💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › rfc › rfc2828.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Obsoleted by:
Keywords: information, system, ISD, internet, standard documents
Network Working Group R. Shirey
Request for Comments: 2828 GTE / BBN Technologies
FYI: 36 May 2000
Category: Informational
Internet Security Glossary
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This Glossary (191 pages of definitions and 13 pages of references)
provides abbreviations, explanations, and recommendations for use of
information system security terminology. The intent is to improve the
comprehensibility of writing that deals with Internet security,
particularly Internet Standards documents (ISDs). To avoid confusion,
ISDs should use the same term or definition whenever the same concept
is mentioned. To improve international understanding, ISDs should use
terms in their plainest, dictionary sense. ISDs should use terms
established in standards documents and other well-founded
publications and should avoid substituting private or newly made-up
terms. ISDs should avoid terms that are proprietary or otherwise
favor a particular vendor, or that create a bias toward a particular
security technology or mechanism versus other, competing techniques
that already exist or might be developed in the future.
Shirey Informational [Page 1]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Explanation of Paragraph Markings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Recommended Terms with an Internet Basis ("I") . . . . . . 4
2.2 Recommended Terms with a Non-Internet Basis ("N") . . . . 5
2.3 Other Definitions ("O") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4 Deprecated Terms, Definitions, and Uses ("D") . . . . . . 6
2.5 Commentary and Additional Guidance ("C") . . . . . . . . . 6
3. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
7. Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
8. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
1. Introduction
This Glossary provides an internally consistent, complementary set of
abbreviations, definitions, explanations, and recommendations for use
of terminology related to information system security. The intent of
this Glossary is to improve the comprehensibility of Internet
Standards documents (ISDs)--i.e., RFCs, Internet-Drafts, and other
material produced as part of the Internet Standards Process [R2026]--
and of all other Internet material, too. Some non-security terms are
included to make the Glossary self-contained, but more complete lists
of networking terms are available elsewhere [R1208, R1983].
Some glossaries (e.g., [Raym]) list terms that are not listed here
but could be applied to Internet security. However, those terms have
not been included in this Glossary because they are not appropriate
for ISDs.
This Glossary marks terms and definitions as being either endorsed or
deprecated for use in ISDs, but this Glossary is not an Internet
standard. The key words "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are intended to be interpreted the same way as in an
Internet Standard [R2119], but this guidance represents only the
recommendations of this author. However, this Glossary includes
reasons for the recommendations--particularly for the SHOULD NOTs--so
that readers can judge for themselves whether to follow the
recommendations.
Shirey Informational [Page 2]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
This Glossary supports the goals of the Internet Standards Process:
o Clear, Concise, and Easily Understood Documentation
This Glossary seeks to improve comprehensibility of security-
related content of ISDs. That requires wording to be clear and
understandable, and requires the set of security-related terms and
definitions to be consistent and self-supporting. Also, the
terminology needs to be uniform across all ISDs; i.e., the same
term or definition needs to be used whenever and wherever the same
concept is mentioned. Harmonization of existing ISDs need not be
done immediately, but it is desirable to correct and standardize
the terminology when new versions are issued in the normal course
of standards development and evolution.
o Technical Excellence
Just as Internet Standard (STD) protocols should operate
effectively, ISDs should use terminology accurately, precisely,
and unambiguously to enable Internet Standards to be implemented
correctly.
o Prior Implementation and Testing
Just as STD protocols require demonstrated experience and
stability before adoption, ISDs need to use well-established
language. Using terms in their plainest, dictionary sense (when
appropriate) helps to ensure international understanding. ISDs
need to avoid using private, made-up terms in place of generally-
accepted terms from standards and other publications. ISDs need to
avoid substituting new definitions that conflict with established
ones. ISDs need to avoid using "cute" synonyms (e.g., see: Green
Book); no matter how popular a nickname may be in one community,
it is likely to cause confusion in another.
o Openness, Fairness, and Timeliness
ISDs need to avoid terms that are proprietary or otherwise favor a
particular vendor, or that create a bias toward a particular
security technology or mechanism over other, competing techniques
that already exist or might be developed in the future. The set of
terminology used across the set of ISDs needs to be flexible and
adaptable as the state of Internet security art evolves.
Shirey Informational [Page 3]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
2. Explanation of Paragraph Markings
Section 3 marks terms and definitions as follows:
o Capitalization: Only terms that are proper nouns are capitalized.
o Paragraph Marking: Definitions and explanations are stated in
paragraphs that are marked as follows:
- "I" identifies a RECOMMENDED Internet definition.
- "N" identifies a RECOMMENDED non-Internet definition.
- "O" identifies a definition that is not recommended as the first
choice for Internet documents but is something that authors of
Internet documents need to know.
- "D" identifies a term or definition that SHOULD NOT be used in
Internet documents.
- "C" identifies commentary or additional usage guidance.
The rest of Section 2 further explains these five markings.
2.1 Recommended Terms with an Internet Basis ("I")
The paragraph marking "I" (as opposed to "O") indicates a definition
that SHOULD be the first choice for use in ISDs. Most terms and
definitions of this type MAY be used in ISDs; however, some "I"
definitions are accompanied by a "D" paragraph that recommends
against using the term. Also, some "I" definitions are preceded by an
indication of a contextual usage limitation (e.g., see:
certification), and ISDs should not the term and definition outside
that context
An "I" (as opposed to an "N") also indicates that the definition has
an Internet basis. That is, either the Internet Standards Process is
authoritative for the term, or the term is sufficiently generic that
this Glossary can freely state a definition without contradicting a
non-Internet authority (e.g., see: attack).
Many terms with "I" definitions are proper nouns (e.g., see:
Internet Protocol). For such terms, the "I" definition is intended
only to provide basic information; the authoritative definition is
found elsewhere.
For a proper noun identified as an "Internet protocol", please refer
to the current edition of "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD
1) for the standardization state and status of the protocol.
Shirey Informational [Page 4]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
2.2 Recommended Terms with a Non-Internet Basis ("N")
The paragraph marking "N" (as opposed to "O") indicates a definition
that SHOULD be the first choice for the term, if the term is used at
all in Internet documents. Terms and definitions of this type MAY be
used in Internet documents (e.g., see: X.509 public-key certificate).
However, an "N" (as opposed to an "I") also indicates a definition
that has a non-Internet basis or origin. Many such definitions are
preceded by an indication of a contextual usage limitation, and this
Glossary's endorsement does not apply outside that context. Also,
some contexts are rarely if ever expected to occur in a Internet
document (e.g., see: baggage). In those cases, the listing exists to
make Internet authors aware of the non-Internet usage so that they
can avoid conflicts with non-Internet documents.
Many terms with "N" definitions are proper nouns (e.g., see:
Computer Security Objects Register). For such terms, the "N"
definition is intended only to provide basic information; the
authoritative definition is found elsewhere.
2.3 Other Definitions ("O")
The paragraph marking "O" indicates a definition that has a non-
Internet basis, but indicates that the definition SHOULD NOT be used
in ISDs *except* in cases where the term is specifically identified
as non-Internet.
For example, an ISD might mention "BCA" (see: brand certification
authority) or "baggage" as an example to illustrate some concept; in
that case, the document should specifically say "SET(trademark) BCA"
or "SET(trademark) baggage" and include the definition of the term.
For some terms that have a definition published by a non-Internet
authority--government (see: object reuse), industry (see: Secure Data
Exchange), national (see: Data Encryption Standard), or international
(see: data confidentiality)--this Glossary marks the definition "N",
recommending its use in Internet documents. In other cases, the non-
Internet definition of a term is inadequate or inappropriate for
ISDs. For example, it may be narrow or outdated, or it may need
clarification by substituting more careful or more explanatory
wording using other terms that are defined in this Glossary. In those
cases, this Glossary marks the tern "O" and provides an "I"
definition (or sometimes a different "N" definition), which precedes
and supersedes the definition marked "O".
Shirey Informational [Page 5]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
In most of the cases where this Glossary provides a definition to
supersede one from a non-Internet standard, the substitute is
intended to subsume the meaning of the superseded "O" definition and
not conflict with it. For the term "security service", for example,
the "O" definition deals narrowly with only communication services
provided by layers in the OSI model and is inadequate for the full
range of ISD usage; the "I" definition can be used in more situations
and for more kinds of service. However, the "O" definition is also
provided here so that ISD authors will be aware of the context in
which the term is used more narrowly.
When making substitutions, this Glossary attempts to use
understandable English that does not contradict any non-Internet
authority. Still, terminology differs between the standards of the
American Bar Association, OSI, SET, the U.S. Department of Defense,
and other authorities, and this Glossary probably is not exactly
aligned with all of them.
2.4 Deprecated Terms, Definitions, and Uses ("D")
If this Glossary recommends that a term or definition SHOULD NOT be
used in ISDs, then either the definition has the paragraph marking
"D", or the restriction is stated in a "D" paragraph that immediately
follows the term or definition.
2.5 Commentary and Additional Guidance ("C")
The paragraph marking "C" identifies text that is advisory or
tutorial. This text MAY be reused in other Internet documents. This
text is not intended to be authoritative, but is provided to clarify
the definitions and to enhance this Glossary so that Internet
security novices can use it as a tutorial.
3. Definitions
Note: Each acronym or other abbreviation (except items of common
English usage, such as "e.g.", "etc.", "i.e.", "vol.", "pp.", "U.S.")
that is used in this Glossary, either in a definition or as a subpart
of a defined term, is also defined in this Glossary.
$ 3DES
See: triple DES.
$ *-property
(N) (Pronounced "star property".) See: "confinement property"
under Bell-LaPadula Model.
Shirey Informational [Page 6]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ ABA Guidelines
(N) "American Bar Association (ABA) Digital Signature Guidelines"
[ABA], a framework of legal principles for using digital
signatures and digital certificates in electronic commerce.
$ Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)
(N) A standard for describing data objects. [X680]
(C) OSI standards use ASN.1 to specify data formats for protocols.
OSI defines functionality in layers. Information objects at higher
layers are abstractly defined to be implemented with objects at
lower layers. A higher layer may define transfers of abstract
objects between computers, and a lower layer may define transfers
concretely as strings of bits. Syntax is needed to define abstract
objects, and encoding rules are needed to transform between
abstract objects and bit strings. (See: Basic Encoding Rules.)
(C) In ASN.1, formal names are written without spaces, and
separate words in a name are indicated by capitalizing the first
letter of each word except the first word. For example, the name
of a CRL is "certificateRevocationList".
$ ACC
See: access control center.
$ access
(I) The ability and means to communicate with or otherwise
interact with a system in order to use system resources to either
handle information or gain knowledge of the information the system
contains.
(O) "A specific type of interaction between a subject and an
object that results in the flow of information from one to the
other." [NCS04]
(C) In this Glossary, "access" is intended to cover any ability to
communicate with a system, including one-way communication in
either direction. In actual practice, however, entities outside a
security perimeter that can receive output from the system but
cannot provide input or otherwise directly interact with the
system, might be treated as not having "access" and, therefore, be
exempt from security policy requirements, such as the need for a
security clearance.
$ access control
(I) Protection of system resources against unauthorized access; a
process by which use of system resources is regulated according to
a security policy and is permitted by only authorized entities
Shirey Informational [Page 7]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(users, programs, processes, or other systems) according to that
policy. (See: access, access control service.)
(O) "The prevention of unauthorized use of a resource, including
the prevention of use of a resource in an unauthorized manner."
[I7498 Part 2]
$ access control center (ACC)
(I) A computer containing a database with entries that define a
security policy for an access control service.
(C) An ACC is sometimes used in conjunction with a key center to
implement access control in a key distribution system for
symmetric cryptography.
$ access control list (ACL)
(I) A mechanism that implements access control for a system
resource by enumerating the identities of the system entities that
are permitted to access the resource. (See: capability.)
$ access control service
(I) A security service that protects against a system entity using
a system resource in a way not authorized by the system's security
policy; in short, protection of system resources against
unauthorized access. (See: access control, discretionary access
control, identity-based security policy, mandatory access control,
rule-based security policy.)
(C) This service includes protecting against use of a resource in
an unauthorized manner by an entity that is authorized to use the
resource in some other manner. The two basic mechanisms for
implementing this service are ACLs and tickets.
$ access mode
(I) A distinct type of data processing operation--e.g., read,
write, append, or execute--that a subject can potentially perform
on an object in a computer system.
$ accountability
(I) The property of a system (including all of its system
resources) that ensures that the actions of a system entity may be
traced uniquely to that entity, which can be held responsible for
its actions. (See: audit service.)
(C) Accountability permits detection and subsequent investigation
of security breaches.
Shirey Informational [Page 8]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ accredit
$ accreditation
(I) An administrative declaration by a designated authority that
an information system is approved to operate in a particular
security configuration with a prescribed set of safeguards.
[FP102] (See: certification.)
(C) An accreditation is usually based on a technical certification
of the system's security mechanisms. The terms "certification" and
"accreditation" are used more in the U.S. Department of Defense
and other government agencies than in commercial organizations.
However, the concepts apply any place where managers are required
to deal with and accept responsibility for security risks. The
American Bar Association is developing accreditation criteria for
CAs.
$ ACL
See: access control list.
$ acquirer
(N) SET usage: "The financial institution that establishes an
account with a merchant and processes payment card authorizations
and payments." [SET1]
(O) "The institution (or its agent) that acquires from the card
acceptor the financial data relating to the transaction and
initiates that data into an interchange system." [SET2]
$ active attack
See: (secondary definition under) attack.
$ active wiretapping
See: (secondary definition under) wiretapping.
$ add-on security
(I) "The retrofitting of protection mechanisms, implemented by
hardware or software, after the [automatic data processing] system
has become operational." [FP039]
$ administrative security
(I) Management procedures and constraints to prevent unauthorized
access to a system. (See: security architecture.)
(O) "The management constraints, operational procedures,
accountability procedures, and supplemental controls established
to provide an acceptable level of protection for sensitive data."
[FP039]
Shirey Informational [Page 9]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Examples include clear delineation and separation of duties,
and configuration control.
$ Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
(N) A future FIPS publication being developed by NIST to succeed
DES. Intended to specify an unclassified, publicly-disclosed,
symmetric encryption algorithm, available royalty-free worldwide.
$ adversary
(I) An entity that attacks, or is a threat to, a system.
$ aggregation
(I) A circumstance in which a collection of information items is
required to be classified at a higher security level than any of
the individual items that comprise it.
$ AH
See: Authentication Header
$ algorithm
(I) A finite set of step-by-step instructions for a problem-
solving or computation procedure, especially one that can be
implemented by a computer. (See: cryptographic algorithm.)
$ alias
(I) A name that an entity uses in place of its real name, usually
for the purpose of either anonymity or deception.
$ American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
(N) A private, not-for-profit association of users, manufacturers,
and other organizations, that administers U.S. private sector
voluntary standards.
(C) ANSI is the sole U.S. representative to the two major non-
treaty international standards organizations, ISO and, via the
U.S. National Committee (USNC), the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC).
$ anonymous
(I) The condition of having a name that is unknown or concealed.
(See: anonymous login.)
(C) An application may require security services that maintain
anonymity of users or other system entities, perhaps to preserve
their privacy or hide them from attack. To hide an entity's real
name, an alias may be used. For example, a financial institution
may assign an account number. Parties to a transaction can thus
remain relatively anonymous, but can also accept the transaction
Shirey Informational [Page 10]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
as legitimate. Real names of the parties cannot be easily
determined by observers of the transaction, but an authorized
third party may be able to map an alias to a real name, such as by
presenting the institution with a court order. In other
applications, anonymous entities may be completely untraceable.
$ anonymous login
(I) An access control feature (or, rather, an access control
weakness) in many Internet hosts that enables users to gain access
to general-purpose or public services and resources on a host
(such as allowing any user to transfer data using File Transfer
Protocol) without having a pre-established, user-specific account
(i.e., user name and secret password).
(C) This feature exposes a system to more threats than when all
the users are known, pre-registered entities that are individually
accountable for their actions. A user logs in using a special,
publicly known user name (e.g., "anonymous", "guest", or "ftp").
To use the public login name, the user is not required to know a
secret password and may not be required to input anything at all
except the name. In other cases, to complete the normal sequence
of steps in a login protocol, the system may require the user to
input a matching, publicly known password (such as "anonymous") or
may ask the user for an e-mail address or some other arbitrary
character string.
$ APOP
See: POP3 APOP.
$ archive
(I) (1.) Noun: A collection of data that is stored for a
relatively long period of time for historical and other purposes,
such as to support audit service, availability service, or system
integrity service. (See: backup.) (2.) Verb: To store data in such
a way. (See: back up.)
(C) A digital signature may need to be verified many years after
the signing occurs. The CA--the one that issued the certificate
containing the public key needed to verify that signature--may not
stay in operation that long. So every CA needs to provide for
long-term storage of the information needed to verify the
signatures of those to whom it issues certificates.
$ ARPANET
(N) Advanced Research Projects Agency Network, a pioneer packet-
switched network that was built in the early 1970s under contract
to the U.S. Government, led to the development of today's
Internet, and was decommissioned in June 1990.
Shirey Informational [Page 11]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ ASN.1
See: Abstract Syntax Notation One.
$ association
(I) A cooperative relationship between system entities, usually
for the purpose of transferring information between them. (See:
security association.)
$ assurance
(I) (1.) An attribute of an information system that provides
grounds for having confidence that the system operates such that
the system security policy is enforced. (2.) A procedure that
ensures a system is developed and operated as intended by the
system's security policy.
$ assurance level
(I) Evaluation usage: A specific level on a hierarchical scale
representing successively increased confidence that a target of
evaluation adequately fulfills the requirements. (E.g., see:
TCSEC.)
$ asymmetric cryptography
(I) A modern branch of cryptography (popularly known as "public-
key cryptography") in which the algorithms employ a pair of keys
(a public key and a private key) and use a different component of
the pair for different steps of the algorithm. (See: key pair.)
(C) Asymmetric algorithms have key management advantages over
equivalently strong symmetric ones. First, one key of the pair
does not need to be known by anyone but its owner; so it can more
easily be kept secret. Second, although the other key of the pair
is shared by all entities that use the algorithm, that key does
not need to be kept secret from other, non-using entities; so the
key distribution part of key management can be done more easily.
(C) For encryption: In an asymmetric encryption algorithm (e.g.,
see: RSA), when Alice wants to ensure confidentiality for data she
sends to Bob, she encrypts the data with a public key provided by
Bob. Only Bob has the matching private key that is needed to
decrypt the data.
(C) For signature: In an asymmetric digital signature algorithm
(e.g., see: DSA), when Alice wants to ensure data integrity or
provide authentication for data she sends to Bob, she uses her
private key to sign the data (i.e., create a digital signature
based on the data). To verify the signature, Bob uses the matching
public key that Alice has provided.
Shirey Informational [Page 12]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) For key agreement: In an asymmetric key agreement algorithm
(e.g., see: Diffie-Hellman), Alice and Bob each send their own
public key to the other person. Then each uses their own private
key and the other's public key to compute the new key value.
$ attack
(I) An assault on system security that derives from an intelligent
threat, i.e., an intelligent act that is a deliberate attempt
(especially in the sense of a method or technique) to evade
security services and violate the security policy of a system.
(See: penetration, violation, vulnerability.)
- Active vs. passive: An "active attack" attempts to alter system
resources or affect their operation. A "passive attack"
attempts to learn or make use of information from the system
but does not affect system resources. (E.g., see: wiretapping.)
- Insider vs. outsider: An "inside attack" is an attack initiated
by an entity inside the security perimeter (an "insider"),
i.e., an entity that is authorized to access system resources
but uses them in a way not approved by those who granted the
authorization. An "outside attack" is initiated from outside
the perimeter, by an unauthorized or illegitimate user of the
system (an "outsider"). In the Internet, potential outside
attackers range from amateur pranksters to organized criminals,
international terrorists, and hostile governments.
(C) The term "attack" relates to some other basic security terms
as shown in the following diagram:
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - -+
| An Attack: | |Counter- | | A System Resource: |
| i.e., A Threat Action | | measure | | Target of the Attack |
| +----------+ | | | | +-----------------+ |
| | Attacker |<==================||<========= | |
| | i.e., | Passive | | | | | Vulnerability | |
| | A Threat |<=================>||<========> | |
| | Agent | or Active | | | | +-------|||-------+ |
| +----------+ Attack | | | | VVV |
| | | | | Threat Consequences |
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - -+
$ attribute authority
(I) A CA that issues attribute certificates.
(O) "An authority, trusted by the verifier to delegate privilege,
which issues attribute certificates." [FPDAM]
Shirey Informational [Page 13]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ attribute certificate
(I) A digital certificate that binds a set of descriptive data
items, other than a public key, either directly to a subject name
or to the identifier of another certificate that is a public-key
certificate. [X509]
(O) "A set of attributes of a user together with some other
information, rendered unforgeable by the digital signature created
using the private key of the CA which issued it." [X509]
(O) "A data structure that includes some attribute values and
identification information about the owner of the attribute
certificate, all digitally signed by an Attribute Authority. This
authority's signature serves as the guarantee of the binding
between the attributes and their owner." [FPDAM]
(C) A public-key certificate binds a subject name to a public key
value, along with information needed to perform certain
cryptographic functions. Other attributes of a subject, such as a
security clearance, may be certified in a separate kind of digital
certificate, called an attribute certificate. A subject may have
multiple attribute certificates associated with its name or with
each of its public-key certificates.
(C) An attribute certificate might be issued to a subject in the
following situations:
- Different lifetimes: When the lifetime of an attribute binding
is shorter than that of the related public-key certificate, or
when it is desirable not to need to revoke a subject's public
key just to revoke an attribute.
- Different authorities: When the authority responsible for the
attributes is different than the one that issues the public-key
certificate for the subject. (There is no requirement that an
attribute certificate be issued by the same CA that issued the
associated public-key certificate.)
$ audit service
(I) A security service that records information needed to
establish accountability for system events and for the actions of
system entities that cause them. (See: security audit.)
$ audit trail
See: security audit trail.
Shirey Informational [Page 14]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ AUTH
See: POP3 AUTH.
$ authentic signature
(I) A signature (particularly a digital signature) that can be
trusted because it can be verified. (See: validate vs. verify.)
$ authenticate
(I) Verify (i.e., establish the truth of) an identity claimed by
or for a system entity. (See: authentication.)
(D) In general English usage, this term usually means "to prove
genuine" (e.g., an art expert authenticates a Michelangelo
painting). But the recommended definition carries a much narrower
meaning. For example, to be precise, an ISD SHOULD NOT say "the
host authenticates each received datagram". Instead, the ISD
SHOULD say "the host authenticates the origin of each received
datagram". In most cases, we also can say "and verifies the
datagram's integrity", because that is usually implied. (See:
("relationship between data integrity service and authentication
services" under) data integrity service.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT talk about authenticating a digital signature
or digital certificate. Instead, we "sign" and then "verify"
digital signatures, and we "issue" and then "validate" digital
certificates. (See: validate vs. verify.)
$ authentication
(I) The process of verifying an identity claimed by or for a
system entity. (See: authenticate, authentication exchange,
authentication information, credential, data origin
authentication, peer entity authentication.)
(C) An authentication process consists of two steps:
1. Identification step: Presenting an identifier to the security
system. (Identifiers should be assigned carefully, because
authenticated identities are the basis for other security
services, such as access control service.)
2. Verification step: Presenting or generating authentication
information that corroborates the binding between the entity
and the identifier. (See: verification.)
(C) See: ("relationship between data integrity service and
authentication services" under) data integrity service.
Shirey Informational [Page 15]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ authentication code
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for any form of
checksum, whether cryptographic or not. The word "authentication"
is misleading because the mechanism involved usually serves a data
integrity function rather than an authentication function, and the
word "code" is misleading because it implies that either encoding
or encryption is involved or that the term refers to computer
software. (See: message authentication code.)
$ authentication exchange
(I) A mechanism to verify the identity of an entity by means of
information exchange.
(O) "A mechanism intended to ensure the identity of an entity by
means of information exchange." [I7498 Part 2]
$ Authentication Header (AH)
(I) An Internet IPsec protocol [R2402] designed to provide
connectionless data integrity service and data origin
authentication service for IP datagrams, and (optionally) to
provide protection against replay attacks.
(C) Replay protection may be selected by the receiver when a
security association is established. AH authenticates upper-layer
protocol data units and as much of the IP header as possible.
However, some IP header fields may change in transit, and the
value of these fields, when the packet arrives at the receiver,
may not be predictable by the sender. Thus, the values of such
fields cannot be protected end-to-end by AH; protection of the IP
header by AH is only partial when such fields are present.
(C) AH may be used alone, or in combination with the IPsec ESP
protocol, or in a nested fashion with tunneling. Security services
can be provided between a pair of communicating hosts, between a
pair of communicating security gateways, or between a host and a
gateway. ESP can provide the same security services as AH, and ESP
can also provide data confidentiality service. The main difference
between authentication services provided by ESP and AH is the
extent of the coverage; ESP does not protect IP header fields
unless they are encapsulated by AH.
$ authentication information
(I) Information used to verify an identity claimed by or for an
entity. (See: authentication, credential.)
(C) Authentication information may exist as, or be derived from,
one of the following:
Shirey Informational [Page 16]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Something the entity knows. (See: password).
- Something the entity possesses. (See: token.)
- Something the entity is. (See: biometric authentication.)
$ authentication service
(I) A security service that verifies an identity claimed by or for
an entity. (See: authentication.)
(C) In a network, there are two general forms of authentication
service: data origin authentication service and peer entity
authentication service.
$ authenticity
(I) The property of being genuine and able to be verified and be
trusted. (See: authenticate, authentication, validate vs. verify)
$ authority
(D) "An entity, responsible for the issuance of certificates."
[FPDAM]
(C) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for AA, CA, RA,
ORA, or similar terms, because it may cause confusion. Instead,
use the full term at the first instance of usage and then, if it
is necessary to shorten text, use the style of abbreviation
defined in this Glossary.
(C) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this definition for any PKI entity,
because the definition is ambiguous with regard to whether the
entity actually issues certificates (e.g., attribute authority or
certification authority) or just has accountability for processes
that precede or follow signing (e.g., registration authority).
(See: issue.)
$ authority certificate
(D) "A certificate issued to an authority (e.g. either to a
certification authority or to an attribute authority)." [FPDAM]
(See: authority.)
(C) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term or definition because they are
ambiguous with regard to which specific types of PKI entities they
address.
$ authority revocation list (ARL)
(I) A data structure that enumerates digital certificates that
were issued to CAs but have been invalidated by their issuer prior
to when they were scheduled to expire. (See: certificate
expiration, X.509 authority revocation list.)
Shirey Informational [Page 17]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(O) "A revocation list containing a list of public-key
certificates issued to authorities, which are no longer considered
valid by the certificate issuer." [FPDAM]
$ authorization
$ authorize
(I) (1.) An "authorization" is a right or a permission that is
granted to a system entity to access a system resource. (2.) An
"authorization process" is a procedure for granting such rights.
(3.) To "authorize" means to grant such a right or permission.
(See: privilege.)
(O) SET usage: "The process by which a properly appointed person
or persons grants permission to perform some action on behalf of
an organization. This process assesses transaction risk, confirms
that a given transaction does not raise the account holder's debt
above the account's credit limit, and reserves the specified
amount of credit. (When a merchant obtains authorization, payment
for the authorized amount is guaranteed--provided, of course, that
the merchant followed the rules associated with the authorization
process.)" [SET2]
$ automated information system
(I) An organized assembly of resources and procedures--i.e.,
computing and communications equipment and services, with their
supporting facilities and personnel--that collect, record,
process, store, transport, retrieve, or display information to
accomplish a specified set of functions.
$ availability
(I) The property of a system or a system resource being accessible
and usable upon demand by an authorized system entity, according
to performance specifications for the system; i.e., a system is
available if it provides services according to the system design
whenever users request them. (See: critical, denial of service,
reliability, survivability.)
(O) "The property of being accessible and usable upon demand by an
authorized entity." [I7498 Part 2]
$ availability service
(I) A security service that protects a system to ensure its
availability.
(C) This service addresses the security concerns raised by denial-
of-service attacks. It depends on proper management and control of
system resources, and thus depends on access control service and
other security services.
Shirey Informational [Page 18]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ back door
(I) A hardware or software mechanism that (a) provides access to a
system and its resources by other than the usual procedure, (b)
was deliberately left in place by the system's designers or
maintainers, and (c) usually is not publicly known. (See: trap
door.)
(C) For example, a way to access a computer other than through a
normal login. Such access paths do not necessarily have malicious
intent; e.g., operating systems sometimes are shipped by the
manufacturer with privileged accounts intended for use by field
service technicians or the vendor's maintenance programmers. (See:
trap door.)
$ back up vs. backup
(I) Verb "back up": To store data for the purpose of creating a
backup copy. (See: archive.)
(I) Noun/adjective "backup": (1.) A reserve copy of data that is
stored separately from the original, for use if the original
becomes lost or damaged. (See: archive.) (2.) Alternate means to
permit performance of system functions despite a disaster to
system resources. (See: contingency plan.)
$ baggage
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term to describe a data element
except when stated as "SET(trademark) baggage" with the following
meaning:
(O) SET usage: An "opaque encrypted tuple, which is included in a
SET message but appended as external data to the PKCS encapsulated
data. This avoids superencryption of the previously encrypted
tuple, but guarantees linkage with the PKCS portion of the
message." [SET2]
$ bandwidth
(I) Commonly used to mean the capacity of a communication channel
to pass data through the channel in a given amount of time.
Usually expressed in bits per second.
$ bank identification number (BIN)
(N) The digits of a credit card number that identify the issuing
bank. (See: primary account number.)
(O) SET usage: The first six digits of a primary account number.
Shirey Informational [Page 19]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Basic Encoding Rules (BER)
(I) A standard for representing ASN.1 data types as strings of
octets. [X690] (See: Distinguished Encoding Rules.)
$ bastion host
(I) A strongly protected computer that is in a network protected
by a firewall (or is part of a firewall) and is the only host (or
one of only a few hosts) in the network that can be directly
accessed from networks on the other side of the firewall.
(C) Filtering routers in a firewall typically restrict traffic
from the outside network to reaching just one host, the bastion
host, which usually is part of the firewall. Since only this one
host can be directly attacked, only this one host needs to be very
strongly protected, so security can be maintained more easily and
less expensively. However, to allow legitimate internal and
external users to access application resources through the
firewall, higher layer protocols and services need to be relayed
and forwarded by the bastion host. Some services (e.g., DNS and
SMTP) have forwarding built in; other services (e.g., TELNET and
FTP) require a proxy server on the bastion host.
$ BCA
See: brand certification authority.
$ BCI
See: brand CRL identifier.
$ Bell-LaPadula Model
(N) A formal, mathematical, state-transition model of security
policy for multilevel-secure computer systems. [Bell]
(C) The model separates computer system elements into a set of
subjects and a set of objects. To determine whether or not a
subject is authorized for a particular access mode on an object,
the clearance of the subject is compared to the classification of
the object. The model defines the notion of a "secure state", in
which the only permitted access modes of subjects to objects are
in accordance with a specified security policy. It is proven that
each state transition preserves security by moving from secure
state to secure state, thereby proving that the system is secure.
(C) In this model, a multilevel-secure system satisfies several
rules, including the following:
Shirey Informational [Page 20]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- "Confinement property" (also called "*-property", pronounced
"star property"): A subject has write access to an object only
if classification of the object dominates the clearance of the
subject.
- "Simple security property": A subject has read access to an
object only if the clearance of the subject dominates the
classification of the object.
- "Tranquillity property": The classification of an object does
not change while the object is being processed by the system.
$ BER
See: Basic Encoding Rules.
$ beyond A1
(O) (1.) Formally, a level of security assurance that is beyond
the highest level of criteria specified by the TCSEC. (2.)
Informally, a level of trust so high that it cannot be provided or
verified by currently available assurance methods, and
particularly not by currently available formal methods.
$ BIN
See: bank identification number.
$ bind
(I) To inseparably associate by applying some mechanism, such as
when a CA uses a digital signature to bind together a subject and
a public key in a public-key certificate.
$ biometric authentication
(I) A method of generating authentication information for a person
by digitizing measurements of a physical characteristic, such as a
fingerprint, a hand shape, a retina pattern, a speech pattern
(voiceprint), or handwriting.
$ bit
(I) The smallest unit of information storage; a contraction of the
term "binary digit"; one of two symbols--"0" (zero) and "1" (one)
--that are used to represent binary numbers.
$ BLACK
(I) Designation for information system equipment or facilities
that handle (and for data that contains) only ciphertext (or,
depending on the context, only unclassified information), and for
such data itself. This term derives from U.S. Government COMSEC
terminology. (See: RED, RED/BLACK separation.)
Shirey Informational [Page 21]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ block cipher
(I) An encryption algorithm that breaks plaintext into fixed-size
segments and uses the same key to transform each plaintext segment
into a fixed-size segment of ciphertext. (See: mode, stream
cipher.)
(C) For example, Blowfish, DEA, IDEA, RC2, and SKIPJACK. However,
a block cipher can be adapted to have a different external
interface, such as that of a stream cipher, by using a mode of
operation to "package" the basic algorithm.
$ Blowfish
(N) A symmetric block cipher with variable-length key (32 to 448
bits) designed in 1993 by Bruce Schneier as an unpatented,
license-free, royalty-free replacement for DES or IDEA. [Schn]
$ brand
(I) A distinctive mark or name that identifies a product or
business entity.
(O) SET usage: The name of a payment card. Financial institutions
and other companies have founded payment card brands, protect and
advertise the brands, establish and enforce rules for use and
acceptance of their payment cards, and provide networks to
interconnect the financial institutions. These brands combine the
roles of issuer and acquirer in interactions with cardholders and
merchants. [SET1]
$ brand certification authority (BCA)
(O) SET usage: A CA owned by a payment card brand, such as
MasterCard, Visa, or American Express. [SET2] (See: certification
hierarchy, SET.)
$ brand CRL identifier (BCI)
(O) SET usage: A digitally signed list, issued by a BCA, of the
names of CAs for which CRLs need to be processed when verifying
signatures in SET messages. [SET2]
$ break
(I) Cryptographic usage: To successfully perform cryptanalysis and
thus succeed in decrypting data or performing some other
cryptographic function, without initially having knowledge of the
key that the function requires. (This term applies to encrypted
data or, more generally, to a cryptographic algorithm or
cryptographic system.)
Shirey Informational [Page 22]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ bridge
(I) A computer that is a gateway between two networks (usually two
LANs) at OSI layer 2. (See: router.)
$ British Standard 7799
(N) Part 1 is a standard code of practice and provides guidance on
how to secure an information system. Part 2 specifies the
management framework, objectives, and control requirements for
information security management systems [B7799]. The certification
scheme works like ISO 9000. It is in use in the UK, the
Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand and might be proposed as
an ISO standard or adapted to be part of the Common Criteria.
$ browser
(I) An client computer program that can retrieve and display
information from servers on the World Wide Web.
(C) For example, Netscape's Navigator and Communicator, and
Microsoft's Explorer.
$ brute force
(I) A cryptanalysis technique or other kind of attack method
involving an exhaustive procedure that tries all possibilities,
one-by-one.
(C) For example, for ciphertext where the analyst already knows
the decryption algorithm, a brute force technique to finding the
original plaintext is to decrypt the message with every possible
key.
$ BS7799
See: British Standard 7799.
$ byte
(I) A fundamental unit of computer storage; the smallest
addressable unit in a computer's architecture. Usually holds one
character of information and, today, usually means eight bits.
(See: octet.)
(C) Larger than a "bit", but smaller than a "word". Although
"byte" almost always means "octet" today, bytes had other sizes
(e.g., six bits, nine bits) in earlier computer architectures.
$ CA
See: certification authority.
Shirey Informational [Page 23]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ CA certificate
(I) "A [digital] certificate for one CA issued by another CA."
[X509]
(C) That is, a digital certificate whose holder is able to issue
digital certificates. A v3 X.509 public-key certificate may have a
"basicConstraints" extension containing a "cA" value that
specifically "indicates whether or not the public key may be used
to verify certificate signatures."
$ call back
(I) An authentication technique for terminals that remotely access
a computer via telephone lines. The host system disconnects the
caller and then calls back on a telephone number that was
previously authorized for that terminal.
$ capability
(I) A token, usually an unforgeable data value (sometimes called a
"ticket") that gives the bearer or holder the right to access a
system resource. Possession of the token is accepted by a system
as proof that the holder has been authorized to access the
resource named or indicated by the token. (See: access control
list, credential, digital certificate.)
(C) This concept can be implemented as a digital certificate.
(See: attribute certificate.)
$ CAPI
See: cryptographic application programming interface.
$ CAPSTONE chip
(N) An integrated circuit (the Mykotronx, Inc. MYK-82) with a Type
II cryptographic processor that implements SKIPJACK, KEA, DSA,
SHA, and basic mathematical functions to support asymmetric
cryptography, and includes the key escrow feature of the CLIPPER
chip. (See: FORTEZZA card.)
$ card
See: cryptographic card, FORTEZZA card, payment card, PC card,
smart card, token.
$ card backup
See: token backup.
$ card copy
See: token copy.
Shirey Informational [Page 24]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ card restore
See: token restore.
$ cardholder
(I) An entity that has been issued a card.
(O) SET usage: "The holder of a valid payment card account and
user of software supporting electronic commerce." [SET2] A
cardholder is issued a payment card by an issuer. SET ensures that
in the cardholder's interactions with merchants, the payment card
account information remains confidential. [SET1]
$ cardholder certificate
(O) SET usage: A digital certificate that is issued to a
cardholder upon approval of the cardholder's issuing financial
institution and that is transmitted to merchants with purchase
requests and encrypted payment instructions, carrying assurance
that the account number has been validated by the issuing
financial institution and cannot be altered by a third party.
[SET1]
$ cardholder certification authority (CCA)
(O) SET usage: A CA responsible for issuing digital certificates
to cardholders and operated on behalf of a payment card brand, an
issuer, or another party according to brand rules. A CCA maintains
relationships with card issuers to allow for the verification of
cardholder accounts. A CCA does not issue a CRL but does
distribute CRLs issued by root CAs, brand CAs, geopolitical CAs,
and payment gateway CAs. [SET2]
$ CAST
(N) A design procedure for symmetric encryption algorithms, and a
resulting family of algorithms, invented by C.A. (Carlisle Adams)
and S.T. (Stafford Tavares). [R2144, R2612]
$ category
(I) A grouping of sensitive information items to which a non-
hierarchical restrictive security label is applied to increase
protection of the data. (See: compartment.)
$ CAW
See: certification authority workstation.
$ CBC
See: cipher block chaining.
$ CCA
See: cardholder certification authority.
Shirey Informational [Page 25]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ CCITT
(N) Acronym for French translation of International Telephone and
Telegraph Consultative Committee. Now renamed ITU-T.
$ CERT
See: computer emergency response team.
$ certificate
(I) General English usage: A document that attests to the truth of
something or the ownership of something.
(C) Security usage: See: capability, digital certificate.
(C) PKI usage: See: attribute certificate, public-key certificate.
$ certificate authority
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it looks like sloppy use
of "certification authority", which is the term standardized by
X.509.
$ certificate chain
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it duplicates the
meaning of a standardized term. Instead, use "certification path".
$ certificate chain validation
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it duplicates the
meaning of standardized terms and mixes concepts in a potentially
misleading way. Instead, use "certificate validation" or "path
validation", depending on what is meant. (See: validate vs.
verify.)
$ certificate creation
(I) The act or process by which a CA sets the values of a digital
certificate's data fields and signs it. (See: issue.)
$ certificate expiration
(I) The event that occurs when a certificate ceases to be valid
because its assigned lifetime has been exceeded. (See: certificate
revocation, validity period.)
$ certificate extension
See: extension.
Shirey Informational [Page 26]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ certificate holder
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for the subject of
a digital certificate because the term is potentially ambiguous.
For example, the term could also refer to a system entity, such as
a repository, that simply has possession of a copy of the
certificate. (See: certificate owner.)
$ certificate management
(I) The functions that a CA may perform during the life cycle of a
digital certificate, including the following:
- Acquire and verify data items to bind into the certificate.
- Encode and sign the certificate.
- Store the certificate in a directory or repository.
- Renew, rekey, and update the certificate.
- Revoke the certificate and issue a CRL.
(See: archive management, certificate management, key management,
security architecture, token management.)
$ certificate owner
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for the subject of
a digital certificate because the term is potentially ambiguous.
For example, the term could also refer to a system entity, such as
a corporation, that has acquired a certificate to operate some
other entity, such as a Web server. (See: certificate holder.)
$ certificate policy
(I) "A named set of rules that indicates the applicability of a
certificate to a particular community and/or class of application
with common security requirements." [X509] (See: certification
practice statement.)
(C) A certificate policy can help a certificate user decide
whether a certificate should be trusted in a particular
application. "For example, a particular certificate policy might
indicate applicability of a type of certificate for the
authentication of electronic data interchange transactions for the
trading goods within a given price range." [R2527]
(C) A v3 X.509 public-key certificate may have a
"certificatePolicies" extension that lists certificate policies,
recognized by the issuing CA, that apply to the certificate and
govern its use. Each policy is denoted by an object identifier and
may optionally have certificate policy qualifiers.
Shirey Informational [Page 27]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) SET usage: Every SET certificate specifies at least one
certificate policy, that of the SET root CA. SET uses certificate
policy qualifiers to point to the actual policy statement and to
add qualifying policies to the root policy. (See: SET qualifier.)
$ certificate policy qualifier
(I) Information that pertains to a certificate policy and is
included in a "certificatePolicies" extension in a v3 X.509
public-key certificate.
$ certificate reactivation
(I) The act or process by which a digital certificate, which a CA
has designated for revocation but not yet listed on a CRL, is
returned to the valid state.
