💾 Archived View for lists.flounder.online › gemini › threads › YXrp891IDIOQza2J@zee.gmi captured on 2022-04-28 at 19:20:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide

Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide

From: pjvm742@disroot.org

Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:20:35 +0000

Message-Id: YXrp891IDIOQza2J@zee

To: "Sean Conner" <sean@conman.org>

In-Reply-To: 20211020233923.GO26182@brevard.conman.org

Cc: "Gemini ML" <gemini@lists.orbitalfox.eu>

Reply

Export

--------------------------------------

Hello Sean,

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:39:23PM -0400, Sean Conner wrote:

Back on April 17th of this year, I wrote the following to solderpunk:
> [...] As far as I'm concerned, I don't have it in me to work further
> on Gemini - there are too many people with too many divergent
> opinions on how it should all work. [...]

This is sad to hear. I suspect I'm one of the people who was making it

difficult for you... I regret being so fierce about the Gitlab thing,

and I also would like to apologise for my contribution to the awful

length of the Gitlab discussion about status code 11. I can easily see

how such, um, enthusiasm coming from many people can quickly become

too much.

Anyway, I too would like to thank you for the finalisation work that you

did for as long as you did it, and also for your significant earlier

contributions to the protocol and the gemtext format.

Not ONE person here who had showed interest in finalizing the spec
bothered to reach out and say, "What's up with the spec?" or "Are you still
working on the spec?" or even "Hey! Haven't heard from you for some time."
Nothing.

I kind of assumed it was similar with you as with Solderpunk, a break of

undefined length rather than a permanent one. Finalising the spec was

never an urgent thing, so I just waited. Also, iirc you made many

provisionary decisions in one go, which made it seem plausible (to me at

least) that the final decisions would also come in a batch.

I like that it now seems the spec is moving towards finalisation. I

will probably disagree with quite a few of Solderpunk's decisions, but

ultimately it's about minor details, and (if there's anything the Gitlab

issue tracker has demonstrated) for many of them there is something to

be said for both sides; for the controversial ones, I expect

Solderpunk's rationale will be enough for most people to accept it.

--

pjvm