automatically be redirected there following this message.
%info off
3.4.11 display
The %display response is used to inform the client that the data
following this response is using the indicated method. The method
selected will continue to be active until a %display response is sent
without any arguments. The server must send an error message to
clients that have been identified as non-RWhois clients. This
response allows the use of display methods such as MIME [RFC 1521] or
other special character sets such as those used in the Japanese
language.
Format for use:
%display<SP>extended:<extended>
%display<SP>name:<name>
%display<SP>length:<length>
%display<SP>description:<description>
%display<SP>command-line-option:<mode>
<extended> This optional argument identifies if the display
method is extended, i.e., RWhois specific.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 34]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Example of use:
%display extended:mime
MIME-Version:1.0
Content-type: image/gif
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
...data...
%display
3.4.12 X-
The %X- response represents extended responses. The client must have
prior knowledge of this response.
Format for use:
%X-<response><SP>[arguments]
<response>{%s} This required argument contains the response name.
Example of use:
%X-extstatus numusers:500
%X-extstatus avalslots:200
[NOTE: The above examples are not implemented in the current
RWhois prototype software. They are only examples of the %X-
response to a -X- directive. X6X error codes are used when
problems are encountered in relation to the -X- directives
contained on the server. Details can be found in Section 5.]
3.4.13 language
The %language response is used to inform the client that the data
following this response will be sent in the indicated language. The
language selected will continue to be active until a %language
response is sent without any arguments, at which time the server will
revert back to English, the default. The server must send an error
message to clients that have been identified as non-RWhois clients.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 35]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
Format for use:
%language:<SP><language>
Example of use:
%language: german
RWhois Deutsche Version: 1.0
%language
3.5 Query Reduction
The critical component of the RWhois server is the ability to reduce
the query to find a server that is closer to the data. The search
algorithm of the server is the following:
1) accept a query
2) find any local matches - display them
3) find any referrals - display them
4) if no local or referral hits, reduce the query and goto step 3
Here is an example of the query ietf.cnri.reston.va.us:
1) query whois for ietf.cnri.reston.va.us
2) search rs.internic.net for information (no hits).
3) search referrals for ietf.cnri.reston.va.us (no hits).
4) search referrals for cnri.reston.va.us (no hits).
5) search referrals for reston.va.us (no hits).
6) search referrals for va.us (no hits).
7) search referrals for us (referral found) - referral to
isi.edu.
[currently on rs.internic.net:4343 for proof of concept].
3.6 Determining Authority
Authority areas are a major part of the RWhois protocol. If an
authoritative response is required, turning the cache off is the
first step. The client can also determine if the server connected
has authority over the name/number space of interest by sending the
-soa <authority area> directive. If the server has authority for the
area requested, it must return important information about the
authority area. The exchange below is a client determining if the
server is an authority for abc.net or no.net.
S wait for connection
C connect to rs.internic.net port 4343
S %RWhois V-1.0 rs.internic.net (Network Solutions, Inc. V-1.0)
Williamson & Kosters [Page 36]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
C -RWhois V-1.0 (Network Solutions, Inc. V-1.0)
S %ok
C -cache off
S %ok
C -soa abc.net
S %error<SP>333<SP>Not SOA for requested authority area
S %ok
C -soa no.net
S %soa authority: no.net
S %soa ttl: 7500
S %soa serial: 45
S %soa refresh: 3600
S %soa retry: 3600
S %soa tech-contact: markk@no.net
S %soa admin-contact: stanb@no.net
S %soa hostmaster: hostmaster@no.net
S %ok
3.7 Secondary Server Interaction
A server that operates as a secondary will report an authoritative
SOA for the authority area of the data it contains. Below is the
interaction between the primary and secondary server. In reality the
secondary operation would be performed using a client specifically
designed for this purpose.
