💾 Archived View for gemini.spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › internet › FAQ › faq-drug.txt captured on 2022-03-01 at 15:47:07.
View Raw
More Information
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The alt.drugs Weekly Posting List
and
F R E Q E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S
by lamontg@milton.u.washington.edu
(Please Read this at least once before posting to alt.drugs)
From: alt.drugs
Subject: 00-Introduction to alt.drugs and the Monthly List
Last Update: 1-18-91
Welcome to alt.drugs. This is a forum for the discussion generally
of recreational drugs. To a large extent the traffic on this group deals
with both currently legal and illegal recreational drugs. Discussions
commonly are concerned with both the psychological and chemical effects of
drugs, along with the social aspects of drug use. Discussions about
prescription medications would probably be best posted to sci.med.
Likewise, discussions about legal psychoactive drugs (nootropic drugs,
amino acids, etc) might better be posted in alt.psychoactives.
talk.politics.drugs is yet another related newsgroup which is for the
discussion of the political and legal ramifications of recreational drug
use. Generally, however, people on alt.drugs aren't too tense if you post
something which really should belong in another newsgroup. In particular,
cross-posting between alt.drugs and talk.politics.drugs is fairly common.
The discussion about illegal drug use is frequently very
controversial. One item should be immediately cleared up: It is *NOT* a
commonly espoused theme that irresponsible illegal drug use should be
- ENCOURAGED*, and the purpose of this list is not to encourage
irresponsible illegal (or legal) drug use. The majority of people who
read alt.drugs, however, do generally condone legal or illegal drug use
provided it is done *RESPONSIBLY* and that means knowledgably.
Part of the purpose of this list is to provide accurate information
about drugs. In particular there are many myths about legal and illegal
drug use, and there is quite a large amount of disinformation also. For
the most part I have tried to insure that this list contains accurate
information. If you think something is in error, please e-mail me. This
list is not, however, meant to be all-encompassing (that would make for an
incredibly large list and I don't have *THAT* much free time). There are
also FAQ lists on the following topics, all of which are available at
several FTP sites (Directions for uucp users to acquire copies of the FAQs
are included in the FTP list).
FAQ-Bibliography : Extensive references to books and articles about drugs
FAQ-Ecstasy : Information about Ecstasy (aka MDMA, MDM, Adam)
FAQ-Everclear : The Everclear list from rec.food.drink
FAQ-LSD : Information about LSD
FAQ-Misc : YOU'RE READING IT!
FAQ-MJ-Consumption : Information on methods of social marijuana consumption
FAQ-Natural-High : Info on legal means of altering your consciousness
THE IMPORTANT BIT: Frequently Asked Questions
Also, this list was created with another purpose in mind. alt.drugs
tends to get bogged down in traffic that is continuously repeated. In
particular threads on the FTP sites, how to beat drug testing, and the
infamous LSD and strychnine thread have been hashed and rehashed :) more
times than many people can remember. Before posting something to the net,
net.etiquette requires you to read this list first. If you don't find an
answer in here, and you cannot find an answer in any of the single-topic
FAQs listed above then a posting to alt.drugs is welcomed.
The following topics are covered in *THIS* FAQ:
Introduction : YOU'RE READING IT!
FTP sites, etc : Information on alt.drugs related net issues like FTP sites
Common FAQs : Short and blunt answers to most FAQs (Please READ THIS!)
Drug Myths : Common misconceptions about drugs (READ THIS TOO!)
Drug Testing : A quick section on how to beat drug tests
Organizations : A list of Anti-War on Drugs organizations
If you are reading this list with rn, then it is laid out in such a way so
that you can easily skip to the next subject by hitting a ^G (<control>-G).
If you're using nn, then you can hit "G%" to break this article up into a
digest.
==============================================================================
From: alt.drugs
Subject: FTP sites, anonymous posting, and other network issues.