$ certificate rekey
(I) The act or process by which an existing public-key certificate
has its public key value changed by issuing a new certificate with
a different (usually new) public key. (See: certificate renewal,
certificate update, rekey.)
(C) For an X.509 public-key certificate, the essence of rekey is
that the subject stays the same and a new public key is bound to
that subject. Other changes are made, and the old certificate is
revoked, only as required by the PKI and CPS in support of the
rekey. If changes go beyond that, the process is a "certificate
update".
(O) MISSI usage: To rekey a MISSI X.509 public-key certificate
means that the issuing authority creates a new certificate that is
identical to the old one, except the new one has a new, different
KEA key; or a new, different DSS key; or new, different KEA and
DSS keys. The new certificate also has a different serial number
and may have a different validity period. A new key creation date
and maximum key lifetime period are assigned to each newly
generated key. If a new KEA key is generated, that key is assigned
a new KMID. The old certificate remains valid until it expires,
but may not be further renewed, rekeyed, or updated.
$ certificate renewal
(I) The act or process by which the validity of the data binding
asserted by an existing public-key certificate is extended in time
by issuing a new certificate. (See: certificate rekey, certificate
update.)
(C) For an X.509 public-key certificate, this term means that the
validity period is extended (and, of course, a new serial number
is assigned) but the binding of the public key to the subject and
Shirey Informational [Page 28]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
to other data items stays the same. The other data items are
changed, and the old certificate is revoked, only as required by
the PKI and CPS to support the renewal. If changes go beyond that,
the process is a "certificate rekey" or "certificate update".
$ certificate request
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it looks like imprecise
use of a term standardized by PKCS #10 and used in PKIX. Instead,
use the standard term, "certification request".
$ certificate revocation
(I) The event that occurs when a CA declares that a previously
valid digital certificate issued by that CA has become invalid;
usually stated with a revocation date.
(C) In X.509, a revocation is announced to potential certificate
users by issuing a CRL that mentions the certificate. Revocation
and listing on a CRL is only necessary before certificate
expiration.
$ certificate revocation list (CRL)
(I) A data structure that enumerates digital certificates that
have been invalidated by their issuer prior to when they were
scheduled to expire. (See: certificate expiration, X.509
certificate revocation list.)
(O) "A signed list indicating a set of certificates that are no
longer considered valid by the certificate issuer. After a
certificate appears on a CRL, it is deleted from a subsequent CRL
after the certificate's expiry. CRLs may be used to identify
revoked public-key certificates or attribute certificates and may
represent revocation of certificates issued to authorities or to
users. The term CRL is also commonly used as a generic term
applying to all the different types of revocation lists, including
CRLs, ARLs, ACRLs, etc." [FPDAM]
$ certificate revocation tree
(I) A mechanism for distributing notice of certificate
revocations; uses a tree of hash results that is signed by the
tree's issuer. Offers an alternative to issuing a CRL, but is not
supported in X.509. (See: certificate status responder.)
$ certificate serial number
(I) An integer value that (a) is associated with, and may be
carried in, a digital certificate; (b) is assigned to the
certificate by the certificate's issuer; and (c) is unique among
all the certificates produced by that issuer.
Shirey Informational [Page 29]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(O) "An integer value, unique within the issuing CA, which is
unambiguously associated with a certificate issued by that CA."
[X509]
$ certificate status responder
(N) FPKI usage: A trusted on-line server that acts for a CA to
provide authenticated certificate status information to
certificate users. [FPKI] Offers an alternative to issuing a CRL,
but is not supported in X.509. (See: certificate revocation tree.)
$ certificate update
(I) The act or process by which non-key data items bound in an
existing public-key certificate, especially authorizations granted
to the subject, are changed by issuing a new certificate. (See:
certificate rekey, certificate renewal.)
(C) For an X.509 public-key certificate, the essence of this
process is that fundamental changes are made in the data that is
bound to the public key, such that it is necessary to revoke the
old certificate. (Otherwise, the process is only a "certificate
rekey" or "certificate renewal".)
$ certificate user
(I) A system entity that depends on the validity of information
(such as another entity's public key value) provided by a digital
certificate. (See: relying party.)
(O) "An entity that needs to know, with certainty, the public key
of another entity." [X509]
(C) The system entity may be a human being or an organization, or
a device or process under the control of a human or an
organization.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for the "subject"
of a certificate.
$ certificate validation
(I) An act or process by which a certificate user establishes that
the assertions made by a digital certificate can be trusted. (See:
valid certificate, validate vs. verify.)
(O) "The process of ensuring that a certificate is valid including
possibly the construction and processing of a certification path,
and ensuring that all certificates in that path have not expired
or been revoked." [FPDAM]
Shirey Informational [Page 30]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) To validate a certificate, a certificate user checks that the
certificate is properly formed and signed and currently in force:
- Checks the signature: Employs the issuer's public key to verify
the digital signature of the CA who issued the certificate in
question. If the verifier obtains the issuer's public key from
the issuer's own public-key certificate, that certificate
should be validated, too. That validation may lead to yet
another certificate to be validated, and so on. Thus, in
general, certificate validation involves discovering and
validating a certification path.
- Checks the syntax and semantics: Parses the certificate's
syntax and interprets its semantics, applying rules specified
for and by its data fields, such as for critical extensions in
an X.509 certificate.
- Checks currency and revocation: Verifies that the certificate
is currently in force by checking that the current date and
time are within the validity period (if that is specified in
the certificate) and that the certificate is not listed on a
CRL or otherwise announced as invalid. (CRLs themselves require
a similar validation process.)
$ certification
(I) Information system usage: Technical evaluation (usually made
in support of an accreditation action) of an information system's
security features and other safeguards to establish the extent to
which the system's design and implementation meet specified
security requirements. [FP102] (See: accreditation.)
(I) Digital certificate usage: The act or process of vouching for
the truth and accuracy of the binding between data items in a
certificate. (See: certify.)
(I) Public key usage: The act or process of vouching for the
ownership of a public key by issuing a public-key certificate that
binds the key to the name of the entity that possesses the
matching private key. In addition to binding a key to a name, a
public-key certificate may bind those items to other restrictive
or explanatory data items. (See: X.509 public-key certificate.)
(O) SET usage: "The process of ascertaining that a set of
requirements or criteria has been fulfilled and attesting to that
fact to others, usually with some written instrument. A system
that has been inspected and evaluated as fully compliant with the
SET protocol by duly authorized parties and process would be said
to have been certified compliant." [SET2]
Shirey Informational [Page 31]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ certification authority (CA)
(I) An entity that issues digital certificates (especially X.509
certificates) and vouches for the binding between the data items
in a certificate.
(O) "An authority trusted by one or more users to create and
assign certificates. Optionally, the certification authority may
create the user's keys." [X509]
(C) Certificate users depend on the validity of information
provided by a certificate. Thus, a CA should be someone that
certificate users trust, and usually holds an official position
created and granted power by a government, a corporation, or some
other organization. A CA is responsible for managing the life
cycle of certificates (see: certificate management) and, depending
on the type of certificate and the CPS that applies, may be
responsible for the life cycle of key pairs associated with the
certificates (see: key management).
$ certification authority workstation (CAW)
(I) A computer system that enables a CA to issue digital
certificates and supports other certificate management functions
as required.
$ certification hierarchy
(I) A tree-structured (loop-free) topology of relationships among
CAs and the entities to whom the CAs issue public-key
certificates. (See: hierarchical PKI.)
(C) In this structure, one CA is the top CA, the highest level of
the hierarchy. (See: root, top CA.) The top CA may issue public-
key certificates to one or more additional CAs that form the
second highest level. Each of these CAs may issue certificates to
more CAs at the third highest level, and so on. The CAs at the
second-lowest of the hierarchy issue certificates only to non-CA
entities, called "end entities" that form the lowest level. (See:
end entity.) Thus, all certification paths begin at the top CA and
descend through zero or more levels of other CAs. All certificate
users base path validations on the top CA's public key.
(O) MISSI usage: A MISSI certification hierarchy has three or four
levels of CAs:
- A CA at the highest level, the top CA, is a "policy approving
authority".
- A CA at the second-highest level is a "policy creation
authority".
Shirey Informational [Page 32]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- A CA at the third-highest level is a local authority called a
"certification authority".
- A CA at the fourth-highest (optional) level is a "subordinate
certification authority".
(O) PEM usage: A PEM certification hierarchy has three levels of
CAs [R1422]:
- The highest level is the "Internet Policy Registration
Authority".
- A CA at the second-highest level is a "policy certification
authority".
- A CA at the third-highest level is a "certification authority".
(O) SET usage: A SET certification hierarchy has three or four
levels of CAs:
- The highest level is a "SET root CA".
- A CA at the second-highest level is a "brand certification
authority".
- A CA at the third-highest (optional) level is a "geopolitical
certification authority".
- A CA at the fourth-highest level is a "cardholder CA", a
"merchant CA", or a "payment gateway CA".
$ certification path
(I) An ordered sequence of public-key certificates (or a sequence
of public-key certificates followed by one attribute certificate)
that enables a certificate user to verify the signature on the
last certificate in the path, and thus enables the user to obtain
a certified public key (or certified attributes) of the entity
that is the subject of that last certificate. (See: certificate
validation, valid certificate.)
(O) "An ordered sequence of certificates of objects in the [X.500
Directory Information Tree] which, together with the public key of
the initial object in the path, can be processed to obtain that of
the final object in the path." [X509, R2527]
(C) The path is the "list of certificates needed to allow a
particular user to obtain the public key of another." [X509] The
list is "linked" in the sense that the digital signature of each
certificate (except the first) is verified by the public key
contained in the preceding certificate; i.e., the private key used
to sign a certificate and the public key contained in the
preceding certificate form a key pair owned by the entity that
signed.
Shirey Informational [Page 33]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) In the X.509 quotation in the previous "C" paragraph, the word
"particular" points out that a certification path that can be
validated by one certificate user might not be able to be
validated by another. That is because either the first certificate
should be a trusted certificate (it might be a root certificate)
or the signature on the first certificate should be verified by a
trusted key (it might be a root key), but such trust is defined
relative to each user, not absolutely for all users.
$ certification policy
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term. Instead, use either
"certificate policy" or "certification practice statement",
depending on what is meant.
$ certification practice statement (CPS)
(I) "A statement of the practices which a certification authority
employs in issuing certificates." [ABA96, R2527] (See: certificate
policy.)
(C) A CPS is a published security policy that can help a
certificate user to decide whether a certificate issued by a
particular CA can be trusted enough to use in a particular
application. A CPS may be (a) a declaration by a CA of the details
of the system and practices it employs in its certificate
management operations, (b) part of a contract between the CA and
an entity to whom a certificate is issued, (c) a statute or
regulation applicable to the CA, or (d) a combination of these
types involving multiple documents. [ABA]
(C) A CPS is usually more detailed and procedurally oriented than
a certificate policy. A CPS applies to a particular CA or CA
community, while a certificate policy applies across CAs or
communities. A CA with a single CPS may support multiple
certificate policies, which may be used for different application
purposes or by different user communities. Multiple CAs, each with
a different CPS, may support the same certificate policy. [R2527]
$ certification request
(I) A algorithm-independent transaction format, defined by PCKS
#10 and used in PKIX, that contains a DN, a public key, and
optionally a set of attributes, collectively signed by the entity
requesting certification, and sent to a CA, which transforms the
request to an X.509 public-key certificate or another type of
certificate.
Shirey Informational [Page 34]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ certify
1. (I) Issue a digital certificate and thus vouch for the truth,
accuracy, and binding between data items in the certificate (e.g.,
see: X.509 public key certificate), such as the identity of the
certificate's subject and the ownership of a public key. (See:
certification.)
(C) To "certify a public key" means to issue a public-key
certificate that vouches for the binding between the certificate's
subject and the key.
2. (I) The act by which a CA employs measures to verify the truth,
accuracy, and binding between data items in a digital certificate.
(C) A description of the measures used for verification should be
included in the CA's CPS.
$ CFB
See: cipher feedback.
$ Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)
(I) A peer entity authentication method for PPP, using a randomly-
generated challenge and requiring a matching response that depends
on a cryptographic hash of the challenge and a secret key. [R1994]
(See: challenge-response, PAP.)
$ challenge-response
(I) An authentication process that verifies an identity by
requiring correct authentication information to be provided in
response to a challenge. In a computer system, the authentication
information is usually a value that is required to be computed in
response to an unpredictable challenge value.
$ Challenge-Response Authentication Mechanism (CRAM)
(I) IMAP4 usage: A mechanism [R2195], intended for use with IMAP4
AUTHENTICATE, by which an IMAP4 client uses a keyed hash [R2104]
to authenticate itself to an IMAP4 server. (See: POP3 APOP.)
(C) The server includes a unique timestamp in its ready response
to the client. The client replies with the client's name and the
hash result of applying MD5 to a string formed from concatenating
the timestamp with a shared secret that is known only to the
client and the server.
$ channel
(I) An information transfer path within a system. (See: covert
channel.)
Shirey Informational [Page 35]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ CHAP
See: Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol.
$ checksum
(I) A value that (a) is computed by a function that is dependent
on the contents of a data object and (b) is stored or transmitted
together with the object, for the purpose of detecting changes in
the data. (See: cyclic redundancy check, data integrity service,
error detection code, hash, keyed hash, protected checksum.)
(C) To gain confidence that a data object has not been changed, an
entity that later uses the data can compute a checksum and compare
it with the checksum that was stored or transmitted with the
object.
(C) Computer systems and networks employ checksums (and other
mechanisms) to detect accidental changes in data. However, active
wiretapping that changes data could also change an accompanying
checksum to match the changed data. Thus, some checksum functions
by themselves are not good countermeasures for active attacks. To
protect against active attacks, the checksum function needs to be
well-chosen (see: cryptographic hash), and the checksum result
needs to be cryptographically protected (see: digital signature,
keyed hash).
$ chosen-ciphertext attack
(I) A cryptanalysis technique in which the analyst tries to
determine the key from knowledge of plaintext that corresponds to
ciphertext selected (i.e., dictated) by the analyst.
$ chosen-plaintext attack
(I) A cryptanalysis technique in which the analyst tries to
determine the key from knowledge of ciphertext that corresponds to
plaintext selected (i.e., dictated) by the analyst.
$ CIAC
See: Computer Incident Advisory Capability.
$ CIK
See: cryptographic ignition key.
$ cipher
(I) A cryptographic algorithm for encryption and decryption.
$ cipher block chaining (CBC)
(I) An block cipher mode that enhances electronic codebook mode by
chaining together blocks of ciphertext it produces. [FP081] (See:
[R1829], [R2451].)
Shirey Informational [Page 36]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) This mode operates by combining (exclusive OR-ing) the
algorithm's ciphertext output block with the next plaintext block
to form the next input block for the algorithm.
$ cipher feedback (CFB)
(I) An block cipher mode that enhances electronic code book mode
by chaining together the blocks of ciphertext it produces and
operating on plaintext segments of variable length less than or
equal to the block length. [FP081]
(C) This mode operates by using the previously generated
ciphertext segment as the algorithm's input (i.e., by "feeding
back" the ciphertext) to generate an output block, and then
combining (exclusive OR-ing) that output block with the next
plaintext segment (block length or less) to form the next
ciphertext segment.
$ ciphertext
(I) Data that has been transformed by encryption so that its
semantic information content (i.e., its meaning) is no longer
intelligible or directly available. (See: cleartext, plaintext.)
(O) "Data produced through the use of encipherment. The semantic
content of the resulting data is not available." [I7498 Part 2]
$ ciphertext-only attack
(I) A cryptanalysis technique in which the analyst tries to
determine the key solely from knowledge of intercepted ciphertext
(although the analyst may also know other clues, such as the
cryptographic algorithm, the language in which the plaintext was
written, the subject matter of the plaintext, and some probable
plaintext words.)
$ CIPSO
See: Common IP Security Option.
$ CKL
See: compromised key list.
$ class 2, 3, 4, or 5
(O) U.S. Department of Defense usage: Levels of PKI assurance
based on risk and value of information to be protected [DOD3]:
- Class 2: For handling low-value information (unclassified, not
mission-critical, or low monetary value) or protection of
system-high information in low- to medium-risk environment.
Shirey Informational [Page 37]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Class 3: For handling medium-value information in low- to
medium-risk environment. Typically requires identification of a
system entity as a legal person, rather than merely a member of
an organization.
- Class 4: For handling medium- to high-value information in any
environment. Typically requires identification of an entity as
a legal person, rather than merely a member of an organization,
and a cryptographic hardware token for protection of keying
material.
- Class 5: For handling high-value information in a high-risk
environment.
$ classification
$ classification level
(I) (1.) A grouping of classified information to which a
hierarchical, restrictive security label is applied to increase
protection of the data. (2.) The level of protection that is
required to be applied to that information. (See: security level.)
$ classified
(I) Refers to information (stored or conveyed, in any form) that
is formally required by a security policy to be given data
confidentiality service and to be marked with a security label
(which in some cases might be implicit) to indicate its protected
status. (See: unclassified.)
(C) The term is mainly used in government, especially in the
military, although the concept underlying the term also applies
outside government. In the U.S. Department of Defense, for
example, it means information that has been determined pursuant to
Executive Order 12958 ("Classified National Security Information",
20 April 1995) or any predecessor order to require protection
against unauthorized disclosure and is marked to indicate its
classified status when in documentary form.
$ clean system
(I) A computer system in which the operating system and
application system software and files have just been freshly
installed from trusted software distribution media.
(C) A clean system is not necessarily in a secure state.
$ clearance
See: security clearance.
Shirey Informational [Page 38]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ clearance level
(I) The security level of information to which a security
clearance authorizes a person to have access.
$ cleartext
(I) Data in which the semantic information content (i.e., the
meaning) is intelligible or is directly available. (See:
plaintext.)
(O) "Intelligible data, the semantic content of which is
available." [I7498 Part 2]
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "plaintext",
the input to an encryption operation, because the plaintext input
to encryption may itself be ciphertext that was output from
another operation. (See: superencryption.)
$ client
(I) A system entity that requests and uses a service provided by
another system entity, called a "server". (See: server.)
(C) Usually, the requesting entity is a computer process, and it
makes the request on behalf of a human user. In some cases, the
server may itself be a client of some other server.
$ CLIPPER chip
(N) The Mykotronx, Inc. MYK-82, an integrated microcircuit with a
cryptographic processor that implements the SKIPJACK encryption
algorithm and supports key escrow. (See: CAPSTONE, Escrowed
Encryption Standard.)
(C) The key escrow scheme for a chip involves a SKIPJACK key
common to all chips that protects the unique serial number of the
chip, and a second SKIPJACK key unique to the chip that protects
all data encrypted by the chip. The second key is escrowed as
split key components held by NIST and the U.S. Treasury
Department.
$ closed security environment
(O) U.S. Department of Defense usage: A system environment that
meets both of the following conditions: (a) Application developers
(including maintainers) have sufficient clearances and
authorizations to provide an acceptable presumption that they have
not introduced malicious logic. (b) Configuration control provides
sufficient assurance that system applications and the equipment
they run on are protected against the introduction of malicious
logic prior to and during the operation of applications. [NCS04]
(See: open security environment.)
Shirey Informational [Page 39]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ code
(I) noun: A system of symbols used to represent information, which
might originally have some other representation. (See: encode.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as synonym for the following:
(a) "cipher", "hash", or other words that mean "a cryptographic
algorithm"; (b) "ciphertext"; or (c) "encrypt", "hash", or other
words that refer to applying a cryptographic algorithm.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT this word as an abbreviation for the following
terms: country code, cyclic redundancy code, Data Authentication
Code, error detection code, Message Authentication Code, object
code, or source code. To avoid misunderstanding, use the fully
qualified term, at least at the point of first usage.
$ color change
(I) In a system that is being operated in periods processing mode,
the act of purging all information from one processing period and
then changing over to the next processing period.
$ Common Criteria
$ Common Criteria for Information Technology Security
(N) "The Common Criteria" is a standard for evaluating information
technology products and systems, such as operating systems,
computer networks, distributed systems, and applications. It
states requirements for security functions and for assurance
measures. [CCIB]
(C) Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
and the United States (NIST and NSA) began developing this
standard in 1993, based on the European ITSEC, the Canadian
Trusted Computer Product Evaluation Criteria (CTCPEC), and the
U.S. "Federal Criteria for Information Technology Security" (FC)
and its precursor, the TCSEC. Work was done in cooperation with
ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 (Information Technology),
Subcommittee 27 (Security Techniques), Working Group 3 (Security
Criteria). Version 2.1 of the Criteria is equivalent to ISO's
International Standard 15408 [I15408]. The U.S. Government intends
that this standard eventually will supersede both the TCSEC and
FIPS PUB 140-1. (See: NIAP.)
(C) The standard addresses data confidentiality, data integrity,
and availability and may apply to other aspects of security. It
focuses on threats to information arising from human activities,
malicious or otherwise, but may apply to non-human threats. It
applies to security measures implemented in hardware, firmware, or
software. It does not apply to (a) administrative security not
related directly to technical security, (b) technical physical
Shirey Informational [Page 40]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
aspects of security such as electromagnetic emanation control, (c)
evaluation methodology or administrative and legal framework under
which the criteria may be applied, (d) procedures for use of
evaluation results, or (e) assessment of inherent qualities of
cryptographic algorithms.
$ Common IP Security Option (CIPSO)
See: (secondary definition under) Internet Protocol Security
Option.
$ common name
(I) A character string that (a) may be a part of the X.500 DN of a
Directory object ("commonName" attribute), (b) is a (possibly
ambiguous) name by which the object is commonly known in some
limited scope (such as an organization), and (c) conforms to the
naming conventions of the country or culture with which it is
associated. [X520] (See: ("subject" and "issuer" under) X.509
public-key certificate.)
(C) For example, "Dr. E. F. Moore", "The United Nations", or
"12-th Floor Laser Printer".
$ communication security (COMSEC)
(I) Measures that implement and assure security services in a
communication system, particularly those that provide data
confidentiality and data integrity and that authenticate
communicating entities.
(C) Usually understood to include cryptographic algorithms and key
management methods and processes, devices that implement them, and
the life cycle management of keying material and devices.
$ community string
(I) A community name in the form of an octet string that serves as
a cleartext password in SNMP version 1. [R1157]
$ compartment
(I) A grouping of sensitive information items that require special
access controls beyond those normally provided for the basic
classification level of the information. (See: category.)
(C) The term is usually understood to include the special handling
procedures to be used for the information.
$ compromise
See: data compromise, security compromise.
Shirey Informational [Page 41]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ compromised key list (CKL)
(O) MISSI usage: A list that identifies keys for which
unauthorized disclosure or alteration may have occurred. (See:
compromise.)
(C) A CKL is issued by an CA, like a CRL is issued. But a CKL
lists only KMIDs, not subjects that hold the keys, and not
certificates in which the keys are bound.
$ COMPUSEC
See: computer security.
$ computer emergency response team (CERT)
(I) An organization that studies computer and network INFOSEC in
order to provide incident response services to victims of attacks,
publish alerts concerning vulnerabilities and threats, and offer
other information to help improve computer and network security.
(See: CSIRT, security incident.)
(C) For example, the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie-Mellon
University (sometimes called "the" CERT) and the Computer Incident
Advisory Capability.
$ Computer Incident Advisory Capability (CIAC)
(N) A computer emergency response team in the U.S. Department of
Energy.
$ computer network
(I) A collection of host computers together with the subnetwork or
internetwork through which they can exchange data.
(C) This definition is intended to cover systems of all sizes and
types, ranging from the complex Internet to a simple system
composed of a personal computer dialing in as a remote terminal of
another computer.
$ computer security (COMPUSEC)
(I) Measures that implement and assure security services in a
computer system, particularly those that assure access control
service.
(C) Usually understood to include functions, features, and
technical characteristics of computer hardware and software,
especially operating systems.
Shirey Informational [Page 42]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ computer security incident response team (CSIRT)
(I) An organization "that coordinates and supports the response to
security incidents that involve sites within a defined
constituency." [R2350] (See: CERT, FIRST, security incident.)
(C) To be considered a CSIRT, an organization must do as follows:
- Provide a (secure) channel for receiving reports about
suspected security incidents.
- Provide assistance to members of its constituency in handling
the incidents.
- Disseminate incident-related information to its constituency
and other involved parties.
$ computer security object
(I) The definition or representation of a resource, tool, or
mechanism used to maintain a condition of security in computerized
environments. Includes many elements referred to in standards that
are either selected or defined by separate user communities.
[CSOR] (See: object identifier, Computer Security Objects
Register.)
$ Computer Security Objects Register (CSOR)
(N) A service operated by NIST is establishing a catalog for
computer security objects to provide stable object definitions
identified by unique names. The use of this register will enable
the unambiguous specification of security parameters and
algorithms to be used in secure data exchanges.
(C) The CSOR follows registration guidelines established by the
international standards community and ANSI. Those guidelines
establish minimum responsibilities for registration authorities
and assign the top branches of an international registration
hierarchy. Under that international registration hierarchy the
CSOR is responsible for the allocation of unique identifiers under
the branch {joint-iso-ccitt(2) country(16) us(840) gov(101)
csor(3)}.
$ COMSEC
See: communication security.
$ confidentiality
See: data confidentiality.
$ configuration control
(I) The process of regulating changes to hardware, firmware,
software, and documentation throughout the development and
operational life of a system. (See: administrative security.)
Shirey Informational [Page 43]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Configuration control helps protect against unauthorized or
malicious alteration of a system and thus provides assurance of
system integrity. (See: malicious logic.)
$ confinement property
See: (secondary definition under) Bell-LaPadula Model.
$ connectionless data integrity service
(I) A security service that provides data integrity service for an
individual IP datagram, by detecting modification of the datagram,
without regard to the ordering of the datagram in a stream of
datagrams.
(C) A connection-oriented data integrity service would be able to
detect lost or reordered datagrams within a stream of datagrams.
$ contingency plan
(I) A plan for emergency response, backup operations, and post-
disaster recovery in a system as part of a security program to
ensure availability of critical system resources and facilitate
continuity of operations in a crisis. [NCS04] (See: availability.)
$ controlled security mode
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term. It was defined in an earlier
version of the U.S. Department of Defense policy that regulates
system accreditation, but was subsumed by "partitioned security
mode" in the current version. [DOD2]
(C) The term refers to a mode of operation of an information
system, wherein at least some users with access to the system have
neither a security clearance nor a need-to-know for all classified
material contained in the system. However, separation and control
of users and classified material on the basis, respectively, of
clearance and classification level are not essentially under
operating system control like they are in "multilevel security
mode".
(C) Controlled mode was intended to encourage ingenuity in meeting
the security requirements of Defense policy in ways less
restrictive than "dedicated security mode" and "system high
security mode", but at a level of risk lower than that generally
associated with the true "multilevel security mode". This was to
be accomplished by implementation of explicit augmenting measures
to reduce or remove a substantial measure of system software
vulnerability together with specific limitation of the security
clearance levels of users permitted concurrent access to the
system.
Shirey Informational [Page 44]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ cookie
(I) access control usage: A synonym for "capability" or "ticket"
in an access control system.
(I) IPsec usage: Data exchanged by ISAKMP to prevent certain
denial-of-service attacks during the establishment of a security
association.
(I) HTTP usage: Data exchanged between an HTTP server and a
browser (a client of the server) to store state information on the
client side and retrieve it later for server use.
(C) An HTTP server, when sending data to a client, may send along
a cookie, which the client retains after the HTTP connection
closes. A server can use this mechanism to maintain persistent
client-side state information for HTTP-based applications,
retrieving the state information in later connections. A cookie
may include a description of the range of URLs for which the state
is valid. Future requests made by the client in that range will
also send the current value of the cookie to the server. Cookies
can be used to generate profiles of web usage habits, and thus may
infringe on personal privacy.
$ Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
(N) UTC is derived from International Atomic Time (TAI) by adding
a number of leap seconds. The International Bureau of Weights and
Measures computes TAI once each month by averaging data from many
laboratories. (See: GeneralizedTime, UTCTime.)
$ copy
See: card copy.
$ correctness integrity
(I) Accuracy and consistency of the information that data values
represent, rather than of the data itself. Closely related to
issues of accountability and error handling. (See: data integrity,
source integrity.)
$ correctness proof
(I) A mathematical proof of consistency between a specification
for system security and the implementation of that specification.
(See: formal specification.)
$ countermeasure
(I) An action, device, procedure, or technique that reduces a
threat, a vulnerability, or an attack by eliminating or preventing
it, by minimizing the harm it can cause, or by discovering and
reporting it so that corrective action can be taken.
Shirey Informational [Page 45]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) In an Internet protocol, a countermeasure may take the form of
a protocol feature, an element function, or a usage constraint.
$ country code
(I) An identifier that is defined for a nation by ISO. [I3166]
(C) For each nation, ISO Standard 3166 defines a unique two-
character alphabetic code, a unique three-character alphabetic
code, and a three-digit code. Among many uses of these codes, the
two-character codes are used as top-level domain names.
$ covert channel
(I) A intra-system channel that permits two cooperating entities,
without exceeding their access authorizations, to transfer
information in a way that violates the system's security policy.
(See: channel, out of band.)
(O) "A communications channel that allows two cooperating
processes to transfer information in a manner that violates the
system's security policy." [NCS04]
(C) The cooperating entities can be either two insiders or an
insider and an outsider. Of course, an outsider has no access
authorization at all. A covert channel is a system feature that
the system architects neither designed nor intended for
information transfer:
- "Timing channel": A system feature that enable one system
entity to signal information to another by modulating its own
use of a system resource in such a way as to affect system
response time observed by the second entity.
- "Storage channel": A system feature that enables one system
entity to signal information to another entity by directly or
indirectly writing a storage location that is later directly or
indirectly read by the second entity.
$ CPS
See: certification practice statement.
$ cracker
(I) Someone who tries to break the security of, and gain access
to, someone else's system without being invited to do so. (See:
hacker and intruder.)
$ CRAM
See: Challenge-Response Authentication Mechanism.
Shirey Informational [Page 46]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ CRC
See: cyclic redundancy check.
$ credential(s)
(I) Data that is transferred or presented to establish either a
claimed identity or the authorizations of a system entity. (See:
authentication information, capability, ticket.)
(O) "Data that is transferred to establish the claimed identity of
an entity." [I7498 Part 2]
$ critical
1. (I) "Critical" system resource: A condition of a service or
other system resource such that denial of access to (i.e., lack of
availability of) that resource would jeopardize a system user's
ability to perform a primary function or would result in other
serious consequences. (See: availability, sensitive.)
2. (N) "Critical" extension: Each extension of an X.509
certificate (or CRL) is marked as being either critical or non-
critical. If an extension is critical and a certificate user (or
CRL user) does not recognize the extension type or does not
implement its semantics, then the user is required to treat the
certificate (or CRL) as invalid. If an extension is non-critical,
a user that does not recognize or implement that extension type is
permitted to ignore the extension and process the rest of the
certificate (or CRL).
$ CRL
See: certificate revocation list.
$ CRL distribution point
See: distribution point.
$ CRL extension
See: extension.
$ cross-certificate
See: cross-certification.
$ cross-certification
(I) The act or process by which two CAs each certify a public key
of the other, issuing a public-key certificate to that other CA.
(C) Cross-certification enables users to validate each other's
certificate when the users are certified under different
certification hierarchies.
Shirey Informational [Page 47]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ cryptanalysis
(I) The mathematical science that deals with analysis of a
cryptographic system in order to gain knowledge needed to break or
circumvent the protection that the system is designed to provide.
(See: cryptology.)
(O) "The analysis of a cryptographic system and/or its inputs and
outputs to derive confidential variables and/or sensitive data
including cleartext." [I7498 Part 2]
(C) The "O" definition states the traditional goal of
cryptanalysis--convert the ciphertext to plaintext (which usually
is cleartext) without knowing the key--but that definition applies
only to encryption systems. Today, the term is used with reference
to all kinds of cryptographic algorithms and key management, and
the "I" definition reflects that. In all cases, however, a
cryptanalyst tries to uncover or reproduce someone else's
sensitive data, such as cleartext, a key, or an algorithm. The
basic cryptanalytic attacks on encryption systems are ciphertext-
only, known-plaintext, chosen-plaintext, and chosen-ciphertext;
and these generalize to the other kinds of cryptography.
$ crypto
(D) Except as part of certain long-established terms listed in
this Glossary, ISDs SHOULD NOT use this abbreviated term because
it may be misunderstood. Instead, use "cryptography" or
"cryptographic".
$ cryptographic algorithm
(I) An algorithm that employs the science of cryptography,
including encryption algorithms, cryptographic hash algorithms,
digital signature algorithms, and key agreement algorithms.
$ cryptographic application programming interface (CAPI)
(I) The source code formats and procedures through which an
application program accesses cryptographic services, which are
defined abstractly compared to their actual implementation. For
example, see: PKCS #11, [R2628].
$ cryptographic card
(I) A cryptographic token in the form of a smart card or a PC
card.
$ cryptographic component
(I) A generic term for any system component that involves
cryptography. (See: cryptographic module.)
Shirey Informational [Page 48]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ cryptographic hash
See: (secondary definition under) hash function.
$ cryptographic ignition key (CIK)
(I) A physical (usually electronic) token used to store,
transport, and protect cryptographic keys. (Sometimes abbreviated
as "crypto ignition key".)
(C) A typical use is to divide a split key between a CIK and a
cryptographic module, so that it is necessary to combine the two
to regenerate a key-encrypting key and thus activate the module
and other keys it contains.
$ cryptographic key
(I) Usually shortened to just "key". An input parameter that
varies the transformation performed by a cryptographic algorithm.
(O) "A sequence of symbols that controls the operations of
encipherment and decipherment." [I7498 Part 2]
(C) If a key value needs to be kept secret, the sequence of
symbols (usually bits) that comprise it should be random, or at
least pseudo-random, because that makes the key hard for an
adversary to guess. (See: cryptanalysis, brute force attack.)
$ Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
(I) A encapsulation syntax for digital signatures, hashes, and
encryption of arbitrary messages. [R2630]
(C) CMS was derived from PKCS #7. CMS values are specified with
ASN.1 and use BER encoding. The syntax permits multiple
encapsulation with nesting, permits arbitrary attributes to be
signed along with message content, and supports a variety of
architectures for digital certificate-based key management.
$ cryptographic module
(I) A set of hardware, software, firmware, or some combination
thereof that implements cryptographic logic or processes,
including cryptographic algorithms, and is contained within the
module's cryptographic boundary, which is an explicitly defined
contiguous perimeter that establishes the physical bounds of the
module. [FP140]
$ cryptographic system
(I) A set of cryptographic algorithms together with the key
management processes that support use of the algorithms in some
application context.
Shirey Informational [Page 49]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) This "I" definition covers a wider range of algorithms than
the following "O" definition:
(O) "A collection of transformations from plaintext into
ciphertext and vice versa [which would exclude digital signature,
cryptographic hash, and key agreement algorithms], the particular
transformation(s) to be used being selected by keys. The
transformations are normally defined by a mathematical algorithm."
[X509]
$ cryptographic token
(I) A portable, user-controlled, physical device used to store
cryptographic information and possibly perform cryptographic
functions. (See: cryptographic card, token.)
(C) A smart token may implement some set of cryptographic
algorithms and may implement related algorithms and key management
functions, such as a random number generator. A smart
cryptographic token may contain a cryptographic module or may not
be explicitly designed that way.
$ cryptography
(I) The mathematical science that deals with transforming data to
render its meaning unintelligible (i.e., to hide its semantic
content), prevent its undetected alteration, or prevent its
unauthorized use. If the transformation is reversible,
cryptography also deals with restoring encrypted data to
intelligible form. (See: cryptology, steganography.)
(O) "The discipline which embodies principles, means, and methods
for the transformation of data in order to hide its information
content, prevent its undetected modification and/or prevent its
unauthorized use. . . . Cryptography determines the methods used
in encipherment and decipherment." [I7498 Part 2]
$ Cryptoki
See: (secondary definition under) PKCS #11.
$ cryptology
(I) The science that includes both cryptography and cryptanalysis,
and sometimes is said to include steganography.
$ cryptonet
(I) A group of system entities that share a secret cryptographic
key for a symmetric algorithm.
Shirey Informational [Page 50]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ cryptoperiod
(I) The time span during which a particular key is authorized to
be used in a cryptographic system. (See: key management.)
(C) A cryptoperiod is usually stated in terms of calendar or clock
time, but sometimes is stated in terms of the maximum amount of
data permitted to be processed by a cryptographic algorithm using
the key. Specifying a cryptoperiod involves a tradeoff between the
cost of rekeying and the risk of successful cryptanalysis.
(C) Although we deprecate its prefix, this term is long-
established in COMPUSEC usage. (See: crypto) In the context of
certificates and public keys, "key lifetime" and "validity period"
are often used instead.
$ cryptosystem
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as an abbreviation for
cryptographic system. (For rationale, see: crypto.)
$ CSIRT
See: computer security incident response team.
$ CSOR
See: Computer Security Objects Register.
$ cut-and-paste attack
(I) An active attack on the data integrity of ciphertext, effected
by replacing sections of ciphertext with other ciphertext, such
that the result appears to decrypt correctly but actually decrypts
to plaintext that is forged to the satisfaction of the attacker.
$ cyclic redundancy check (CRC)
(I) Sometimes called "cyclic redundancy code". A type of checksum
algorithm that is not a cryptographic hash but is used to
implement data integrity service where accidental changes to data
are expected.
$ DAC
See: Data Authentication Code, discretionary access control.
$ DASS
See: Distributed Authentication Security Service.
$ data
(I) Information in a specific physical representation, usually a
sequence of symbols that have meaning; especially a representation
of information that can be processed or produced by a computer.
Shirey Informational [Page 51]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Data Authentication Algorithm
(N) A keyed hash function equivalent to DES cipher block chaining
with IV = 0. [A9009]
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use the uncapitalized form of this term as a
synonym for other kinds of checksums.
$ data authentication code vs. Data Authentication Code (DAC)
1. (N) Capitalized: "The Data Authentication Code" refers to a
U.S. Government standard [FP113] for a checksum that is computed
by the Data Authentication Algorithm. (Also known as the ANSI
standard Message Authentication Code [A9009].)
2. (D) Not capitalized: ISDs SHOULD NOT use "data authentication
code" as a synonym for another kind of checksum, because this term
mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way. (See:
authentication code.) Instead, use "checksum", "error detection
code", "hash", "keyed hash", "Message Authentication Code", or
"protected checksum", depending on what is meant.
$ data compromise
(I) A security incident in which information is exposed to
potential unauthorized access, such that unauthorized disclosure,
alteration, or use of the information may have occurred. (See:
compromise.)
$ data confidentiality
(I) "The property that information is not made available or
disclosed to unauthorized individuals, entities, or processes
[i.e., to any unauthorized system entity]." [I7498 Part 2]. (See:
data confidentiality service.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "privacy",
which is a different concept.
$ data confidentiality service
(I) A security service that protects data against unauthorized
disclosure. (See: data confidentiality.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "privacy",
which is a different concept.
$ Data Encryption Algorithm (DEA)
(N) A symmetric block cipher, defined as part of the U.S.
Government's Data Encryption Standard. DEA uses a 64-bit key, of
which 56 bits are independently chosen and 8 are parity bits, and
maps a 64-bit block into another 64-bit block. [FP046] (See: DES,
symmetric cryptography.)
Shirey Informational [Page 52]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) This algorithm is usually referred to as "DES". The algorithm
has also been adopted in standards outside the Government (e.g.,
[A3092]).
$ data encryption key (DEK)
(I) A cryptographic key that is used to encipher application data.
(See: key-encrypting key.)
$ Data Encryption Standard (DES)
(N) A U.S. Government standard [FP046] that specifies the Data
Encryption Algorithm and states policy for using the algorithm to
protect unclassified, sensitive data. (See: AES, DEA.)
$ data integrity
(I) The property that data has not been changed, destroyed, or
lost in an unauthorized or accidental manner. (See: data integrity
service.)
(O) "The property that information has not been modified or
destroyed in an unauthorized manner." [I7498 Part 2]
(C) Deals with constancy of and confidence in data values, not
with the information that the values represent (see: correctness
integrity) or the trustworthiness of the source of the values
(see: source integrity).
$ data integrity service
(I) A security service that protects against unauthorized changes
to data, including both intentional change or destruction and
accidental change or loss, by ensuring that changes to data are
detectable. (See: data integrity.)
(C) A data integrity service can only detect a change and report
it to an appropriate system entity; changes cannot be prevented
unless the system is perfect (error-free) and no malicious user
has access. However, a system that offers data integrity service
might also attempt to correct and recover from changes.
(C) Relationship between data integrity service and authentication
services: Although data integrity service is defined separately
from data origin authentication service and peer entity
authentication service, it is closely related to them.
Authentication services depend, by definition, on companion data
integrity services. Data origin authentication service provides
verification that the identity of the original source of a
received data unit is as claimed; there can be no such
verification if the data unit has been altered. Peer entity
Shirey Informational [Page 53]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
authentication service provides verification that the identity of
a peer entity in a current association is as claimed; there can be
no such verification if the claimed identity has been altered.
$ data origin authentication
(I) "The corroboration that the source of data received is as
claimed." [I7498 Part 2] (See: authentication.)
$ data origin authentication service
(I) A security service that verifies the identity of a system
entity that is claimed to be the original source of received data.
(See: authentication, authentication service.)
(C) This service is provided to any system entity that receives or
holds the data. Unlike peer entity authentication service, this
service is independent of any association between the originator
and the recipient, and the data in question may have originated at
any time in the past.
(C) A digital signature mechanism can be used to provide this
service, because someone who does not know the private key cannot
forge the correct signature. However, by using the signer's public
key, anyone can verify the origin of correctly signed data.