S wait for connection
C connect to slam.internic.net port 4343
S %RWhois V-1.0 slam.internic.net (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
C -RWhois V-1.0 (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
S %ok
C -soa internic.net
S %soa authority: internic.net
S %soa ttl: 7500
S %soa serial: 45
S %soa refresh: 3600
S %soa retry: 3600
S %soa tech-contact: markk@internic.net
S %soa admin-contact: stanb@internic.net
S %soa hostmaster: hostmaster@rs.internic.net
S %ok
C -xfer domain internic.net
S ... all data for domain object in the internic.net authority
area transferred
S%ok
C -notify inssec netman1.netsol.com:4343:domain:internic.net
S %ok
C -quit
Williamson & Kosters [Page 37]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
S close connection
C close connection
3.8 Registration Process
The following is the interaction that occurs when a server accepts a
registration from a client.
S wait for connection
C connect to slam.internic.net port 4343
S %RWhois V-1.0 slam.internic.net (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
C -RWhois V-1.0 (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
S %ok
C -soa internic.net
S %soa authority: internic.net
S %soa ttl: 7500
S %soa serial: 45
S %soa refresh: 3600
S %soa retry: 3600
S %soa tech-contact: markk@internic.net
S %soa admin-contact: stanb@internic.net
S %soa hostmaster: hostmaster@rs.internic.net
S %ok
C -private auth password 98uuuts
S %ok
C -register on add scottw@netsol.com 98uuuts
S %ok
C ... send all attributes for object to register
S %error 120 Registration not processed... will process hours:24
C %quit
3.9 Out-of-Service
Servers that are being taken out of service should automatically
refer the client back into the tree. Of course, this is not possible
if the system which hosts the server is out of service. In this
case, the client's robustness must be relied upon to return to the
referrer and notify that server that the referral was bad. If the
system will still be available on the Internet, the following
exchange is recommended:
S wait for connection
C connect to slam.internic.net port 3636
S %RWhois V-1.0 slam.internic.net (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
C -RWhois V-1.0 (Network Solutions Inc. V-1.0)
S %info on
S This server will no longer be in service. You should
S change your configuration file to reflect the new root
Williamson & Kosters [Page 38]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
S server at rs.internic.net:4343. You will automatically be
S referred to the new root.
S %error 200 Service not available referral to follow
S %referral rs.internic.net:4343
S close connection
C close connection
4. Interaction: Client Directives and Acceptable Server Responses
This section describes the responses to the various client
directives.
4.1 General
The responses below are general responses that can occur as a result
of any directive. Therefore, they will not be repeated under each
directive.
%ok
%error<SP>400<SP>Invalid Server Directive
%error<SP>100<SP>Get Peer Name query failed
%error<SP>500<SP>Memory Allocation Problem
%error<SP>401<SP>Not authorized for directive
%error<SP>402<SP>Unidentified error... continue
%error<SP>502<SP>Unrecoverable error... goodbye
%error<SP>503<SP>Idle time exceeded... goodbye
4.2 On Connection
These responses will only occur following successful connection to
the server's host and start-up of the application:
%RWhois
%error<SP>501<SP>Service not available
%referral
%error<SP>503<SP>Idle time exceeded... goodbye
4.3 <QUERY>
These responses may occur following a query:
<answer>
%referral
%see-also
%error<SP>334<SP>Pre-query directive not implemented
%error<SP>230<SP>No Records Found
%error<SP>130<SP>Not authority for answer... TTL good
%error<SP>231<SP>Not authority for answer... TTL expired
Williamson & Kosters [Page 39]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
4.4 -RWhois
%error<SP>300<SP>Not compatible with that version number
4.5 -load
%load
%error<SP>335<SP>System's load not available
4.6 -limit<SP>< value >
%limit
%error<SP>330<SP>Exceeded Max Records Limit
%error<SP>331<SP>Invalid Max Records Size
4.7 -schema<SP>[object]
%schema
%error<SP>337<SP>Object's schema not found
4.8 -xfer<SP>[object]
%xfer
%error<SP>332<SP>Nothing to transfer
%error<SP>337<SP>Object's schema not found
4.9 -quit
%ok
4.10 -cache<SP><on/off>
%error<SP>232<SP>Cache disabled
4.11 -status
%status
4.12 -forward
%error<SP>431<SP>Not authorized to forward