Last Updated: 2-7-91
The following is list of Internet sites which have FTP access to files related
to alt.drugs. To use them login via FTP as 'anonymous':
site [internet address] (contact person)
/directory: description
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
life.slhs.udel.edu [128.175.4.33] (tom@genie.slhs.udel.edu)
/alt.drugs: alt.drugs FAQs, selected alt.drugs articles, .gifs
jyu.fi [130.234.0.1] (eloranta@jyu.fi)
/pub/alt.drugs: archived articles since 25 Apr 91, FAQs, .gifs
--==>this is the main archive site for *ALL* alt.drugs postings<==--
lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.36]
/news/alt/drugs: last several days article for those without USENET access
rusmv1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.1.12]
/soft/kommunikation/news/spool/alt/drugs: same as lcs.mit.edu
milton.u.washington.edu [128.95.136.1] (lamontg@milton.u.washington.edu)
/public/alt.drugs: misc alt.drugs related material, FAQs
pit-manager.mit.edu [18.72.1.58]
/pub/activism: has constitution of US, Bill of Rights, etc
ftp.eff.org [192.88.144.3]
/pub/academic/civics: Government addresses, constitution, Senate fax#, etc
(send updates to lamontg@milton.u.washington.edu or post)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't have access to FTP because you are on a uucp/Fidonet/etc network
there is an e-mail gateway at ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com that can retrieve the files
for you. To get instrutions on how to use the FTP gateway send a blank message
to ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com with one line containing the work 'help'.
This is a sample message of how to retrieve some files from the alt.drugs
archives at milton:
% mail ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: <ignored>
reply <yourname>@<yoursite>
connect milton.u.washington.edu anonymous
dir /public/alt.drugs
get /public/alt.drugs/000-readme
get /public/alt.drugs/000-index
uuencode /* note: this command is optional and the default is btoa */
binary
get /public/alt.drugs/marijuana-myths.Z
quit
That would retrieve a directory of the archive, then the two printable
ascii files 000-readme and 000-index. To recieve the rest of the files
you must set the server to "binary" mode because all the files are
compressed. Those compressed files are then either sent out uuencoded or
btoa'd. So, you must obtain copies of the programs 'uudecode' (or 'atob') and
'uncompress' to unpack the files that you will recieve.
->Ask your local computer guru for clarification on how to do this<-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a list of persons on alt.drugs that will post articles
submitted to them via e-mail anonymously. In other words if you would like
to remain anonymous, write up your article, and e-mail it to one of these
people prefaced with a note that you would like it posted anonymously:
[note: the @layout.berkeley.edu addresses are so that you can e-mail the
person, and not reveal your address even to them!]
lamontg@milton.u.washington.edu (anonymous: ap.4497@layout.berkeley.edu)
mikea@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
zane@ddsw1.mcs.com (anonymous: ap.3684@layout.berkeley.edu)
tms@flubber.cs.umd.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't have net.access to alt.drugs, check out the pharm mailing
list. From the canonical list of publicly accessable mailing lists on
news.lists:
}pharm
} Contact: pharm-request@udel.edu
}
} Purpose: a mailing list digest version of "alt.drugs" restricted
} to postings without repetitive political arguments or flames.
} Political articles of particularly novel value and reports of
} policy developments will be included.
}
} Under no circumstances will any message be passed along that may
} be construed to be a solicitation to engage in any form of illegal
} behavior.
Also, you can post to alt.drugs by sending e-mail to:
alt-drugs@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
===============================================================================
From: alt.drugs
Subject: Common Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and answers
Last Updated: 2-7-91
1) HEY D00DZ, WHERE CAN I GET SOME KILLER WEED (or LSD, MDMA, etc)?!?!?
2) Do banana peels have hallucinogenic substances in them? [etc...]
3) Does LSD commonly have strychnine in it? [etc...]
4) How can I make LSD? [inc. warnings about The Anarchist Cookbook]
5) What is Ecstasy/MDMA/Adam? [and all kinds of related info on MDMA]
6) What does the acronym PDFA, DPA, etc mean?
You can skip to a specific FAQ by searching for the regular expression '^x'
where x is the number of the question you want to read.
1) HEY D00DZ, WHERE CAN I GET SOME KILLER WEED (or LSD, MDMA, etc)?!?!?
Grow up, and get a life. Anyone stupid enough to setup a
transaction over a public network (that could very easily be monitored
by the FBI) deserves to get caught. Likewise, please don't send e-mail
to the frequent posters (especially me), asking to purchase drugs.
2) Do banana peels have hallucinogenic substances in them? Can you get
high by smoking banana peels?