(C) This service is usually bundled with connectionless data
integrity service. (See: (relationship between data integrity
service and authentication services under) data integrity service.
$ data privacy
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it mix concepts in a
potentially misleading way. Instead, use either "data
confidentiality" or "privacy", depending on what is meant.
$ data security
(I) The protection of data from disclosure, alteration,
destruction, or loss that either is accidental or is intentional
but unauthorized.
(C) Both data confidentiality service and data integrity service
are needed to achieve data security.
$ datagram
(I) "A self-contained, independent entity of data carrying
sufficient information to be routed from the source to the
destination." [R1983]
$ DEA
See: Data Encryption Algorithm.
Shirey Informational [Page 54]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ deception
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ decipher
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "decrypt",
except in special circumstances. (See: (usage discussion under)
encryption.)
$ decipherment
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "decryption",
except in special circumstances. (See: (usage discussion under)
encryption.)
$ decode
(I) Convert encoded data back to its original form of
representation. (See: decrypt.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "decrypt",
because that would mix concepts in a potentially misleading way.
$ decrypt
(I) Cryptographically restore ciphertext to the plaintext form it
had before encryption.
$ decryption
See: (secondary definition under) encryption.
$ dedicated security mode
(I) A mode of operation of an information system, wherein all
users have the clearance or authorization, and the need-to-know,
for all data handled by the system. In this mode, the system may
handle either a single classification level or category of
information or a range of levels and categories. [DOD2]
(C) This mode is defined formally in U.S. Department of Defense
policy regarding system accreditation, but the term is also used
outside the Defense Department and outside the Government.
$ default account
(I) A system login account (usually accessed with a user name and
password) that has been predefined in a manufactured system to
permit initial access when the system is first put into service.
(C) Sometimes, the default user name and password are the same in
each copy of the system. In any case, when the system is put into
service, the default password should immediately be changed or the
default account should be disabled.
Shirey Informational [Page 55]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ degauss
(N) Apply a magnetic field to permanently remove, erase, or clear
data from a magnetic storage medium, such as a tape or disk
[NCS25]. Reduce magnetic flux density to zero by applying a
reversing magnetic field.
$ degausser
(N) An electrical device that can degauss magnetic storage media.
$ DEK
See: data encryption key.
$ delta CRL
(I) A partial CRL that only contains entries for X.509
certificates that have been revoked since the issuance of a prior,
base CRL. This method can be used to partition CRLs that become
too large and unwieldy.
$ denial of service
(I) The prevention of authorized access to a system resource or
the delaying of system operations and functions. (See:
availability, critical (resource of a system), flooding.)
$ DES
See: Data Encryption Standard.
$ dictionary attack
(I) An attack that uses a brute-force technique of successively
trying all the words in some large, exhaustive list.
(C) For example, an attack on an authentication service by trying
all possible passwords; or an attack on encryption by encrypting
some known plaintext phrase with all possible keys so that the key
for any given encrypted message containing that phrase may be
obtained by lookup.
$ Diffie-Hellman
(N) A key agreement algorithm published in 1976 by Whitfield
Diffie and Martin Hellman [DH76, R2631].
(C) Diffie-Hellman does key establishment, not encryption.
However, the key that it produces may be used for encryption, for
further key management operations, or for any other cryptography.
(C) The difficulty of breaking Diffie-Hellman is considered to be
equal to the difficulty of computing discrete logarithms modulo a
large prime. The algorithm is described in [R2631] and [Schn]. In
brief, Alice and Bob together pick large integers that satisfy
Shirey Informational [Page 56]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
certain mathematical conditions, and then use the integers to each
separately compute a public-private key pair. They send each other
their public key. Each person uses their own private key and the
other person's public key to compute a key, k, that, because of
the mathematics of the algorithm, is the same for each of them.
Passive wiretapping cannot learn the shared k, because k is not
transmitted, and neither are the private keys needed to compute k.
However, without additional mechanisms to authenticate each party
to the other, a protocol based on the algorithm may be vulnerable
to a man-in-the-middle attack.
$ digest
See: message digest.
$ digital certificate
(I) A certificate document in the form of a digital data object (a
data object used by a computer) to which is appended a computed
digital signature value that depends on the data object. (See:
attribute certificate, capability, public-key certificate.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term to refer to a signed CRL or CKL.
Although the recommended definition can be interpreted to include
those items, the security community does not use the term with
those meanings.
$ digital certification
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for
"certification", unless the context is not sufficient to
distinguish between digital certification and another kind of
certification, in which case it would be better to use "public-key
certification" or another phrase that indicates what is being
certified.
$ digital document
(I) An electronic data object that represents information
originally written in a non-electronic, non-magnetic medium
(usually ink on paper) or is an analogue of a document of that
type.
$ digital envelope
(I) A digital envelope for a recipient is a combination of (a)
encrypted content data (of any kind) and (b) the content
encryption key in an encrypted form that has been prepared for the
use of the recipient.
(C) In ISDs, this term should be defined at the point of first use
because, although the term is defined in PKCS #7 and used in
S/MIME, it is not yet widely established.
Shirey Informational [Page 57]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Digital enveloping is not simply a synonym for implementing
data confidentiality with encryption; digital enveloping is a
hybrid encryption scheme to "seal" a message or other data, by
encrypting the data and sending both it and a protected form of
the key to the intended recipient, so that no one other than the
intended recipient can "open" the message. In PCKS #7, it means
first encrypting the data using a symmetric encryption algorithm
and a secret key, and then encrypting the secret key using an
asymmetric encryption algorithm and the public key of the intended
recipient. In S/MIME, additional methods are defined for
conveying the content encryption key.
$ Digital ID(service mark)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "digital
certificate" because (a) it is the service mark of a commercial
firm, (b) it unnecessarily duplicates the meaning of other, well-
established terms, and (c) a certificate is not always used as
authentication information. In some contexts, however, it may be
useful to explain that the key conveyed in a public-key
certificate can be used to verify an identity and, therefore, that
the certificate can be thought of as digital identification
information. (See: identification information.)
$ digital key
(C) The adjective "digital" need not be used with "key" or
"cryptographic key", unless the context is insufficient to
distinguish the digital key from another kind of key, such as a
metal key for a door lock.
$ digital notary
(I) Analogous to a notary public. Provides a trusted date-and-time
stamp for a document, so that someone can later prove that the
document existed at a point in time. May also verify the
signature(s) on a signed document before applying the stamp. (See:
notarization.)
$ digital signature
(I) A value computed with a cryptographic algorithm and appended
to a data object in such a way that any recipient of the data can
use the signature to verify the data's origin and integrity. (See:
data origin authentication service, data integrity service,
digitized signature, electronic signature, signer.)
(I) "Data appended to, or a cryptographic transformation of, a
data unit that allows a recipient of the data unit to prove the
source and integrity of the data unit and protect against forgery,
e.g. by the recipient." [I7498 Part 2]
Shirey Informational [Page 58]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Typically, the data object is first input to a hash function,
and then the hash result is cryptographically transformed using a
private key of the signer. The final resulting value is called the
digital signature of the data object. The signature value is a
protected checksum, because the properties of a cryptographic hash
ensure that if the data object is changed, the digital signature
will no longer match it. The digital signature is unforgeable
because one cannot be certain of correctly creating or changing
the signature without knowing the private key of the supposed
signer.
(C) Some digital signature schemes use a asymmetric encryption
algorithm (e.g., see: RSA) to transform the hash result. Thus,
when Alice needs to sign a message to send to Bob, she can use her
private key to encrypt the hash result. Bob receives both the
message and the digital signature. Bob can use Alice's public key
to decrypt the signature, and then compare the plaintext result to
the hash result that he computes by hashing the message himself.
If the values are equal, Bob accepts the message because he is
certain that it is from Alice and has arrived unchanged. If the
values are not equal, Bob rejects the message because either the
message or the signature was altered in transit.
(C) Other digital signature schemes (e.g., see: DSS) transform the
hash result with an algorithm (e.g., see: DSA, El Gamal) that
cannot be directly used to encrypt data. Such a scheme creates a
signature value from the hash and provides a way to verify the
signature value, but does not provide a way to recover the hash
result from the signature value. In some countries, such a scheme
may improve exportability and avoid other legal constraints on
usage.
$ Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA)
(N) An asymmetric cryptographic algorithm that produces a digital
signature in the form of a pair of large numbers. The signature is
computed using rules and parameters such that the identity of the
signer and the integrity of the signed data can be verified. (See:
Digital Signature Standard.)
$ Digital Signature Standard (DSS)
(N) The U.S. Government standard [FP186] that specifies the
Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA), which involves asymmetric
cryptography.
$ digital watermarking
(I) Computing techniques for inseparably embedding unobtrusive
marks or labels as bits in digital data--text, graphics, images,
video, or audio--and for detecting or extracting the marks later.
Shirey Informational [Page 59]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The set of embedded bits (the digital watermark) is sometimes
hidden, usually imperceptible, and always intended to be
unobtrusive. Depending on the particular technique that is used,
digital watermarking can assist in proving ownership, controlling
duplication, tracing distribution, ensuring data integrity, and
performing other functions to protect intellectual property
rights. [ACM]
$ digitized signature
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because there is no current
consensus on its definition. Although it appears to be used mainly
to refer to various forms of digitized images of handwritten
signatures, the term should be avoided because it might be
confused with "digital signature".
$ directory
$ Directory
See: directory vs. Directory.
$ Directory Access Protocol (DAP)
(N) An OSI protocol [X519] for communication between a Directory
User Agent (a client) and a Directory System Agent (a server).
(See: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol.)
$ directory vs. Directory
1. (I) Not capitalized: The term "directory" refers generically to
a database server or other system that provides information--such
as a digital certificate or CRL--about an entity whose name is
known.
2. (I) Capitalized: "Directory" refers specifically to the X.500
Directory. (See: repository.)
$ disaster plan
(D) A synonym for "contingency plan". In the interest of
consistency, ISDs SHOULD use "contingency plan" instead of
"disaster plan".
$ disclosure (i.e., unauthorized disclosure)
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ discretionary access control (DAC)
(I) An access control service that enforces a security policy
based on the identity of system entities and their authorizations
to access system resources. (See: access control list, identity-
based security policy, mandatory access control.)
Shirey Informational [Page 60]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) This service is termed "discretionary" because an entity might
have access rights that permit the entity, by its own volition, to
enable another entity to access some resource.
(O) "A means of restricting access to objects based on the
identity of subjects and/or groups to which they belong. The
controls are discretionary in the sense that a subject with a
certain access permission is capable of passing that permission
(perhaps indirectly) on to any other subject." [DOD1]
$ disruption
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
(N) A subset of the Basic Encoding Rules, which gives exactly one
way to represent any ASN.1 value as an octet string [X690].
(C) Since there is more than one way to encode ASN.1 in BER, DER
is used in applications in which a unique encoding is needed, such
as when a digital signature is computed on an ASN.1 value.
$ distinguished name (DN)
(I) An identifier that uniquely represents an object in the X.500
Directory Information Tree (DIT) [X501]. (See: domain name.)
(C) A DN is a set of attribute values that identify the path
leading from the base of the DIT to the object that is named. An
X.509 public-key certificate or CRL contains a DN that identifies
its issuer, and an X.509 attribute certificate contains a DN or
other form of name that identifies its subject.
$ Distributed Authentication Security Service (DASS)
(I) An experimental Internet protocol [R1507] that uses
cryptographic mechanisms to provide strong, mutual authentication
services in a distributed environment.
$ distribution point
(I) An X.500 Directory entry or other information source that is
named in a v3 X.509 public-key certificate extension as a location
from which to obtain a CRL that might list the certificate.
(C) A v3 X.509 public-key certificate may have a
"cRLDistributionPoints" extension that names places to get CRLs on
which the certificate might be listed. A CRL obtained from a
distribution point may (a) cover either all reasons for which a
certificate might be revoked or only some of the reasons, (b) be
issued by either the authority that signed the certificate or some
Shirey Informational [Page 61]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
other authority, and (c) contain revocation entries for only a
subset of the full set of certificates issued by one CA or (c')
contain revocation entries for multiple CAs.
$ DN
See: distinguished name.
$ DNS
See: Domain Name System.
$ DOI
See: Domain of Interpretation.
$ domain
(I) Security usage: An environment or context that is defined by a
security policy, security model, or security architecture to
include a set of system resources and the set of system entities
that have the right to access the resources. (See: domain of
interpretation, security perimeter.)
(I) Internet usage: That part of the Internet domain name space
tree [R1034] that is at or below the name the specifies the
domain. A domain is a subdomain of another domain if it is
contained within that domain. For example, D.C.B.A is a subdomain
of C.B.A. (See: Domain Name System.)
(O) MISSI usage: The domain of a MISSI CA is the set of MISSI
users whose certificates are signed by the CA.
(O) OSI usage: An administrative partition of a complex
distributed OSI system.
$ domain name
(I) The style of identifier--a sequence of case-insensitive ASCII
labels separated by dots ("bbn.com.")--defined for subtrees in the
Internet Domain Name System [R1034] and used in other Internet
identifiers, such as host names (e.g., "rosslyn.bbn.com."),
mailbox names (e.g., "rshirey@bbn.com."), and URLs (e.g.,
"http://www.rosslyn.bbn.com/foo"). (See: distinguished name,
domain.)
(C) The domain name space of the DNS is a tree structure in which
each node and leaf holds records describing a resource. Each node
has a label. The domain name of a node is the list of labels on
the path from the node to the root of the tree. The labels in a
domain name are printed or read left to right, from the most
specific (lowest, farthest from the root) to the least specific
(highest, closest to the root). The root's label is the null
Shirey Informational [Page 62]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
string, so a complete domain name properly ends in a dot. The top-
level domains, those immediately below the root, include COM, EDU,
GOV, INT, MIL, NET, ORG, and two-letter country codes (such as US)
from ISO-3166. [R1591] (See: country code.)
$ Domain Name System (DNS)
(I) The main Internet operations database, which is distributed
over a collection of servers and used by client software for
purposes such as translating a domain name-style host name into an
IP address (e.g., "rosslyn.bbn.com" is "192.1.7.10") and locating
a host that accepts mail for some mailbox address. [R1034]
(C) The DNS has three major components:
- Domain name space and resource records: Specifications for the
tree-structured domain name space, and data associated with the
names.
- Name servers: Programs that hold information about a subset of
the tree's structure and data holdings, and also hold pointers
to other name servers that can provide information from any
part of the tree.
- Resolvers: Programs that extract information from name servers
in response to client requests; typically, system routines
directly accessible to user programs.
(C) Extensions to the DNS [R2065, R2137, R2536] support (a) key
distribution for public keys needed for the DNS and for other
protocols, (b) data origin authentication service and data
integrity service for resource records, (c) data origin
authentication service for transactions between resolvers and
servers, and (d) access control of records.
$ domain of interpretation (DOI)
(I) IPsec usage: An ISAKMP/IKE DOI defines payload formats,
exchange types, and conventions for naming security-relevant
information such as security policies or cryptographic algorithms
and modes.
(C) For example, see [R2407]. The DOI concept is based on work by
the TSIG's CIPSO Working Group.
$ dominate
(I) Security level A is said to "dominate" security level B if the
hierarchical classification level of A is greater (higher) than or
equal to that of B and the nonhierarchical categories of A include
all of those of B.
Shirey Informational [Page 63]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ dongle
(I) A portable, physical, electronic device that is required to be
attached to a computer to enable a particular software program to
run. (See: token.)
(C) A dongle is essentially a physical key used for copy
protection of software, because the program will not run unless
the matching dongle is attached. When the software runs, it
periodically queries the dongle and quits if the dongle does not
reply with the proper authentication information. Dongles were
originally constructed as an EPROM (erasable programmable read-
only memory) to be connected to a serial input-output port of a
personal computer.
$ downgrade
(I) Reduce the classification level of information in an
authorized manner.
$ draft RFC
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term, because the Request for Comment
series is archival in nature and does not have a "draft" category.
(Instead, see: Internet Draft, Draft Standard (in Internet
Standard).)
$ DSA
See: Digital Signature Algorithm.
$ DSS
See: Digital Signature Standard.
$ dual control
(I) A procedure that uses two or more entities (usually persons)
operating in concert to protect a system resource, such that no
single entity acting alone can access that resource. (See: no-lone
zone, separation of duties, split knowledge.)
$ dual signature
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term except when stated as
"SET(trademark) dual signature" with the following meaning:
(O) SET usage: A single digital signature that protects two
separate messages by including the hash results for both sets in a
single encrypted value. [SET2]
Shirey Informational [Page 64]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Generated by hashing each message separately, concatenating
the two hash results, and then hashing that value and encrypting
the result with the signer's private key. Done to reduce the
number of encryption operations and to enable verification of data
integrity without complete disclosure of the data.
$ EAP
See: Extensible Authentication Protocol
$ eavesdropping
(I) Passive wiretapping done secretly, i.e., without the knowledge
of the originator or the intended recipients of the communication.
$ ECB
See: electronic codebook.
$ ECDSA
See: Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm.
$ economy of mechanism
(I) The principle that each security mechanism should be designed
to be as simple as possible, so that the mechanism can be
correctly implemented and so that it can be verified that the
operation of the mechanism enforces the containing system's
security policy. (See: least privilege.)
$ EDI
See: electronic data interchange.
$ EDIFACT
See: (secondary definition under) electronic data interchange.
$ EE
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this abbreviation because of possible
confusion among "end entity", "end-to-end encryption", "escrowed
encryption standard", and other terms.
$ EES
See: Escrowed Encryption Standard.
$ El Gamal algorithm
(N) An algorithm for asymmetric cryptography, invented in 1985 by
Taher El Gamal, that is based on the difficulty of calculating
discrete logarithms and can be used for both encryption and
digital signatures. [ElGa, Schn]
Shirey Informational [Page 65]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ electronic codebook (ECB)
(I) An block cipher mode in which a plaintext block is used
directly as input to the encryption algorithm and the resultant
output block is used directly as ciphertext [FP081].
$ electronic commerce
(I) General usage: Business conducted through paperless exchanges
of information, using electronic data interchange, electronic
funds transfer (EFT), electronic mail, computer bulletin boards,
facsimile, and other paperless technologies.
(O) SET usage: "The exchange of goods and services for payment
between the cardholder and merchant when some or all of the
transaction is performed via electronic communication." [SET2]
$ electronic data interchange (EDI)
(I) Computer-to-computer exchange, between trading partners, of
business data in standardized document formats.
(C) EDI formats have been standardized primarily by ANSI X12 and
by EDIFACT (EDI for Administration, Commerce, and Transportation),
which is an international, UN-sponsored standard primarily used in
Europe and Asia. X12 and EDIFACT are aligning to create a single,
global EDI standard.
$ electronic signature
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because there is no current
consensus on its definition. (Instead, see: digital signature.)
$ elliptic curve cryptography (ECC)
(I) A type of asymmetric cryptography based on mathematics of
groups that are defined by the points on a curve.
(C) The most efficient implementation of ECC is claimed to be
stronger per bit of key (against cryptanalysis that uses a brute
force attack) than any other known form of asymmetric
cryptography. ECC is based on mathematics different than the kinds
originally used to define the Diffie-Hellman algorithm and the
Digital Signature Algorithm. ECC is based on the mathematics of
groups defined by the points on a curve, where the curve is
defined by a quadratic equation in a finite field. ECC can be used
to define both an algorithm for key agreement that is an analog of
Diffie-Hellman and an algorithm for digital signature that is an
analog of DSA. (See: ECDSA.)
$ Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)
(N) A standard [A9062] that is the elliptic curve cryptography
analog of the Digital Signature Algorithm.
Shirey Informational [Page 66]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ emanation
(I) An signal (electromagnetic, acoustic, or other medium) that is
emitted by a system (through radiation or conductance) as a
consequence (i.e., byproduct) of its operation, and that may
contain information. (See: TEMPEST.)
$ emanations security (EMSEC)
(I) Physical constraints to prevent information compromise through
signals emanated by a system, particular the application of
TEMPEST technology to block electromagnetic radiation.
$ emergency plan
(D) A synonym for "contingency plan". In the interest of
consistency, ISDs SHOULD use "contingency plan" instead of
"emergency plan".
$ EMSEC
See: emanations security.
$ EMV
(I) An abbreviation of "Europay, MasterCard, Visa". Refers to a
specification for smart cards that are used as payment cards, and
for related terminals and applications. [EMV1, EMV2, EMV3]
$ Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
(I) An Internet IPsec protocol [R2406] designed to provide a mix
of security services--especially data confidentiality service--in
the Internet Protocol. (See: Authentication Header.)
(C) ESP may be used alone, or in combination with the IPsec AH
protocol, or in a nested fashion with tunneling. Security services
can be provided between a pair of communicating hosts, between a
pair of communicating security gateways, or between a host and a
gateway. The ESP header is encapsulated by the IP header, and the
ESP header encapsulates either the upper layer protocol header
(transport mode) or an IP header (tunnel mode). ESP can provide
data confidentiality service, data origin authentication service,
connectionless data integrity service, an anti-replay service, and
limited traffic flow confidentiality. The set of services depends
on the placement of the implementation and on options selected
when the security association is established.
$ encipher
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "encrypt".
However, see the usage note under "encryption".
Shirey Informational [Page 67]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ encipherment
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "encryption",
except in special circumstances that are explained in the usage
discussion under "encryption".
$ encode
(I) Use a system of symbols to represent information, which might
originally have some other representation. (See: decode.)
(C) Examples include Morse code, ASCII, and BER.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "encrypt",
because encoding is not usually intended to conceal meaning.
$ encrypt
(I) Cryptographically transform data to produce ciphertext. (See:
encryption.)
$ encryption
(I) Cryptographic transformation of data (called "plaintext") into
a form (called "ciphertext") that conceals the data's original
meaning to prevent it from being known or used. If the
transformation is reversible, the corresponding reversal process
is called "decryption", which is a transformation that restores
encrypted data to its original state. (See: cryptography.)
(C) Usage note: For this concept, ISDs should use the verb "to
encrypt" (and related variations: encryption, decrypt, and
decryption). However, because of cultural biases, some
international usage, particularly ISO and CCITT standards, avoids
"to encrypt" and instead uses the verb "to encipher" (and related
variations: encipherment, decipher, decipherment).
(O) "The cryptographic transformation of data (see: cryptography)
to produce ciphertext." [I7498 Part 2]
(C) Usually, the plaintext input to an encryption operation is
cleartext. But in some cases, the plaintext may be ciphertext that
was output from another encryption operation. (See:
superencryption.)
(C) Encryption and decryption involve a mathematical algorithm for
transforming data. In addition to the data to be transformed, the
algorithm has one or more inputs that are control parameters: (a)
a key value that varies the transformation and, in some cases, (b)
an initialization value that establishes the starting state of the
algorithm.
Shirey Informational [Page 68]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ encryption certificate
(I) A public-key certificate that contains a public key that is
intended to be used for encrypting data, rather than for verifying
digital signatures or performing other cryptographic functions.
C) A v3 X.509 public-key certificate may have a "keyUsage"
extension that indicates the purpose for which the certified
public key is intended.
$ end entity
(I) A system entity that is the subject of a public-key
certificate and that is using, or is permitted and able to use,
the matching private key only for a purpose or purposes other than
signing a digital certificate; i.e., an entity that is not a CA.
(D) "A certificate subject which uses its public [sic] key for
purposes other than signing certificates." [X509]
(C) ISDs SHOULD NOT use the X.509 definition, because it is
misleading and incomplete. First, the X.509 definition should say
"private key" rather than "public key" because certificates are
not usefully signed with a public key. Second, the X.509
definition is weak regarding whether an end entity may or may not
use the private key to sign a certificate, i.e., whether the
subject may be a CA. The intent of X.509's authors was that an end
entity certificate is not valid for use in verifying a signature
on an X.509 certificate or X.509 CRL. Thus, it would have been
better for the X.509 definition to have said "only for purposes
other than signing certificates".
(C) Despite the problems in the X.509 definition, the term itself
is useful in describing applications of asymmetric cryptography.
The way the term is used in X.509 implies that it was meant to be
defined, as we have done here, relative to roles that an entity
(which is associated with an OSI end system) is playing or is
permitted to play in applications of asymmetric cryptography other
than the PKI that supports applications.
(C) Whether a subject can play both CA and non-CA roles, with
either the same or different certificates, is a matter of policy.
(See: certification practice statement.) A v3 X.509 public-key
certificate may have a "basicConstraints" extension containing a
"cA" value that specifically "indicates whether or not the public
key may be used to verify certificate signatures".
Shirey Informational [Page 69]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ end system
(I) An OSI term for a computer that implements all seven layers of
the OSIRM and may attach to a subnetwork. (In the context of the
Internet Protocol Suite, usually called a "host".)
$ end-to-end encryption
(I) Continuous protection of data that flows between two points in
a network, provided by encrypting data when it leaves its source,
leaving it encrypted while it passes through any intermediate
computers (such as routers), and decrypting only when the data
arrives at the intended destination. (See: link encryption,
wiretapping.)
(C) When two points are separated by multiple communication links
that are connected by one or more intermediate relays, end-to-end
encryption enables the source and destination systems to protect
their communications without depending on the intermediate systems
to provide the protection.
$ end user
(I) General usage: A system entity, usually a human individual,
that makes use of system resources, primarily for application
purposes as opposed to system management purposes.
(I) PKI usage: A synonym for "end entity"; but the term "end
entity" is preferred.
$ entity
See: system entity.
$ entrapment
(I) "The deliberate planting of apparent flaws in a system for the
purpose of detecting attempted penetrations or confusing an
intruder about which flaws to exploit." [FP039] (See: honey pot.)
$ ephemeral key
(I) A public key or a private key that is relatively short-lived.
(See: session key.)
$ error detection code
(I) A checksum designed to detect, but not correct, accidental
(i.e., unintentional) changes in data.
$ Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES)
(N) A U.S. Government standard [FP185] that specifies use of a
symmetric encryption algorithm (SKIPJACK) and a Law Enforcement
Shirey Informational [Page 70]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
Access Field (LEAF) creation method to implement part of a key
escrow system that provides for decryption of encrypted
telecommunications when interception is lawfully authorized.
(C) Both SKIPJACK and the LEAF are to be implemented in equipment
used to encrypt and decrypt unclassified, sensitive
telecommunications data.
$ ESP
See: Encapsulating Security Payload.
$ Estelle
(N) A language (ISO 9074-1989) for formal specification of
computer network protocols.
$ evaluated products list
(O) General usage: A list of information system equipment items
that have been evaluated against, and found to be compliant with,
a particular set of criteria.
(O) U.S. Department of Defense usage: The Evaluated Products List
(http://www.radium.ncsc.mil/tpep/epl/) contains items that have
been evaluated against the TCSEC by the NCSC, or against the
Common Criteria by the NCSC or one of its partner agencies in
another county. The List forms Chapter 4 of NSA's "Information
Systems Security Products and Services Catalogue".
$ evaluated system
(I) Refers to a system that has been evaluated against security
criteria such as the TCSEC or the Common Criteria.
$ expire
See: certificate expiration.
$ exposure
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ Extensible Authentication Protocol
(I) A framework that supports multiple, optional authentication
mechanisms for PPP, including cleartext passwords, challenge-
response, and arbitrary dialog sequences. [R2284]
(C) This protocol is intended for use primarily by a host or
router that connects to a PPP network server via switched circuits
or dial-up lines.
Shirey Informational [Page 71]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ extension
(I) A data item defined for optional inclusion in a v3 X.509
public-key certificate or a v2 X.509 CRL.
(C) The formats defined in X.509 can be extended to provide
methods for associating additional attributes with subjects and
public keys and for managing a certification hierarchy:
- "Certificate extension": X.509 defines standard extensions that
may be included in v3 certificates to provide additional key
and security policy information, subject and issuer attributes,
and certification path constraints.
- "CRL extension": X.509 defines extensions that may be included
in v2 CRLs to provide additional issuer key and name
information, revocation reasons and constraints, and
information about distribution points and delta CRLs.
- "Private extension": Additional extensions, each named by an
OID, can be locally defined as needed by applications or
communities. (See: PKIX private extension, SET private
extensions.)
$ extranet
(I) A computer network that an organization uses to carry
application data traffic between the organization and its business
partners. (See: intranet.)
(C) An extranet can be implemented securely, either on the
Internet or using Internet technology, by constructing the
extranet as a VPN.
$ fail safe
(I) A mode of system termination that automatically leaves system
processes and components in a secure state when a failure occurs
or is detected in the system.
$ fail soft
(I) Selective termination of affected non-essential system
functions and processes when a failure occurs or is detected in
the system.
$ failure control
(I) A methodology used to provide fail-safe or fail-soft
termination and recovery of functions and processes when failures
are detected or occur in a system. [FP039]
Shirey Informational [Page 72]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)
(N) The Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS
PUB) series issued by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and
Technology as technical guidelines for U.S. Government
procurements of information processing system equipment and
services. [FP031, FP039, FP046, FP081, FP102, FP113, FP140, FP151,
FP180, FP185, FP186, FP188]
(C) Issued under the provisions of section 111(d) of the Federal
Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 as amended by the
Computer Security Act of 1987, Public Law 100-235.
$ Federal Public-key Infrastructure (FPKI)
(N) A PKI being planned to establish facilities, specifications,
and policies needed by the U.S. Federal Government to use public-
key certificates for INFOSEC, COMSEC, and electronic commerce
involving unclassified but sensitive applications and interactions
between Federal agencies as well as with entities of other
branches of the Federal Government, state, and local governments,
business, and the public. [FPKI]
$ Federal Standard 1027
(N) An U.S. Government document defining emanation, anti-tamper,
security fault analysis, and manual key management criteria for
DES encryption devices, primary for OSI layer 2. Was renamed "FIPS
PUB 140" when responsibility for protecting unclassified,
sensitive information was transferred from NSA to NIST, and then
was superseded by FIPS PUB 140-1.
$ File Transfer Protocol (FTP)
(I) A TCP-based, application-layer, Internet Standard protocol
[R0959] for moving data files from one computer to another.
$ filtering router
(I) An internetwork router that selectively prevents the passage
of data packets according to a security policy.
(C) A filtering router may be used as a firewall or part of a
firewall. A router usually receives a packet from a network and
decides where to forward it on a second network. A filtering
router does the same, but first decides whether the packet should
be forwarded at all, according to some security policy. The policy
is implemented by rules (packet filters) loaded into the router.
The rules mostly involve values of data packet control fields
(especially IP source and destination addresses and TCP port
numbers). [R2179]
Shirey Informational [Page 73]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ financial institution
(N) "An establishment responsible for facilitating customer-
initiated transactions or transmission of funds for the extension
of credit or the custody, loan, exchange, or issuance of money."
[SET2]
$ fingerprint
(I) A pattern of curves formed by the ridges on a fingertip. (See:
biometric authentication, thumbprint.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "hash result"
because it mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term with the following PGP
definition, because the term and definition mix concepts in a
potentially misleading way and duplicate the meaning of "hash
result":
(O) PGP usage: A hash result used to authenticate a public key
(key fingerprint) or other data. [PGP]
$ FIPS
See: Federal Information Processing Standards.
$ FIPS PUB 140-1
(N) The U.S. Government standard [FP140] for security requirements
to be met by a cryptographic module used to protect unclassified
information in computer and communication systems. (See: Common
Criteria, FIPS, Federal Standard 1027.)
(C) The standard specifies four increasing levels (from "Level 1"
to "Level 4") of requirements to cover a wide range of potential
applications and environments. The requirements address basic
design and documentation, module interfaces, authorized roles and
services, physical security, software security, operating system
security, key management, cryptographic algorithms,
electromagnetic interference and electromagnetic compatibility
(EMI/EMC), and self-testing. NIST and the Canadian Communication
Security Establishment jointly certify modules.
$ firewall
(I) An internetwork gateway that restricts data communication
traffic to and from one of the connected networks (the one said to
be "inside" the firewall) and thus protects that network's system
resources against threats from the other network (the one that is
said to be "outside" the firewall). (See: guard, security
gateway.)
Shirey Informational [Page 74]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) A firewall typically protects a smaller, secure network (such
as a corporate LAN, or even just one host) from a larger network
(such as the Internet). The firewall is installed at the point
where the networks connect, and the firewall applies security
policy rules to control traffic that flows in and out of the
protected network.
(C) A firewall is not always a single computer. For example, a
firewall may consist of a pair of filtering routers and one or
more proxy servers running on one or more bastion hosts, all
connected to a small, dedicated LAN between the two routers. The
external router blocks attacks that use IP to break security (IP
address spoofing, source routing, packet fragments), while proxy
servers block attacks that would exploit a vulnerability in a
higher layer protocol or service. The internal router blocks
traffic from leaving the protected network except through the
proxy servers. The difficult part is defining criteria by which
packets are denied passage through the firewall, because a
firewall not only needs to keep intruders out, but usually also
needs to let authorized users in and out.
$ firmware
(I) Computer programs and data stored in hardware--typically in
read-only memory (ROM) or programmable read-only memory (PROM)--
such that the programs and data cannot be dynamically written or
modified during execution of the programs. (See: hardware,
software.)
$ FIRST
See: Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams.
$ flaw hypothesis methodology
(I) An evaluation or attack technique in which specifications and
documentation for a system are analyzed to hypothesize flaws in
the system. The list of hypothetical flaws is prioritized on the
basis of the estimated probability that a flaw exists and,
assuming it does, on the ease of exploiting it and the extent of
control or compromise it would provide. The prioritized list is
used to direct a penetration test or attack against the system.
[NCS04]
$ flooding
(I) An attack that attempts to cause a failure in (especially, in
the security of) a computer system or other data processing entity
by providing more input than the entity can process properly.
(See: denial of service.)
Shirey Informational [Page 75]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ flow analysis
(I) An analysis performed on a nonprocedural formal system
specification that locates potential flows of information between
system variables. By assigning security levels to the variables,
the analysis can find some types of covert channels.
$ flow control
(I) A procedure or technique to ensure that information transfers
within a system are not made from one security level to another
security level, and especially not from a higher level to a lower
level. (See: covert channel, simple security property, confinement
property.)
$ formal specification
(I) A specification of hardware or software functionality in a
computer-readable language; usually a precise mathematical
description of the behavior of the system with the aim of
providing a correctness proof.
$ formulary
(I) A technique for enabling a decision to grant or deny access to
be made dynamically at the time the access is attempted, rather
than earlier when an access control list or ticket is created.
$ FORTEZZA(trademark)
(N) A registered trademark of NSA, used for a family of
interoperable security products that implement a NIST/NSA-approved
suite of cryptographic algorithms for digital signature, hash,
encryption, and key exchange. The products include a PC card that
contains a CAPSTONE chip, serial port modems, server boards, smart
cards, and software implementations.
$ Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST)
(N) An international consortium of CSIRTs that work together to
handle computer security incidents and promote preventive
activities. (See: CSIRT, security incident.)
(C) FIRST was founded in 1990 and, as of September 1999, had
nearly 70 members spanning the globe. Its mission includes:
- Provide members with technical information, tools, methods,
assistance, and guidance.
- Coordinate proactive liaison activities and analytical support.
- Encourage development of quality products and services.
- Improve national and international information security for
government, private industry, academia, and the individual.
- Enhance the image and status of the CSIRT community.
Shirey Informational [Page 76]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ forward secrecy
See: public-key forward secrecy.
$ FPKI
See: Federal Public-Key Infrastructure.
$ FTP
See: File Transfer Protocol.
$ gateway
(I) A relay mechanism that attaches to two (or more) computer
networks that have similar functions but dissimilar
implementations and that enables host computers on one network to
communicate with hosts on the other; an intermediate system that
is the interface between two computer networks. (See: bridge,
firewall, guard, internetwork, proxy server, router, and
subnetwork.)
(C) In theory, gateways are conceivable at any OSI layer. In
practice, they operate at OSI layer 3 (see: bridge, router) or
layer 7 (see: proxy server). When the two networks differ in the
protocol by which they offer service to hosts, the gateway may
translate one protocol into another or otherwise facilitate
interoperation of hosts (see: Internet Protocol).
$ GCA
See: geopolitical certificate authority.
$ GeneralizedTime
(N) The ASN.1 data type "GeneralizedTime" (specified in ISO 8601)
contains a calendar date (YYYYMMDD) and a time of day, which is
either (a) the local time, (b) the Coordinated Universal Time, or
(c) both the local time and an offset allowing Coordinated
Universal Time to be calculated. (See: Coordinated Universal Time,
UTCTime.)
$ Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R2078] that specifies calling
conventions by which an application (typically another
communication protocol) can obtain authentication, integrity, and
confidentiality security services independently of the underlying
security mechanisms and technologies, thus allowing the
application source code to be ported to different environments.
(C) "A GSS-API caller accepts tokens provided to it by its local
GSS-API implementation and transfers the tokens to a peer on a
remote system; that peer passes the received tokens to its local
Shirey Informational [Page 77]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
GSS-API implementation for processing. The security services
available through GSS-API in this fashion are implementable (and
have been implemented) over a range of underlying mechanisms based
on [symmetric] and [asymmetric cryptography]." [R2078]
$ geopolitical certificate authority (GCA)
(O) SET usage: In a SET certification hierarchy, an optional level
that is certified by a BCA and that may certify cardholder CAs,
merchant CAs, and payment gateway CAs. Using GCAs enables a brand
to distribute responsibility for managing certificates to
geographic or political regions, so that brand policies can vary
between regions as needed.
$ Green Book
(D) Except as an explanatory appositive, ISDs SHOULD NOT use this
term as a synonym for "Defense Password Management Guideline"
[CSC2]. Instead, use the full proper name of the document or, in
subsequent references, a conventional abbreviation. (See: Rainbow
Series.)
(D) Usage note: To improve international comprehensibility of
Internet Standards and the Internet Standards Process, ISDs SHOULD
NOT use "cute" synonyms for document titles. No matter how popular
and clearly understood a nickname may be in one community, it is
likely to cause confusion in others. For example, several other
information system standards also are called "the Green Book". The
following are some examples:
- Each volume of 1992 ITU-T (at that time, CCITT) standards.
- "PostScript Language Program Design", Adobe Systems, Addison-
Wesley, 1988.
- IEEE 1003.1 POSIX Operating Systems Interface.
- "Smalltalk-80: Bits of History, Words of Advice", Glenn
Krasner, Addison-Wesley, 1983.
- "X/Open Compatibility Guide".
- A particular CD-ROM format developed by Phillips.
$ GRIP
(I) A contraction of "Guidelines and Recommendations for Security
Incident Processing", the name of the IETF working group that
seeks to facilitate consistent handling of security incidents in
the Internet community. (See: security incident.)
(C) Guidelines to be produced by the WG will address technology
vendors, network service providers, and response teams in their
roles assisting organizations in resolving security incidents.
These relationships are functional and can exist within and across
organizational boundaries.
Shirey Informational [Page 78]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ GSS-API
See: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface.
$ guard
(I) A gateway that is interposed between two networks (or
computers, or other information systems) operating at different
security levels (one level is usually higher than the other) and
is trusted to mediate all information transfers between the two
levels, either to ensure that no sensitive information from the
first (higher) level is disclosed to the second (lower) level, or
to protect the integrity of data on the first (higher) level.
(See: firewall.)
$ guest login
See: anonymous login.
$ GULS
(I) Generic Upper Layer Security service element (ISO 11586), a
five-part standard for the exchange of security information and
security-transformation functions that protect confidentiality and
integrity of application data.
$ hacker
(I) Someone with a strong interest in computers, who enjoys
learning about them and experimenting with them. (See: cracker.)
(C) The recommended definition is the original meaning of the term
(circa 1960), which then had a neutral or positive connotation of
"someone who figures things out and makes something cool
happen". Today, the term is frequently misused, especially by
journalists, to have the pejorative meaning of cracker.
$ handle
(I) (1.) Verb: Perform processing operations on data, such as
receive and transmit, collect and disseminate, create and delete,
store and retrieve, read and write, and compare. (2.) Noun: An on-
line pseudonym, particularly one used by a cracker; derived from
citizens band radio culture.
$ hardware
(I) The material physical components of a computer system. (See:
firmware, software.)
$ hardware token
See: token.
Shirey Informational [Page 79]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ hash code
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term (especially not as a synonym for
"hash result") because it mixes concepts in a potentially
misleading way. A hash result is not a "code" in any sense defined
by this glossary. (See: code, hash result, hash value, message
digest.)
$ hash function
(I) An algorithm that computes a value based on a data object
(such as a message or file; usually variable-length; possibly very
large), thereby mapping the data object to a smaller data object
(the "hash result") which is usually a fixed-size value. (See:
checksum, keyed hash.)
(O) "A (mathematical) function which maps values from a large
(possibly very large) domain into a smaller range. A 'good' hash
function is such that the results of applying the function to a
(large) set of values in the domain will be evenly distributed
(and apparently at random) over the range." [X509]
(C) The kind of hash function needed for security applications is
called a "cryptographic hash function", an algorithm for which it
is computationally infeasible (because no attack is significantly
more efficient than brute force) to find either (a) a data object
that maps to a pre-specified hash result (the "one-way" property)
or (b) two data objects that map to the same hash result (the
"collision-free" property). (See: MD2, MD4, MD5, SHA-1.)
(C) A cryptographic hash is "good" in the sense stated in the "O"
definition for hash function. Any change to an input data object
will, with high probability, result in a different hash result, so
that the result of a cryptographic hash makes a good checksum for
a data object.
$ hash result
(I) The output of a hash function. (See: hash code, hash value.)
(O) "The output produced by a hash function upon processing a
message" (where "message" is broadly defined as "a digital
representation of data"). [ABA] (The recommended definition is
compatible with this ABA definition, but we avoid the unusual
definition of "message".)