%error<SP>433<SP>Bad reference on forward
4.13 -soa
%soa
%error<SP>333<SP>Not SOA for requested authority area
Williamson & Kosters [Page 40]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
4.14 -notify
%error<SP>434<SP>Referral does not exist on this server
%error<SP>530<SP>Not authorized as secondary
4.15 -register
%error<SP>120<SP>Registration not processed... will process
hours:<hours>
%error<SP>320<SP>Invalid attribute line:<line number>
%error<SP>321<SP>Invalid format line:<line number>
%error<SP>322<SP>Required attribute missing name:<attribute
name>
%error<SP>323<SP>Required related object missing name:<object
name>
%error<SP>324<SP>Primary key not unique
%error<SP>420<SP>Registration not authorized
%error<SP>421<SP>Not authorized to change object:<object
name><SP>key:<key>
4.16 -holdconnect
4.17 -object
%object
%error<SP>336<SP>Object not defined
4.18 -define
%define
%error<SP>435<SP>Macro not defined
4.19 -X-
%X-
%error<SP>460<SP>Extended directive not recognized
%error<SP>461<SP>Extended directive not authorized
4.20 -display
%display
%display<SP>436<SP>Display mode not allowed
4.21 -language
%language<SP>437<SP>Language not supported
Williamson & Kosters [Page 41]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
5. Error Codes
The error code immediately follows the %error response from the
RWhois server. The definitions of the error codes are below. The
error codes are descriptive so that the client can group the error
messages in order to determine group action that must be taken before
taking error specific action. Error codes should remain consistent
without variable extensions except for messages associated with the
registration process. If a client receives a `6' in the second
position of the error code and the client does not support the
extended code received, the client must act on the first position
code. (Example: If a client received %error 561 and the client did
not support the extended error codes for the server currently
connected, the client would exit based on the `5' in the first
position of the error code.)
X00
1 - information only, no action required
2 - information, action required
3 - Specific command error, retry that command or try
another directive
4 - Serious for current directive, may correct with another
directive
5 - Fatal, must disconnect
0X0
0(1) - System wide, no specific directive
2 - Registration error
3(4,5) - Specific directive
6 - Extended message (version specific)
00X
Sequential order
5.1 Error Code List
Below is an ordered list of RWhois error codes. These codes may be
extended with implementation specific codes. These extended codes
will have a `6' in the second position of the code.
100 Get Peer Name query failed
120 Registration not processed... will process hours:<hours>
130 Not authority for answer... TTL good
200 Service not available... Referral to follow
230 No Records Found
Williamson & Kosters [Page 42]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
231 Not authority for answer... TTL expired
232 Cache disabled
300 Not compatible with that version number
320 Invalid attribute line:<line number>
321 Invalid format line:<line number>
322 Required attribute missing name:<attribute name>
323 Required related object missing name:<object name>
324 Primary key not unique
330 Exceeded Max Records Limit
331 Invalid Max Records Size
332 Nothing to transfer
333 Not SOA for requested authority area
334 Pre-query directive not implemented
335 System's load not available
336 Object not defined
337 Object's schema not found
400 Invalid Server Directive
401 Not authorized for directive
402 Unidentified error... continue
420 Registration not authorized
421 Not authorized to change object:<object name><SP>key:<key>
431 Not authorized to forward
432 Not authorized to transfer
433 Bad reference on forward
434 Referral does not exist on this server
435 Macro not defined
436 Display mode not allowed
437 Language not supported
460 Extended directive not recognized
461 Extended directive not authorized
500 Memory Allocation Problem
501 Service not available
502 Unrecoverable error... goodbye
503 Idle time exceeded... goodbye
530 Not authorized as secondary
6. Attribute Format
The format for all attributes for objects in the RWhois server must
be specified using a format specifier. This definition will allow
the client software to interpret the received data correctly. The
RWhois format specifier closely follows the `C' language scanf syntax
with macro extensions.