No. This is an urban legend which was started by the Berkeley
_Barb_ in the late 60's. Sidney Cohen analyzed bananas and found that
they contained no hallucinogenic substances. Also, rumors that you can
smoke peanut shells to get high, are most likely a spin-off of the
banana peel legend. Instructions in The Anarchist Cookbook on how to
get high from banana peels are bogus (and if you do get some effect,
then congratulations, you're a placebo responder).
3) Does LSD commonly have strychnine in it? It strychnine the cause of
cramps/nausea on an LSD trip? Does strychnine cause the "tracers"
from an LSD trip? etc...
Your chances of getting strychnine contaminated _blotter_ LSD,
are probably about the same as your chances of getting hit by a piece
of the wing sheared off of a passing 747. Strychnine is not the
cause of tracers, cramps, nausea, or amphetamine-like LSD-effects.
Strychnine is not needed to bond the LSD to blotter paper. Pure
LSD tartrate/maleate gets absorbed on blotter quite efficiently all by
itself. Any chemist competent enough to manufacture LSD would know
that Strychnine is not needed to produce LSD, therefore there is no
Strychnine "added" in the process of manufacture.
"Cutting" LSD with Strychnine would be utterly ludicrous due to
the expense of Strychnine, and the ease of "cutting" LSD with the
solvent of your choice, before depositing it on the paper. Its much
more likely that if someone is going to try and rip someone off, that
they'll just pass off blank blotter paper -- its *so* much easier than
trying to lace LSD with strychnine.
There have been several other theories to explain the existance
of Strychnine in LSD. They all, however, fall short in one very
critical test. There are no reports that can be found of Strychnine
poisoning due to the ingestion of laced LSD. If Strychnine was
on LSD, and given Strychnine's high toxicity, and given the number of
people who take rather insane (>100 hits) of LSD, there should be
acid-heads dropping like flies from strychnine poisoning. This has
not been reported, therefore the likelyhood of strychnine laced LSD
being sold on the illegal market is small.
And, finally, there have been analysis of street drugs samples
which have never turned up a sample of strychnine laced LSD. The
only reports are a few anecdotal ones, and the report in _LSD:
My Problem Child_. It should be noted that in _LSD:MPC_ the "LSD"
was being sold as a "white powder". The lesson is to only buy
blotter LSD -- its very, very hard to fit enough adulterants onto a
small square of blotter to effect a person. LSD can only be
distributed in this manner because its effective dose is in the
50-200 microgram range.
Its possible that poorly synthesized LSD might have other ergot
derivatives in it. This *MAY* be the cause of the various adverse
effects that people report on LSD. Its also entirely likely that
the adverse effects to LSD are simply due to the psychological
stress of taking LSD.
Also, advice would be to avoid methylxanthines (caffiene,
theophylline in chocolate, etc) prior to dosing. There may be a
synergistic effect between them and LSD causing, or contributing, to
the "strychnine effect". And prior use of dramamine may alleviate
the nausea sometimes associated with LSD.
4) How can I make LSD? And what about the instructions in The Anarchist
Cookbook for making LSD?
LSD is not easy to make. If you're seriously interested the
various methods of synthesis can be found in chemistry journals (see
the Merck Index for a list of references). Also, the book _Psychedelic
Chemistry_ (available from Loompanics, Unld. -- see end of FAQ list)
has some rather good, referenced info on how to synthesize LSD.
However, do expect to be in *way* over your head unless you've had
at least a few years of college chemistry.
Please don't post asking for "simple" instructions on how to make
LSD. There aren't. And if you *needed* "simple" instructions to make
LSD, you're probably not a good chemist and shouldn't be attempting
to synthesize it.
Also, the synthesis instructions in The Anarchist Cookbook are
about 90% bullshit. The "synthesis" given is at best a recipe for the
extraction of Lysergic Acid Amides (which is not LSD), and some have
commented that the instructions are still flawed and dangerous. Also,
the reproduction of the patent on how to make LSD has reported to be
flawed -- please don't trust the A.C and order the patent for yourself.
The A.C. in general is something which is best to avoid.
5) What is Ecstasy? What is MDMA? What is Adam? What are the
effects? Is it an aphrodisiac? Is it a designer drug? Does it
cause Parkinson's disease? And does it dry up your spinal fluid?
Ecstasy chemically is 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine or MDMA.
Its also known as: MDM, M&M, Adam, XTC, X, M or E. Its is *NOT* the
same as MDA, MDE ('Eve'), MMDA or MPTP (Although MDA, MDE and MMDA have
effects that are similar to MDMA). It is chemically similar to
methamphetamine but has a much different method of action.