$ hash value
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term (especially not as a synonym for
"hash result", the output of a hash function) because it might be
confused with "hashed value" (the input to a hash function). (See:
hash code, hash result, message digest.)
Shirey Informational [Page 80]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ hierarchical PKI
(I) A PKI architecture based on a certification hierarchy. (See:
mesh PKI, trust-file PKI.)
$ hierarchy management
(I) The process of generating configuration data and issuing
public-key certificates to build and operate a certification
hierarchy.
$ hierarchy of trust
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term with regard to PKI, especially
not as a synonym for "certification hierarchy", because this term
mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way. (See:
certification hierarchy, trust, web of trust.)
$ hijack attack
(I) A form of active wiretapping in which the attacker seizes
control of a previously established communication association.
(See: man-in-the-middle attack, pagejacking, piggyback attack.)
$ HMAC
(I) A keyed hash [R2104] that can be based on any iterated
cryptographic hash (e.g., MD5 or SHA-1), so that the cryptographic
strength of HMAC depends on the properties of the selected
cryptographic hash. (See: [R2202, R2403, R2404].)
(C) Assume that H is a generic cryptographic hash in which a
function is iterated on data blocks of length B bytes. L is the
length of the of hash result of H. K is a secret key of length L
<= K <= B. The values IPAD and OPAD are fixed strings used as
inner and outer padding and defined as follows: IPAD = the byte
0x36 repeated B times, OPAD = the byte 0x5C repeated B times. HMAC
is computed by H(K XOR OPAD, H(K XOR IPAD, inputdata)).
(C) The goals of HMAC are as follows:
- To use available cryptographic hash functions without
modification, particularly functions that perform well in
software and for which software is freely and widely available.
- To preserve the original performance of the selected hash
without significant degradation.
- To use and handle keys in a simple way.
- To have a well-understood cryptographic analysis of the
strength of the mechanism based on reasonable assumptions about
the underlying hash function.
- To enable easy replacement of the hash function in case a
faster or stronger hash is found or required.
Shirey Informational [Page 81]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ honey pot
(I) A system (e.g., a web server) or a system resource (e.g., a
file on a server), that is designed to be attractive to potential
crackers and intruders, like honey is attractive to bears. (See:
entrapment.)
(D) It is likely that other cultures have different metaphors for
this concept. To ensure international understanding, ISDs should
not use this term unless they also provide an explanation like
this one. (See: (usage note under) Green Book.)
$ host
(I) General computer network usage: A computer that is attached to
a communication subnetwork or internetwork and can use services
provided by the network to exchange data with other attached
systems. (See: end system.)
(I) Specific Internet Protocol Suite usage: A networked computer
that does not forward Internet Protocol packets that are not
addressed to the computer itself. (See: router.)
(C) Derivation: As viewed by its users, a host "entertains"
guests, providing application layer services or access to other
computers attached to the network. However, even though some
traditional peripheral service devices, such as printers, can now
be independently connected to networks, they are not usually
called hosts.
$ HTML
See: Hypertext Markup Language.
$ HTTP
See: Hypertext Transfer Protocol.
$ https
(I) When used in the first part of a URL (the part that precedes
the colon and specifies an access scheme or protocol), this term
specifies the use of HTTP enhanced by a security mechanism, which
is usually SSL. (See: S-HTTP.)
$ hybrid encryption
(I) An application of cryptography that combines two or more
encryption algorithms, particularly a combination of symmetric and
asymmetric encryption. (E.g., see: digital envelope.)
(C) Asymmetric algorithms require more computation than
equivalently strong symmetric ones. Thus, asymmetric encryption is
not normally used for data confidentiality except in distributing
Shirey Informational [Page 82]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
symmetric keys in applications where the key data is usually short
(in terms of bits) compared to the data it protects. (E.g., see:
MSP, PEM, PGP.)
$ hyperlink
(I) In hypertext or hypermedia, an information object (such as a
word, a phrase, or an image; usually highlighted by color or
underscoring) that points (indicates how to connect) to related
information that is located elsewhere and can be retrieved by
activating the link (e.g., by selecting the object with a mouse
pointer and then clicking).
$ hypermedia
(I) A generalization of hypertext; any media that contain
hyperlinks that point to material in the same or another data
object.
$ hypertext
(I) A computer document, or part of a document, that contains
hyperlinks to other documents; i.e., text that contains active
pointers to other text. Usually written in Hypertext Markup
Language and accessed using a web browser. (See: hypermedia.)
$ Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)
(I) A platform-independent system of syntax and semantics for
adding characters to data files (particularly text files) to
represent the data's structure and to point to related data, thus
creating hypertext for use in the World Wide Web and other
applications. [R1866]
$ Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
(I) A TCP-based, application-layer, client-server, Internet
protocol [R2616] used to carry data requests and responses in the
World Wide Web. (See: hypertext.)
$ IAB
See: Internet Architecture Board.
$ IANA
See: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.
$ ICANN
See: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
$ ICMP
See: Internet Control Message Protocol.
Shirey Informational [Page 83]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ ICMP flood
(I) A denial of service attack that sends a host more ICMP echo
request ("ping") packets than the protocol implementation can
handle. (See: flooding, smurf.)
$ ICRL
See: indirect certificate revocation list.
$ IDEA
See: International Data Encryption Algorithm.
$ identification
(I) An act or process that presents an identifier to a system so
that the system can recognize a system entity and distinguish it
from other entities. (See: authentication.)
$ Identification Protocol
(I) An client-server Internet protocol [R1413] for learning the
identity of a user of a particular TCP connection.
(C) Given a TCP port number pair, the server returns a character
string that identifies the owner of that connection on the
server's system. The protocol is not intended for authorization or
access control. At best, it provides additional auditing
information with respect to TCP.
$ identity-based security policy
(I) "A security policy based on the identities and/or attributes
of users, a group of users, or entities acting on behalf of the
users and the resources/objects being accessed." [I7498 Part 2]
(See: rule-based security policy.)
$ IEEE
See: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
$ IEEE 802.10
(N) An IEEE committee developing security standards for local area
networks. (See: SILS.)
$ IEEE P1363
(N) An IEEE working group, Standard for Public-Key Cryptography,
developing a comprehensive reference standard for asymmetric
cryptography. Covers discrete logarithm (e.g., DSA), elliptic
curve, and integer factorization (e.g., RSA); and covers key
agreement, digital signature, and encryption.
$ IESG
See: Internet Engineering Steering Group.
Shirey Informational [Page 84]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ IETF
See: Internet Engineering Task Force.
$ IKE
See: IPsec Key Exchange.
$ IMAP4
See: Internet Message Access Protocol, version 4.
$ IMAP4 AUTHENTICATE
(I) A IMAP4 "command" (better described as a transaction type, or
a protocol-within-a-protocol) by which an IMAP4 client optionally
proposes a mechanism to an IMAP4 server to authenticate the client
to the server and provide other security services. (See: POP3.)
(C) If the server accepts the proposal, the command is followed by
performing a challenge-response authentication protocol and,
optionally, negotiating a protection mechanism for subsequent POP3
interactions. The security mechanisms that are used by IMAP4
AUTHENTICATE--including Kerberos, GSSAPI, and S/Key--are described
in [R1731].
$ in the clear
(I) Not encrypted. (See: cleartext.)
$ indirect certificate revocation list (ICRL)
(I) In X.509, a CRL that may contain certificate revocation
notifications for certificates issued by CAs other than the issuer
of the ICRL.
$ indistinguishability
(I) An attribute of an encryption algorithm that is a
formalization of the notion that the encryption of some string is
indistinguishable from the encryption of an equal-length string of
nonsense.
(C) Under certain conditions, this notion is equivalent to
"semantic security".
$ information
(I) Facts and ideas, which can be represented (encoded) as various
forms of data.
$ Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria (ITSEC)
(N) Standard developed for use in the European Union; accommodates
a wider range of security assurance and functionality combinations
than the TCSEC. Superseded by the Common Criteria. [ITSEC]
Shirey Informational [Page 85]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ INFOSEC
(I) Abbreviation for "information security", referring to security
measures that implement and assure security services in computer
systems (i.e., COMPUSEC) and communication systems (i.e., COMSEC).
$ initialization value (IV)
(I) An input parameter that sets the starting state of a
cryptographic algorithm or mode. (Sometimes called "initialization
vector" or "message indicator".)
(C) An IV can be used to introduce cryptographic variance in
addition to that provided by a key (see: salt), and to synchronize
one cryptographic process with another. For an example of the
latter, cipher block chaining mode requires an IV. [R2405]
$ initialization vector
(D) For consistency, ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym
for "initialization value".
$ insider attack
See: (secondary definition under) attack.
$ Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
(N) The IEEE is a not-for-profit association of more than 330,000
individual members in 150 countries. The IEEE produces 30 percent
of the world's published literature in electrical engineering,
computers, and control technology; holds annually more than 300
major conferences; and has more than 800 active standards with 700
under development. (See: Standards for Interoperable LAN/MAN
Security.)
$ integrity
See: data integrity, correctness integrity, source integrity,
system integrity.
$ integrity check
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "cryptographic
hash" or "protected checksum", because this term unnecessarily
duplicates the meaning of other, well-established terms.
$ intelligent threat
(I) A circumstance in which an adversary has the technical and
operational capability to detect and exploit a vulnerability and
also has the demonstrated, presumed, or inferred intent to do so.
(See: threat.)
Shirey Informational [Page 86]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ International Data Encryption Algorithm (IDEA)
(N) A patented, symmetric block cipher that uses a 128-bit key and
operates on 64-bit blocks. [Schn] (See: symmetric cryptography.)
$ International Standard
See: (secondary definition under) ISO.
$ International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)
(N) Rules issued by the U.S. State Department, by authority of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778), to control export and
import of defense articles and defense services, including
information security systems, such as cryptographic systems, and
TEMPEST suppression technology. (See: Wassenaar Arrangement.)
$ internet
$ Internet
See: internet vs. Internet.
$ Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
(I) A technical advisory group of the ISOC, chartered by the ISOC
Trustees to provide oversight of Internet architecture and
protocols and, in the context of Internet Standards, a body to
which decisions of the IESG may be appealed. Responsible for
approving appointments to the IESG from among nominees submitted
by the IETF nominating committee. [R2026]
$ Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
(I) From the early days of the Internet, the IANA was chartered by
the ISOC and the U.S. Government's Federal Network Council to be
the central coordination, allocation, and registration body for
parameters for Internet protocols. Superseded by ICANN.
$ Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R0792] that is used to report
error conditions during IP datagram processing and to exchange
other information concerning the state of the IP network.
$ Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
(I) The non-profit, private corporation that has assumed
responsibility for the IP address space allocation, protocol
parameter assignment, domain name system management, and root
server system management functions formerly performed under U.S.
Government contract by IANA and other entities.
(C) The Internet Protocol Suite, as defined by the IETF and the
IESG, contains numerous parameters, such as internet addresses,
domain names, autonomous system numbers, protocol numbers, port
numbers, management information base object identifiers, including
Shirey Informational [Page 87]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
private enterprise numbers, and many others. The Internet
community requires that the values used in these parameter fields
be assigned uniquely. ICANN makes those assignments as requested
and maintains a registry of the current values.
(C) ICANN was formed in October 1998, by a coalition of the
Internet's business, technical, and academic communities. The U.S.
Government designated ICANN to serve as the global consensus
entity with responsibility for coordinating four key functions for
the Internet: the allocation of IP address space, the assignment
of protocol parameters, the management of the DNS, and the
management of the DNS root server system.
$ Internet Draft
(I) A working document of the IETF, its areas, and its working
groups. (Other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet Drafts.) An Internet Draft is not an archival document
like an RFC is. Instead, an Internet Draft is a preliminary or
working document that is valid for a maximum of six months and may
be updated, replaced, or made obsolete by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use an Internet Draft as reference
material or to cite it other than as "work in progress."
$ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)
(I) The part of the ISOC responsible for technical management of
IETF activities and administration of the Internet Standards
Process according to procedures approved by the ISOC Trustees.
Directly responsible for actions along the "standards track",
including final approval of specifications as Internet Standards.
Composed of IETF Area Directors and the IETF chairperson, who also
chairs the IESG. [R2026]
$ Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
(I) A self-organized group of people who make contributions to the
development of Internet technology. The principal body engaged in
developing Internet Standards, although not itself a part of the
ISOC. Composed of Working Groups, which are arranged into Areas
(such as the Security Area), each coordinated by one or more Area
Directors. Nominations to the IAB and the IESG are made by a
committee selected at random from regular IETF meeting attendees
who have volunteered. [R2026, R2323]
$ Internet Message Access Protocol, version 4 (IMAP4)
(I) An Internet protocol [R2060] by which a client workstation can
dynamically access a mailbox on a server host to manipulate and
retrieve mail messages that the server has received and is holding
for the client. (See: POP3.)
Shirey Informational [Page 88]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) IMAP4 has mechanisms for optionally authenticating a client to
a server and providing other security services. (See: IMAP4
AUTHENTICATE.)
$ Internet Policy Registration Authority (IPRA)
(I) An X.509-compliant CA that is the top CA of the Internet
certification hierarchy operated under the auspices of the ISOC
[R1422]. (See: (PEM usage under) certification hierarchy.)
$ Internet Protocol (IP)
(I) A Internet Standard protocol (version 4 [R0791] and version 6
[R2460]) that moves datagrams (discrete sets of bits) from one
computer to another across an internetwork but does not provide
reliable delivery, flow control, sequencing, or other end-to-end
services that TCP provides. (See: IP address, TCP/IP.)
(C) In the OSIRM, IP would be located at the top of layer 3.
$ Internet Protocol security (IPsec)
(I) (1.) The name of the IETF working group that is specifying a
security architecture [R2401] and protocols to provide security
services for Internet Protocol traffic. (2.) A collective name for
that architecture and set of protocols. (Implementation of IPsec
protocols is optional for IP version 4, but mandatory for IP
version 6.) (See: Internet Protocol Security Option.)
(C) Note that the letters "sec" are lower-case.
(C) The IPsec architecture specifies (a) security protocols (AH
and ESP), (b) security associations (what they are, how they work,
how they are managed, and associated processing), (c) key
management (IKE), and (d) algorithms for authentication and
encryption. The set of security services include access control
service, connectionless data integrity service, data origin
authentication service, protection against replays (detection of
the arrival of duplicate datagrams, within a constrained window),
data confidentiality service, and limited traffic flow
confidentiality.
$ Internet Protocol Security Option (IPSO)
(I) Refers to one of three types of IP security options, which are
fields that may be added to an IP datagram for the purpose of
carrying security information about the datagram. (See: IPsec.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term without a modifier to indicate
which of the three types is meant.
Shirey Informational [Page 89]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
1. "DoD Basic Security Option" (IP option type 130): Defined for
use on U.S. Department of Defense common user data networks.
Identifies the Defense classification level at which the
datagram is to be protected and the protection authorities
whose rules apply to the datagram. [R1108]
A "protection authority" is a National Access Program (e.g.,
GENSER, SIOP-ESI, SCI, NSA, Department of Energy) or Special
Access Program that specifies protection rules for transmission
and processing of the information contained in the datagram.
[R1108]
2. "DoD Extended Security Option" (IP option type 133): Permits
additional security labeling information, beyond that present
in the Basic Security Option, to be supplied in the datagram to
meet the needs of registered authorities. [R1108]
3. "Common IP Security Option" (CIPSO) (IP option type 134):
Designed by TSIG to carry hierarchic and non-hierarchic
security labels. (Formerly called "Commercial IP Security
Option".) Was published as Internet-Draft [CIPSO]; not advanced
to RFC.
$ Internet Protocol Suite
See: (secondary definition under) Internet.
$ Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP)
(I) An Internet IPsec protocol [R2408] to negotiate, establish,
modify, and delete security associations, and to exchange key
generation and authentication data, independent of the details of
any specific key generation technique, key establishment protocol,
encryption algorithm, or authentication mechanism.
(C) ISAKMP supports negotiation of security associations for
protocols at all TCP/IP layers. By centralizing management of
security associations, ISAKMP reduces duplicated functionality
within each protocol. ISAKMP can also reduce connection setup
time, by negotiating a whole stack of services at once. Strong
authentication is required on ISAKMP exchanges, and a digital
signature algorithm based on asymmetric cryptography is used
within ISAKMP's authentication component.
$ Internet Society (ISOC)
(I) A professional society concerned with Internet development
(including technical Internet Standards); with how the Internet is
and can be used; and with social, political, and technical issues
Shirey Informational [Page 90]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
that result. The ISOC Board of Trustees approves appointments to
the IAB from among nominees submitted by the IETF nominating
committee. [R2026]
$ Internet Standard
(I) A specification, approved by the IESG and published as an RFC,
that is stable and well-understood, is technically competent, has
multiple, independent, and interoperable implementations with
substantial operational experience, enjoys significant public
support, and is recognizably useful in some or all parts of the
Internet. [R2026] (See: RFC.)
(C) The Internet Standards Process is an activity of the ISOC and
is organized and managed by the IAB and the IESG. The process is
concerned with all protocols, procedures, and conventions used in
or by the Internet, whether or not they are part of the Internet
Protocol Suite. The "Internet Standards Track" has three levels of
increasing maturity: Proposed Standard, Draft Standard, and
Standard. (See: (standards levels under) ISO.)
$ Internet Standards document (ISD)
(C) In this Glossary, this term refers to an RFC, Internet-Draft,
or other item that is produced as part of the Internet Standards
Process [R2026]. However, neither the term nor the abbreviation is
widely accepted and, therefore, SHOULD NOT be used in an ISD
unless it is accompanied by an explanation like this. (See:
Internet Standard.)
$ internet vs. Internet
1. (I) Not capitalized: A popular abbreviation for "internetwork".
2. (I) Capitalized: "The Internet" is the single, interconnected,
worldwide system of commercial, government, educational, and other
computer networks that share the set of protocols specified by the
IAB [R2026] and the name and address spaces managed by the ICANN.
(C) The protocol set is named the "Internet Protocol Suite". It
also is popularly known as "TCP/IP", because TCP and IP are two of
its fundamental components. These protocols enable a user of any
one of the networks in the Internet to communicate with, or use
services located on, any of the other networks.
(C) Although the Internet does have architectural principles
[R1958], no Internet Standard formally defines a layered reference
model for the IPS that is similar to the OSIRM. However, Internet
community documents do refer (inconsistently) to layers:
application, socket, transport, internetwork, network, data link,
Shirey Informational [Page 91]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
and physical. In this Glossary, Internet layers are referred to by
name to avoid confusing them with OSIRM layers, which are referred
to by number.
$ internetwork
(I) A system of interconnected networks; a network of networks.
Usually shortened to "internet". (See: internet vs. Internet.)
(C) An internet is usually built using OSI layer 3 gateways to
connect a set of subnetworks. When the subnetworks differ in the
OSI layer 3 protocol service they provide, the gateways sometimes
implement a uniform internetwork protocol (e.g., IP) that operates
at the top of layer 3 and hides the underlying heterogeneity from
hosts that use communication services provided by the internet.
(See: router.)
$ intranet
(I) A computer network, especially one based on Internet
technology, that an organization uses for its own internal, and
usually private, purposes and that is closed to outsiders. (See:
extranet, virtual private network.)
$ intruder
(I) An entity that gains or attempts to gain access to a system or
system resource without having authorization to do so. (See:
cracker.)
$ intrusion
See: security intrusion.
$ intrusion detection
(I) A security service that monitors and analyzes system events
for the purpose of finding, and providing real-time or near real-
time warning of, attempts to access system resources in an
unauthorized manner.
$ invalidity date
(N) An X.509 CRL entry extension that "indicates the date at which
it is known or suspected that the [revoked certificate's private
key] was compromised or that the certificate should otherwise be
considered invalid" [X509].
(C) This date may be earlier than the revocation date in the CRL
entry, and may even be earlier than the date of issue of earlier
CRLs. However, the invalidity date is not, by itself, sufficient
for purposes of non-repudiation service. For example, to
Shirey Informational [Page 92]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
fraudulently repudiate a validly-generated signature, a private
key holder may falsely claim that the key was compromised at some
time in the past.
$ IP
See: Internet Protocol.
$ IP address
(I) A computer's internetwork address that is assigned for use by
the Internet Protocol and other protocols.
(C) An IP version 4 [R0791] address is written as a series of four
8-bit numbers separated by periods. For example, the address of
the host named "rosslyn.bbn.com" is 192.1.7.10.
(C) An IP version 6 [R2373] address is written as x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x,
where each "x" is the hexadecimal value of one of the eight 16-bit
parts of the address. For example, 1080:0:0:0:8:800:200C:417A and
FEDC:BA98:7654:3210:FEDC:BA98:7654:3210.
$ IP Security Option
See: Internet Protocol Security Option.
$ IPRA
See: Internet Policy Registration Authority.
$ IPsec
See: Internet Protocol security.
$ IPsec Key Exchange (IKE)
(I) An Internet, IPsec, key-establishment protocol [R2409] (partly
based on OAKLEY) that is intended for putting in place
authenticated keying material for use with ISAKMP and for other
security associations, such as in AH and ESP.
$ IPSO
See: Internet Protocol Security Option.
$ ISAKMP
See: Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol.
$ ISD
See: Internet Standards document.
$ ISO
(I) International Organization for Standardization, a voluntary,
non-treaty, non-government organization, established in 1947, with
voting members that are designated standards bodies of
Shirey Informational [Page 93]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
participating nations and non-voting observer organizations. (See:
ANSI, ITU-T.)
(C) Legally, ISO is a Swiss, non-profit, private organization. ISO
and the IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission) form
the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National
bodies that are members of ISO or IEC participate in developing
international standards through ISO and IEC technical committees
that deal with particular fields of activity. Other international
governmental and non-governmental organizations, in liaison with
ISO and IEC, also take part. (ANSI is the U.S. voting member of
ISO. ISO is a class D member of ITU-T.)
(C) The ISO standards development process has four levels of
increasing maturity: Working Draft (WD), Committee Draft (CD),
Draft International Standard (DIS), and International Standard
(IS). (See: (standards track levels under) Internet Standard.) In
information technology, ISO and IEC have a joint technical
committee, ISO/IEC JTC 1. DISs adopted by JTC 1 are circulated to
national bodies for voting, and publication as an IS requires
approval by at least 75% of the national bodies casting a vote.
$ ISOC
See: Internet Society.
$ issue (a digital certificate or CRL)
(I) Generate and sign a digital certificate (or CRL) and, usually,
distribute it and make it available to potential certificate users
(or CRL users). (See: certificate creation.)
(C) The ABA Guidelines [ABA] explicitly limit this term to
certificate creation, and exclude the act of publishing. In
general usage, however, "issuing" a digital certificate (or CRL)
includes not only certificate creation but also making it
available to potential users, such as by storing it in a
repository or other directory or otherwise publishing it.
$ issuer
1. (I) "Issuer" of a certificate or CRL: The CA that signs the
digital certificate or CRL.
(C) An X.509 certificate always includes the issuer's name. The
name may include a common name value.
2. (N) "Issuer" of a payment card: SET usage: "The financial
institution or its agent that issues the unique primary account
number to the cardholder for the payment card brand." [SET2]
Shirey Informational [Page 94]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The institution that establishes the account for a cardholder
and issues the payment card also guarantees payment for authorized
transactions that use the card in accordance with card brand
regulations and local legislation. [SET1]
$ ITAR
See: International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
$ ITSEC
See: Information Technology System Evaluation Criteria.
$ ITU-T
(N) International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunication
Standardization Sector (formerly "CCITT"), a United Nations treaty
organization that is composed mainly of postal, telephone, and
telegraph authorities of the member countries and that publishes
standards called "Recommendations". (See: X.400, X.500.)
(C) The Department of State represents the United States. ITU-T
works on many kinds of communication systems. ITU-T cooperates
with ISO on communication protocol standards, and many
Recommendations in that area are also published as an ISO standard
with an ISO name and number.
$ IV
See: initialization value.
$ KDC
See: Key Distribution Center.
$ KEA
See: Key Exchange Algorithm.
$ KEK
See: key-encrypting key.
$ Kerberos
(N) A system developed at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology that depends on passwords and symmetric cryptography
(DES) to implement ticket-based, peer entity authentication
service and access control service distributed in a client-server
network environment. [R1510, Stei]
(C) Kerberos was developed by Project Athena and is named for the
three-headed dog guarding Hades.
$ key
See: cryptographic key.
Shirey Informational [Page 95]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ key agreement (algorithm or protocol)
(I) A key establishment method (especially one involving
asymmetric cryptography) by which two or more entities, without
prior arrangement except a public exchange of data (such as public
keys), each computes the same key value. I.e., each can
independently generate the same key value, but that key cannot be
computed by other entities. (See: Diffie-Hellman, key
establishment, Key Exchange Algorithm, key transport.)
(O) "A method for negotiating a key value on line without
transferring the key, even in an encrypted form, e.g., the Diffie-
Hellman technique." [X509]
(O) "The procedure whereby two different parties generate shared
symmetric keys such that any of the shared symmetric keys is a
function of the information contributed by all legitimate
participants, so that no party [alone] can predetermine the value
of the key." [A9042]
(C) For example, a message originator and the intended recipient
can each use their own private key and the other's public key with
the Diffie-Hellman algorithm to first compute a shared secret
value and, from that value, derive a session key to encrypt the
message.
$ key authentication
(N) "The assurance of the legitimate participants in a key
agreement that no non-legitimate party possesses the shared
symmetric key." [A9042]
$ key center
(I) A centralized key distribution process (used in symmetric
cryptography), usually a separate computer system, that uses key-
encrypting keys (master keys) to encrypt and distribute session
keys needed in a community of users.
(C) An ANSI standard [A9017] defines two types of key center: key
distribution center and key translation center.
$ key confirmation
(N) "The assurance of the legitimate participants in a key
establishment protocol that the intended parties sharing the
symmetric key actually possess the shared symmetric key." [A9042]
$ key distribution
(I) A process that delivers a cryptographic key from the location
where it is generated to the locations where it is used in a
cryptographic algorithm. (See: key management.)
Shirey Informational [Page 96]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ key distribution center (KDC)
(I) A type of key center (used in symmetric cryptography) that
implements a key distribution protocol to provide keys (usually,
session keys) to two (or more) entities that wish to communicate
securely. (See: key translation center.)
(C) A KDC distributes keys to Alice and Bob, who (a) wish to
communicate with each other but do not currently share keys, (b)
each share a KEK with the KDC, and (c) may not be able to generate
or acquire keys by themselves. Alice requests the keys from the
KDC. The KDC generates or acquires the keys and makes two
identical sets. The KDC encrypts one set in the KEK it shares with
Alice, and sends that encrypted set to Alice. The KDC encrypts the
second set in the KEK it shares with Bob, and either sends that
encrypted set to Alice for her to forward to Bob, or sends it
directly to Bob (although the latter option is not supported in
the ANSI standard [A9017]).
$ key encapsulation
See: (secondary definition under) key recovery.
$ key-encrypting key (KEK)
(I) A cryptographic key that is used to encrypt other keys, either
DEKs or other KEKs, but usually is not used to encrypt application
data.
$ key escrow
See: (secondary definition under) key recovery.
$ key establishment (algorithm or protocol)
(I) A process that combines the key generation and key
distribution steps needed to set up or install a secure
communication association. (See: key agreement, key transport.)
(O) "The procedure to share a symmetric key among different
parties by either key agreement or key transport." [A9042]
(C) Key establishment involves either key agreement or key
transport:
- Key transport: One entity generates a secret key and securely
sends it to the other entity. (Or each entity generates a
secret value and securely sends it to the other entity, where
the two values are combined to form a secret key.)
- Key agreement: No secret is sent from one entity to another.
Instead, both entities, without prior arrangement except a
public exchange of data, compute the same secret value. I.e.,
Shirey Informational [Page 97]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
each can independently generate the same value, but that value
cannot be computed by other entities.
$ Key Exchange Algorithm (KEA)
(N) A key agreement algorithm [NIST] that is similar to the
Diffie-Hellman algorithm, uses 1024-bit asymmetric keys, and was
developed and formerly classified at the "Secret" level by NSA.
(See: CAPSTONE, CLIPPER, FORTEZZA, SKIPJACK.)
(C) On 23 June 1998, the NSA announced that KEA had been
declassified.
$ key generation
(I) A process that creates the sequence of symbols that comprise a
cryptographic key. (See: key management.)
$ key generator
1. (I) An algorithm that uses mathematical rules to
deterministically produce a pseudo-random sequence of
cryptographic key values.
2. (I) An encryption device that incorporates a key generation
mechanism and applies the key to plaintext (e.g., by exclusive OR-
ing the key bit string with the plaintext bit string) to produce
ciphertext.
$ key length
(I) The number of symbols (usually bits) needed to be able to
represent any of the possible values of a cryptographic key. (See:
key space.)
$ key lifetime
(N) MISSI usage: An attribute of a MISSI key pair that specifies a
time span that bounds the validity period of any MISSI X.509
public-key certificate that contains the public component of the
pair. (See: cryptoperiod.)
$ key management
(I) The process of handling and controlling cryptographic keys and
related material (such as initialization values) during their life
cycle in a cryptographic system, including ordering, generating,
distributing, storing, loading, escrowing, archiving, auditing,
and destroying the material. (See: key distribution, key escrow,
keying material, public-key infrastructure.)
(O) "The generation, storage, distribution, deletion, archiving
and application of keys in accordance with a security policy."
[I7498 Part 2]
Shirey Informational [Page 98]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(O) "The activities involving the handling of cryptographic keys
and other related security parameters (e.g., IVs, counters) during
the entire life cycle of the keys, including their generation,
storage, distribution, entry and use, deletion or destruction, and
archiving." [FP140]
$ Key Management Protocol (KMP)
(N) A protocol to establish a shared symmetric key between a pair
(or a group) of users. (One version of KMP was developed by SDNS,
and another by SILS.)
$ key material identifier (KMID)
(N) MISSI usage: A 64-bit identifier that is assigned to a key
pair when the public key is bound in a MISSI X.509 public-key
certificate.
$ key pair
(I) A set of mathematically related keys--a public key and a
private key--that are used for asymmetric cryptography and are
generated in a way that makes it computationally infeasible to
derive the private key from knowledge of the public key (e.g.,
see: Diffie-Hellman, Rivest-Shamir-Adleman).
(C) A key pair's owner discloses the public key to other system
entities so they can use the key to encrypt data, verify a digital
signature, compute a protected checksum, or generate a key in a
key agreement algorithm. The matching private key is kept secret
by the owner, who uses it to decrypt data, generate a digital
signature, verify a protected checksum, or generate a key in a key
agreement algorithm.
$ key recovery
1. (I) A process for learning the value of a cryptographic key
that was previously used to perform some cryptographic operation.
(See: cryptanalysis.)
2. (I) Techniques that provide an intentional, alternate (i.e.,
secondary) means to access the key used for data confidentiality
service in an encrypted association. [DOD4]
(C) We assume that the encryption mechanism has a primary means of
obtaining the key through a key establishment algorithm or
protocol. For the secondary means, there are two classes of key
recovery techniques--key escrow and key encapsulation:
Shirey Informational [Page 99]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- "Key escrow": A key recovery technique for storing knowledge of
a cryptographic key or parts thereof in the custody of one or
more third parties called "escrow agents", so that the key can
be recovered and used in specified circumstances.
Key escrow is typically implemented with split knowledge
techniques. For example, the Escrowed Encryption Standard
[FP185] entrusts two components of a device-unique split key to
separate escrow agents. The agents provide the components only
to someone legally authorized to conduct electronic
surveillance of telecommunications encrypted by that specific
device. The components are used to reconstruct the device-
unique key, and it is used to obtain the session key needed to
decrypt communications.
- "Key encapsulation": A key recovery technique for storing
knowledge of a cryptographic key by encrypting it with another
key and ensuring that that only certain third parties called
"recovery agents" can perform the decryption operation to
retrieve the stored key.
Key encapsulation typically allows direct retrieval of the
secret key used to provide data confidentiality.
$ key space
(I) The range of possible values of a cryptographic key; or the
number of distinct transformations supported by a particular
cryptographic algorithm. (See: key length.)
$ key translation center
(I) A type of key center (used in a symmetric cryptography) that
implements a key distribution protocol to convey keys between two
(or more) parties who wish to communicate securely. (See: key
distribution center.)
(C) A key translation center translates keys for future
communication between Bob and Alice, who (a) wish to communicate
with each other but do not currently share keys, (b) each share a
KEK with the center, and (c) have the ability to generate or
acquire keys by themselves. Alice generates or acquires a set of
keys for communication with Bob. Alice encrypts the set in the KEK
she shares with the center and sends the encrypted set to the
center. The center decrypts the set, reencrypts the set in the KEK
it shares with Bob, and either sends that encrypted set to Alice
for her to forward to Bob, or sends it directly to Bob (although
direct distribution is not supported in the ANSI standard
[A9017]).
Shirey Informational [Page 100]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ key transport (algorithm or protocol)
(I) A key establishment method by which a secret key is generated
by one entity in a communication association and securely sent to
another entity in the association. (See: key agreement.)
(O) "The procedure to send a symmetric key from one party to other
parties. As a result, all legitimate participants share a common
symmetric key in such a way that the symmetric key is determined
entirely by one party." [A9042]
(C) For example, a message originator can generate a random
session key and then use the Rivest-Shamir-Adleman algorithm to
encrypt that key with the public key of the intended recipient.
$ key update
(I) Derive a new key from an existing key. (See: certificate
rekey.)
$ key validation
(N) "The procedure for the receiver of a public key to check that
the key conforms to the arithmetic requirements for such a key in
order to thwart certain types of attacks." [A9042]
$ keyed hash
(I) A cryptographic hash (e.g., [R1828]) in which the mapping to a
hash result is varied by a second input parameter that is a
cryptographic key. (See: checksum.)
(C) If the input data object is changed, a new hash result cannot
be correctly computed without knowledge of the secret key. Thus,
the secret key protects the hash result so it can be used as a
checksum even when there is a threat of an active attack on the
data. There are least two forms of keyed hash:
- A function based on a keyed encryption algorithm. (E.g., see:
Data Authentication Code.)
- A function based on a keyless hash that is enhanced by
combining (e.g., by concatenating) the input data object
parameter with a key parameter before mapping to the hash
result. (E.g., see: HMAC.)
$ keying material
(I) Data (such as keys, key pairs, and initialization values)
needed to establish and maintain a cryptographic security
association.
Shirey Informational [Page 101]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ KMID
See: key material identifier.
$ known-plaintext attack
(I) A cryptanalysis technique in which the analyst tries to
determine the key from knowledge of some plaintext-ciphertext
pairs (although the analyst may also have other clues, such as the
knowing the cryptographic algorithm).
$ L2F
See: Layer 2 Forwarding Protocol.
$ L2TP
See: Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol.
$ label
See: security label.
$ Language of Temporal Ordering Specification (LOTOS)
(N) A language (ISO 8807-1990) for formal specification of
computer network protocols; describes the order in which events
occur.
$ lattice model
(I) A security model for flow control in a system, based on the
lattice that is formed by the finite security levels in a system
and their partial ordering. [Denn] (See: flow control, security
level, security model.)
(C) The model describes the semantic structure formed by a finite
set of security levels, such as those used in military
organizations.
(C) A lattice is a finite set together with a partial ordering on
its elements such that for every pair of elements there is a least
upper bound and a greatest lower bound. For example, a lattice is
formed by a finite set S of security levels -- i.e., a set S of all
ordered pairs (x, c), where x is one of a finite set X of
hierarchically ordered classification levels (X1, ..., Xm), and c
is a (possibly empty) subset of a finite set C of non-hierarchical
categories (C1, ..., Cn) -- together with the "dominate" relation.
(See: dominate.)
$ Law Enforcement Access Field (LEAF)
(N) A data item that is automatically embedded in data encrypted
by devices (e.g., see: CLIPPER chip) that implement the Escrowed
Encryption Standard.
Shirey Informational [Page 102]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Layer 2 Forwarding Protocol (L2F)
(N) An Internet protocol (originally developed by Cisco
Corporation) that uses tunneling of PPP over IP to create a
virtual extension of a dial-up link across a network, initiated by
the dial-up server and transparent to the dial-up user. (See:
L2TP.)
$ Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
(N) An Internet client-server protocol that combines aspects of
PPTP and L2F and supports tunneling of PPP over an IP network or
over frame relay or other switched network. (See: virtual private
network.)
(C) PPP can in turn encapsulate any OSI layer 3 protocol. Thus,
L2TP does not specify security services; it depends on protocols
layered above and below it to provide any needed security.
$ LDAP
See: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol.
$ least privilege
(I) The principle that a security architecture should be designed
so that each system entity is granted the minimum system resources
and authorizations that the entity needs to do its work. (See:
economy of mechanism.)
(C) This principle tends to limit damage that can be caused by an
accident, error, or unauthorized act.
$ Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
(N) A client-server protocol that supports basic use of the X.500
Directory (or other directory servers) without incurring the
resource requirements of the full Directory Access Protocol (DAP).
[R1777]
(C) Designed for simple management and browser applications that
provide simple read/write interactive directory service. Supports
both simple authentication and strong authentication of the client
to the directory server.
$ link
(I) World Wide Web usage: See: hyperlink.
(I) Subnetwork usage: A point-to-point communication channel
connecting two subnetwork relays (especially one between two
packet switches) that is implemented at OSI layer 2. (See: link
encryption.)
Shirey Informational [Page 103]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The relay computers assume that links are logically passive.
If a computer at one end of a link sends a sequence of bits, the
sequence simply arrives at the other end after a finite time,
although some bits may have been changed either accidentally
(errors) or by active wiretapping.
$ link-by-link encryption
$ link encryption
(I) Stepwise protection of data that flows between two points in a
network, provided by encrypting data separately on each network
link, i.e., by encrypting data when it leaves a host or subnetwork
relay and decrypting when it arrives at the next host or relay.
Each link may use a different key or even a different algorithm.
[R1455] (See: end-to-end encryption.)
$ logic bomb
(I) Malicious logic that activates when specified conditions are
met. Usually intended to cause denial of service or otherwise
damage system resources. (See: Trojan horse, virus, worm.)
$ login
(I) The act of a system entity gaining access to a session in
which the entity can use system resources; usually accomplished by
providing a user name and password to an access control system
that authenticates the user.
(C) Derives from "log" file", a security audit trail that records
security events, such as the beginning of sessions, and who
initiates them.
$ LOTOS
See: Language of Temporal Ordering Specification.
$ MAC
See: mandatory access control, Message Authentication Code.
$ malicious logic
(I) Hardware, software, or firmware that is intentionally included
or inserted in a system for a harmful purpose. (See: logic bomb,
Trojan horse, virus, worm.)
$ malware
(I) A contraction of "malicious software". (See: malicious logic.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it is not listed in most
dictionaries and could confuse international readers.
Shirey Informational [Page 104]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ man-in-the-middle
(I) A form of active wiretapping attack in which the attacker
intercepts and selectively modifies communicated data in order to
masquerade as one or more of the entities involved in a
communication association. (See: hijack attack, piggyback attack.)
(C) For example, suppose Alice and Bob try to establish a session
key by using the Diffie-Hellman algorithm without data origin
authentication service. A "man in the middle" could (a) block
direct communication between Alice and Bob and then (b) masquerade
as Alice sending data to Bob, (c) masquerade as Bob sending data
to Alice, (d) establish separate session keys with each of them,
and (e) function as a clandestine proxy server between them in
order to capture or modify sensitive information that Alice and
Bob think they are sending only to each other.
$ mandatory access control (MAC)
(I) An access control service that enforces a security policy
based on comparing (a) security labels (which indicate how
sensitive or critical system resources are) with (b) security
clearances (which indicate system entities are eligible to access
certain resources). (See: discretionary access control, rule-based
security policy.)
(C) This kind of access control is called "mandatory" because an
entity that has clearance to access a resource may not, just by
its own volition, enable another entity to access that resource.
(O) "A means of restricting access to objects based on the
sensitivity (as represented by a label) of the information
contained in the objects and the formal authorization (i.e.,
clearance) of subjects to access information of such sensitivity."
[DOD1]
$ manipulation detection code
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "checksum"
because the word "manipulation" implies protection against active
attacks, which an ordinary checksum might not provide. Instead, if
such protection is intended, use "protected checksum" or some
particular type thereof, depending on which is meant. If such
protection is not intended, use "error detection code" or some
specific type of checksum that is not protected.
$ masquerade attack
(I) A type of attack in which one system entity illegitimately
poses as (assumes the identity of) another entity. (See: spoofing
attack.)
Shirey Informational [Page 105]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ MCA
See: merchant certificate authority.
$ MD2
(N) A cryptographic hash [R1319] that produces a 128-bit hash
result, was designed by Ron Rivest, and is similar to MD4 and MD5
but slower. (See: message digest.)
$ MD4
(N) A cryptographic hash [R1320] that produces a 128-bit hash
result and was designed by Ron Rivest. (See: message digest and
SHA-1.)
$ MD5
(N) A cryptographic hash [R1321] that produces a 128-bit hash
result and was designed by Ron Rivest to be an improved version of
MD4.
$ merchant
(O) SET usage: "A seller of goods, services, and/or other
information who accepts payment for these items electronically."
[SET2] A merchant may also provide electronic selling services
and/or electronic delivery of items for sale. With SET, the
merchant can offer its cardholders secure electronic interactions,
but a merchant that accepts payment cards is required to have a
relationship with an acquirer. [SET1, SET2]
$ merchant certificate
(O) SET usage: A public-key certificate issued to a merchant.
Sometimes used to refer to a pair of such certificates where one
is for digital signature use and the other is for encryption.