Format specifiers must follow this pattern:
Williamson & Kosters [Page 43]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
%[alignment][length restriction]<type>[range restriction]
[alignment] '-' = left justified
'.' = right justified
[length restriction] <value> = number of bytes allowed
<value>B = number of bits allowed
<type> This is the only required part of the format specifier.
Below are the allowed format type values. The length
of these values are not specified. These restrictions
will be on the left of the [length restriction].
%c Character
%s String
%d Integer
%x Hex Integer
%o Octal Integer
%f Float
%e Scientific
%M defined macro
[range restriction] The range restriction will limit the allowed
values. This may specify a number,
character, or string range.
Examples: %-3s["ON","OFF"] = Defines a string with 3 characters
left aligned and limited to the
strings ON or OFF.
%16Bd[0-50] = 16 bit integer between 0 and 50
%4.2f[0-2500.50] = Defines a floating point number
limited to 4 digits before and 2
after the decimal with a value
between 0 and 2500.50.
6.1 Format Specification Macros
Format specifications may be presented as macros. Format
specification macros may be defined using the following format.
%M<macro name>=<format string or earlier macro>
The following macros are pre-defined in this RWhois specification:
Month/Day/Year formats:
%MM=[%-2d[0-12]]
%MD=[%-2d[0-31]]
Williamson & Kosters [Page 44]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
%MY2=[%-2d[0-99]]
%MY4=[%-4d[0-9999]]
%MMs=[%-3s\
["JAN","FEB","MAR","APR","MAY","JUN","JUL","AUG","SEP",\
"OCT","NOV","DEC"]]
Date formats:
%Mdate1=[%MM/%MD/%MY2]
%Mdate2=[%MM/%MD/%MY4]
%Mdate3=[%MD-%MMs-%MY2]
%Mdate4=[%MD-%MMs-%MY4]
%Mdate5=[%MY4%MM%MD]
Hour/Minute/Second formats:
%MTH=[%-2d[0-24]]
%MTM=[%-2d[0-59]]
%MTS=[%-2d[0-59]]
Time formats:
%Mtime1=[%MTH:%MTM:%MTS]
%Mtime2=[%MTH%MTM%MTS]
Miscellaneous formats:
%Mserver=[%s:%16Bd]
%Mipnumber=[%8Bd.%8Bd.%8Bd.%8Bd]
%Memail=[%s@%s]
%Mserial=[%Mdate5%Mtime2]
%Mstype=[RWHOIS/WHOIS/WHOIS++/OTHER]
%Murl=[%s://%s]
Macro definitions may be obtained by sending the -define directive to
the server. For client efficiency, definitions can be remembered.
If the definition of a macro changes, the serial number of all
schemas using that macro must change, allowing the client to
reacquire the schema and format specifier macros.
7. Quick Query (RWhois using UDP)
The overhead incurred by establishing a TCP connection and
interacting with an RWhois server may be unnecessary if the client
only wishes to ask one question. A separate document will describe
the UDP facility for RWhois. Adjustments to the query must be made
to make this a practical option. The only function allowed while
utilizing UDP is a single query.
Williamson & Kosters [Page 45]
RFC 1714 Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois) November 1994
8. References
[RFC-954] Harrenstien, K., Stahl, M., and E Feinler, "NICNAME/
WHOIS", RFC 954, SRI, October 1985.
[RFC-1521] Borenstein, N., and N. Freed, "MIME (Multipurpose
Internet Mail Extensions) Part One: Mechanisms for
Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet
Message Bodies", RFC 1521, Bellcore, Innosoft,
September 1993.
9. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
10. Authors' Addresses
Scott Williamson
505 Huntmar Park Dr.
Herndon, VA 22070
Phone: (703) 742-4820
EMail: scottw@internic.net
Mark Kosters
505 Huntmar Park Dr.
Herndon, VA 22070
Phone: (703) 742-4795
EMail: markk@internic.net
Williamson & Kosters [Page 46]