In large doses Ecstasy can cause hallucinations (and a chemical
relative, MDA, causes hallucinations at lower doses), however it
is not accurate to call it a hallucinogen. Since it tends to increase
empathy and communication with no ego-disrupting effects, it has been
labeled as either an "entactogen" or "empathogen". Based on its
effects, there was some speculation that its was a chemical involved
in the process of falling in love. This is incorrect, but its
indicative of what the MDMA high feels like.
MDMA is not chemically related to LSD, and really cannot be
compared to LSD. "Bad Trips" on MDMA are extremely rare, and
there is no ego disruption associated with an MDMA trip like there
is in an LSD trip.
From Ralph Metzner, presented in an address at a 1983 conference
at the University of California, Santa Barbara on "Psychedelics
and Spirituality":
Another group of drugs are the phenethylamines, of which
MDA [and MDMA] is an example. Instead of calling these
"psychedelic drugs," I'd like to suggest the name "empathogenic."
Empathogenic means "empathy generating." Everyone I've mentioned
this name to thinks it is a good one. These drugs don't produce
visions as LSD does. They don't produce multileveled thinking
or objectivity toward your mind as LSD and the psychedelics do.
They generate a profound state of empathy for self and other in
the most general and profound terms. A state of empathy where the
feeling is that the self, the other, and the world is basically
good, is all right. This state can be referred to as the ground
of being, the core of our being, a still point of our being.
Then individuals using these substances in therapy can look
at their own problems from the standpoint of stillness and
empathy. They are able to do changework on themselves very
rapidly, compared to ordinary therapy.
MDMA also is not technically an aphrodisiac. It does not directly
stimulate sexual desire, however its empathogenic effect does tend to
lead to intimacy. It has been described as a "hug drug".
From Buffman-J, Moser-C, "MDMA and Human Sexual Function" Journal
of Psychoactive Drugs, Oct 1985:
It appears that MDMA does not increase sexual excitation
or sexual desire in a majority of individuals. For both males
and females, MDMA enhances the sensual aspects of sex. This may
be due to the increased feelings of emotional closeness.
Almost half of the males and a third of the females indicated
that they felt more receptive to being sexual while under the
influence of MDMA, but this effect was not paralleled by an
increased interest in initiating sexual activity in either the
men or the women. While a majority indicated that they would use
MDMA as a sexual enhancer, most of the subjects who had used MDMA
during sex reported increased emotional closeness. It is
curious that a drug, which can increase emotional closeness,
enhance receptivity to being sexual and would be chosen as a
sexual enhancer, does not increase the desire to have sex.
The subjects who were surveyed found that MDMA makes orgasm
more difficult to achieve, especially for males. Erectile
ability was decreased in almost half the males. No other
sexual effects occurred in a majority of subjects.
It is not a "Designer Drug" created during the 80's by underground
chemists. It was first synthesized in 1914, and was used
recreationally prior to the 1980's.
MDMA does *NOT* cause Parkinson's disease. This rumor was caused
by an error by Shari Roan in the July 2, 1985 issue of the Dallas
"Sun Sentinel". She incorrectly attributed this effect to MDMA, when
in fact it is caused by MPTP, which is a by-product of the incorrect
synthesis of an synthetic opiate. MPTP shares nothing in common with
MDMA other than having an chemical abbreviation which begins with an
'M' and has four letters in it.
Likewise, rumors that MDMA "dries up your spinal fluid" and
similar rumors with respect to spinal fluid are incorrect. There have
been studies which linked MDMA use to lower levels of 5-HIAA in
cerebrospinal fluid, which is probably where this rumor originated.
This is not as dramatic as it may sound and may be a spurious
relationship, such that people with lower levels of 5-HIAA in their
CSF are the ones more likely to use MDMA in the first place. But, it
may be an indication of some neurotoxic effect of MDMA. However, the
neurotoxic effect of MDMA disappears in laboratory animals at doses
equivalent to human dose levels. Also, there are no known behavioral
correlates to this hypothesized neurotoxicity, and an FDA-approved
drug (fenfluramine) continues to be used chronicly with no reported
adverse side effects, even though its causes similar types of
neurotoxicity as MDMA. It should also be noted that alcohol is a
drug which is also slightly neurotoxic, but that typically isn't
a strong consideration of users while consuming it. Users, however,
should be cautioned that MDMA may be neurotoxic and you're taking
your own risks by injesting it.