$ merchant certification authority (MCA)
(O) SET usage: A CA that issues digital certificates to merchants
and is operated on behalf of a payment card brand, an acquirer, or
another party according to brand rules. Acquirers verify and
approve requests for merchant certificates prior to issuance by
the MCA. An MCA does not issue a CRL, but does distribute CRLs
issued by root CAs, brand CAs, geopolitical CAs, and payment
gateway CAs. [SET2]
$ mesh PKI
(I) A non-hierarchical PKI architecture in which there are several
trusted CAs rather than a single root. Each certificate user bases
path validations on the public key of one of the trusted CAs,
usually the one that issued that user's own public-key
certificate. Rather than having superior-to-subordinate
Shirey Informational [Page 106]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
relationships between CAs, the relationships are peer-to-peer, and
CAs issue cross-certificates to each other. (See: hierarchical
PKI, trust-file PKI.)
$ message authentication code vs. Message Authentication Code (MAC)
1. (N) Capitalized: "(The) Message Authentication Code" refers to
an ANSI standard for a checksum that is computed with a keyed hash
that is based on DES. [A9009] (Also known as the U.S. Government
standard Data Authentication Code. [FP113])
(C) The ANSI standard MAC algorithm is equivalent to cipher block
chaining with IV = 0.
2. (D) Not capitalized: ISDs SHOULD NOT use the uncapitalized form
"message authentication code", because this term mixes concepts in
a potentially misleading way. Instead, use "checksum", "error
detection code", "hash", "keyed hash", "Message Authentication
Code", or "protected checksum", depending on what is meant. (See:
authentication code.)
(C) In the uncapitalized form, the word "message" is misleading
because it implies that the mechanism is particularly suitable for
or limited to electronic mail (see: Message Handling Systems), the
word "authentication" is misleading because the mechanism
primarily serves a data integrity function rather than an
authentication function, and the word "code" is misleading because
it implies that either encoding or encryption is involved or that
the term refers to computer software.
$ message digest
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "hash result"
because it unnecessarily duplicates the meaning of the other, more
general term and mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way.
(See: cryptographic hash, Message Handling System.)
$ Message Handling Systems
(I) A ITU-T/ISO system concept, which encompasses the notion of
electronic mail but defines more comprehensive OSI systems and
services that enable users to exchange messages on a store-and-
forward basis. (The ISO equivalent is "Message Oriented Text
Interchange System".) (See: X.400.)
$ message indicator
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "initialization
value" because it mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way.
Shirey Informational [Page 107]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ message integrity check
$ message integrity code
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use these terms because they mix concepts in a
potentially misleading way. (The word "message" is misleading
because it suggests that the mechanism is particularly suitable
for or limited to electronic mail. The word "code" is misleading
because it suggests that either encoding or encryption is
involved, or that the term refers to computer software.) Instead,
use "checksum", "error detection code", "hash", "keyed hash",
"Message Authentication Code", or "protected checksum", depending
on what is meant.
$ Message Security Protocol (MSP)
(N) A secure message handling protocol [SDNS7] for use with X.400
and Internet mail protocols. Developed by NSA's SDNS program and
used in the U.S. Defense Message System.
$ MHS
See: message handling system.
$ MIME
See: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions.
$ MIME Object Security Services (MOSS)
(I) An Internet protocol [R1848] that applies end-to-end
encryption and digital signature to MIME message content, using
symmetric cryptography for encryption and asymmetric cryptography
for key distribution and signature. MOSS is based on features and
specifications of PEM. (See: S/MIME.)
$ Minimum Interoperability Specification for PKI Components (MISPC)
(N) A technical description to provide a basis for interoperation
between PKI components from different vendors; consists primarily
of a profile of certificate and CRL extensions and a set of
transactions for PKI operation. [MISPC]
$ MISPC
See: Minimum Interoperability Specification for PKI Components.
$ MISSI
(N) Multilevel Information System Security Initiative, an NSA
program to encourage development of interoperable, modular
products for constructing secure network information systems in
support of a wide variety of Government missions. (See: MSP.)
Shirey Informational [Page 108]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ MISSI user
(O) MISSI usage: A system entity that is the subject of one or
more MISSI X.509 public-key certificates issued under a MISSI
certification hierarchy. (See: personality.)
(C) MISSI users include both end users and the authorities that
issue certificates. A MISSI user is usually a person but may be a
machine or other automated process. Some machines are required to
operate non-stop. To avoid downtime needed to exchange the
FORTEZZA cards of machine operators at shift changes, the machines
may be issued their own cards, as if they were persons.
$ mode
$ mode of operation
(I) Encryption usage: A technique for enhancing the effect of a
cryptographic algorithm or adapting the algorithm for an
application, such as applying a block cipher to a sequence of data
blocks or a data stream. (See: electronic codebook, cipher block
chaining, cipher feedback, output feedback.)
(I) System operation usage: A type of security policy that states
the range of classification levels of information that a system is
permitted to handle and the range of clearances and authorizations
of users who are permitted to access the system. (See: dedicated
security mode, multilevel security mode, partitioned security
mode, system high security mode.)
$ modulus
(I) The defining constant in modular arithmetic, and usually a
part of the public key in asymmetric cryptography that is based on
modular arithmetic. (See: Diffie-Hellman, Rivest-Shamir-Adleman.)
$ Morris Worm
(I) A worm program written by Robert T. Morris, Jr. that flooded
the ARPANET in November, 1988, causing problems for thousands of
hosts. (See: worm.)
$ MOSS
See: MIME Object Security Services.
$ MSP
See: Message Security Protocol.
$ multilevel secure (MLS)
(I) A class of system that has system resources (particularly
stored information) at more than one security level (i.e., has
different types of sensitive resources) and that permits
Shirey Informational [Page 109]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
concurrent access by users who differ in security clearance and
need-to-know, but is able to prevent each user from accessing
resources for which the user lacks authorization.
$ multilevel security mode
(I) A mode of operation of an information system, that allows two
or more classification levels of information to be processed
concurrently within the same system when not all users have a
clearance or formal access authorization for all data handled by
the system.
(C) This mode is defined formally in U.S. Department of Defense
policy regarding system accreditation [DOD2], but the term is also
used outside the Defense Department and outside the Government.
$ Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME)
(I) An Internet protocol [R2045] that enhances the basic format of
Internet electronic mail messages [R0822] to be able to use
character sets other than US-ASCII for textual headers and text
content, and to carry non-textual and multi-part content. (See:
S/MIME.)
$ mutual suspicion
(I) The state that exists between two interacting system entities
in which neither entity can trust the other to function correctly
with regard to some security requirement.
$ National Computer Security Center (NCSC)
(N) A U.S. Department of Defense organization, housed in NSA, that
has responsibility for encouraging widespread availability of
trusted computer systems throughout the Federal Government. It has
established criteria for, and performs evaluations of, computer
and network systems that have a trusted computing base. (See:
Evaluated Products List, Rainbow Series, TCSEC.)
$ National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP)
(N) An organization created by NIST and NSA to enhance the quality
of commercial products for information security and increase
consumer confidence in those products through objective evaluation
and testing methods.
(C) NIAP is registered, through the U.S. Department of Defense, as
a National Performance Review Reinvention Laboratory. NIAP
functions include the following:
- Developing tests, test methods, and other tools that developers
and testing laboratories may use to improve and evaluate
security products.
Shirey Informational [Page 110]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Collaborating with industry and others on research and testing
programs.
- Using the Common Criteria to develop protection profiles and
associated test sets for security products and systems.
- Cooperating with the NIST National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program to develop a program to accredit private-
sector laboratories for the testing of information security
products using the Common Criteria.
- Working to establish a formal, international mutual recognition
scheme for a Common Criteria-based evaluation.
$ National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
(N) A U.S. Department of Commerce agency that promotes U.S.
economic growth by working with industry to develop and apply
technology, measurements, and standards. Has primary Government
responsibility for INFOSEC standards for unclassified but
sensitive information. (See: ANSI, DES, DSA, DSS, FIPS, NIAP,
NSA.)
$ National Security Agency (NSA)
(N) A U.S. Department of Defense intelligence agency that has
primary Government responsibility for INFOSEC for classified
information and for unclassified but sensitive information handled
by national security systems. (See: FORTEZZA, KEA, MISSI, NIAP,
NIST, SKIPJACK.)
$ need-to-know
(I) The necessity for access to, knowledge of, or possession of
specific information required to carry out official duties.
(C) This criterion is used in security procedures that require a
custodian of sensitive information, prior to disclosing the
information to someone else, to establish that the intended
recipient has proper authorization to access the information.
$ network
See: computer network.
$ NIAP
See: National Information Assurance Partnership.
$ NIST
See: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
$ NLSP
Network Layer Security Protocol. An OSI protocol (IS0 11577) for
end-to-end encryption services at the top of OSI layer 3. NLSP is
derived from an SDNS protocol, SP3, but is much more complex.
Shirey Informational [Page 111]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ no-lone zone
(I) A room or other space to which no person may have
unaccompanied access and that, when occupied, is required to be
occupied by two or more appropriately authorized persons. (See:
dual control.)
$ nonce
(I) A random or non-repeating value that is included in data
exchanged by a protocol, usually for the purpose of guaranteeing
liveness and thus detecting and protecting against replay attacks.
$ non-critical
See: critical (extension of certificate).
$ non-repudiation service
(I) A security service that provide protection against false
denial of involvement in a communication. (See: repudiation.)
(C) Non-repudiation service does not and cannot prevent an entity
from repudiating a communication. Instead, the service provides
evidence that can be stored and later presented to a third party
to resolve disputes that arise if and when a communication is
repudiated by one of the entities involved. There are two basic
kinds of non-repudiation service:
- "Non-repudiation with proof of origin" provides the recipient
of data with evidence that proves the origin of the data, and
thus protects the recipient against an attempt by the
originator to falsely deny sending the data. This service can
be viewed as a stronger version of an data origin
authentication service, in that it proves authenticity to a
third party.
- "Non-repudiation with proof of receipt" provides the originator
of data with evidence that proves the data was received as
addressed, and thus protects the originator against an attempt
by the recipient to falsely deny receiving the data.
(C) Phases of a Non-Repudiation Service: Ford [For94, For97] uses
the term "critical action" to refer to the act of communication
that is the subject of the service:
Shirey Informational [Page 112]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- . --------
Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4: Phase 5: . Phase 6:
Request Generate Transfer Verify Retain . Resolve
Service Evidence Evidence Evidence Evidence . Dispute
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- . --------
Service Critical Evidence Evidence Archive . Evidence
Request => Action => Stored => Is => Evidence . Is
Is Made Occurs For Later Tested In Case . Verified
and Use | ^ Critical . ^
Evidence v | Action Is . |
Is +-------------------+ Repudiated . |
Generated |Verifiable Evidence|------> ... . ----+
+-------------------+
Phase / Explanation
-------------------
1. Before the critical action, the service requester asks, either
implicitly or explicitly, to have evidence of the action be
generated.
2. When the critical action occurs, evidence is generated by a
process involving the potential repudiator and possibly also a
trusted third party.
3. The evidence is transferred to the requester, or stored by a
third party, for later use if needed.
4. The entity that holds the evidence tests to be sure that it
will suffice if a dispute arises.
5. The evidence is retained for possible future retrieval and use.
6. In this phase, which occurs only if the critical action is
repudiated, the evidence is retrieved from storage, presented,
and verified to resolve the dispute.
$ no-PIN ORA (NORA)
(O) MISSI usage: An organizational RA that operates in a mode in
which the ORA performs no card management functions and,
therefore, does not require knowledge of either the SSO PIN or
user PIN for an end user's FORTEZZA PC card.
$ NORA
See: no-PIN ORA.
$ notarization
(I) Registration of data under the authority or in the care of a
trusted third party, thus making it possible to provide subsequent
assurance of the accuracy of characteristics claimed for the data,
such as content, origin, time, and delivery. [I7498 Part 2] (See:
digital notary.)
Shirey Informational [Page 113]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ NULL encryption algorithm
(I) An algorithm [R2410] that does nothing to transform plaintext
data; i.e., a no-op. It originated because of IPsec ESP, which
always specifies the use of an encryption algorithm to provide
confidentiality. The NULL encryption algorithm is a convenient way
to represent the option of not applying encryption in ESP (or in
any other context where this is needed).
$ OAKLEY
(I) A key establishment protocol (proposed for IPsec but
superseded by IKE) based on the Diffie-Hellman algorithm and
designed to be a compatible component of ISAKMP. [R2412]
(C) OAKLEY establishes a shared key with an assigned identifier
and associated authenticated identities for parties. I.e., OAKLEY
provides authentication service to ensure the entities of each
other's identity, even if the Diffie-Hellman exchange is
threatened by active wiretapping. Also, provides public-key
forward secrecy for the shared key and supports key updates,
incorporation of keys distributed by out-of-band mechanisms, and
user-defined abstract group structures for use with Diffie-
Hellman.
$ object
(I) Trusted computer system modeling usage: A system element that
contains or receives information. (See: Bell-LaPadula Model,
trusted computer system.)
$ object identifier (OID)
(I) An official, globally unique name for a thing, written as a
sequence of integers (which are formed and assigned as defined in
the ASN.1 standard) and used to reference the thing in abstract
specifications and during negotiation of security services in a
protocol.
(O) "A value (distinguishable from all other such values) which is
associated with an object." [X680]
(C) Objects named by OIDs are leaves of the object identifier tree
(which is similar to but different from the X.500 Directory
Information Tree). Each arc (i.e., each branch of the tree) is
labeled with a non-negative integer. An OID is the sequence of
integers on the path leading from the root of the tree to a named
object.
(C) The OID tree has three arcs immediately below the root: {0}
for use by ITU-T, {1} for use by ISO, and {2} for use by both
jointly. Below ITU-T are four arcs, where {0 0} is for ITU-T
Shirey Informational [Page 114]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
recommendations. Below {0 0} are 26 arcs, one for each series of
recommendations starting with the letters A to Z, and below these
are arcs for each recommendation. Thus, the OID for ITU-T
Recommendation X.509 is {0 0 24 509}. Below ISO are four arcs,
where {1 0 }is for ISO standards, and below these are arcs for
each ISO standard. Thus, the OID for ISO/IEC 9594-8 (the ISO
number for X.509) is {1 0 9594 8}.
(C) The following are additional examples: ANSI registers
organization names below the branch {joint-iso-ccitt(2)
country(16) US(840) organization(1)}. The NIST CSOR records PKI
objects below the branch {joint-iso-ccitt(2) country(16) us(840)
gov(101) csor(3) pki(4)}. The U.S. Department of Defense registers
INFOSEC objects below the branch {joint-iso-ccitt(2) country(16)
us(840) organization(1) gov(101) dod(2) infosec(1)}. The OID for
the PKIX private extension is defined in an arc below the arc for
the PKIX name space, as {iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6)
internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) 1 1}.
$ object reuse
(N) "The reassignment and reuse of a storage medium (e.g., page
frame, disk sector, magnetic tape) that once contained one or more
[information] objects. To be securely reused and assigned to a new
subject, storage media must contain no residual data (magnetic
remanence) from the object(s) previously contained in the media."
[NCS04]
$ OCSP
See: On-line Certificate Status Protocol.
$ octet
(I) A data unit of eight bits. (See: byte.)
(c) This term is used in networking (especially in OSI standards)
in preference to "byte", because some systems use "byte" for data
storage units of a size other than eight.
$ OFB
See: output feedback.
$ ohnosecond
(C) That minuscule fraction of time in which you realize that your
private key has been compromised.
$ OID
See: object identifier.
Shirey Informational [Page 115]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ On-line Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP)
(I) An Internet protocol used by a client to obtain from a server
the validity status and other information concerning a digital
certificate.
(C) In some applications, such as those involving high-value
commercial transactions, it may be necessary to obtain certificate
revocation status that is more timely than is possible with CRLs
or to obtain other kinds of status information. OCSP may be used
to determine the current revocation status of a digital
certificate, in lieu of or as a supplement to checking against a
periodic CRL. An OCSP client issues a status request to an OCSP
server and suspends acceptance of the certificate in question
until the server provides a response.
$ one-time pad
(I) An encryption algorithm in which the key is a random sequence
of symbols and each symbol is used for encryption only one time--
to encrypt only one plaintext symbol to produce only one
ciphertext symbol--and a copy of the key is used similarly for
decryption.
(C) To ensure one-time use, the copy of the key used for
encryption is destroyed after use, as is the copy used for
decryption. This is the only encryption algorithm that is truly
unbreakable, even given unlimited resources for cryptanalysis
[Schn], but key management costs and synchronization problems make
it impractical except in special situations.
$ one-time password
$ One-Time Password (OTP)
1. Not capitalized: A "one-time password" is a simple
authentication technique in which each password is used only once
as authentication information that verifies an identity. This
technique counters the threat of a replay attack that uses
passwords captured by wiretapping.
2. Capitalized: "One-Time Password" is an Internet protocol
[R1938] that is based on S/KEY and uses a cryptographic hash
function to generate one-time passwords for use as authentication
information in system login and in other processes that need
protection against replay attacks.
$ one-way encryption
(I) Irreversible transformation of plaintext to ciphertext, such
that the plaintext cannot be recovered from the ciphertext by
other than exhaustive procedures even if the cryptographic key is
known. (See: encryption.)
Shirey Informational [Page 116]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ one-way function
(I) "A (mathematical) function, f, which is easy to compute, but
which for a general value y in the range, it is computationally
difficult to find a value x in the domain such that f(x) = y.
There may be a few values of y for which finding x is not
computationally difficult." [X509]
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "cryptographic
hash".
$ open security environment
(O) U.S. Department of Defense usage: A system environment that
meets at least one of the following conditions: (a) Application
developers (including maintainers) do not have sufficient
clearance or authorization to provide an acceptable presumption
that they have not introduced malicious logic. (b) Configuration
control does not provide sufficient assurance that applications
and the equipment are protected against the introduction of
malicious logic prior to and during the operation of system
applications. [NCS04] (See: closed security environment.)
$ Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Reference Model (OSIRM)
(N) A joint ISO/ITU-T standard [I7498 Part 1] for a seven-layer,
architectural communication framework for interconnection of
computers in networks.
(C) OSI-based standards include communication protocols that are
mostly incompatible with the Internet Protocol Suite, but also
include security models, such as X.509, that are used in the
Internet.
(C) The OSIRM layers, from highest to lowest, are (7) Application,
(6) Presentation, (5) Session, (4) Transport, (3) Network, (2)
Data Link, and (1) Physical. In this Glossary, these layers are
referred to by number to avoid confusing them with Internet
Protocol Suite layers, which are referred to by name.
(C) Some unknown person described how the OSI layers correspond to
the seven deadly sins:
7. Wrath: Application is always angry at the mess it sees below
itself. (Hey! Who is it to be pointing fingers?)
6. Sloth: Presentation is too lazy to do anything productive by
itself.
5. Lust: Session is always craving and demanding what truly
belongs to Application's functionality.
4. Avarice: Transport wants all of the end-to-end functionality.
(Of course, it deserves it, but life isn't fair.)
Shirey Informational [Page 117]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
3. Gluttony: (Connection-Oriented) Network is overweight and
overbearing after trying too often to eat Transport's lunch.
2. Envy: Poor Data Link is always starved for attention. (With
Asynchronous Transfer Mode, maybe now it is feeling less
neglected.)
1. Pride: Physical has managed to avoid much of the controversy,
and nearly all of the embarrassment, suffered by the others.
(C) John G. Fletcher described how the OSI layers also correspond
to Snow White's dwarf friends:
7. Doc: Application acts as if it is in charge, but sometimes
muddles its syntax.
6. Sleepy: Presentation is indolent, being guilty of the sin of
Sloth.
5. Dopey: Session is confused because its charter is not very
clear.
4. Grumpy: Transport is irritated because Network has encroached
on Transport's turf.
3. Happy: Network smiles for the same reason that Transport is
irritated.
2. Sneezy: Data Link makes loud noises in the hope of attracting
attention.
1. Bashful: Physical quietly does its work, unnoticed by the
others.
$ operational integrity
(I) A synonym for "system integrity"; emphasizes the actual
performance of system functions rather than just the ability to
perform them.
$ operations security (OPSEC)
(I) A process to identify, control, and protect evidence of the
planning and execution of sensitive activities and operations, and
thereby prevent potential adversaries from gaining knowledge of
capabilities and intentions.
$ OPSEC
See: operations security.
$ ORA
See: organizational registration authority.
$ Orange Book
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "Trusted
Computer System Evaluation Criteria" [CSC001, DOD1]. Instead, use
Shirey Informational [Page 118]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
the full, proper name of the document or, in subsequent
references, the abbreviation "TCSEC". (See: (usage note under)
Green Book.)
$ organizational certificate
(O) MISSI usage: A type of MISSI X.509 public-key certificate that
is issued to support organizational message handling for the U.S.
Government's Defense Message System.
$ organizational registration authority (ORA)
(I) General usage: An RA for an organization.
(O) MISSI usage: The MISSI implementation of RA. A MISSI end
entity that (a) assists a PCA, CA, or SCA to register other end
entities, by gathering, verifying, and entering data and
forwarding it to the signing authority and (b) may also assist
with card management functions. An ORA is a local administrative
authority, and the term refers both to the office or role, and to
the person who fills that office. An ORA does not sign
certificates, CRLs, or CKLs. (See: no-PIN ORA, SSO-PIN ORA, user-
PIN ORA.)
$ origin authentication
$ origin authenticity
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use these terms because they look like
careless use of an internationally standardized term. Instead, use
"data origin authentication" or "peer entity authentication",
depending which is meant.
$ OSI
$ OSIRM
See: Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model.
$ OTP
See: One-Time Password.
$ out of band
(I) Transfer of information using a channel that is outside (i.e.,
separate from) the channel that is normally used. (See: covert
channel.)
(C) Out-of-band mechanisms are often used to distribute shared
secrets (e.g., a symmetric key) or other sensitive information
items (e.g., a root key) that are needed to initialize or
otherwise enable the operation of cryptography or other security
mechanisms. (See: key distribution.)
Shirey Informational [Page 119]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ output feedback (OFB)
(N) A block cipher mode [FP081] that modifies electronic codebook
mode to operate on plaintext segments of variable length less than
or equal to the block length.
(C) This mode operates by directly using the algorithm's
previously generated output block as the algorithm's next input
block (i.e., by "feeding back" the output block) and combining
(exclusive OR-ing) the output block with the next plaintext
segment (of block length or less) to form the next ciphertext
segment.
$ outside attack
$ outsider attack
See: (secondary definition under) attack.
$ P1363
See: IEEE P1363.
$ PAA
See: policy approving authority.
$ packet filter
See: (secondary definition under) filtering router.
$ pagejacking
(I) A contraction of "Web page hijacking". A masquerade attack in
which the attacker copies (steals) a home page or other material
from the target server, rehosts the page on a server the attacker
controls, and causes the rehosted page to be indexed by the major
Web search services, thereby diverting browsers from the target
server to the attacker's server.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term without including a definition,
because the term is not listed in most dictionaries and could
confuse international readers. (See: (usage note under) Green
Book.)
$ PAN
See: primary account number.
$ PAP
See: Password Authentication Protocol.
Shirey Informational [Page 120]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ partitioned security mode
(N) A mode of operation of an information system, wherein all
users have the clearance, but not necessarily formal access
authorization and need-to-know, for all information handled by the
system. This mode is defined in U.S. Department of Defense policy
regarding system accreditation. [DoD2]
$ passive attack
See: (secondary definition under) attack.
$ passive wiretapping
See: (secondary definition under) wiretapping.
$ password
(I) A secret data value, usually a character string, that is used
as authentication information. (See: challenge-response.)
(C) A password is usually matched with a user identifier that is
explicitly presented in the authentication process, but in some
cases the identity may be implicit.
(C) Using a password as authentication information assumes that
the password is known only by the system entity whose identity is
being authenticated. Therefore, in a network environment where
wiretapping is possible, simple authentication that relies on
transmission of static (i.e., repetitively used) passwords as
cleartext is inadequate. (See: one-time password, strong
authentication.)
$ Password Authentication Protocol (PAP)
(I) A simple authentication mechanism in PPP. In PAP, a user
identifier and password are transmitted in cleartext. [R1334]
(See: CHAP.)
$ password sniffing
(I) Passive wiretapping, usually on a local area network, to gain
knowledge of passwords. (See: (usage note under) sniffing.)
$ path discovery
(I) For a digital certificate, the process of finding a set of
public-key certificates that comprise a certification path from a
trusted key to that specific certificate.
$ path validation
(I) The process of validating (a) all of the digital certificates
in a certification path and (b) the required relationships between
those certificates, thus validating the contents of the last
certificate on the path. (See: certificate validation.)
Shirey Informational [Page 121]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ payment card
(N) SET usage: Collectively refers "to credit cards, debit cards,
charge cards, and bank cards issued by a financial institution and
which reflects a relationship between the cardholder and the
financial institution." [SET2]
$ payment gateway
(O) SET usage: A system operated by an acquirer, or a third party
designated by an acquirer, for the purpose of providing electronic
commerce services to the merchants in support of the acquirer, and
which interfaces to the acquirer to support the authorization,
capture, and processing of merchant payment messages, including
payment instructions from cardholders. [SET1, SET2]
$ payment gateway certification authority (SET PCA)
(O) SET usage: A CA that issues digital certificates to payment
gateways and is operated on behalf of a payment card brand, an
acquirer, or another party according to brand rules. A SET PCA
issues a CRL for compromised payment gateway certificates. [SET2]
(See: PCA.)
$ PC card
(N) A type of credit card-sized, plug-in peripheral device that
was originally developed to provide memory expansion for portable
computers, but is also used for other kinds of functional
expansion. (See: FORTEZZA, PCMCIA.)
(C) The international PC Card Standard defines a non-proprietary
form factor in three standard sizes--Types I, II and III--each of
which have a 68-pin interface between the card and the socket into
which it plugs. All three types have the same length and width,
roughly the size of a credit card, but differ in their thickness
from 3.3 to 10.5 mm. Examples include storage modules, modems,
device interface adapters, and cryptographic modules.
$ PCA
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this acronym without a qualifying
adjective because that would be ambiguous. (See: Internet policy
certification authority, (MISSI) policy creation authority, (SET)
payment gateway certification authority.)
$ PCMCIA
(N) Personal Computer Memory Card International Association, a
group of manufacturers, developers, and vendors, founded in 1989
to standardize plug-in peripheral memory cards for personal
computers and now extended to deal with any technology that works
in the PC card form factor. (See: PC card.)
Shirey Informational [Page 122]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ peer entity authentication
(I) "The corroboration that a peer entity in an association is the
one claimed." [I7498 Part 2] (See: authentication.)
$ peer entity authentication service
(I) A security service that verifies an identity claimed by or for
a system entity in an association. (See: authentication,
authentication service.)
(C) This service is used at the establishment of, or at times
during, an association to confirm the identity of one entity to
another, thus protecting against a masquerade by the first entity.
However, unlike data origin authentication service, this service
requires an association to exist between the two entities, and the
corroboration provided by the service is valid only at the current
time that the service is provided.
(C) See: "relationship between data integrity service and
authentication services" under data integrity service.
$ PEM
See: Privacy Enhanced Mail.
$ penetration
(I) Successful, repeatable, unauthorized access to a protected
system resource. (See: attack, violation.)
$ penetration test
(I) A system test, often part of system certification, in which
evaluators attempt to circumvent the security features of the
system. [NCS04]
(C) Penetration testing may be performed under various constraints
and conditions. However, for a TCSEC evaluation, testers are
assumed to have all system design and implementation
documentation, including source code, manuals, and circuit
diagrams, and to work under no greater constraints than those
applied to ordinary users.
$ perfect forward secrecy
See: (discussion under) public-key forward secrecy.
$ perimeter
See: security perimeter.
Shirey Informational [Page 123]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ periods processing
(I) A mode of system operation in which information of different
sensitivities is processed at distinctly different times by the
same system, with the system being properly purged or sanitized
between periods. (See: color change.)
$ permission
(I) A synonym for "authorization", but "authorization" is
preferred in the PKI context. (See: privilege.)
$ personal identification number (PIN)
(I) A character string used as a password to gain access to a
system resource. (See: authentication information.)
(C) Despite the words "identification" and "number", a PIN seldom
serves as a user identifier, and a PIN's characters are not
necessarily all numeric. A better name for this concept would have
been "personal authentication system string (PASS)".
(C) Retail banking applications commonly use 4-digit PINs.
FORTEZZA PC card's use up to 12 characters for user or SSO PINs.
$ personality
$ personality label
(O) MISSI usage: A set of MISSI X.509 public-key certificates that
have the same subject DN, together with their associated private
keys and usage specifications, that is stored on a FORTEZZA PC
card to support a role played by the card's user.
(C) When a card's user selects a personality to use in a FORTEZZA-
aware application, the data determines behavior traits (the
personality) of the application. A card's user may have multiple
personalities on the card. Each has a "personality label", a user-
friendly character string that applications can display to the
user for selecting or changing the personality to be used. For
example, a military user's card might contain three personalities:
GENERAL HALFTRACK, COMMANDER FORT SWAMPY, and NEW YEAR'S EVE PARTY
CHAIRMAN. Each personality includes one or more certificates of
different types (such as DSA versus RSA), for different purposes
(such as digital signature versus encryption), or with different
authorizations.
$ personnel security
(I) Procedures to ensure that persons who access a system have
proper clearance, authorization, and need-to-know as required by
the system's security policy.
Shirey Informational [Page 124]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ PGP(trademark)
See: Pretty Good Privacy.
$ Photuris
(I) A UDP-based, key establishment protocol for session keys,
designed for use with the IPsec protocols AH and ESP. Superseded
by IKE.
$ phreaking
(I) A contraction of "telephone breaking". An attack on or
penetration of a telephone system or, by extension, any other
communication or information system. [Raym]
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it is not listed in most
dictionaries and could confuse international readers.
$ physical security
(I) Tangible means of preventing unauthorized physical access to a
system. E.g., fences, walls, and other barriers; locks, safes, and
vaults; dogs and armed guards; sensors and alarm bells. [FP031,
R1455]
$ piggyback attack
(I) A form of active wiretapping in which the attacker gains
access to a system via intervals of inactivity in another user's
legitimate communication connection. Sometimes called a "between-
the-lines" attack. (See: hijack attack, man-in-the-middle attack.)
$ PIN
See: personal identification number.
$ ping of death
(I) An attack that sends an improperly large ICMP [R0792] echo
request packet (a "ping") with the intent of overflowing the input
buffers of the destination machine and causing it to crash.
$ ping sweep
(I) An attack that sends ICMP [R0792] echo requests ("pings") to a
range of IP addresses, with the goal of finding hosts that can be
probed for vulnerabilities.
$ PKCS
See: Public-Key Cryptography Standards.
$ PKCS #7
(N) A standard [PKC07, R2315] from the PKCS series; defines a
syntax for data that may have cryptography applied to it, such as
for digital signatures and digital envelopes.
Shirey Informational [Page 125]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ PKCS #10
(N) A standard [PKC10] from the PKCS series; defines a syntax for
requests for public-key certificates. (See: certification
request.)
(C) A PKCS #10 request contains a DN and a public key, and may
contain other attributes, and is signed by the entity making the
request. The request is sent to a CA, who converts it to an X.509
public-key certificate (or some other form) and returns it,
possibly in PKCS #7 format.
$ PKCS #11
(N) A standard [PKC11] from the PKCS series; defines a software
CAPI called Cryptoki (pronounced "crypto-key"; short for
"cryptographic token interface") for devices that hold
cryptographic information and perform cryptographic functions.
$ PKI
See: public-key infrastructure.
$ PKIX
(I) (1.) A contraction of "Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)", the
name of the IETF working group that is specifying an architecture
and set of protocols needed to support an X.509-based PKI for the
Internet. (2.) A collective name for that architecture and set of
protocols.
(C) The goal of PKIX is to facilitate the use of X.509 public-key
certificates in multiple Internet applications and to promote
interoperability between different implementations that use those
certificates. The resulting PKI is intended to provide a framework
that supports a range of trust and hierarchy environments and a
range of usage environments. PKIX specifies (a) profiles of the v3
X.509 public-key certificate standards and the v2 X.509 CRL
standards for the Internet; (b) operational protocols used by
relying parties to obtain information such as certificates or
certificate status; (c) management protocols used by system
entities to exchange information needed for proper management of
the PKI; and (d) information about certificate policies and CPSs,
covering the areas of PKI security not directly addressed in the
rest of PKIX.
$ PKIX private extension
(I) PKIX defines a private extension to identify an on-line
verification service supporting the issuing CA.
Shirey Informational [Page 126]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ plaintext
(I) Data that is input to and transformed by an encryption
process, or that is output by a decryption process.
(C) Usually, the plaintext input to an encryption operation is
cleartext. But in some cases, the input is ciphertext that was
output from another encryption operation. (See: superencryption.)
$ Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R1661] for encapsulation and
full-duplex transportation of network layer (mainly OSI layer 3)
protocol data packets over a link between two peers, and for
multiplexing different network layer protocols over the same link.
Includes optional negotiation to select and use a peer entity
authentication protocol to authenticate the peers to each other
before they exchange network layer data. (See: CHAP, EAP, PAP.)
$ Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)
(I) An Internet client-server protocol (originally developed by
Ascend and Microsoft) that enables a dial-up user to create a
virtual extension of the dial-up link across a network by
tunneling PPP over IP. (See: L2TP.)
(C) PPP can encapsulate any Internet Protocol Suite network layer
protocol (or OSI layer 3 protocol). Therefore, PPTP does not
specify security services; it depends on protocols above and below
it to provide any needed security. PPTP makes it possible to
divorce the location of the initial dial-up server (i.e., the PPTP
Access Concentrator, the client, which runs on a special-purpose
host) from the location at which the dial-up protocol (PPP)
connection is terminated and access to the network is provided
(i.e., the PPTP Network Server, which runs on a general-purpose
host).
$ policy
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this word as an abbreviation for either
"security policy" or "certificate policy". Instead, to avoid
misunderstanding, use the fully qualified term, at least at the
point of first usage.
$ policy approving authority (PAA)
(O) MISSI usage: The top-level signing authority of a MISSI
certification hierarchy. The term refers both to that
authoritative office or role and to the person who plays that
role. (See: root registry.)
Shirey Informational [Page 127]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) A PAA registers MISSI PCAs and signs their X.509 public-key
certificates. A PAA issues CRLs but does not issue a CKL. A PAA
may issue cross-certificates to other PAAs.
$ policy certification authority (Internet PCA)
(I) An X.509-compliant CA at the second level of the Internet
certification hierarchy, under the Internet Policy Registration
Authority (IPRA). Each PCA operates in accordance with its
published security policy (see: certification practice statement)
and within constraints established by the IPRA for all PCAs.
[R1422]. (See: policy creation authority.)
$ policy creation authority (MISSI PCA)
(O) MISSI usage: The second level of a MISSI certification
hierarchy; the administrative root of a security policy domain of
MISSI users and other, subsidiary authorities. The term refers
both to that authoritative office or role and to the person who
fills that office. (See: policy certification authority.)
(C) A MISSI PCA's certificate is issued by a policy approving
authority. The PCA registers the CAs in its domain, defines their
configurations, and issues their X.509 public-key certificates.
(The PCA may also issue certificates for SCAs, ORAs, and other end
entities, but a PCA does not usually do this.) The PCA
periodically issues CRLs and CKLs for its domain.
$ Policy Management Authority
(N) Canadian usage: An organization responsible for PKI oversight
and policy management in the Government of Canada.
$ policy mapping
(I) "Recognizing that, when a CA in one domain certifies a CA in
another domain, a particular certificate policy in the second
domain may be considered by the authority of the first domain to
be equivalent (but not necessarily identical in all respects) to a
particular certificate policy in the first domain." [X509]
$ POP3
See: Post Office Protocol, version 3.
$ POP3 APOP
(I) A POP3 "command" (better described as a transaction type, or a
protocol-within-a-protocol) by which a POP3 client optionally uses
a keyed hash (based on MD5) to authenticate itself to a POP3
server and, depending on the server implementation, to protect
against replay attacks. (See: CRAM, POP3 AUTH, IMAP4
AUTHENTICATE.)
Shirey Informational [Page 128]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The server includes a unique timestamp in its greeting to the
client. The subsequent APOP command sent by the client to the
server contains the client's name and the hash result of applying
MD5 to a string formed from both the timestamp and a shared secret
that is known only to the client and the server. APOP was designed
to provide as an alternative to using POP3's USER and PASS (i.e.,
password) command pair, in which the client sends a cleartext
password to the server.
$ POP3 AUTH
(I) A "command" [R1734] (better described as a transaction type,
or a protocol-within-a-protocol) in POP3, by which a POP3 client
optionally proposes a mechanism to a POP3 server to authenticate
the client to the server and provide other security services.
(See: POP3 APOP, IMAP4 AUTHENTICATE.)
(C) If the server accepts the proposal, the command is followed by
performing a challenge-response authentication protocol and,
optionally, negotiating a protection mechanism for subsequent POP3
interactions. The security mechanisms used by POP3 AUTH are those
used by IMAP4.
$ port scan
(I) An attack that sends client requests to a range of server port
addresses on a host, with the goal of finding an active port and
exploiting a known vulnerability of that service.
$ POSIX
(N) Portable Operating System Interface for Computer Environments,
a standard [FP151, IS9945-1] (originally IEEE Standard P1003.1)
that defines an operating system interface and environment to
support application portability at the source code level. It is
intended to be used by both application developers and system
implementers.
(C) P1003.1 supports security functionality like those on most
UNIX systems, including discretionary access control and
privilege. IEEE Draft Standard P1003.6.1 specifies additional
functionality not provided in the base standard, including (a)
discretionary access control, (b) audit trail mechanisms, (c)
privilege mechanisms, (d) mandatory access control, and (e)
information label mechanisms.
$ Post Office Protocol, version 3 (POP3)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R1939] by which a client
workstation can dynamically access a mailbox on a server host to
retrieve mail messages that the server has received and is holding
for the client. (See: IMAP4.)
Shirey Informational [Page 129]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) POP3 has mechanisms for optionally authenticating a client to
a server and providing other security services. (See: POP3 APOP,
POP3 AUTH.)
$ PPP
See: Point-to-Point Protocol.
$ PPTP
See: Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol.
$ pre-authorization
(I) A capability of a CAW that enables certification requests to
be automatically validated against data provided in advance to the
CA by an authorizing entity.
$ Pretty Good Privacy(trademark) (PGP(trademark))
(O) Trademarks of Network Associates, Inc., referring to a
computer program (and related protocols) that uses cryptography to
provide data security for electronic mail and other applications
on the Internet. (See: MOSS, PEM, S/MIME.)
(C) PGP encrypts messages with IDEA in CFB mode, distributes the
IDEA keys by encrypting them with RSA, and creates digital
signatures on messages with MD5 and RSA. To establish ownership of
public keys, PGP depends on the web of trust. (See: Privacy
Enhanced Mail.)
$ primary account number (PAN)
(O) SET usage: "The assigned number that identifies the card
issuer and cardholder. This account number is composed of an
issuer identification number, an individual account number
identification, and an accompanying check digit as defined by ISO
7812-1985." [SET2, IS7812] (See: bank identification number.)
(C) The PAN is embossed, encoded, or both on a magnetic-strip-
based credit card. The PAN identifies the issuer to which a
transaction is to be routed and the account to which it is to be
applied unless specific instructions indicate otherwise. The
authority that assigns the bank identification number part of the
PAN is the American Bankers Association.
$ privacy
(I) The right of an entity (normally a person), acting in its own
behalf, to determine the degree to which it will interact with its
environment, including the degree to which the entity is willing
to share information about itself with others. (See: anonymity.)
Shirey Informational [Page 130]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(O) "The right of individuals to control or influence what
information related to them may be collected and stored and by
whom and to whom that information may be disclosed." [I7498 Part
2]
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "data
confidentiality" or "data confidentiality service", which are
different concepts. Privacy is a reason for security rather than a
kind of security. For example, a system that stores personal data
needs to protect the data to prevent harm, embarrassment,
inconvenience, or unfairness to any person about whom data is
maintained, and to protect the person's privacy. For that reason,
the system may need to provide data confidentiality service.
$ Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM)
(I) An Internet protocol to provide data confidentiality, data
integrity, and data origin authentication for electronic mail.
[R1421, R1422]. (See: MOSS, MSP, PGP, S/MIME.)
(C) PEM encrypts messages with DES in CBC mode, provides key
distribution of DES keys by encrypting them with RSA, and signs
messages with RSA over either MD2 or MD5. To establish ownership
of public keys, PEM uses a certification hierarchy, with X.509
public-key certificates and X.509 CRLs that are signed with RSA
and MD2. (See: Pretty Good Privacy.)
(C) PEM is designed to be compatible with a wide range of key
management methods, but is limited to specifying security services
only for text messages and, like MOSS, has not been widely
implemented in the Internet.
$ private component
(I) A synonym for "private key".
(D) In most cases, ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term; to avoid
confusing readers, use "private key" instead. However, the term
MAY be used when specifically discussing a key pair; e.g., "A key
pair has a public component and a private component."
$ private extension
See: (secondary definition under) extension.
$ private key
(I) The secret component of a pair of cryptographic keys used for
asymmetric cryptography. (See: key pair, public key.)
(O) "(In a public key cryptosystem) that key of a user's key pair
which is known only by that user." [X509]
Shirey Informational [Page 131]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ privilege
(I) An authorization or set of authorizations to perform security-
relevant functions, especially in the context of a computer
operating system.
$ privilege management infrastructure
(N) "The complete set of processes required to provide an
authorization service", i.e., processes concerned with attribute
certificates. [FPDAM] (See: PKI.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term and its definition because the
definition is vague, and there is no consensus on an alternate
definition.
$ privileged process
(I) An computer process that is authorized (and, therefore,
trusted) to perform some security-relevant functions that ordinary
processes are not. (See: privilege, trusted process.)
$ procedural security
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "administrative
security". Any type of security may involve procedures; therefore,
the term may be misleading. Instead, use "administrative
security", "communication security", "computer security",
"emanations security", "personnel security", "physical security",
or whatever specific type is meant. (See: security architecture.)
$ proprietary
(I) Refers to information (or other property) that is owned by an
individual or organization and for which the use is restricted by
that entity.
$ protected checksum
(I) A checksum that is computed for a data object by means that
protect against active attacks that would attempt to change the
checksum to make it match changes made to the data object. (See:
digital signature, keyed hash, (discussion under) checksum.
$ protected distribution system
(I) A wireline or fiber-optic system that includes sufficient
safeguards (acoustic, electric, electromagnetic, and physical) to
permit its use for unencrypted transmission of (cleartext) data.
$ protection authority
See: (secondary definition under) Internet Protocol Security
Option.
Shirey Informational [Page 132]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ protection ring
(I) One of a hierarchy of privileged operation modes of a system
that gives certain access rights to processes authorized to
operate in that mode.
$ protocol
(I) A set of rules (i.e., formats and procedures) to implement and
control some type of association (e.g., communication) between
systems. (E.g., see: Internet Protocol.)
(C) In particular, a series of ordered steps involving computing
and communication that are performed by two or more system
entities to achieve a joint objective. [A9042]
$ protocol suite
(I) A complementary collection of communication protocols used in
a computer network. (See: Internet, OSI.)
$ proxy server
(I) A computer process--often used as, or as part of, a firewall--
that relays a protocol between client and server computer systems,
by appearing to the client to be the server and appearing to the
server to be the client. (See: SOCKS.)
(C) In a firewall, a proxy server usually runs on a bastion host,
which may support proxies for several protocols (e.g., FTP, HTTP,
and TELNET). Instead of a client in the protected enclave
connecting directly to an external server, the internal client
connects to the proxy server which in turn connects to the
external server. The proxy server waits for a request from inside
the firewall, forwards the request to the remote server outside
the firewall, gets the response, then sends the response back to
the client. The proxy may be transparent to the clients, or they
may need to connect first to the proxy server, and then use that
association to also initiate a connection to the real server.
(C) Proxies are generally preferred over SOCKS for their ability
to perform caching, high-level logging, and access control. A
proxy can provide security service beyond that which is normally
part of the relayed protocol, such as access control based on peer
entity authentication of clients, or peer entity authentication of
servers when clients do not have that capability. A proxy at OSI
layer 7 can also provide finer-grained security service than can a
filtering router at OSI layer 3. For example, an FTP proxy could
permit transfers out of, but not into, a protected network.
Shirey Informational [Page 133]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ pseudo-random
(I) A sequence of values that appears to be random (i.e.,
unpredictable) but is actually generated by a deterministic
algorithm. (See: random.)
$ pseudo-random number generator
(I) A process used to deterministically generate a series of
numbers (usually integers) that appear to be random according to
certain statistical tests, but actually are pseudo-random.
(C) Pseudo-random number generators are usually implemented in
software.
$ public component
(I) A synonym for "public key".
(D) In most cases, ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term; to avoid
confusing readers, use "private key" instead. However, the term
MAY be used when specifically discussing a key pair; e.g., "A key
pair has a public component and a private component."
$ public key
(I) The publicly-disclosable component of a pair of cryptographic
keys used for asymmetric cryptography. (See: key pair, private
key.)
(O) "(In a public key cryptosystem) that key of a user's key pair
which is publicly known." [X509]
$ public-key certificate
(I) A digital certificate that binds a system entity's identity to
a public key value, and possibly to additional data items; a
digitally-signed data structure that attests to the ownership of a
public key. (See: X.509 public-key certificate.)
(C) The digital signature on a public-key certificate is
unforgeable. Thus, the certificate can be published, such as by
posting it in a directory, without the directory having to protect
the certificate's data integrity.
(O) "The public key of a user, together with some other
information, rendered unforgeable by encipherment with the private
key of the certification authority which issued it." [X509]
$ public-key cryptography
(I) The popular synonym for "asymmetric cryptography".
Shirey Informational [Page 134]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS)
(I) A series of specifications published by RSA Laboratories for
data structures and algorithm usage for basic applications of
asymmetric cryptography. (See: PKCS #7, PKCS #10, PKCS #11.)
(C) The PKCS were begun in 1991 in cooperation with industry and
academia, originally including Apple, Digital, Lotus, Microsoft,
Northern Telecom, Sun, and MIT. Today, the specifications are
widely used, but they are not sanctioned by an official standards
organization, such as ANSI, ITU-T, or IETF. RSA Laboratories
retains sole decision-making authority over the PKCS.
$ public-key forward secrecy (PFS)
(I) For a key agreement protocol based on asymmetric cryptography,
the property that ensures that a session key derived from a set of
long-term public and private keys will not be compromised if one
of the private keys is compromised in the future.
(C) Some existing RFCs use the term "perfect forward secrecy" but
either do not define it or do not define it precisely. While
preparing this Glossary, we tried to find a good definition for
that term, but found this to be a muddled area. Experts did not
agree. For all practical purposes, the literature defines "perfect
forward secrecy" by stating the Diffie-Hellman algorithm. The term
"public-key forward secrecy" (suggested by Hilarie Orman) and the
"I" definition stated for it here were crafted to be compatible
with current Internet documents, yet be narrow and leave room for
improved terminology.
(C) Challenge to the Internet security community: We need a
taxonomy--a family of mutually exclusive and collectively
exhaustive terms and definitions to cover the basic properties
discussed here--for the full range of cryptographic algorithms and
protocols used in Internet Standards:
(C) Involvement of session keys vs. long-term keys: Experts
disagree about the basic ideas involved.
- One concept of "forward secrecy" is that, given observations of
the operation of a key establishment protocol up to time t, and
given some of the session keys derived from those protocol runs,
you cannot derive unknown past session keys or future session
keys.
- A related property is that, given observations of the protocol
and knowledge of the derived session keys, you cannot derive one
or more of the long-term private keys.
Shirey Informational [Page 135]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- The "I" definition presented above involves a third concept of
"forward secrecy" that refers to the effect of the compromise of
long-term keys.
- All three concepts involve the idea that a compromise of "this"
encryption key is not supposed to compromise the "next" one. There
also is the idea that compromise of a single key will compromise
only the data protected by the single key. In Internet literature,
the focus has been on protection against decryption of back
traffic in the event of a compromise of secret key material held
by one or both parties to a communication.
(C) Forward vs. backward: Experts are unhappy with the word
"forward", because compromise of "this" encryption key also is not
supposed to compromise the "previous" one, which is "backward"
rather than forward. In S/KEY, if the key used at time t is
compromised, then all keys used prior to that are compromised. If
the "long-term" key (i.e., the base of the hashing scheme) is
compromised, then all keys past and future are compromised; thus,
you could say that S/KEY has neither forward nor backward secrecy.
(C) Asymmetric cryptography vs. symmetric: Experts disagree about
forward secrecy in the context of symmetric cryptographic systems.
In the absence of asymmetric cryptography, compromise of any long-
term key seems to compromise any session key derived from the
long-term key. For example, Kerberos isn't forward secret, because
compromising a client's password (thus compromising the key shared
by the client and the authentication server) compromises future
session keys shared by the client and the ticket-granting server.
(C) Ordinary forward secrecy vs. "perfect" forward secret: Experts
disagree about the difference between these two. Some say there is
no difference, and some say that the initial naming was
unfortunate and suggest dropping the word "perfect". Some suggest
using "forward secrecy" for the case where one long-term private
key is compromised, and adding "perfect" for when both private
keys (or, when the protocol is multi-party, all private keys) are
compromised.
(C) Acknowledgements: Bill Burr, Burt Kaliski, Steve Kent, Paul
Van Oorschot, Michael Wiener, and, especially, Hilarie Orman
contributed ideas to this discussion.
$ public-key infrastructure (PKI)
(I) A system of CAs (and, optionally, RAs and other supporting
servers and agents) that perform some set of certificate
management, archive management, key management, and token
Shirey Informational [Page 136]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
management functions for a community of users in an application of
asymmetric cryptography. (See: hierarchical PKI, mesh PKI,
security management infrastructure, trust-file PKI.)
(O) PKIX usage: The set of hardware, software, people, policies,
and procedures needed to create, manage, store, distribute, and
revoke digital certificates based on asymmetric cryptography.
(C) The core PKI functions are (a) to register users and issue
their public-key certificates, (b) to revoke certificates when
required, and (c) to archive data needed to validate certificates
at a much later time. Key pairs for data confidentiality may be
generated (and perhaps escrowed) by CAs or RAs, but requiring a
PKI client to generate its own digital signature key pair helps
maintain system integrity of the cryptographic system, because
then only the client ever possesses the private key it uses. Also,
an authority may be established to approve or coordinate CPSs,
which are security policies under which components of a PKI
operate.
(C) A number of other servers and agents may support the core PKI,
and PKI clients may obtain services from them. The full range of
such services is not yet fully understood and is evolving, but
supporting roles may include archive agent, certified delivery
agent, confirmation agent, digital notary, directory, key escrow
agent, key generation agent, naming agent who ensures that issuers
and subjects have unique identifiers within the PKI, repository,
ticket-granting agent, and time stamp agent.
$ RA
See: registration authority.
$ RA domains
(I) A capability of a CAW that allows a CA to divide the
responsibility for certification requests among multiple RAs.
(C) This capability might be used to restrict access to private
authorization data that is provided with a certification request,
and to distribute the responsibility to review and approve
certification requests in high volume environments. RA domains
might segregate certification requests according to an attribute
of the certificate subject, such as an organizational unit.
$ RADIUS
See: Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service.
Shirey Informational [Page 137]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Rainbow Series
(O) A set of more than 30 technical and policy documents with
colored covers, issued by the NCSC, that discuss in detail the
TCSEC and provide guidance for meeting and applying the criteria.
(See: Green Book, Orange Book, Red Book, Yellow Book.)
$ random
(I) General usage: In mathematics, random means "unpredictable". A
sequence of values is called random if each successive value is
obtained merely by chance and does not depend on the preceding
values of the sequence, and a selected individual value is called
random if each of the values in the total population of
possibilities has equal probability of being selected. [Knuth]
(See: cryptographic key, pseudo-random, random number generator.)
(I) Security usage: In cryptography and other security
applications, random means not only unpredictable, but also
"unguessable". When selecting data values to use for cryptographic
keys, "the requirement is for data that an adversary has a very
low probability of guessing or determining." It is not sufficient
to use data that "only meets traditional statistical tests for
randomness or which is based on limited range sources, such as
clocks. Frequently such random quantities are determinable [i.e.,
guessable] by an adversary searching through an embarrassingly
small space of possibilities." [R1750]
$ random number generator
(I) A process used to generate an unpredictable, uniformly
distributed series of numbers (usually integers). (See: pseudo-
random, random.)
(C) True random number generators are hardware-based devices that
depend on the output of a "noisy diode" or other physical
phenomena. [R1750]
$ RBAC
See: Role-Based Access Control.
$ RC2
$ RC4
See: Rivest Cipher #2, Rivest Cipher #4.
$ realm
(O) Kerberos usage: The domain of authority of a Kerberos server
(consisting of an authentication server and a ticket-granting
server), including the Kerberized clients and the Kerberized
application servers
Shirey Informational [Page 138]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ RED
(I) Designation for information system equipment or facilities
that handle (and for data that contains) only plaintext (or,
depending on the context, classified information), and for such
data itself. This term derives from U.S. Government COMSEC
terminology. (See: BLACK, RED/BLACK separation.)
$ Red Book
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "Trusted
Network Interpretation of the Trusted Computer System Evaluation
Criteria" [NCS05]. Instead, use the full proper name of the
document or, in subsequent references, a more conventional
abbreviation. (See: TCSEC, Rainbow Series, (usage note under)
Green Book.)
$ RED/BLACK separation
(I) An architectural concept for cryptographic systems that
strictly separates the parts of a system that handle plaintext
(i.e., RED information) from the parts that handle ciphertext
(i.e., BLACK information). This term derives from U.S. Government
COMSEC terminology. (See: BLACK, RED.)
$ reference monitor
(I) "An access control concept that refers to an abstract machine
that mediates all accesses to objects by subjects." [NCS04] (See:
security kernel.)
(C) A reference monitor should be (a) complete (i.e., it mediates
every access), (b) isolated (i.e., it cannot be modified by other
system entities), and (c) verifiable (i.e., small enough to be
subjected to analysis and tests to ensure that it is correct).
$ reflection attack
(I) A type of replay attack in which transmitted data is sent back
to its originator.
$ register
$ registration
(I) An administrative act or process whereby an entity's name and
other attributes are established for the first time at a CA, prior
to the CA issuing a digital certificate that has the entity's name
as the subject. (See: registration authority.)
(C) Registration may be accomplished either directly, by the CA,
or indirectly, by a separate RA. An entity is presented to the CA
or RA, and the authority either records the name(s) claimed for
the entity or assigns the entity's name(s). The authority also
determines and records other attributes of the entity that are to
Shirey Informational [Page 139]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
be bound in a certificate (such as a public key or authorizations)
or maintained in the authority's database (such as street address
and telephone number). The authority is responsible, possibly
assisted by an RA, for authenticating the entity's identity and
verifying the correctness of the other attributes, in accordance
with the CA's CPS.
(C) Among the registration issues that a CPS may address are the
following [R2527]:
- How a claimed identity and other attributes are verified.
- How organization affiliation or representation is verified.
- What forms of names are permitted, such as X.500 DN, domain
name, or IP address.
- Whether names are required to be meaningful or unique, and
within what domain.
- How naming disputes are resolved, including the role of
trademarks.
- Whether certificates are issued to entities that are not
persons.
- Whether a person is required to appear before the CA or RA, or
can instead be represented by an agent.
- Whether and how an entity proves possession of the private key
matching a public key.
$ registration authority (RA)
(I) An optional PKI entity (separate from the CAs) that does not
sign either digital certificates or CRLs but has responsibility
for recording or verifying some or all of the information
(particularly the identities of subjects) needed by a CA to issue
certificates and CRLs and to perform other certificate management
functions. (See: organizational registration authority,
registration.)
(C) Sometimes, a CA may perform all certificate management
functions for all end users for which the CA signs certificates.
Other times, such as in a large or geographically dispersed
community, it may be necessary or desirable to offload secondary
CA functions and delegate them to an assistant, while the CA
retains the primary functions (signing certificates and CRLs). The
tasks that are delegated to an RA by a CA may include personal
authentication, name assignment, token distribution, revocation
reporting, key generation, and archiving. An RA is an optional PKI
component, separate from the CA, that is assigned secondary
functions. The duties assigned to RAs vary from case to case but
may include the following:
Shirey Informational [Page 140]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Verifying a subject's identity, i.e., performing personal
authentication functions.
- Assigning a name to a subject. (See: distinguished name.)
- Verifying that a subject is entitled to have the attributes
requested for a certificate.
- Verifying that a subject possesses the private key that matches
the public key requested for a certificate.
- Performing functions beyond mere registration, such as
generating key pairs, distributing tokens, and handling
revocation reports. (Such functions may be assigned to a PKI
element that is separate from both the CA and the RA.)
(I) PKIX usage: An optional PKI component, separate from the
CA(s). The functions that the RA performs will vary from case to
case but may include identity authentication and name assignment,
key generation and archiving of key pairs, token distribution, and
revocation reporting. [R2510]
(O) SET usage: "An independent third-party organization that
processes payment card applications for multiple payment card
brands and forwards applications to the appropriate financial
institutions." [SET2]
$ regrade
(I) Deliberately change the classification level of information in
an authorized manner.
$ rekey
(I) Change the value of a cryptographic key that is being used in
an application of a cryptographic system. (See: certificate
rekey.)
(C) For example, rekey is required at the end of a cryptoperiod or
key lifetime.
$ reliability
(I) The ability of a system to perform a required function under
stated conditions for a specified period of time. (See:
availability, survivability.)
$ relying party
(N) A synonym for "certificate user". Used in a legal context to
mean a recipient of a certificate who acts in reliance on that
certificate. (See: ABA Guidelines.)
$ Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)
(I) An Internet protocol [R2138] for carrying dial-in users'
authentication information and configuration information between a
Shirey Informational [Page 141]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
shared, centralized authentication server (the RADIUS server) and
a network access server (the RADIUS client) that needs to
authenticate the users of its network access ports. (See: TACACS.)
(C) A user of the RADIUS client presents authentication
information to the client, and the client passes that information
to the RADIUS server. The server authenticates the client using a
shared secret value, then checks the user's authentication
information, and finally returns to the client all authorization
and configuration information needed by the client to deliver
service to the user.
$ renew
See: certificate renewal.
$ replay attack
(I) An attack in which a valid data transmission is maliciously or
fraudulently repeated, either by the originator or by an adversary
who intercepts the data and retransmits it, possibly as part of a
masquerade attack. (See: active wiretapping.)
$ repository
(I) A system for storing and distributing digital certificates and
related information (including CRLs, CPSs, and certificate
policies) to certificate users. (See: directory.)
(O) "A trustworthy system for storing and retrieving certificates
or other information relevant to certificates." [ABA]
(C) A certificate is published to those who might need it by
putting it in a repository. The repository usually is a publicly
accessible, on-line server. In the Federal Public-key
Infrastructure, for example, the expected repository is a
directory that uses LDAP, but also may be the X.500 Directory that
uses DAP, or an HTTP server, or an FTP server that permits
anonymous login.
$ repudiation
(I) Denial by a system entity that was involved in an association
(especially an association that transfers information) of having
participated in the relationship. (See: accountability, non-
repudiation service.)
(O) "Denial by one of the entities involved in a communication of
having participated in all or part of the communication." [I7498
Part 2]
Shirey Informational [Page 142]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ Request for Comment (RFC)
(I) One of the documents in the archival series that is the
official channel for ISDs and other publications of the Internet
Engineering Steering Group, the Internet Architecture Board, and
the Internet community in general. [R2026, R2223] (See: Internet
Standard.)
(C) This term is *not* a synonym for "Internet Standard".
$ residual risk
(I) The risk that remains after countermeasures have been applied.
$ restore
See: card restore.
$ revocation
See: certificate revocation.
$ revocation date
(N) In an X.509 CRL entry, a date-time field that states when the
certificate revocation occurred, i.e., when the CA declared the
digital certificate to be invalid. (See: invalidity date.)
(C) The revocation date may not resolve some disputes because, in
the worst case, all signatures made during the validity period of
the certificate may have to be considered invalid. However, it may
be desirable to treat a digital signature as valid even though the
private key used to sign was compromised after the signing. If
more is known about when the compromise actually occurred, a
second date-time, an "invalidity date", can be included in an
extension of the CRL entry.
$ revocation list
See: certificate revocation list.
$ revoke
See: certificate revocation.
$ RFC
See: Request for Comment.
$ risk
(I) An expectation of loss expressed as the probability that a
particular threat will exploit a particular vulnerability with a
particular harmful result.
Shirey Informational [Page 143]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(O) SET usage: "The possibility of loss because of one or more
threats to information (not to be confused with financial or
business risk)." [SET2]
$ risk analysis
$ risk assessment
(I) A process that systematically identifies valuable system
resources and threats to those resources, quantifies loss
exposures (i.e., loss potential) based on estimated frequencies
and costs of occurrence, and (optionally) recommends how to
allocate resources to countermeasures so as to minimize total
exposure.
(C) The analysis lists risks in order of cost and criticality,
thereby determining where countermeasures should be applied first.
It is usually financially and technically infeasible to counteract
all aspects of risk, and so some residual risk will remain, even
after all available countermeasures have been deployed. [FP031,
R2196]
$ risk management
(I) The process of identifying, controlling, and eliminating or
minimizing uncertain events that may affect system resources.
(See: risk analysis.)
$ Rivest Cipher #2 (RC2)
(N) A proprietary, variable-key-length block cipher invented by
Ron Rivest for RSA Data Security, Inc. (now a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Security Dynamics, Inc.).
$ Rivest Cipher #4 (RC4)
(N) A proprietary, variable-key-length stream cipher invented by
Ron Rivest for RSA Data Security, Inc. (now a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Security Dynamics, Inc.).
$ Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA)
(N) An algorithm for asymmetric cryptography, invented in 1977 by
Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman [RSA78, Schn].
(C) RSA uses exponentiation modulo the product of two large prime
numbers. The difficulty of breaking RSA is believed to be
equivalent to the difficulty of factoring integers that are the
product of two large prime numbers of approximately equal size.
(C) To create an RSA key pair, randomly choose two large prime
numbers, p and q, and compute the modulus, n = pq. Randomly choose
a number e, the public exponent, that is less than n and
relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1). Choose another number d, the
Shirey Informational [Page 144]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
private exponent, such that ed-1 evenly divides (p-1)(q-1). The
public key is the set of numbers (n,e), and the private key is the
set (n,d).
(C) It is assumed to be difficult to compute the private key (n,d)
from the public key (n,e). However, if n can be factored into p
and q, then the private key d can be computed easily. Thus, RSA
security depends on the assumption that it is computationally
difficult to factor a number that is the product of two large
prime numbers. (Of course, p and q are treated as part of the
private key, or else destroyed after computing n.)
(C) For encryption of a message, m, to be sent to Bob, Alice uses
Bob's public key (n,e) to compute m**e (mod n) = c. She sends c to
Bob. Bob computes c**d (mod n) = m. Only Bob knows d, so only Bob
can compute c**d (mod n) = m to recover m.
(C) To provide data origin authentication of a message, m, to be
sent to Bob, Alice computes m**d (mod n) = s, where (d,n) is
Alice's private key. She sends m and s to Bob. To recover the
message that only Alice could have sent, Bob computes s**e (mod n)
= m, where (e,n) is Alice's public key.
(C) To ensure data integrity in addition to data origin
authentication requires extra computation steps in which Alice and
Bob use a cryptographic hash function h (as explained for digital
signature). Alice computes the hash value h(m) = v, and then
encrypts v with her private key to get s. She sends m and s. Bob
receives m' and s', either of which might have been changed from
the m and s that Alice sent. To test this, he decrypts s' with
Alice's public key to get v'. He then computes h(m') = v". If v'
equals v", Bob is assured that m' is the same m that Alice sent.
$ role-based access control (RBAC)
(I) A form of identity-based access control where the system
entities that are identified and controlled are functional
positions in an organization or process.
$ root
(I) A CA that is directly trusted by an end entity. Acquiring the
value of a root CA's public key involves an out-of-band procedure.
(I) Hierarchical PKI usage: The CA that is the highest level (most
trusted) CA in a certification hierarchy; i.e., the authority upon
whose public key all certificate users base their trust. (See: top
CA.)
Shirey Informational [Page 145]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) In a hierarchical PKI, a root issues public-key certificates
to one or more additional CAs that form the second highest level.
Each of these CAs may issue certificates to more CAs at the third
highest level, and so on. To initialize operation of a
hierarchical PKI, the root's initial public key is securely
distributed to all certificate users in a way that does not depend
on the PKI's certification relationships. The root's public key
may be distributed simply as a numerical value, but typically is
distributed in a self-signed certificate in which the root is the
subject. The root's certificate is signed by the root itself
because there is no higher authority in a certification hierarchy.
The root's certificate is then the first certificate in every
certification path.
(O) MISSI usage: A name previously used for a MISSI policy
creation authority, which is not a root as defined above for
general usage, but is a CA at the second level of the MISSI
hierarchy, immediately subordinate to a MISSI policy approving
authority.
(O) UNIX usage: A user account (also called "superuser") that has
all privileges (including all security-related privileges) and
thus can manage the system and its other user accounts.
$ root certificate
(I) A certificate for which the subject is a root.
(I) Hierarchical PKI usage: The self-signed public-key certificate
at the top of a certification hierarchy.
$ root key
(I) A public key for which the matching private key is held by a
root.
$ root registry
(O) MISSI usage: A name previously used for a MISSI policy
approving authority.
$ router
(I) A computer that is a gateway between two networks at OSI layer
3 and that relays and directs data packets through that
internetwork. The most common form of router operates on IP
packets. (See: bridge.)
(I) Internet usage: In the context of the Internet protocol suite,
a networked computer that forwards Internet Protocol packets that
are not addressed to the computer itself. (See: host.)
Shirey Informational [Page 146]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ RSA
See: Rivest-Shamir-Adleman.
$ rule-based security policy
(I) "A security policy based on global rules imposed for all
users. These rules usually rely on comparison of the sensitivity
of the resource being accessed and the possession of corresponding
attributes of users, a group of users, or entities acting on
behalf of users." [I7498 Part 2] (See: identity-based security
policy.)
$ safety
(I) The property of a system being free from risk of causing harm
to system entities and outside entities.
$ SAID
See: security association identifier.
$ salt
(I) A random value that is concatenated with a password before
applying the one-way encryption function used to protect passwords
that are stored in the database of an access control system. (See:
initialization value.)
(C) Salt protects a password-based access control system against a
dictionary attack.
$ sanitize
(I) Delete sensitive data from a file, a device, or a system; or
modify data so as to be able to downgrade its classification
level.
$ SASL
See: Simple Authentication and Security Layer.
$ SCA
See: subordinate certification authority.
$ scavenging
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ screening router
(I) A synonym for "filtering router".
$ SDE
See: Secure Data Exchange.
Shirey Informational [Page 147]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ SDNS
See: Secure Data Network System.
$ seal
(O) To use cryptography to provide data integrity service for a
data object. (See: sign, wrap.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this definition; instead, use language
that is more specific with regard to the mechanism(s) used, such
as "sign" when the mechanism is digital signature.
$ secret
(I) (1.) Adjective: The condition of information being protected
from being known by any system entities except those who are
intended to know it. (2.) Noun: An item of information that is
protected thusly.
(C) This term applies to symmetric keys, private keys, and
passwords.
$ secret-key cryptography
(I) A synonym for "symmetric cryptography".
$ Secure Data Exchange (SDE)
(N) A local area network security protocol defined by the IEEE
802.10 standard.
$ Secure Data Network System (SDNS)
(N) An NSA program that developed security protocols for
electronic mail (Message Security Protocol), OSI layer 3 (SP3),
OSI layer 4 (SP4), and key management (KMP).
$ Secure Hash Standard (SHS)
(N) The U.S. Government standard [FP180] that specifies the Secure
Hash Algorithm (SHA-1), a cryptographic hash function that
produces a 160-bit output (hash result) for input data of any
length < 2**64 bits.
$ Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (Secure-HTTP, S-HTTP)
(I) A Internet protocol for providing client-server security
services for HTTP communications. (See: https.)
(C) S-HTTP was originally specified by CommerceNet, a coalition of
businesses interested in developing the Internet for commercial
uses. Several message formats may be incorporated into S-HTTP
clients and servers, particularly CMS and MOSS. S-HTTP supports
choice of security policies, key management mechanisms, and
cryptographic algorithms through option negotiation between
Shirey Informational [Page 148]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
parties for each transaction. S-HTTP supports both asymmetric and
symmetric key operation modes. S-HTTP attempts to avoid presuming
a particular trust model, but it attempts to facilitate multiply-
rooted hierarchical trust and anticipates that principals may have
many public key certificates.
$ Secure/MIME (S/MIME)
(I) Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, an Internet
protocol [R2633] to provide encryption and digital signatures for
Internet mail messages.
$ Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)
(N) An Internet protocol (originally developed by Netscape
Communications, Inc.) that uses connection-oriented end-to-end
encryption to provide data confidentiality service and data
integrity service for traffic between a client (often a web
browser) and a server, and that can optionally provide peer entity
authentication between the client and the server. (See: Transport
Layer Security.)
(C) SSL is layered below HTTP and above a reliable transport
protocol (TCP). SSL is independent of the application it
encapsulates, and any higher level protocol can layer on top of
SSL transparently. However, many Internet applications might be
better served by IPsec.
(C) SSL has two layers: (a) SSL's lower layer, the SSL Record
Protocol, is layered on top of the transport protocol and
encapsulates higher level protocols. One such encapsulated
protocol is SSL Handshake Protocol. (b) SSL's upper layer provides
asymmetric cryptography for server authentication (verifying the
server's identity to the client) and optional client
authentication (verifying the client's identity to the server),
and also enables them to negotiate a symmetric encryption
algorithm and secret session key (to use for data confidentiality)
before the application protocol transmits or receives data. A
keyed hash provides data integrity service for encapsulated data.
$ secure state
(I) A system condition in which no subject can access any object
in an unauthorized manner. (See: (secondary definition under)
Bell-LaPadula Model, clean system.)
$ security
(I) (1.) Measures taken to protect a system. (2.) The condition of
a system that results from the establishment and maintenance of
Shirey Informational [Page 149]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
measures to protect the system. (3.) The condition of system
resources being free from unauthorized access and from
unauthorized or accidental change, destruction, or loss.
$ security architecture
(I) A plan and set of principles that describe (a) the security
services that a system is required to provide to meet the needs of
its users, (b) the system elements required to implement the
services, and (c) the performance levels required in the elements
to deal with the threat environment. (See: (discussion under)
security policy.)
(C) A security architecture is the result of applying the system
engineering process. A complete system security architecture
includes administrative security, communication security, computer
security, emanations security, personnel security, and physical
security (e.g., see: [R2179]). A complete security architecture
needs to deal with both intentional, intelligent threats and
accidental kinds of threats.
$ security association
(I) A relationship established between two or more entities to
enable them to protect data they exchange. The relationship is
used to negotiate characteristics of protection mechanisms, but
does not include the mechanisms themselves. (See: association.)
(C) A security association describes how entities will use
security services. The relationship is represented by a set of
information that is shared between the entities and is agreed upon
and considered a contract between them.
(O) IPsec usage: A simplex (uni-directional) logical connection
created for security purposes and implemented with either AH or
ESP (but not both). The security services offered by a security
association depend on the protocol selected, the IPsec mode
(transport or tunnel), the endpoints, and the election of optional
services within the protocol. A security association is identified
by a triple consisting of (a) a destination IP address, (b) a
protocol (AH or ESP) identifier, and (c) a Security Parameter
Index.
$ security association identifier (SAID)
(I) A data field in a security protocol (such as NLSP or SDE),
used to identify the security association to which a protocol data
unit is bound. The SAID value is usually used to select a key for
decryption or authentication at the destination. (See: Security
Parameter Index.)
Shirey Informational [Page 150]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ security audit
(I) An independent review and examination of a system's records
and activities to determine the adequacy of system controls,
ensure compliance with established security policy and procedures,
detect breaches in security services, and recommend any changes
that are indicated for countermeasures. [I7498 Part 2, NCS01]
(C) The basic audit objective is to establish accountability for
system entities that initiate or participate in security-relevant
events and actions. Thus, means are needed to generate and record
a security audit trail and to review and analyze the audit trail
to discover and investigate attacks and security compromises.
$ security audit trail
(I) A chronological record of system activities that is sufficient
to enable the reconstruction and examination of the sequence of
environments and activities surrounding or leading to an
operation, procedure, or event in a security-relevant transaction
from inception to final results. [NCS04] (See: security audit.)
$ security class
(D) A synonym for "security level". For consistency, ISDs SHOULD
use "security level" instead of "security class".
$ security clearance
(I) A determination that a person is eligible, under the standards
of a specific security policy, for authorization to access
sensitive information or other system resources. (See: clearance
level.)
$ security compromise
(I) A security violation in which a system resource is exposed, or
is potentially exposed, to unauthorized access. (See: data
compromise, violation.)
$ security domain
See: domain.
$ security environment
(I) The set of external entities, procedures, and conditions that
affect secure development, operation, and maintenance of a system.
$ security event
(I) A occurrence in a system that is relevant to the security of
the system. (See: security incident.)
Shirey Informational [Page 151]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The term includes both events that are security incidents and
those that are not. In a CA workstation, for example, a list of
security events might include the following:
- Performing a cryptographic operation, e.g., signing a digital
certificate or CRL.
- Performing a cryptographic card operation: creation, insertion,
removal, or backup.
- Performing a digital certificate lifecycle operation: rekey,
renewal, revocation, or update.
- Posting information to an X.500 Directory.
- Receiving a key compromise notification.
- Receiving an improper certification request.
- Detecting an alarm condition reported by a cryptographic
module.
- Logging the operator in or out.
- Failing a built-in hardware self-test or a software system
integrity check.
$ security fault analysis
(I) A security analysis, usually performed on hardware at a logic
gate level, gate-by-gate, to determine the security properties of
a device when a hardware fault is encountered.
$ security gateway
(I) A gateway that separates trusted (or relatively more trusted)
hosts on the internal network side from untrusted (or less
trusted) hosts on the external network side. (See: firewall and
guard.)
(O) IPsec usage: "An intermediate system that implements IPsec
protocols." [R2401] Normally, AH or ESP is implemented to serve a
set of internal hosts, providing security services for the hosts
when they communicate with other, external hosts or gateways that
also implement IPsec.
$ security incident
(I) A security event that involves a security violation. (See:
CERT, GRIP, security event, security intrusion, security
violation.)
(C) In other words, a security-relevant system event in which the
system's security policy is disobeyed or otherwise breached.
(O) "Any adverse event which compromises some aspect of computer
or network security." [R2350]
Shirey Informational [Page 152]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this "O" definition because (a) a security
incident may occur without actually being harmful (i.e., adverse)
and (b) this Glossary defines "compromise" more narrowly in
relation to unauthorized access.
$ security intrusion
(I) A security event, or a combination of multiple security
events, that constitutes a security incident in which an intruder
gains, or attempts to gain, access to a system (or system
resource) without having authorization to do so.
$ security kernel
(I) "The hardware, firmware, and software elements of a trusted
computing base that implement the reference monitor concept. It
must mediate all accesses, be protected from modification, and be
verifiable as correct." [NCS04] (See: reference monitor.)
(C) That is, a security kernel is an implementation of a reference
monitor for a given hardware base.
$ security label
(I) A marking that is bound to a system resource and that names or
designates the security-relevant attributes of that resource.
[I7498 Part 2, R1457]
(C) The recommended definition is usefully broad, but usually the
term is understood more narrowly as a marking that represents the
security level of an information object, i.e., a marking that
indicates how sensitive an information object is. [NCS04]
(C) System security mechanisms interpret security labels according
to applicable security policy to determine how to control access
to the associated information, otherwise constrain its handling,
and affix appropriate security markings to visible (printed and
displayed) images thereof. [FP188]
$ security level
(I) The combination of a hierarchical classification level and a
set of non-hierarchical category designations that represents how
sensitive information is. (See: (usage note under) classification
level, dominate, lattice model.)
$ security management infrastructure (SMI)
(I) System elements and activities that support security policy by
monitoring and controlling security services and mechanisms,
distributing security information, and reporting security events.
The associated functions are as follows [I7498-4]:
Shirey Informational [Page 153]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Controlling (granting or restricting) access to system
resources: This includes verifying authorizations and
identities, controlling access to sensitive security data, and
modifying access priorities and procedures in the event of
attacks.
- Retrieving (gathering) and archiving (storing) security
information: This includes logging security events and
analyzing the log, monitoring and profiling usage, and
reporting security violations.
- Managing and controlling the encryption process: This includes
performing the functions of key management and reporting on key
management problems. (See: public-key infrastructure.)
$ security mechanism
(I) A process (or a device incorporating such a process) that can
be used in a system to implement a security service that is
provided by or within the system. (See: (discussion under)
security policy.)
(C) Some examples of security mechanisms are authentication
exchange, checksum, digital signature, encryption, and traffic
padding.
$ security model
(I) A schematic description of a set of entities and relationships
by which a specified set of security services are provided by or
within a system. (See: (discussion under) security policy.)
(C) An example is the Bell-LaPadula Model.
$ security parameters index (SPI)
(I) IPsec usage: The type of security association identifier used
in IPsec protocols. A 32-bit value used to distinguish among
different security associations terminating at the same
destination (IP address) and using the same IPsec security
protocol (AH or ESP). Carried in AH and ESP to enable the
receiving system to determine under which security association to
process a received packet.
$ security perimeter
(I) The boundary of the domain in which a security policy or
security architecture applies; i.e., the boundary of the space in
which security services protect system resources.
Shirey Informational [Page 154]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ security policy
(I) A set of rules and practices that specify or regulate how a
system or organization provides security services to protect
sensitive and critical system resources. (See: identity-based
security policy, rule-based security policy, security
architecture, security mechanism, security model.)
(O) "The set of rules laid down by the security authority
governing the use and provision of security services and
facilities." [X509]
(C) Ravi Sandhu notes that security policy is one of four layers
of the security engineering process (as shown in the following
diagram). Each layer provides a different view of security,
ranging from what services are needed to how services are
implemented.
What Security Services Should Be Provided?
^
| + - - - - - - - - - - - +
| | Security Policy |
| + - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
| | Security Model | | A "top-level specification" |
| + - - - - - - - - - - - + <- | is at a level below "model" |
| | Security Architecture | | but above "architecture". |
| + - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
| | Security Mechanism |
| + - - - - - - - - - - - +
v
How Are Security Services Implemented?
$ Security Protocol 3 (SP3)
(O) A protocol [SDNS3] developed by SDNS to provide connectionless
data security at the top of OSI layer 3. (See: NLSP.)
$ Security Protocol 4 (SP4)
(O) A protocol [SDNS4] developed by SDNS to provide either
connectionless or end-to-end connection-oriented data security at
the bottom of OSI layer 4. (See: TLSP.)
$ security-relevant event
See: security event.
$ security service
(I) A processing or communication service that is provided by a
system to give a specific kind of protection to system resources.
(See: access control service, audit service, availability service,
Shirey Informational [Page 155]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
data confidentiality service, data integrity service, data origin
authentication service, non-repudiation service, peer entity
authentication service, system integrity service.)
(O) "A service, provided by a layer of communicating open systems,
which ensures adequate security of the systems or the data
transfers." [I7498 Part 2]
(C) Security services implement security policies, and are
implemented by security mechanisms.
$ security situation
(I) ISAKMP usage: The set of all security-relevant information--
e.g., network addresses, security classifications, manner of
operation (normal or emergency)--that is needed to decide the
security services that are required to protect the association
that is being negotiated.
$ security token
See: token.
$ security violation
(I) An act or event that disobeys or otherwise breaches security
policy. (See: compromise, penetration, security incident.)
$ self-signed certificate
(I) A public-key certificate for which the public key bound by the
certificate and the private key used to sign the certificate are
components of the same key pair, which belongs to the signer.
(See: root certificate.)
(C) In a self-signed X.509 public-key certificate, the issuer's DN
is the same as the subject's DN.
$ semantic security
(I) An attribute of a encryption algorithm that is a formalization
of the notion that the algorithm not only hides the plaintext but
also reveals no partial information about the plaintext. Whatever
is efficiently computable about the plaintext when given the
ciphertext, is also efficiently computable without the ciphertext.
(See: indistinguishability.)
$ sensitive (information)
(I) Information is sensitive if disclosure, alteration,
destruction, or loss of the information would adversely affect the
interests or business of its owner or user. (See: critical.)
Shirey Informational [Page 156]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ separation of duties
(I) The practice of dividing the steps in a system function among
different individuals, so as to keep a single individual from
subverting the process. (See: dual control, administrative
security.)
$ serial number
See: certificate serial number.
$ server
(I) A system entity that provides a service in response to
requests from other system entities called clients.
$ session key
(I) In the context of symmetric encryption, a key that is
temporary or is used for a relatively short period of time. (See:
ephemeral key, key distribution center, master key.)
(C) Usually, a session key is used for a defined period of
communication between two computers, such as for the duration of a
single connection or transaction set, or the key is used in an
application that protects relatively large amounts of data and,
therefore, needs to be rekeyed frequently.
$ SET
See: SET Secure Electronic Transaction(trademark).
$ SET private extension
(O) One of the private extensions defined by SET for X.509
certificates. Carries information about hashed root key,
certificate type, merchant data, cardholder certificate
requirements, encryption support for tunneling, or message support
for payment instructions.
$ SET qualifier
(O) A certificate policy qualifier that provides information about
the location and content of a SET certificate policy.
(C) In addition to the policies and qualifiers inherited from its
own certificate, each CA in the SET certification hierarchy may
add one qualifying statement to the root policy when the CA issues
a certificate. The additional qualifier is a certificate policy
for that CA. Each policy in a SET certificate may have these
qualifiers:
- A URL where a copy of the policy statement may be found.
- An electronic mail address where a copy of the policy statement
may be found.
Shirey Informational [Page 157]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- A hash result of the policy statement, computed using the
indicated algorithm.
- A statement declaring any disclaimers associated with the
issuing of the certificate.
$ SET Secure Electronic Transaction(trademark) or SET(trademark)
(N) A protocol developed jointly by MasterCard International and
Visa International and published as an open standard to provide
confidentiality of transaction information, payment integrity, and
authentication of transaction participants for payment card
transactions over unsecured networks, such as the Internet. [SET1]
(See: acquirer, brand, cardholder, dual signature, electronic
commerce, issuer, merchant, payment gateway, third party.)
(C) This term and acronym are trademarks of SETCo. MasterCard and
Visa announced the SET standard on 1 February 1996. On 19 December
1997, MasterCard and Visa formed SET Secure Electronic Transaction
LLC (commonly referred to as "SETCo") to implement the SET 1.0
specification. A memorandum of understanding adds American Express
and JCB Credit Card Company as co-owners of SETCo.
$ SETCo
See: (secondary definition under) SET Secure Electronic
Transaction.
$ SHA-1
See: Secure Hash Standard.
$ shared secret
(I) A synonym for "keying material" or "cryptographic key".
$ S-HTTP
See: Secure HTTP.
$ sign
(I) Create a digital signature for a data object.
$ signature
See: digital signature, electronic signature.
$ signature certificate
(I) A public-key certificate that contains a public key that is
intended to be used for verifying digital signatures, rather than
for encrypting data or performing other cryptographic functions.