For more information on MDMA see the specific FAQ on Ecstasy
(available via FTP -- see above).
6. What does the acronym [....] stand for?
DARE: Drug Abuse Resistance Education (Gates' WoD group)
DPF: Drug Policy Foundation (anti-WoD group)
HBWR,HBWS: Hawaiian Baby Woodrose Seeds
IMHO: In My [Humble, Honest] Opinion
LAA: Lysergic Acid Amides
LSA: Lysergic Acid Amides
LSD: Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
MDA: 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine
MDMA: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine
N2O: Nitrous Oxide
NO2: Nitrogen Dioxide (which is *quite* poisonous)
NORML: National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws
PDFA,PTFA: Partnership for a [Drug, Truth]-Free America (anti-WoD)
WoD,WoSD: War on (Some) Drugs
WRT: With Respect To
===============================================================================
From: alt.drugs
Subject: Drug Myths
Last Updated: 12-30-91
These are all a variety of things which commonly get passed off as "truth" by
anti-drug groups, such as the PDFA, DEA, DARE, etc. I have included references
for those interested in more information.
MYTH: Marijuana causes brain damage or Marijuana gets between nerve
synapses and "widens them up".
This myth is based upon a study done by Robert G. Heath in the middle to
late 1970's. Heath claimed to have found brain damage in the deep brain
sites of three monkeys exposed to marijuana smoke and i.v. delta-9-THC (the
active ingredient in marijuana). This study, however, has severe flaws in
it. Most importantly is that Heath did not find any dead brain cells. He
found "damage" such as a change in synaptic cleft width, and clumping of the
synaptic vesicles. These changes are not well regarded as being indications
of brain damage, and the methods used to determine that these changes took
place were highly subject to bias--which Dr. Health did not control for.
In fact the clumping of the synaptic vesicles, which Health claimed as being
"brain damage", is a normal variant in the mammalian brain. Also, two studies
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1977, found
no evidence of brain damage in the brains of heavy smokers using computerized
tomography methods.
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.). Institute of Medicine. Division of
Health Sciences Policy. _Marijuana_and_Health_. Washington: National
Academy Press. ISBN 0-309-03236-9. LC 81-86534.
The following sections will be eventually included:
(Whee, more vaporware... In the meantime see Paul Hager's marijuana myths
paper at milton.u.washington.edu in /public/alt.drugs/marijuana-myths)
MYTH: Marijuana causes reproductive system damage
MYTH: Marijuana concentrates in the brain and reproductive organs
MYTH: Marijuana causes breast enlargement in males
MYTH: Marijuana causes immune system damage
MYTH: Marijuana causes chromosome damage
MYTH: Marijuana potency has increased 10 times since the 1960's
MYTH: Marijuana is a gateway drug
MYTH: Marijuana metabolites stay in your body for 30 days and "do things"...
MYTH: Marijuana is more carcinogenic than tobacco
MYTH: LSD causes chromosome damage
MYTH: Designer Drugs -- Custom made chemicals of the '80s and '90s
===============================================================================
From: alt.drugs
Subject: Drug Testing FAQ
Last Updated: 12-30-91
Beating Drug Metabolite tests (for informational purposes *only* of course).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are several commonly used drug metabolite tests: EMIT, RIA,
Abuscreen, etc. All of these tests are reasonably easy to beat, given a
little advance planning. First of all, the drug which is most easily
tested for is marijuana -- its claimed that drug tests can detect
marijuana use up to two months previous. By following the following
guidelines, its frequently reported that non-chronic marijuana smoking two
weeks prior to the test still resulted in a negative test result. Two
weeks, however, is probably the minimum safety allowance.
In order to prepare for a drug metabolite test, make sure that you
flush your system adequately. Every day prior to the test, drink at least
eight glasses of liquid (preferably water). Do *NOT*, however, do this
to excess -- you can end up with water intoxication, and people have
actually overdosed and died off of water. On the day of the test, you
likewise need to dilute your urine by drinking water -- drink 4-6 glasses
or so, and piss until your urine turns clear. When its clear that means
that the concentration of all the solutes in the urine is lower
- including* the drug metabolites. This process can be aided by taking some
caffiene, or the prescription diuretic Lasix (again, don't overdo anything
-- there is nothing to be gained by drinking more water/taking more
diuretics -- 80mg Lasix should be quite sufficient). The clear dilute
urine can also be masked by taking Vitamin B-2 which will color it and
make it less suspicious (use 50-100mg).