(C) A v3 X.509 public-key certificate may have a "keyUsage"
extension which indicates the purpose for which the certified
public key is intended.
Shirey Informational [Page 158]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ signer
(N) A human being or an organization entity that uses its private
key to create a digital signature for a data object. [ABA]
$ SILS
See: Standards for Interoperable LAN/MAN Security.
$ simple authentication
(I) An authentication process that uses a password as the
information needed to verify an identity claimed for an entity.
(See: strong authentication.)
(O) "Authentication by means of simple password arrangements."
[X509]
$ Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)
(I) An Internet specification [R2222] for adding authentication
service to connection-based protocols. To use SASL, a protocol
includes a command for authenticating a user to a server and for
optionally negotiating protection of subsequent protocol
interactions. The command names a registered security mechanism.
SASL mechanisms include Kerberos, GSSAPI, S/KEY, and others. Some
protocols that use SASL are IMAP4 and POP3.
$ Simple Key-management for Internet Protocols (SKIP)
(I) A key distribution protocol that uses hybrid encryption to
convey session keys that are used to encrypt data in IP packets.
[R2356] (See: IKE, IPsec.)
(C) SKIP uses the Diffie-Hellman algorithm (or could use another
key agreement algorithm) to generate a key-encrypting key for use
between two entities. A session key is used with a symmetric
algorithm to encrypt data in one or more IP packets that are to be
sent from one of the entities to the other. The KEK is used with a
symmetric algorithm to encrypt the session key, and the encrypted
session key is placed in a SKIP header that is added to each IP
packet that is encrypted with that session key.
$ Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)
(I) A TCP-based, application-layer, Internet Standard protocol
[R0821] for moving electronic mail messages from one computer to
another.
$ Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
(I) A UDP-based, application-layer, Internet Standard protocol
[R2570, R2574] for conveying management information between
managers and agents.
Shirey Informational [Page 159]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) SNMP version 1 uses cleartext passwords for authentication and
access control. (See: community string.) Version 2 adds
cryptographic mechanisms based on DES and MD5. Version 3 provides
enhanced, integrated support for security services, including data
confidentiality, data integrity, data origin authentication, and
message timeliness and limited replay protection.
$ simple security property
See: (secondary definition under) Bell-LaPadula Model.
$ single sign-on
(I) A system that enables a user to access multiple computer
platforms (usually a set of hosts on the same network) or
application systems after being authenticated just one time. (See:
Kerberos.)
(C) Typically, a user logs in just once, and then is transparently
granted access to a variety of permitted resources with no further
login being required until after the user logs out. Such a system
has the advantages of being user friendly and enabling
authentication to be managed consistently across an entire
enterprise, and has the disadvantage of requiring all hosts and
applications to trust the same authentication mechanism.
$ situation
See: security situation.
$ S/Key
(I) A security mechanism that uses a cryptographic hash function
to generate a sequence of 64-bit, one-time passwords for remote
user login. [R1760]
(C) The client generates a one-time password by applying the MD4
cryptographic hash function multiple times to the user's secret
key. For each successive authentication of the user, the number of
hash applications is reduced by one. (Thus, an intruder using
wiretapping cannot compute a valid password from knowledge of one
previously used.) The server verifies a password by hashing the
currently presented password (or initialization value) one time
and comparing the hash result with the previously presented
password.
$ SKIP
See: Simple Key-management for IP.
Shirey Informational [Page 160]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ SKIPJACK
(N) A Type II block cipher [NIST] with a block size of 64 bits and
a key size of 80 bits, that was developed by NSA and formerly
classified at the U.S. Department of Defense "Secret" level. (See:
CAPSTONE, CLIPPER, FORTEZZA, Key Exchange Algorithm.)
(C) On 23 June 1998, NSA announced that SKIPJACK had been
declassified.
$ slot
(O) MISSI usage: One of the FORTEZZA PC card storage areas that
are each able to hold an X.509 certificate and additional data
that is associated with the certificate, such as the matching
private key.
$ smart card
(I) A credit-card sized device containing one or more integrated
circuit chips, which perform the functions of a computer's central
processor, memory, and input/output interface. (See: PC card.)
(C) Sometimes this term is used rather strictly to mean a card
that closely conforms to the dimensions and appearance of the kind
of plastic credit card issued by banks and merchants. At other
times, the term is used loosely to include cards that are larger
than credit cards, especially cards that are thicker, such as PC
cards.
(C) A "smart token" is a device that conforms to the definition of
smart card except that rather than having standard credit card
dimensions, the token is packaged in some other form, such as a
dog tag or door key shape.
$ smart token
See: (secondary definition under) smart card.
$ SMI
See: security management infrastructure.
$ S/MIME
See: Secure/MIME.
$ SMTP
See: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol.
$ smurf
(I) Software that mounts a denial-of-service attack ("smurfing")
by exploiting IP broadcast addressing and ICMP ping packets to
cause flooding. (See: flood, ICMP flood.)
Shirey Informational [Page 161]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it is not listed in most
dictionaries and could confuse international readers.
(C) A smurf program builds a network packet that appears to
originate from another address, that of the "victim", either a
host or an IP router. The packet contains an ICMP ping message
that is addressed to an IP broadcast address, i.e., to all IP
addresses in a given network. The echo responses to the ping
message return to the victim's address. The goal of smurfing may
be either to deny service at a particular host or to flood all or
part of an IP network.
$ sniffing
(C) A synonym for "passive wiretapping". (See: password sniffing.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it unnecessarily
duplicates the meaning of a term that is better established. (See:
(usage note under) Green Book.
$ SNMP
See: Simple Network Management Protocol.
$ social engineering
(I) A euphemism for non-technical or low-technology means--such as
lies, impersonation, tricks, bribes, blackmail, and threats--used
to attack information systems. (See: masquerade attack.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it is vague; instead,
use a term that is specific with regard to the means of attack.
$ SOCKS
(I) An Internet protocol [R1928] that provides a generalized proxy
server that enables client-server applications--such as TELNET,
FTP, and HTTP; running over either TCP or UDP--to use the services
of a firewall.
(C) SOCKS is layered under the application layer and above the
transport layer. When a client inside a firewall wishes to
establish a connection to an object that is reachable only through
the firewall, it uses TCP to connect to the SOCKS server,
negotiates with the server for the authentication method to be
used, authenticates with the chosen method, and then sends a relay
request. The SOCKS server evaluates the request, typically based
on source and destination addresses, and either establishes the
appropriate connection or denies it.
Shirey Informational [Page 162]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ soft TEMPEST
(O) The use of software techniques to reduce the radio frequency
information leakage from computer displays and keyboards. [Kuhn]
(See: TEMPEST.)
$ software
(I) Computer programs (which are stored in and executed by
computer hardware) and associated data (which also is stored in
the hardware) that may be dynamically written or modified during
execution. (See: firmware, hardware.)
$ SORA
See: SSO-PIN ORA.
$ source authentication
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term because it is ambiguous. If the
intent is to authenticate the original creator or packager of data
received, then say "data origin authentication". If the intent is
to authenticate the identity of the sender of data, then say "peer
entity authentication". (See: data origin authentication, peer
entity authentication).
$ source integrity
(I) The degree of confidence that can be placed in information
based on the trustworthiness of its sources. (See: integrity.)
$ SP3
See: Security Protocol 3.
$ SP4
See: Security Protocol 4.
$ spam
(I) (1.) Verb: To indiscriminately send unsolicited, unwanted,
irrelevant, or inappropriate messages, especially commercial
advertising in mass quantities. (2.) Noun: electronic "junk mail".
[R2635]
(D) This term SHOULD NOT be written in upper-case letters, because
SPAM(trademark) is a trademark of Hormel Foods Corporation. Hormel
says, "We do not object to use of this slang term [spam] to
describe [unsolicited commercial email (UCE)], although we do
object to the use of our product image in association with that
term. Also, if the term is to be used, it should be used in all
lower-case letters to distinguish it from our trademark SPAM,
which should be used with all uppercase letters."
Shirey Informational [Page 163]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) In sufficient volume, spam can cause denial of service. (See:
flooding.) According to the SPAM Web site, the term was adopted as
a result of the Monty Python skit in which a group of Vikings sang
a chorus of 'SPAM, SPAM, SPAM . . .' in an increasing crescendo,
drowning out other conversation. Hence, the analogy applied
because UCE was drowning out normal discourse on the Internet.
$ SPC
See: software publisher certificate.
$ SPI
See: Security Parameters Index.
$ split key
(I) A cryptographic key that is divided into two or more separate
data items that individually convey no knowledge of the whole key
that results from combining the items. (See: dual control, split
knowledge.)
$ split knowledge
(I) A security technique in which two or more entities separately
hold data items that individually convey no knowledge of the
information that results from combining the items. (See: dual
control, split key.)
(O) "A condition under which two or more entities separately have
key components which individually convey no knowledge of the
plaintext key which will be produced when the key components are
combined in the cryptographic module." [FP140]
$ spoofing attack
(I) A synonym for "masquerade attack".
$ SSH
(I) A protocol for secure remote login and other secure network
services over an insecure network.
(C) Consists of three major components:
- Transport layer protocol: Provides server authentication,
confidentiality, and integrity. It may optionally also provide
compression. The transport layer will typically be run over a
TCP/IP connection, but might also be used on top of any other
reliable data stream.
- User authentication protocol: Authenticates the client-side
user to the server. It runs over the transport layer protocol.
Shirey Informational [Page 164]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- Connection protocol: Multiplexes the encrypted tunnel into
several logical channels. It runs over the user authentication
protocol.
$ SSL
See: Secure Sockets Layer, Standard Security Label.
$ SSO
See: system security officer.
$ SSO PIN
(O) MISSI usage: One of two personal identification numbers that
control access to the functions and stored data of a FORTEZZA PC
card. Knowledge of the SSO PIN enables the card user to perform
the FORTEZZA functions intended for use by an end user and also
the functions intended for use by a MISSI certification authority.
(See: user PIN.)
$ SSO-PIN ORA (SORA)
(O) MISSI usage: A MISSI organizational RA that operates in a mode
in which the ORA performs all card management functions and,
therefore, requires knowledge of the SSO PIN for an end user's
FORTEZZA PC card.
$ Standards for Interoperable LAN/MAN Security (SILS)
(N) (1.) The IEEE 802.10 standards committee. (2.) A developing
set of IEEE standards, which has eight parts: (a) Model, including
security management, (b) Secure Data Exchange protocol, (c) Key
Management, (d) [has been incorporated in (a)], (e) SDE Over
Ethernet 2.0, (f) SDE Sublayer Management, (g) SDE Security
Labels, and (h) SDE PICS Conformance. Parts b, e, f, g, and h are
incorporated in IEEE Standard 802.10-1998.
$ star property
(I) (Written "*-property".) See: "confinement property" under
Bell-LaPadula Model.
$ Star Trek attack
(C) An attack that penetrates your system where no attack has ever
gone before.
$ steganography
(I) Methods of hiding the existence of a message or other data.
This is different than cryptography, which hides the meaning of a
message but does not hide the message itself. (See: cryptology.)
(C) An example of a steganographic method is "invisible" ink.
(See: digital watermark.)
Shirey Informational [Page 165]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ storage channel
See: (secondary definition under) covert channel.
$ stream cipher
(I) An encryption algorithm that breaks plaintext into a stream of
successive bits (or characters) and encrypts the n-th plaintext
bit with the n-th element of a parallel key stream, thus
converting the plaintext bit stream into a ciphertext bit stream.
[Schn] (See: block cipher.)
$ strong authentication
(I) An authentication process that uses cryptography--particularly
public-key certificates--to verify the identity claimed for an
entity. (See: X.509.)
(O) "Authentication by means of cryptographically derived
credentials." [X509]
$ subject
1. (I) In a computer system: A system entity that causes
information to flow among objects or changes the system state;
technically, a process-domain pair. (See: Bell-LaPadula Model.)
2. (I) Of a certificate: The entity name that is bound to the data
items in a digital certificate, and particularly a name that is
bound to a key value in a public-key certificate.
$ subnetwork
(N) An OSI term for a system of packet relays and connecting links
that implement the lower three protocol layers of the OSIRM to
provide a communication service that interconnects attached end
systems. Usually the relays operate at OSI layer 3 and are all of
the same type (e.g., all X.25 packet switches, or all interface
units in an IEEE 802.3 LAN). (See: gateway, internet, router.)
$ subordinate certification authority (SCA)
(I) A CA whose public-key certificate is issued by another
(superior) CA. (See: certification hierarchy.)
(O) MISSI usage: The fourth-highest (bottom) level of a MISSI
certification hierarchy; a MISSI CA whose public-key certificate
is signed by a MISSI CA rather than by a MISSI PCA. A MISSI SCA is
the administrative authority for a subunit of an organization,
established when it is desirable to organizationally distribute or
decentralize the CA service. The term refers both to that
authoritative office or role, and to the person who fills that
Shirey Informational [Page 166]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
office. A MISSI SCA registers end users and issues their
certificates and may also register ORAs, but may not register
other CAs. An SCA periodically issues a CRL.
$ subordinate distinguished name
(I) An X.500 DN is subordinate to another X.500 DN if it begins
with a set of attributes that is the same as the entire second DN
except for the terminal attribute of the second DN (which is
usually the name of a CA). For example, the DN <C=FooLand, O=Gov,
OU=Treasurer, CN=DukePinchpenny> is subordinate to the DN
<C=FooLand, O=Gov, CN=KingFooCA>.
$ superencryption
(I) An encryption operation for which the plaintext input to be
transformed is the ciphertext output of a previous encryption
operation.
$ survivability
(I) The ability of a system to remain in operation or existence
despite adverse conditions, including both natural occurrences,
accidental actions, and attacks on the system. (See: availability,
reliability.)
$ symmetric cryptography
(I) A branch of cryptography involving algorithms that use the
same key for two different steps of the algorithm (such as
encryption and decryption, or signature creation and signature
verification). (See: asymmetric cryptography.)
(C) Symmetric cryptography has been used for thousands of years
[Kahn]. A modern example of a symmetric encryption algorithm is
the U.S. Government's Data Encryption Algorithm. (See: DEA, DES.)
(C) Symmetric cryptography is sometimes called "secret-key
cryptography" (versus public-key cryptography) because the
entities that share the key, such as the originator and the
recipient of a message, need to keep the key secret. For example,
when Alice wants to ensure confidentiality for data she sends to
Bob, she encrypts the data with a secret key, and Bob uses the
same key to decrypt. Keeping the shared key secret entails both
cost and risk when the key is distributed to both Alice and Bob.
Thus, symmetric cryptography has a key management disadvantage
compared to asymmetric cryptography.
$ symmetric key
(I) A cryptographic key that is used in a symmetric cryptographic
algorithm.
Shirey Informational [Page 167]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ SYN flood
(I) A denial of service attack that sends a host more TCP SYN
packets (request to synchronize sequence numbers, used when
opening a connection) than the protocol implementation can handle.
(See: flooding.)
$ system
(C) In this Glossary, the term is mainly used as an abbreviation
for "automated information system".
$ system entity
(I) An active element of a system--e.g., an automated process, a
subsystem, a person or group of persons--that incorporates a
specific set of capabilities.
$ system high
(I) The highest security level supported by a system at a
particular time or in a particular environment. (See: system high
security mode.)
$ system high security mode
(I) A mode of operation of an information system, wherein all
users having access to the system possess a security clearance or
authorization, but not necessarily a need-to-know, for all data
handled by the system. (See: mode of operation.)
(C) This mode is defined formally in U.S. Department of Defense
policy regarding system accreditation [DOD2], but the term is
widely used outside the Defense Department and outside the
Government.
$ system integrity
(I) "The quality that a system has when it can perform its
intended function in a unimpaired manner, free from deliberate or
inadvertent unauthorized manipulation." [NCS04] (See: system
integrity service.)
$ system integrity service
(I) A security service that protects system resources in a
verifiable manner against unauthorized or accidental change, loss,
or destruction. (See: system integrity.)
$ system low
(I) The lowest security level supported by a system at a
particular time or in a particular environment. (See: system
high.)
Shirey Informational [Page 168]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ system resource
(I) Data contained in an information system; or a service provided
by a system; or a system capability, such as processing power or
communication bandwidth; or an item of system equipment (i.e., a
system component--hardware, firmware, software, or documentation);
or a facility that houses system operations and equipment.
$ system security officer (SSO)
(I) A person responsible for enforcement or administration of the
security policy that applies to the system.
$ system verification
See: (secondary definition under) verification.
$ TACACS
$ TACACS+
See: Terminal Access Controller (TAC) Access Control System.
$ tamper
(I) Make an unauthorized modification in a system that alters the
system's functioning in a way that degrades the security services
that the system was intended to provide.
$ TCB
See: trusted computing base.
$ TCP
See: Transmission Control Protocol.
$ TCP/IP
(I) A synonym for "Internet Protocol Suite", in which the
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the Internet Protocol (IP)
are important parts.
$ TCSEC
See: Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria.
$ TELNET
(I) A TCP-based, application-layer, Internet Standard protocol
[R0854] for remote login from one host to another.
$ TEMPEST
(O) A nickname for specifications and standards for limiting the
strength of electromagnetic emanations from electrical and
electronic equipment and thus reducing vulnerability to
eavesdropping. This term originated in the U.S. Department of
Defense. [Army, Kuhn, Russ] (See: emanation security, soft
tempest.)
Shirey Informational [Page 169]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for
"electromagnetic emanations security".
$ Terminal Access Controller (TAC) Access Control System (TACACS)
(I) A UDP-based authentication and access control protocol [R1492]
in which a network access server receives an identifier and
password from a remote terminal and passes them to a separate
authentication server for verification.
(C) TACACS was developed for ARPANET and has evolved for use in
commercial equipment. TACs were a type of network access server
computer used to connect terminals to the early Internet, usually
using dial-up modem connections. TACACS used centralized
authentication servers and served not only network access servers
like TACs but also routers and other networked computing devices.
TACs are no longer in use, but TACACS+ is. [R1983]
- "XTACACS": The name of Cisco Corporation's implementation,
which enhances and extends the original TACACS.
- "TACACS+": A TCP-based protocol that improves on TACACS and
XTACACS by separating the functions of authentication,
authorization, and accounting and by encrypting all traffic
between the network access server and authentication server. It
is extensible to allow any authentication mechanism to be used
with TACACS+ clients.
$ TESS
See: The Exponential Encryption System.
$ The Exponential Encryption System (TESS)
(I) A system of separate but cooperating cryptographic mechanisms
and functions for the secure authenticated exchange of
cryptographic keys, the generation of digital signatures, and the
distribution of public keys. TESS employs asymmetric cryptography,
based on discrete exponentiation, and a structure of self-
certified public keys. [R1824]
$ threat
(I) A potential for violation of security, which exists when there
is a circumstance, capability, action, or event that could breach
security and cause harm. (See: attack, threat action, threat
consequence.)
(C) That is, a threat is a possible danger that might exploit a
vulnerability. A threat can be either "intentional" (i.e.,
intelligent; e.g., an individual cracker or a criminal
Shirey Informational [Page 170]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
organization) or "accidental" (e.g., the possibility of a computer
malfunctioning, or the possibility of an "act of God" such as an
earthquake, a fire, or a tornado).
(C) In some contexts, such as the following, the term is used
narrowly to refer only to intelligent threats:
(N) U. S. Government usage: The technical and operational
capability of a hostile entity to detect, exploit, or subvert
friendly information systems and the demonstrated, presumed, or
inferred intent of that entity to conduct such activity.
$ threat action
(I) An assault on system security. (See: attack, threat, threat
consequence.)
(C) A complete security architecture deals with both intentional
acts (i.e. attacks) and accidental events [FIPS31]. Various kinds
of threat actions are defined as subentries under "threat
consequence".
$ threat analysis
(I) An analysis of the probability of occurrences and consequences
of damaging actions to a system.
$ threat consequence
(I) A security violation that results from a threat action.
Includes disclosure, deception, disruption, and usurpation. (See:
attack, threat, threat action.)
(C) The following subentries describe four kinds of threat
consequences, and also list and describe the kinds of threat
actions that cause each consequence. Threat actions that are
accidental events are marked by "*".
1. "(Unauthorized) Disclosure" (a threat consequence): A
circumstance or event whereby an entity gains access to data
for which the entity is not authorized. (See: data
confidentiality.) The following threat actions can cause
unauthorized disclosure:
A. "Exposure": A threat action whereby sensitive data is
directly released to an unauthorized entity. This includes:
a. "Deliberate Exposure": Intentional release of sensitive
data to an unauthorized entity.
Shirey Informational [Page 171]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
b. "Scavenging": Searching through data residue in a system
to gain unauthorized knowledge of sensitive data.
c* "Human error": Human action or inaction that
unintentionally results in an entity gaining unauthorized
knowledge of sensitive data.
d* "Hardware/software error". System failure that results in
an entity gaining unauthorized knowledge of sensitive
data.
B. "Interception": A threat action whereby an unauthorized
entity directly accesses sensitive data traveling between
authorized sources and destinations. This includes:
a. "Theft": Gaining access to sensitive data by stealing a
shipment of a physical medium, such as a magnetic tape or
disk, that holds the data.
b. "Wiretapping (passive)": Monitoring and recording data
that is flowing between two points in a communication
system. (See: wiretapping.)
c. "Emanations analysis": Gaining direct knowledge of
communicated data by monitoring and resolving a signal
that is emitted by a system and that contains the data
but is not intended to communicate the data. (See:
emanation.)
C. "Inference": A threat action whereby an unauthorized entity
indirectly accesses sensitive data (but not necessarily the
data contained in the communication) by reasoning from
characteristics or byproducts of communications. This
includes:
a. Traffic analysis: Gaining knowledge of data by observing
the characteristics of communications that carry the
data. (See: (main Glossary entry for) traffic analysis.)
b. "Signals analysis": Gaining indirect knowledge of
communicated data by monitoring and analyzing a signal
that is emitted by a system and that contains the data
but is not intended to communicate the data. (See:
emanation.)
D. "Intrusion": A threat action whereby an unauthorized entity
gains access to sensitive data by circumventing a system's
security protections. This includes:
Shirey Informational [Page 172]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
a. "Trespass": Gaining unauthorized physical access to
sensitive data by circumventing a system's protections.
b. "Penetration": Gaining unauthorized logical access to
sensitive data by circumventing a system's protections.
c. "Reverse engineering": Acquiring sensitive data by
disassembling and analyzing the design of a system
component.
d. Cryptanalysis: Transforming encrypted data into plaintext
without having prior knowledge of encryption parameters
or processes. (See: (main Glossary entry for)
cryptanalysis.)
2. "Deception" (a threat consequence): A circumstance or event
that may result in an authorized entity receiving false data
and believing it to be true. The following threat actions can
cause deception:
A. "Masquerade": A threat action whereby an unauthorized entity
gains access to a system or performs a malicious act by
posing as an authorized entity. (See: (main Glossary entry
for) masquerade attack.)
a. "Spoof": Attempt by an unauthorized entity to gain access
to a system by posing as an authorized user.
b. "Malicious logic": In context of masquerade, any
hardware, firmware, or software (e.g., Trojan horse) that
appears to perform a useful or desirable function, but
actually gains unauthorized access to system resources or
tricks a user into executing other malicious logic. (See:
(main Glossary entry for) malicious logic.)
B. "Falsification": A threat action whereby false data deceives
an authorized entity. (See: active wiretapping.)
a. "Substitution": Altering or replacing valid data with
false data that serves to deceive an authorized entity.
b. "Insertion": Introducing false data that serves to
deceive an authorized entity.
C. "Repudiation": A threat action whereby an entity deceives
another by falsely denying responsibility for an act. (See:
non-repudiation service, (main Glossary entry for)
repudiation.)
Shirey Informational [Page 173]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
a. "False denial of origin": Action whereby the originator
of data denies responsibility for its generation.
b. "False denial of receipt": Action whereby the recipient
of data denies receiving and possessing the data.
3. "Disruption" (a threat consequence): A circumstance or event
that interrupts or prevents the correct operation of system
services and functions. (See: denial of service.) The following
threat actions can cause disruption:
A. "Incapacitation": A threat action that prevents or
interrupts system operation by disabling a system component.
a. "Malicious logic": In context of incapacitation, any
hardware, firmware, or software (e.g., logic bomb)
intentionally introduced into a system to destroy system
functions or resources. (See: (main Glossary entry for)
malicious logic.)
b. "Physical destruction": Deliberate destruction of a
system component to interrupt or prevent system
operation.
c* "Human error": Action or inaction that unintentionally
disables a system component.
d* "Hardware or software error": Error that causes failure
of a system component and leads to disruption of system
operation.
e* "Natural disaster": Any "act of God" (e.g., fire, flood,
earthquake, lightning, or wind) that disables a system
component. [FP031 section 2]
B. "Corruption": A threat action that undesirably alters system
operation by adversely modifying system functions or data.
a. "Tamper": In context of corruption, deliberate alteration
of a system's logic, data, or control information to
interrupt or prevent correct operation of system
functions.
b. "Malicious logic": In context of corruption, any
hardware, firmware, or software (e.g., a computer virus)
intentionally introduced into a system to modify system
functions or data. (See: (main Glossary entry for)
malicious logic.)
Shirey Informational [Page 174]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
c* "Human error": Human action or inaction that
unintentionally results in the alteration of system
functions or data.
d* "Hardware or software error": Error that results in the
alteration of system functions or data.
e* "Natural disaster": Any "act of God" (e.g., power surge
caused by lightning) that alters system functions or
data. [FP031 section 2]
C. "Obstruction": A threat action that interrupts delivery of
system services by hindering system operations.
a. "Interference": Disruption of system operations by
blocking communications or user data or control
information.
b. "Overload": Hindrance of system operation by placing
excess burden on the performance capabilities of a system
component. (See: flooding.)
4. "Usurpation" (a threat consequence): A circumstance or event
that results in control of system services or functions by an
unauthorized entity. The following threat actions can cause
usurpation:
A. "Misappropriation": A threat action whereby an entity
assumes unauthorized logical or physical control of a system
resource.
a. "Theft of service": Unauthorized use of service by an
entity.
b. "Theft of functionality": Unauthorized acquisition of
actual hardware, software, or firmware of a system
component.
c. "Theft of data": Unauthorized acquisition and use of
data.
B. "Misuse": A threat action that causes a system component to
perform a function or service that is detrimental to system
security.
a. "Tamper": In context of misuse, deliberate alteration of
a system's logic, data, or control information to cause
the system to perform unauthorized functions or services.
Shirey Informational [Page 175]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
b. "Malicious logic": In context of misuse, any hardware,
software, or firmware intentionally introduced into a
system to perform or control execution of an unauthorized
function or service.
c. "Violation of permissions": Action by an entity that
exceeds the entity's system privileges by executing an
unauthorized function.
$ thumbprint
(I) A pattern of curves formed by the ridges on the tip of a
thumb. (See: biometric authentication, fingerprint.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "hash result"
because that meaning mixes concepts in a potentially misleading
way.
$ ticket
(I) A synonym for "capability". (See: Kerberos.)
(C) A ticket is usually granted by a centralized access control
server (ticket-granting agent) to authorize access to a system
resource for a limited time. Tickets have been implemented with
symmetric cryptography, but can also be implemented as attribute
certificates using asymmetric cryptography.
$ timing channel
See: (secondary definition under) covert channel.
$ TLS
See: Transport Layer Security. (See: TLSP.)
$ TLSP
See: Transport Layer Security Protocol. (See: TLS.)
$ token
1. (I) General usage: An object that is used to control access and
is passed between cooperating entities in a protocol that
synchronizes use of a shared resource. Usually, the entity that
currently holds the token has exclusive access to the resource.
2. (I) Authentication usage: A data object or a portable, user-
controlled, physical device used to verify an identity in an
authentication process. (See: authentication information, dongle.)
3. (I) Cryptographic usage: See: cryptographic token.
Shirey Informational [Page 176]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
4. (O) SET usage: "A portable device [e.g., smart card or PCMCIA
card] specifically designed to store cryptographic information and
possibly perform cryptographic functions in a secure manner."
[SET2]
$ token backup
(I) A token management operation that stores sufficient
information in a database (e.g., in a CAW) to recreate or restore
a security token (e.g., a smart card) if it is lost or damaged.
$ token copy
(I) A token management operation that copies all the personality
information from one security token to another. However, unlike in
a token restore operation, the second token is initialized with
its own, different local security values such as PINs and storage
keys.
$ token management
(I) The process of initializing security tokens (e.g., see: smart
card), loading data into the tokens, and controlling the tokens
during their life cycle. May include performing key management and
certificate management functions; generating and installing PINs;
loading user personality data; performing card backup, card copy,
and card restore operations; and updating firmware.
$ token restore
(I) A token management operation that loads a security token with
data for the purpose of recreating (duplicating) the contents
previously held by that or another token.
$ token storage key
(I) A cryptography key used to protect data that is stored on a
security token.
$ top CA
(I) A CA that is the highest level (i.e., is the most trusted CA)
in a certification hierarchy. (See: root.)
$ top-level specification
(I) "A non-procedural description of system behavior at the most
abstract level; typically a functional specification that omits
all implementation details." [NCS04] (See: (discussion under)
security policy.)
(C) A top-level specification may be descriptive or formal:
Shirey Informational [Page 177]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
- "Descriptive top-level specification": One that is written in a
natural language like English or an informal design notation.
- "Formal top-level specification": One that is written in a
formal mathematical language to enable theorems to be proven that
show that the specification correctly implements a set of formal
requirements or a formal security model. (See: correctness proof.)
$ traffic analysis
(I) Inference of information from observable characteristics of
data flow(s), even when the data is encrypted or otherwise not
directly available. Such characteristics include the identities
and locations of the source(s) and destination(s), and the
presence, amount, frequency, and duration of occurrence. (See:
wiretapping.)
(O) "The inference of information from observation of traffic
flows (presence, absence, amount, direction, and frequency)."
[I7498 Part 2]
$ traffic flow confidentiality
(I) A data confidentiality service to protect against traffic
analysis.
(O) "A confidentiality service to protect against traffic
analysis." [I7498 Part 2]
$ traffic padding
(I) "The generation of spurious instances of communication,
spurious data units, and/or spurious data within data units."
[I7498 Part 2]
$ tranquillity property
See: (secondary definition under) Bell-LaPadula Model.
$ Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R0793] that reliably delivers a
sequence of datagrams (discrete sets of bits) from one computer to
another in a computer network. (See: TCP/IP.)
(C) TCP is designed to fit into a layered hierarchy of protocols
that support internetwork applications. TCP assumes it can obtain
a simple, potentially unreliable datagram service (such as the
Internet Protocol) from the lower-layer protocols.
$ Transport Layer Security (TLS)
(I) TLS Version 1.0 is an Internet protocol [R2246] based-on and
very similar to SSL Version 3.0. (See: TLSP.)
Shirey Informational [Page 178]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) The TLS protocol is misnamed, because it operates well above
the transport layer (OSI layer 4).
$ Transport Layer Security Protocol (TLSP)
(I) An end-to-end encryption protocol(ISO Standard 10736) that
provides security services at the bottom of OSI layer 4, i.e.,
directly above layer 3. (See: TLS.)
(C) TLSP evolved directly from the SP4 protocol of SDNS.
$ transport mode vs. tunnel mode
(I) IPsec usage: Two ways to apply IPsec protocols (AH and ESP) to
protect communications:
- "Transport mode": The protection applies to (i.e., the IPsec
protocol encapsulates) the packets of upper-layer protocols,
the ones that are carried above IP.
- "Tunnel mode": The protection applies to (i.e., the IPsec
protocol encapsulates) IP packets.
(C) A transport mode security association is always between two
hosts. In a tunnel mode security association, each end may be
either a host or a gateway. Whenever either end of an IPsec
security association is a security gateway, the association is
required to be in tunnel mode.
$ trap door
(I) A hidden computer flaw known to an intruder, or a hidden
computer mechanism (usually software) installed by an intruder,
who can activate the trap door to gain access to the computer
without being blocked by security services or mechanisms. (See:
back door, Trojan horse.)
$ triple DES
(I) A block cipher, based on DES, that transforms each 64-bit
plaintext block by applying the Data Encryption Algorithm three
successive times, using either two or three different keys, for an
effective key length of 112 or 168 bits. [A9052] (See: DES.)
(C) IPsec usage: The algorithm variation proposed for ESP uses a
168-bit key, consisting of three independent 56-bit quantities
used by the Data Encryption Algorithm, and a 64-bit initialization
value. Each datagram contains an IV to ensure that each received
datagram can be decrypted even when other datagrams are dropped or
a sequence of datagrams is reordered in transit. [R1851]
Shirey Informational [Page 179]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ triple-wrapped
(I) S/MIME usage: Data that has been signed with a digital
signature, and then encrypted, and then signed again. [R2634]
$ Trojan horse
(I) A computer program that appears to have a useful function, but
also has a hidden and potentially malicious function that evades
security mechanisms, sometimes by exploiting legitimate
authorizations of a system entity that invokes the program.
$ trust
1. (I) Information system usage: The extent to which someone who
relies on a system can have confidence that the system meets its
specifications, i.e., that the system does what it claims to do
and does not perform unwanted functions. (See: trust level.)
(C) "trusted vs. trustworthy": In discussing a system or system
process or object, this Glossary (and industry usage) prefers the
term "trusted" to describe a system that operates as expected,
according to design and policy. When the trust can also be
guaranteed in some convincing way, such as through formal analysis
or code review, the system is termed "trustworthy"; this differs
from the ABA Guidelines definition (see: trustworthy system).
2. (I) PKI usage: A relationship between a certificate user and a
CA in which the user acts according to the assumption that the CA
creates only valid digital certificates.
(O) "Generally, an entity can be said to 'trust' a second entity
when it (the first entity) makes the assumption that the second
entity will behave exactly as the first entity expects. This trust
may apply only for some specific function. The key role of trust
in [X.509] is to describe the relationship between an entity and a
[certification] authority; an entity shall be certain that it can
trust the certification authority to create only valid and
reliable certificates." [X509]
$ trust chain
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "certification
path" because it mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way.
(See: trust.)
$ trust-file PKI
(I) A non-hierarchical PKI in which each certificate user has a
local file (which is used by application software) of public-key
certificates that the user trusts as starting points (i.e., roots)
for certification paths. (See: hierarchical PKI, mesh PKI, root,
web of trust.)
Shirey Informational [Page 180]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) For example, popular browsers are distributed with an initial
file of trusted certificates, which often are self-signed
certificates. Users can add certificates to the file or delete
from it. The file may be directly managed by the user, or the
user's organization may manage it from a centralized server.
$ trust hierarchy
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "certification
hierarchy" because this term mixes concepts (see: trust) in a
potentially misleading way and duplicates the meaning of another,
standardized term. (See: trust, web of trust.)
$ trust level
(I) A characterization of a standard of security protection to be
met by a computer system.
(C) The TCSEC defines eight trust levels. From the lowest to the
highest, they are D, C1, C2, B1, B2, B3, and A1. A trust level is
based not only on the presence of security mechanisms but also on
the use of systems engineering discipline to properly structure
the system and implementation analysis to ensure that the system
provides an appropriate degree of trust.
$ trusted
See: (discussion under) trust.
$ trusted certificate
(I) A certificate upon which a certificate user relies as being
valid without the need for validation testing; especially a
public-key certificate that is used to provide the first public
key in a certification path. (See: certification path, root
certificate, validation.)
(C) A trusted public-key certificate might be (a) the root
certificate in a hierarchical PKI, (b) the certificate of the CA
that issued the user's own certificate in a mesh PKI, or (c)
any certificate accepted by the user in a trust-file PKI.
$ trusted computer system
(I) Multilevel security usage: "A system that employs sufficient
hardware and software assurance measures to allow its use for
simultaneous processing of a range of sensitive or classified
information." [NCS04] (See: (discussion under) trust.)
$ Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC)
(N) A standard for evaluating the security provided by operating
systems [CSC001, DOD1]. Informally called the "Orange Book"
Shirey Informational [Page 181]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
because of the color of its cover; first document in the Rainbow
Series. (See: Common Criteria, (usage note under) Green Book,
Orange Book, trust level.)
$ trusted computing base (TCB)
(I) "The totality of protection mechanisms within a computer
system, including hardware, firmware, and software, the
combination of which is responsible for enforcing a security
policy." [NCS04] (See: (discussion of "trusted" under) trust.)
$ trusted distribution
(I) "A trusted method for distributing the TCB hardware, software,
and firmware components, both originals and updates, that provides
methods for protecting the TCB from modification during
distribution and for detection of any changes to the TCB that may
occur." [NCS04]
$ trusted key
(I) A public key upon which a user relies; especially a public key
that can be used as the first public key in a certification path.
(See: certification path, root key, validation.)
(C) A trusted public key might be (a) the root key in a
hierarchical PKI, (b) the key of the CA that issued the user's own
certificate in a mesh PKI, or (c) any key accepted by the user in
a trust-file PKI.
$ trusted path
(I) COMPUSEC usage: A mechanism by which a computer system user
can communicate directly and reliably with the trusted computing
base (TCB) and that can only be activated by the user or the TCB
and cannot be imitated by untrusted software within the computer.
[NCS04]
(I) COMSEC usage: A mechanism by which a person or process can
communicate directly with a cryptographic module and that can only
be activated by the person, process, or module, and cannot be
imitated by untrusted software within the module. [FP140]
$ trusted process
(I) A system process that has privileges that enable it to affect
the state of system security and that can, therefore, through
incorrect or malicious execution, violate the system's security
policy. (See: privileged process, (discussion of "trusted" under)
trust.)
Shirey Informational [Page 182]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ trusted subnetwork
(I) A subnetwork containing hosts and routers that trust each
other not to engage in active or passive attacks. (There also is
an assumption that the underlying communication channels--e.g.,
telephone lines, or a LAN--are protected from attack by some
means.)
$ trusted system
See: (discussion under) trust, trusted computer system,
trustworthy system.
$ Trusted Systems Interoperability Group (TSIG)
(N) A forum of computer vendors, system integrators, and users
devoted to promoting interoperability of trusted computer systems.
TSIG meetings are open to all persons who are working in the
INFOSEC area.
$ trustworthy system
(O) ABA usage: "Computer hardware, software, and procedures that:
(a) are reasonably secure from intrusion and misuse; (b) provide a
reasonably reliable level of availability, reliability, and
correct operation; (c) are reasonably suited to performing their
intended functions; and (d) adhere to generally accepted security
principles." [ABA] This differs somewhat from other industry
usage. (See: (discussion of "trusted vs. trustworthy" under)
trust.)
$ TSIG
See: Trusted System Interoperability Group.
$ tunnel
(I) A communication channel created in a computer network by
encapsulating (carrying, layering) a communication protocol's data
packets in (on top of) a second protocol that normally would be
carried above, or at the same layer as, the first one. (See: L2TP,
VPN.)
(C) Tunneling can involve almost any OSI or TCP/IP protocol
layers; for example, a TCP connection between two hosts could
conceivably be tunneled through email messages across the
Internet. Most often, a tunnel is a logical point-to-point link--
i.e., an OSI layer 2 connection--created by encapsulating the
layer 2 protocol in a transport protocol (such as TCP), in a
network or internetwork layer protocol (such as IP), or in another
link layer protocol. Often, encapsulation is accomplished with an
extra, intermediate protocol, i.e., a tunneling protocol (such as
L2TP) that is layered between the tunneled layer 2 protocol and
the encapsulating protocol.
Shirey Informational [Page 183]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Tunneling can move data between computers that use a protocol
not supported by the network connecting them. Tunneling also can
enable a computer network to use the services of a second network
as though the second network were a set of point-to-point links
between the first network's nodes. (See: virtual private network.)
(O) SET usage: The name of a SET private extension that indicates
whether the CA or the payment gateway supports passing encrypted
messages to the cardholder through the merchant. If so, the
extension lists OIDs of symmetric encryption algorithms that are
supported.
$ tunnel mode
(I) IPsec usage: See: transport mode vs. tunnel mode.
$ two-person control
(I) The close surveillance and control of a system, process, or
materials (especially with regard to cryptography) at all times by
a minimum of two appropriately authorized persons, each capable of
detecting incorrect and unauthorized procedures with respect to
the tasks to be performed and each familiar with established
security requirements. (See: dual control, no-lone zone.)
$ Type I cryptography
(O) A cryptographic algorithm or device approved by NSA for
protecting classified information.
$ Type II cryptography
(O) A cryptographic algorithm or device approved by NSA for
protecting sensitive unclassified information (as specified in
section 2315 of Title 10 United States Code, or section 3502(2) of
Title 44, United States Code.)
$ Type III cryptography
(O) A cryptographic algorithm or device approved as a Federal
Information Processing Standard.
$ UDP
See: User Datagram Protocol.
$ unclassified
(I) Not classified.
$ unencrypted
(I) Not encrypted.
Shirey Informational [Page 184]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ unforgeable
(I) Cryptographic usage: The property of a cryptographic data
structure (i.e., a data structure that is defined using one or
more cryptographic functions) that makes it computationally
infeasible to construct (i.e., compute) an unauthorized but
correct value of the structure without having knowledge of one of
more keys. (E.g., see: digital certificate.)
(C) This definition is narrower than general English usage, where
"unforgeable" means unable to be fraudulently created or
duplicated. In that broader sense, anyone can forge a digital
certificate containing any set of data items whatsoever by
generating the to-be-signed certificate and signing it with any
private key whatsoever. But for PKI purposes, the forged data
structure is invalid if it is not signed with the true private key
of the claimed issuer; thus, the forgery will be detected when a
certificate user uses the true public key of the claimed issuer to
verify the signature.