Should you fail the initial test you will most likely be required to
have a confirmatory GC/MS test. For this test, the best precautions are
abstinence and prayer. You should not smoke between the time you get
tested for the first time and the results come back -- if they're positive
and you have to take a GC/MS test, you will be screwed. GC/MS tests are
much more sensitive than the preliminary immunoassays.
There are several substances, some marketed commercially, which are
reported to interfere with the immunoassays to give a negative test
result. Generally, these are treated with some skepticism (but if you
really feel like trying them...). In particular, vinegar and
phenylpropanolamine (Dexatrim) do not work. Zinc Sulfate is reported to
work -- take 250mg the night before, and a few hours before the test -- DO
NOT TAKE ANY MORE OF THIS CHEMICAL. Also the following two products claim
to be effective screens:
Test Free -- Zydot Unlimited Inc.
Box 9485
Tulsa OK 74157
(918) 747-2400
Naturally Klean -- Houston Enterprises
PO Box 27776
Tempe AZ 85285
(602) 968-0773
As a last resort, piss tests can be doped with chemicals. Bleach
detergent, blood, Draino crystals are reported to work at least on the
EMIT test (I would not expect them to interfere at all on the GC/MS
tests). Its apparently not necessary to spike it with a large quantity,
and the chemicals will noticably effect the urine and could be detected.
For more information see Abbie Hoffman's book "Steal this Urine Test".
==============================================================================
From: alt.drugs
Subject: Information/Organizations
Last Updated: 1-18-91
This list is composed entirely out of postings from the net. I don't
guarantee anything about the organizations, their addresses or their
descriptions. However, these are all organizations that are typically
recommended on the net. Corrections or updates would be *MOST* appreciated.
Drug Policy Foundation
4801 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20016-2087
(202) 895-1634
Desc: The DPF supports legalization of cannabis and medicalization or
legalization of harder drugs. They are a more mainstream
organization than NORML.
The Albert Hofmann Foundation
1341 Ocean Avenue, Suite 300
Santa Monica, CA 90401
(213) 281-8110
Desc: Educational group building a library on research done on
consciousness, including LSD studies.
Free newsletter is available.
National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws (NORML)
1636 R St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 483-5500
Desc: This really shouldn't need any description
NOTE: Another address I've got is: 2001 'S' Street, NW Suite 640, DC 20009
National Drug Strategy Network
2000 L St., N.W., Suite 702
Washington, D.C. 20036
Desc: ???
Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics (ACT)
PO Box 21210
Kalorama Station
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 483-8595
Desc: Physicians who want broader ability to use cannabis therapeutically
Books-by-Phone
Box 522
Berkeley CA 94701
(800) 858-2665 USA (800) 992-2665 CA (415) 548-2124 INFO
Call for FREE Catalog
Desc: They Carry the following titles among others:
"The Controlled Substances Act" [Shulgin's reference on drugs & laws]
"Psychedelic Chemistry" [synthesis instructions - recommended]
"Ecstasy: The MDMA Story" [recommended]
"Mushroom Cultivator"
"Cocaine Handbook: An Essential Reference"
"Marijuana Botany: Cultivation and Breeding of Cannabis"
"Steal this Urine Test" by Abbie Hoffman
"Designer Drugs" [Ecstasy, crack, china white, PCP, etc]
"History of Psychoactive Plants"
"War on Drugs: Heroin, Cocaine, Crime and Public Policy"
"Through the Gateway of the Heart" [experiences with MDMA]
Loompanics Unlimited
P.O. Box 1197
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Desc: Booksellers. They stock "Psychedelic Chemistry" and "The Design and
Construction of Clandestine Drug Laboratories" among other somewhat
anarchistic books. $3 for a catalog.
The Twentieth Century Alchemist
P.O. Box 1684
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Desc: Booksellers. They stock "Basic Drug Manufacture", "The Book of Acid",
"The Art and Science of Cooking with Cannabis" and "Growing the
Hallucinogens" among others. $1 for a catalog.