$ uniform resource identifier (URI)
(I) A type of formatted identifier that encapsulates the name of
an Internet object, and labels it with an identification of the
name space, thus producing a member of the universal set of names
in registered name spaces and of addresses referring to registered
protocols or name spaces. [R1630]
(C) URIs are used in HTML to identify the target of hyperlinks. In
common practice, URIs include uniform resource locators [R2368]
and relative URLs, and may be URNs. [R1808]
$ uniform resource locator (URL)
(I) A type of formatted identifier that describes the access
method and location of an information resource object on the
Internet. [R1738]
(C) A URL is a URI that provides explicit instructions on how to
access the named object. For example,
"ftp://bbnarchive.bbn.com/foo/bar/picture/cambridge.zip" is a URL.
The part before the colon specifies the access scheme or protocol,
and the part after the colon is interpreted according to that
access method. Usually, two slashes after the colon indicate the
host name of a server (written as a domain name). In an FTP or
HTTP URL, the host name is followed by the path name of a file on
the server. The last (optional) part of a URL may be either a
fragment identifier that indicates a position in the file, or a
query string.
Shirey Informational [Page 185]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ uniform resource name (URN)
(I) A URI that has an institutional commitment to persistence and
availability.
$ untrusted process
(I) A system process that is not able to affect the state of
system security through incorrect or malicious operation, usually
because its operation is confined by a security kernel. (See:
trusted process.)
$ UORA
See: user-PIN ORA.
$ update
See: certificate update and key update.
$ URI
See: uniform resource identifier.
$ URL
See: uniform resource locator.
$ URN
See: uniform resource name.
$ user
(I) A person, organization entity, or automated process that
accesses a system, whether authorized to do so or not. (See:
[R2504].)
(C) Any ISD that uses this term SHOULD provide an explicit
definition, because this term is used in many ways and can easily
be misunderstood.
$ User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
(I) An Internet Standard protocol [R0768] that provides a datagram
mode of packet-switched computer communication in an internetwork.
(C) UDP is a transport layer protocol, and it assumes that IP is
the underlying protocol. UDP enables application programs to send
transaction-oriented data to other programs with minimal protocol
mechanism. UDP does not provide reliable delivery, flow control,
sequencing, or other end-to-end services that TCP provides.
$ user identifier
(I) A character string or symbol that is used in a system to
uniquely name a specific user or group of users.
Shirey Informational [Page 186]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) Often verified by a password in an authentication process.
$ user PIN
(O) MISSI usage: One of two personal identification numbers that
control access to the functions and stored data of a FORTEZZA PC
card. Knowledge of the user PIN enables the card user to perform
the FORTEZZA functions that are intended for use by an end user.
(See: SSO PIN.)
$ user-PIN ORA (UORA)
(O) A MISSI organizational RA that operates in a mode in which the
ORA performs only the subset of card management functions that are
possible with knowledge of the user PIN for a FORTEZZA PC card.
(See: no-PIN ORA, SSO-PIN ORA.)
$ usurpation
See: (secondary definition under) threat consequence.
$ UTCTime
(N) The ASN.1 data type "UTCTime" contains a calendar date
(YYMMDD) and a time to a precision of either one minute (HHMM) or
one second (HHMMSS), where the time is either (a) Coordinated
Universal Time or (b) the local time followed by an offset that
enables Coordinated Universal Time to be calculated. Note: UTCTime
has the Year 2000 problem. (See: Coordinated Universal Time,
GeneralizedTime.)
$ v1 certificate
(C) Ambiguously refers to either an X.509 public-key certificate
in its version 1 format, or an X.509 attribute certificate in its
version 1 format. However, many people who use this term are not
aware that X.509 specifies attribute certificates that do not
contain a public key. Therefore, ISDs MAY use this term as an
abbreviation for "version 1 X.509 public-key certificate", but
only after using the full term at the first instance.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as an abbreviation for "version
1 X.509 attribute certificate".
$ v1 CRL
(I) An abbreviation for "X.509 CRL in version 1 format".
(C) ISDs should use this abbreviation only after using the full
term at its first occurrence and defining the abbreviation.
$ v2 certificate
(I) An abbreviation for "X.509 public-key certificate in version 2
format".
Shirey Informational [Page 187]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) ISDs should use this abbreviation only after using the full
term at its first occurrence and defining the abbreviation.
$ v2 CRL
(I) An abbreviation for "X.509 CRL in version 2 format".
(C) ISDs should use this abbreviation only after using the full
term at its first occurrence and defining the abbreviation.
$ v3 certificate
(I) An abbreviation for "X.509 public-key certificate in version 3
format".
(C) ISDs should use this abbreviation only after using the full
term at its first occurrence and defining the abbreviation.
$ valid certificate
(I) A digital certificate for which the binding of the data items
can be trusted; one that can be validated successfully. (See:
validate vs. verify.)
$ valid signature
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term; instead, use "authentic
signature". This Glossary recommends saying "validate the
certificate" and "verify the signature"; therefore, it would be
inconsistent to say that a signature is "valid". (See: validate
vs. verify.)
$ validate vs. verify
(C) The PKI community uses words inconsistently when describing
what a certificate user does to make certain that a digital
certificate can be trusted. Usually, we say "verify the signature"
but say "validate the certificate"; i.e., we "verify" atomic
truths but "validate" data structures, relationships, and systems
that are composed of or depend on verified items. Too often,
however, verify and validate are used interchangeably.
ISDs SHOULD comply with the following two rules to ensure
consistency and to align Internet security terminology with
ordinary English:
- Rule 1: Use "validate" when referring to a process intended to
establish the soundness or correctness of a construct. (E.g.,
see: certificate validation.)
- Rule 2: Use "verify" when referring to a process intended to
test or prove the truth or accuracy of a fact or value. (E.g.,
see: authenticate.)
Shirey Informational [Page 188]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
The rationale for Rule 1 is that "valid" derives from a word that
means "strong" in Latin. Thus, to validate means to make sure that
a construction is sound. A certificate user validates a public-key
certificate to establish trust in the binding that the certificate
asserts between an identity and a key. (To validate can also mean
to officially approve something; e.g., NIST validates
cryptographic modules for conformance with FIPS PUB 140-1.)
The rationale for Rule 2 is that "verify" derives from a word that
means "true" in Latin. Thus, to verify means to prove the truth of
an assertion by examining evidence or performing tests. To verify
an identity, an authentication process examines identification
information that is presented or generated. To validate a
certificate, a certificate user verifies the digital signature on
the certificate by performing calculations; verifies that the
current time is within the certificate's validity period; and may
need to validate a certification path involving additional
certificates.
$ validation
See: validate vs. verify.
$ validity period
(I) A data item in a digital certificate that specifies the time
period for which the binding between data items (especially
between the subject name and the public key value in a public-key
certificate) is valid, except if the certificate appears on a CRL
or the key appears on a CKL.
$ value-added network (VAN)
(I) A computer network or subnetwork (which is usually a
commercial enterprise) that transmits, receives, and stores EDI
transactions on behalf of its customers.
(C) A VAN may also provide additional services, ranging from EDI
format translation, to EDI-to-FAX conversion, to integrated
business systems.
$ VAN
See: value-added network.
$ verification
1. System verification: The process of comparing two levels of
system specification for proper correspondence, such as comparing
a security policy with a top-level specification, a top-level
specification with source code, or source code with object code.
[NCS04]
Shirey Informational [Page 189]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
2. Identification verification: Presenting information to
establish the truth of a claimed identity.
$ verify
See: validate vs. verify.
$ violation
See: security violation.
$ virtual private network (VPN)
(I) A restricted-use, logical (i.e., artificial or simulated)
computer network that is constructed from the system resources of
a relatively public, physical (i.e., real) network (such as the
Internet), often by using encryption (located at hosts or
gateways), and often by tunneling links of the virtual network
across the real network.
(C) For example, if a corporation has LANs at several different
sites, each connected to the Internet by a firewall, the
corporation could create a VPN by (a) using encrypted tunnels to
connect from firewall to firewall across the Internet and (b) not
allowing any other traffic through the firewalls. A VPN is
generally less expensive to build and operate than a dedicated
real network, because the virtual network shares the cost of
system resources with other users of the real network.
$ virus
(I) A hidden, self-replicating section of computer software,
usually malicious logic, that propagates by infecting--i.e.,
inserting a copy of itself into and becoming part of--another
program. A virus cannot run by itself; it requires that its host
program be run to make the virus active.
$ VPN
See: virtual private network.
$ vulnerability
(I) A flaw or weakness in a system's design, implementation, or
operation and management that could be exploited to violate the
system's security policy.
(C) Most systems have vulnerabilities of some sort, but this does
not mean that the systems are too flawed to use. Not every threat
results in an attack, and not every attack succeeds. Success
depends on the degree of vulnerability, the strength of attacks,
and the effectiveness of any countermeasures in use. If the
attacks needed to exploit a vulnerability are very difficult to
carry out, then the vulnerability may be tolerable. If the
Shirey Informational [Page 190]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
perceived benefit to an attacker is small, then even an easily
exploited vulnerability may be tolerable. However, if the attacks
are well understood and easily made, and if the vulnerable system
is employed by a wide range of users, then it is likely that there
will be enough benefit for someone to make an attack.
$ W3
See: World Wide Web.
$ war dialer
(I) A computer program that automatically dials a series of
telephone numbers to find lines connected to computer systems, and
catalogs those numbers so that a cracker can try to break into the
systems.
$ Wassenaar Arrangement
(N) The Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional
Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies is a global, multilateral
agreement approved by 33 countries in July 1996 to contribute to
regional and international security and stability, by promoting
information exchange concerning, and greater responsibility in,
transfers of arms and dual-use items, thus preventing
destabilizing accumulations. (See: International Traffic in Arms
Regulations.)
(C) The Arrangement began operations in September 1996. The
participating countries are Argentina, Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and
United States. Participants meet on a regular basis in Vienna,
where the Arrangement has its headquarters.
Participating countries seek through their national policies to
ensure that transfers do not contribute to the development or
enhancement of military capabilities that undermine the goals of
the arrangement, and are not diverted to support such
capabilities. The countries maintain effective export controls for
items on the agreed lists, which are reviewed periodically to
account for technological developments and experience gained.
Through transparency and exchange of views and information,
suppliers of arms and dual-use items can develop common
understandings of the risks associated with their transfer and
assess the scope for coordinating national control policies to
combat these risks. Members provide semi-annual notification of
arms transfers, covering seven categories derived from the UN
Shirey Informational [Page 191]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
Register of Conventional Arms. Members also report transfers or
denials of transfers of certain controlled dual-use items.
However, the decision to transfer or deny transfer of any item is
the sole responsibility of each participating country. All
measures undertaken with respect to the arrangement are in
accordance with national legislation and policies and are
implemented on the basis of national discretion.
$ watermarking
See: digital watermarking.
$ web of trust
(O) PGP usage: A trust-file PKI technique used in PGP for building
a file of validated public keys by making personal judgments about
being able to trust certain people to be holding properly
certified keys of other people. (See: certification hierarchy,
mesh PKI.)
$ web server
(I) A software process that runs on a host computer connected to
the Internet to respond to HTTP requests for documents from client
web browsers.
$ web vs. Web
1. (I) Capitalized: ISDs SHOULD capitalize "Web" when using the
term (as either a noun or an adjective) to refer specifically to
the World Wide Web. (Similarly, see: internet vs. Internet.)
2. (C) Not capitalized: ISDs SHOULD NOT capitalize "web" when
using the term (usually as an adjective) to refer generically to
technology--such as web browsers, web servers, HTTP, and HTML--
that is used in the Web or similar networks.
(C) IETF documents SHOULD spell out "World Wide Web" fully at the
first instance of usage and SHOULD Use "Web" and "web" especially
carefully where confusion with the PGP "web of trust" is possible.
$ wiretapping
(I) An attack that intercepts and accesses data and other
information contained in a flow in a communication system.
(C) Although the term originally referred to making a mechanical
connection to an electrical conductor that links two nodes, it is
now used to refer to reading information from any sort of medium
used for a link or even directly from a node, such as gateway or
subnetwork switch.
Shirey Informational [Page 192]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
(C) "Active wiretapping" attempts to alter the data or otherwise
affect the flow; "passive wiretapping" only attempts to observe
the flow and gain knowledge of information it contains. (See:
active attack, end-to-end encryption, passive attack.)
$ work factor
(I) General security usage: The estimated amount of effort or time
that can be expected to be expended by a potential intruder to
penetrate a system, or defeat a particular countermeasure, when
using specified amounts of expertise and resources.
(I) Cryptography usage: The estimated amount of computing time and
power needed to break a cryptographic system.
$ World Wide Web ("the Web", WWW, W3)
(N) The global, hypermedia-based collection of information and
services that is available on Internet servers and is accessed by
browsers using Hypertext Transfer Protocol and other information
retrieval mechanisms. (See: web vs. Web, [R2084].)
$ worm
(I) A computer program that can run independently, can propagate a
complete working version of itself onto other hosts on a network,
and may consume computer resources destructively. (See: Morris
Worm, virus.)
$ wrap
(O) To use cryptography to provide data confidentiality service
for a data object. (See: encrypt, seal.)
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term with this definition because it
duplicates the meaning of other, standard terms. Instead, use
"encrypt" or use a term that is specific with regard to the
mechanism used.
$ WWW
See: World Wide Web.
$ X.400
(N) An ITU-T Recommendation [X400] that is one part of a joint
ITU-T/ISO multi-part standard (X.400-X.421) that defines the
Message Handling Systems. (The ISO equivalent is IS 10021, parts
1-7.) (See: Message Handling Systems.)
$ X.500
$ X.500 Directory
(N) An ITU-T Recommendation [X500] that is one part of a joint
ITU-T/ISO multi-part standard (X.500-X.525) that defines the X.500
Shirey Informational [Page 193]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
Directory, a conceptual collection of systems that provide
distributed directory capabilities for OSI entities, processes,
applications, and services. (The ISO equivalent is IS 9594-1 and
related standards, IS 9594-x.) (See: directory vs. Directory,
X.509.)
(C) The X.500 Directory is structured as a tree (the Directory
Information Tree), and information is stored in directory entries.
Each entry is a collection of information about one object, and
each object has a DN. A directory entry is composed of attributes,
each with a type and one or more values. For example, if a PKI
uses the Directory to distribute certificates, then the X.509
public-key certificate of an end user is normally stored as a
value of an attribute of type "userCertificate" in the Directory
entry that has the DN that is the subject of the certificate.
$ X.509
(N) An ITU-T Recommendation [X509] that defines a framework to
provide and support data origin authentication and peer entity
authentication services, including formats for X.509 public-key
certificates, X.509 attribute certificates, and X.509 CRLs. (The
ISO equivalent is IS 9498-4.) (See: X.500.)
(C) X.509 describes two levels of authentication: simple
authentication based on a password, and strong authentication
based on a public-key certificate.
$ X.509 attribute certificate
(N) An attribute certificate in the version 1 (v1) format defined
by X.509. (The v1 designation for an X.509 attribute certificate
is disjoint from the v1 designation for an X.509 public-key
certificate, and from the v1 designation for an X.509 CRL.)
(C) An X.509 attribute certificate has a subject field, but the
attribute certificate is a separate data structure from that
subject's public-key certificate. A subject may have multiple
attribute certificates associated with each of its public-key
certificates, and an attribute certificate may be issued by a
different CA than the one that issued the associated public-key
certificate.
(C) An X.509 attribute certificate contains a sequence of data
items and has a digital signature that is computed from that
sequence. In addition to the signature, an attribute certificate
contains items 1 through 9 listed below:
Shirey Informational [Page 194]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
1. version Identifies v1.
2. subject Is one of the following:
2a. baseCertificateID - Issuer and serial number of an
X.509 public-key certificate.
2b. subjectName - DN of the subject.
3. issuer DN of the issuer (the CA who signed).
4. signature OID of algorithm that signed the cert.
5. serialNumber Certificate serial number;
an integer assigned by the issuer.
6. attCertValidityPeriod Validity period; a pair of UTCTime
values: "not before" and "not after".
7. attributes Sequence of attributes describing the
subject.
8. issuerUniqueId Optional, when a DN is not sufficient.
9. extensions Optional.
$ X.509 authority revocation list
(N) An ARL in one of the formats defined by X.509--version 1 (v1)
or version 2 (v2). A specialized kind of certificate revocation
list.
$ X.509 certificate
(N) Either an X.509 public-key certificate or an X.509 attribute
certificate.
(C) This Glossary uses the term with the precise meaning
recommended here. However, some who use the term may not be aware
that X.509 specifies attribute certificates that do not contain a
public key. Even among those who are aware, this term is commonly
used as an abbreviation to mean "X.509 public-key certificate".
ISDs MAY use the term as an abbreviation for "X.509 public-key
certificate", but only after using the full term at the first
instance.
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as an abbreviation to mean
"X.509 attribute certificate".
$ X.509 certificate revocation list (CRL)
(N) A CRL in one of the formats defined by X.509--version 1 (v1)
or version 2 (v2). (The v1 and v2 designations for an X.509 CRL
are disjoint from the v1 and v2 designations for an X.509 public-
key certificate, and from the v1 designation for an X.509
attribute certificate.) (See: certificate revocation.)
(C) ISDs SHOULD NOT refer to an X.509 CRL as a digital
certificate, but note that an X.509 CRL does meet this Glossary's
definition of "digital certificate". Like a digital certificate,
Shirey Informational [Page 195]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
an X.509 CRL makes an assertion and is signed by a CA. But instead
of binding a key or other attributes to a subject, an X.509 CRL
asserts that certain previously-issued X.509 certificates have
been revoked.
(C) An X.509 CRL contains a sequence of data items and has a
digital signature computed on that sequence. In addition to the
signature, both v1 and v2 contain items 2 through 6b listed below.
Version 2 contains item 1 and may optionally contain 6c and 7.
1. version Optional. If present, identifies v2.
2. signature OID of the algorithm that signed CRL.
3. issuer DN of the issuer (the CA who signed).
4. thisUpdate A UTCTime value.
5. nextUpdate A UTCTime value.
6. revokedCertificates 3-tuples of 6a, 6b, and (optional) 6c:
6a. userCertificate A certificate's serial number.
6b. revocationDate UTCTime value for the revocation date.
6c. crlEntryExtensions Optional.
7. crlExtensions Optional.
$ X.509 public-key certificate
(N) A public-key certificate in one of the formats defined by
X.509--version 1 (v1), version 2 (v2), or version 3 (v3). (The v1
and v2 designations for an X.509 public-key certificate are
disjoint from the v1 and v2 designations for an X.509 CRL, and
from the v1 designation for an X.509 attribute certificate.)
(C) An X.509 public-key certificate contains a sequence of data
items and has a digital signature computed on that sequence. In
addition to the signature, all three versions contain items 1
through 7 listed below. Only v2 and v3 certificates may also
contain items 8 and 9, and only v3 may contain item 10.
1. version Identifies v1, v2, or v3.
2. serialNumber Certificate serial number;
an integer assigned by the issuer.
3. signature OID of algorithm that was used to
sign the certificate.
4. issuer DN of the issuer (the CA who signed).
5. validity Validity period; a pair of UTCTime
values: "not before" and "not after".
6. subject DN of entity who owns the public key.
7. subjectPublicKeyInfo Public key value and algorithm OID.
8. issuerUniqueIdentifier Defined for v2, v3; optional.
9. subjectUniqueIdentifier Defined for v2, v2; optional.
10. extensions Defined only for v3; optional.
Shirey Informational [Page 196]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
$ XTACACS
See: (secondary definition under) Terminal Access Controller (TAC)
Access Control System.
$ Yellow Book
(D) ISDs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for "Computer
Security Requirements: Guidance for Applying the Department of
Defense Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria in Specific
Environments" [CSC3]. Instead, use the full proper name of the
document or, in subsequent references, a conventional
abbreviation. (See: (usage note under) Green Book, Rainbow
Series.)
$ zeroize
(I) Use erasure or other means to render stored data unusable and
unrecoverable, particularly a key stored in a cryptographic module
or other device.
(O) Erase electronically stored data by altering the contents of
the data storage so as to prevent the recovery of the data.
[FP140]
4. References
This Glossary focuses on the Internet Standards Process. Therefore,
this set of references emphasizes international, governmental, and
industry standards documents; only a few other texts are listed. RFCs
are listed, but not Internet-Drafts, because the latter are not an
archival document series and should not be cited or quoted in an RFC.
[A3092] American National Standards Institute, "American National
Standard Data Encryption Algorithm", ANSI X3.92-1981, 30 Dec
1980.
[A9009] ---, "Financial Institution Message Authentication
(Wholesale)", ANSI X9.9-1986, 15 Aug 1986.
[A9017] ---, "Financial Institution Key Management (Wholesale)",
X9.17, 4 Apr 1985. [Defines procedures for the manual and
automated management of keying material and uses DES to
provide key management for a variety of operational
environments.]
[A9042] ---, "Public key Cryptography for the Financial Service
Industry: Agreement of Symmetric Keys Using Diffie-Hellman
and MQV Algorithms", X9.42, 29 Jan 1999.
Shirey Informational [Page 197]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[A9052] ---, "Triple Data Encryption Algorithm Modes of Operation",
X9.52-1998, ANSI approval 9 Nov 1998.
[A9062] ---, "Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services
Industry: The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
(ECDSA)", X9.62-1998, ANSI approval 7 Jan 1999.
[ABA] American Bar Association, "Digital Signature Guidelines:
Legal Infrastructure for Certification Authorities and
Secure Electronic Commerce", Chicago, IL, 1 Aug 1996.
[ACM] Association for Computing Machinery, "Communications of the
ACM", Jul 1998 issue with: Minerva M. Yeung, "Digital
Watermarking"; Nasir Memom and Ping Wah Wong, "Protecting
Digital Media Content"; and Scott Craver, Boon-Lock Yeo, and
Minerva Yeung, "Technical Trials and Legal Tribulations".
[Army] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, "Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP)
and Tempest Protection for Facilities", EP 1110-3-2, 31 Dec
1990.
[B7799] British Standards Institution, "Information Security
Management, Part 1: Code of Practice for Information
Security Management", BS 7799-1:1999, effective 15 May 1999.
---, ---, "Part 2: Specification for Information Security
Management Systems", BS 7799-2:1999, effective 15 May 1999.
[Bell] D. E. Bell and L. J. LaPadula, "Secure Computer Systems:
Mathematical Foundations and Model", M74-244, The MITRE
Corporation, Bedford, MA, May 1973. (Available as AD-771543,
National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.)
[CCIB] Common Criteria Implementation Board, "Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1:
Introduction and General Model", ver. 2.1, CCIB-99-01, Aug
1999.
[CIPSO] Trusted Systems Interoperability Working Group, "Common IP
Security Option", ver. 2.3, 9 Mar 1993. [A "work in
progress" that is probably defunct.]
[CSC1] U.S. Department of Defense Computer Security Center,
"Department of Defense Trusted Computer System Evaluation
Criteria", CSC-STD-001-83, 15 Aug 1983. (Superseded by
[DOD1].)
Shirey Informational [Page 198]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[CSC2] ---, "Department of Defense Password Management Guideline",
CSC-STD-002-85, 12 Apr 1985.
[CSC3] ---, "Computer Security Requirements: Guidance for Applying
the Department of Defense Trusted Computer System Evaluation
Criteria in Specific Environments", CSC-STD-003-85, 25 Jun
1985.
[CSOR] U.S. Department of Commerce, "General Procedures for
Registering Computer Security Objects", National Institute
of Standards Interagency Report 5308, Dec 1993.
[Denn] D. E. Denning, "A Lattice Model of Secure Information Flow",
in "Communications of the ACM", vol. 19, no. 5, May 1976,
pp. 236-243.
[DH76] W. Diffie and M. H. Hellman, "New Directions in
Cryptography" in "IEEE Transactions on Information Theory",
vol. IT-22, no. 6, Nov 1976, pp. 644-654.
[DOD1] U.S. Department of Defense, "Department of Defense Trusted
Computer System Evaluation Criteria", DoD 5200.28-STD, 26
Dec 1985. (Supersedes [CSC1].)
[DOD2] ---, Directive 5200.28, "Security Requirements for Automated
Information Systems (AISs)", 21 Mar 1988.
[DOD3] ---, "X.509 Certificate Policy", ver. 2, Mar 1999.
[DOD4] ---, "NSA Key Recovery Assessment Criteria", 8 Jun 1998.
[ElGa] T. El Gamal, "A Public-Key Cryptosystem and a Signature
Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms" in "IEEE Transactions
on Information Theory", vol. IT-31, no. 4, 1985, pp. 469-
472.
[EMV1] Europay International S.A., MasterCard International
Incorporated, and Visa International Service Association,
"EMV '96 Integrated Circuit Card Specification for Payment
Systems", ver. 3.1.1, 31 May 1998.
[EMV2] ---, "EMV '96 Integrated Circuit Card Terminal Specification
for Payment Systems", ver. 3.1.1, 31 May 1998.
[EMV3] ---, EMV '96 Integrated Circuit Card Application
Specification for Payment Systems", ver. 3.1.1, 31 May 1998.
Shirey Informational [Page 199]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[For94] W. Ford, "Computer Communications Security: Principles,
Standard Protocols and Techniques", ISBN 0-13-799453-2,
1994.
[For97] W. Ford and M. Baum, "Secure Electronic Commerce: Building
the Infrastructure for Digital Signatures and Encryption",
ISBN 0-13-476342-4, 1994.
[FP031] U.S. Department of Commerce, "Guidelines for Automatic Data
Processing Physical Security and Risk Management", Federal
Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) 31,
Jun 1974.
[FP039] ---, "Glossary for Computer Systems Security", FIPS PUB 39,
15 Feb 1976.
[FP046] ---, "Data Encryption Standard (DES)", FIPS PUB 46-2, 30 Dec
1993.
[FP081] ---, "DES Modes of Operation", FIPS PUB 81, 2 Dec 1980.
[FP102] ---, "Guideline for Computer Security Certification and
Accreditation", FIPS PUB 102, 27 Sep 1983.
[FP113] ---, "Computer Data Authentication", FIPS PUB 113, 30 May
1985.
[FP140] ---, "Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules", FIPS
PUB 140-1, 11 Jan 1994.
[FP151] ---, "Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX)--System
Application Program Interface [C Language]", FIPS PUB 151-2,
12 May 1993
[FP180] ---, "Secure Hash Standard", FIPS PUB 180-1, 17 Apr 1995.
[FP185] ---, "Escrowed Encryption Standard", FIPS PUB 185, 9 Feb
1994.
[FP186] ---, "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)", FIPS PUB 186, 19
May 1994.
[FP188] ---, "Standard Security Label for Information Transfer",
FIPS PUB 188, 6 Sep 1994.
[FPDAM] Collaborative ITU and ISO/IEC meeting on the Directory,
"Final Proposed Draft Amendment on Certificate Extensions",
April 1999. (This draft proposes changes to [X.509].)
Shirey Informational [Page 200]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[FPKI] U.S. Department of Commerce, "Public Key Infrastructure
(PKI) Technical Specifications: Part A--Technical Concept of
Operations", National Institute of Standards, 4 Sep 1998.
[I3166] International Standards Organization, "Codes for the
Representation of Names of countries and Their Subdivisions
--Part 1: Country Codes", ISO 3166-1:1997.
---, --- "Part 2: Country Subdivision Codes", ISO/DIS 3166-
2.
---, --- "Part 3: Codes for Formerly Used Names of
Countries", ISO/DIS 3166-3.
[I7498] ---, "Information Processing Systems--Open Systems
Interconnection Reference Model--[Part 1:] Basic Reference
Model", ISO/IEC 7498-1. (Equivalent to ITU-T Recommendation
X.200.)
---, --- "Part 2: Security Architecture", ISO/IEC 7499-2.
---, --- "Part 4: Management Framework", ISO/IEC 7498-4.
[I7812] ---, "Identification cards--Identification of Issuers--Part
1: Numbering System", ISO/IEC 7812-1:1993
---, --- "Part 2: Application and Registration Procedures",
ISO/IEC 7812-2:1993.
[I9945] ---, "Portable Operating System Interface for Computer
Environments", ISO/IEC 9945-1:1990.
[I15408] ---, "Information Technology--Security Techniques--
Evaluation criteria for IT Security--Part 1: Introduction
and General Model", ISO/IEC 15408-1:1999.
[ITSEC] "Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria
(ITSEC): Harmonised Criteria of France, Germany, the
Netherlands, and the United Kingdom", ver. 1.2, U.K.
Department of Trade and Industry, Jun 1991.
[Kahn] David Kahn, "The Codebreakers: The Story of Secret Writing",
The Macmillan Company, New York, 1967.
[Knuth] D. E. Knuth, Chapter 3 ("Random Numbers") in Volume 2
("Seminumerical Algorithms") of "The Art of Computer
Programming", Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969.
Shirey Informational [Page 201]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[Kuhn] Markus G. Kuhn and Ross J. Anderson, "Soft Tempest: Hidden
Data Transmission Using Electromagnetic Emanations", in
David Aucsmith, ed., "Information Hiding, Second
International Workshop, IH'98", Portland, Oregon, USA, 15-17
Apr 1998, LNCS 1525, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-65386-4,
pp. 124-142.
[MISPC] U.S. Department of Commerce, "Minimum Interoperability
Specification for PKI Components (MISPC), Version 1",
National Institute of Standards Special Publication 800-15,
Sep 1997.
[NCS01] National Computer Security Center, "A Guide to Understanding
Audit in Trusted Systems", NCSC-TG-001, 1 Jun 1988. (Part of
the Rainbow Series.)
[NCS04] ---, "Glossary of Computer Security Terms", NCSC-TG-004,
ver. 1, 21 Oct 1988. (Part of the Rainbow Series.)
[NCS05] ---, "Trusted Network Interpretation of the Trusted Computer
System Evaluation Criteria", NCSC-TG-005, ver. 1, 31 Jul
1987. (Part of the Rainbow Series.)
[NCS25] ---, "A Guide to Understanding Data Remanence in Automated
Information Systems", NCSC-TG-025, ver. 2, Sep 1991. (Part
of the Rainbow Series.)
[NIST] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "SKIPJACK
and KEA Algorithm Specifications", ver. 2, 29 May 1998.
(http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/skipjack-kea.htm)
[PGP] Simson Garfinkel, "PGP: Pretty Good Privacy", O'Reilly &
Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 1995.
[PKCS] Burton S. Kaliski, Jr., "An Overview of the PKCS Standards",
RSA Data Security, Inc., 3 Jun 1991.
[PKC07] RSA Laboratories, "PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax
Standard", ver. 1.5, RSA Laboratories Technical Note, 1 Nov
1993.
[PKC10] ---, "PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax Standard", ver.
1.0, RSA Laboratories Technical Note, 1 Nov 1993.
[PKC11] ---, "PKCS #11: Cryptographic Token Interface Standard",
ver. 1.0, 28 Apr 1995.
Shirey Informational [Page 202]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768, August
1980.
[R0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September
1981.
[R0792] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5, RFC
792, September 1981. [See: RFC 1885.]
[R0793] Postel, J., ed., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC
793, September 1981.
[R0821] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC
821, August 1982.
[R0822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.
[R0854] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "TELNET Protocol Specification",
STD 8, RFC 854, May 1983.
[R0959] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol (FTP)",
STD 9, RFC 959, October 1985.
[R1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names--Concepts and Facilities",
STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
[R1157] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "A Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)" [version 1], STD 15, RFC
1157, May 1990.
[R1208] Jacobsen O. and D. Lynch, "A Glossary of Networking Terms",
RFC 1208, March 1991.
[R1319] Kaliski, B., "The MD2 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1319,
April 1992.
[R1320] Rivest, R., "The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1320,
April 1992.
[R1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
April 1992.
[R1334] Lloyd, B. and W. Simpson, "PPP Authentication Protocols",
RFC 1334, October 1992.
[R1413] St. Johns, M., "Identification Protocol", RFC 1413, February
1993.
Shirey Informational [Page 203]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R1421] Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail,
Part I: Message Encryption and Authentication Procedures",
RFC 1421, February 1993.
[R1422] Kent, S., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail,
Part II: Certificate-Based Key Management", RFC 1422,
February 1993.
[R1455] Eastlake, D., "Physical Link Security Type of Service", RFC
1455, May 1993.
[R1457] Housley, R., "Security Label Framework for the Internet",
RFC 1457, May 1993.
[R1492] Finseth, C., "An Access Control Protocol, Sometimes Called
TACACS", RFC 1492, July 1993.
[R1507] Kaufman, C., "DASS: Distributed Authentication Security
Service", RFC 1507, September 1993.
[R1510] Kohl, J. and C. Neuman, "The Kerberos Network Authentication
Service (V5)", RFC 1510, September 1993.
[R1591] Kohl, J. and C. Neuman, "Domain Name System Structure and
Delegation", March 1994.
[R1630] Berners-Lee, T., "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW",
RFC 1630, June 1994.
[R1661] Simpson, W., ed., " The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD
51, RFC 1661, July 1994.
[R1731] Myers, J., "IMAP4 Authentication Mechanisms", RFC 1731,
December 1994.
[R1734] Myers, J., "POP3 AUTHentication Command", RFC 1734, December
1994.
[R1738] Myers, J., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, ed's., "Uniform
Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.
[R1750] Eastlake, D., Crocker, S. and J. Schiller, "Randomness
Recommendations for Security", RFC 1750, December 1994.
[R1777] Yeong, W., Howes, T. and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol", RFC 1777, March 1995.
Shirey Informational [Page 204]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R1808] Fielding, R., "Relative Uniform Resource Locators", RFC
1808, June 1995.
[R1824] Danisch, H., "The Exponential Security System TESS: An
Identity-Based Cryptographic Protocol for Authenticated Key-
Exchange (E.I.S.S.-Report 1995/4)", RFC 1824, August 1995.
[R1828] Metzger, P. and W. Simpson, "IP Authentication using Keyed
MD5", RFC 1828, August 1995.
[R1829] Karn, P., Metzger, P. and W. Simpson, "The ESP DES-CBC
Transform", RFC 1829, August 1995.
[R1848] Crocker, S., Freed, N., Galvin, J. and S. Murphy, "MIME
Object Security Services", RFC 1848, October 1995.
[R1851] Karn, P., Metzger, P. and W. Simpson, "The ESP Triple DES
Transform", RFC 1851, September 1995.
[R1866] Berners-Lee, T., "Hypertext Markup Language--2.0", RFC 1866,
November 1995.
[R1885] Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Internet Control Message Protocol
(ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification", RFC 1885, December 1995.
[R1928] Leech, M., Ganis, M., Lee, Y., Kuris, R., Koblas, D. and L.
Jones, "SOCKS Protocol Version 5", RFC 1928, March 1996.
[R1938] Haller, N. and C. Metzion, "A One-Time Password System", RFC
1938, May 1996.
[R1939] Myers, J. and M. Rose, "Post Office Protocol - Version 3",
STD 53, RFC 1939, May 1996.
[R1958] Carpenter, B., ed., "Architectural Principles of the
Internet", RFC 1958, June 1996.
[R1983] Malkin, G., ed., "Internet Users' Glossary", FYI 18, RFC
1983, August 1996.
[R1994] Simpson, W. "PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol
(CHAP)", RFC 1994, August 1996.
[R2023] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Instructions to RFC Authors",
RFC 2023, October 1997.
Shirey Informational [Page 205]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process--Revision 3",
BCP 9, RFC 2026, March 1994.
[R2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message
Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996.
[R2060] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol--Version 4
Revision 1", RFC 2060, December 1996.
[R2065] Eastlake, D., 3rd, "Domain Name System Security Extensions",
RFC 2065, January 1997.
[R2078] Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program
Interface, Version 2", RFC 2078, January 1997.
[R2084] Bossert, G., Cooper, S. and W. Drummond, "Considerations for
Web Transaction Security", RFC 2084, January 1997.
[R2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M. and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104, February
1997.
[R2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs To Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[R2138] Rigney, C., Rubens, A., Simpson, W. and S. Willens, "Remote
Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2138,
April 1997.
[R2137] Eastlake, D., "Secure Domain Name System Dynamic Update",
RFC 2137, April 1997.
[R2179] Gwinn, A., "Network Security For Trade Shows", RFC 2179,
July 1997.
[R2195] Klensin, J., Catoe, R. and P. Krumviede, "IMAP/POP AUTHorize
Extension for Simple Challenge/Response", RFC 2195, Sepember
1997.
[R2196] Fraser, B., "Site Security Handbook", FYI 8, RFC 2196,
Sepember 1997.
[R2202] Cheng, P. and R. Glenn, "Test Cases for HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-
SHA-1", RFC 2202, Sepember 1997.
Shirey Informational [Page 206]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R2222] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer
(SASL)", RFC 2222, October 1997.
[R2223] Postel, J., "Instructions to RFC Authors", RFC 2223, October
1997.
[R2246] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol, Version 1.0",
RFC 2246, January 1999.
[R2284] Blunk, L. and J. Vollbrecht, "PPP Extensible Authentication
Protocol (EAP)", RFC 2284, March 1998.
[R2315] Kaliski, B., "PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax, Version
1.5", RFC 2315, March 1998.
[R2323] Ramos, A., "IETF Identification and Security Guidelines",
RFC 2323, 1 April 1998. [Intended for humorous entertainment
("please laugh loud and hard"); does not contain serious
security information.]
[R2350] Brownlee, N. and E. Guttman, "Expectations for Computer
Security Incident Response", RFC 2350, June 1998.
[R2356] Montenegro, C. and V. Gupta, "Sun's SKIP Firewall Traversal
for Mobile IP", RFC 2356, June 1998.
[R2373] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 2373, July 2998.
[R2401] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "Security Architecture for the
Internet Protocol", RFC 2401, November 1998.
[R2402] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Authentication Header", RFC
2402, November 1998.
[R2403] Madson, C. and R. Glenn, "The Use of HMAC-MD5-96 within ESP
and AH", RFC 2403, November 1998.
[R2404] Madson, C. and R. Glenn, "The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within
ESP and AH", RFC 2404, November 1998.
[R2405] Madson, C. and N. Doraswamy, "The ESP DES-CBC Cipher
Algorithm With Explicit IV", RFC 2405, November 1998.
[R2406] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Encapsulating Security Payload
(ESP)", RFC 2406, November 1998.
Shirey Informational [Page 207]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R2407] Piper, D., "The Internet IP Security Domain of
Interpretation for ISAKMP", RFC 2407, November 1998.
[R2408] Maughan, D., Schertler, M., Schneider, M. and J. Turner,
"Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol
(ISAKMP)", RFC 2408, November 1998.
[R2409] Harkins, D. and D. Carrel, "The Internet Key Exchange
(IKE)", RFC 2409, November 1998.
[R2410] Glenn, R. and S. Kent, "The NULL Encryption Algorithm and
Its Use With IPsec", RFC 2410, November 1998.
[R2412] Orman, H., "The OAKLEY Key Determination Protocol", RFC
2412, November 1998.
[R2451] Pereira, R. and R. Adams, "The ESP CBC-Mode Cipher
Algorithms", RFC 2451, November 1998.
[R2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[R2504] Guttman, E., Leong, L. and G. Malkin, "Users' Security
Handbook", RFC 2504, February 1999.
[R2510] Adams, C. and S. Farrell, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocols", RFC 2510,
March 1999.
[R2527] Chokhani, S. and W. Ford, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure, Certificate Policy and Certification
Practices Framework", RFC 2527, March 1999.
[R2536] EastLake, D., "DSA KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System
(DNS)", RFC 2536, March 1999.
[R2570] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart,
"Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-Standard Network
Management Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999.
[R2574] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
(USM) for Version 3 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.
[R2612] Adams, C. and J. Gilchrist, "The CAST-256 Encryption
Algorithm", RFC 2612, June 1999.
Shirey Informational [Page 208]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[R2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter,
L., Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer
Protocol-- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[R2628] Smyslov, V., "Simple Cryptographic Program Interface", RFC
2628, June 1999.
[R2630] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax", RFC 2630, June
1999.
[R2631] Rescorla, E., "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method", RFC
2631, June 1999.
[R2633] Ramsdell, B., ed., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification",
RFC 2633, June 1999.
[R2634] Hoffman, P., ed., "Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME",
RFC 2634, June 1999.
[R2635] Hambridge, S. and A. Lunde, "Don't Spew: A Set of Guidelines
for Mass Unsolicited Mailings and Postings", RFC 2635, June
1999.
[Raym] E. S. Raymond, ed., "The On-Line Hacker Jargon File", ver.
4.0.0, 24 Jul 1996. (Also available as "The New Hacker's
Dictionary", 2nd edition, MIT Press, Sep 1993, ISBN 0-262-
18154-1. See: http://www.tuxedo.org/jargon/ for the latest
version.)
[Russ] D. Russell and G. T. Gangemi Sr., Chapter 10 ("TEMPEST") in
"Computer Security Basics", ISBN 0-937175-71-4, 1991.
[Schn] B. Schneier, "Applied Cryptography", John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York, 1994.
[SDNS3] U.S. Department of Defense, National Security Agency,
"Secure Data Network Systems, Security Protocol 3 (SP3)",
document SDN.301, Revision 1.5, 15 May 1989.
[SDNS4] ---, ---, "Security Protocol 4 (SP4)", document SDN.401,
Revision 1.2, 12 Jul 1988.
[SDNS7] ---, ---, "Secure data Network System, Message Security
Protocol (MSP)", document SDN.701, Revision 4.0, 7 Jun 1996,
with Corrections to Message Security Protocol, SDN.701, Rev
4.0", 96-06-07, 30 Aug, 1996.
Shirey Informational [Page 209]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
[SET1] MasterCard and Visa, "SET Secure Electronic Transaction
Specification, Book 1: Business Description", ver. 1.0, 31
May 1997.
[SET2] ---, "SET Secure Electronic Transaction Specification, Book
2: Programmer's Guide", ver. 1.0, 31 May 1997.
[Stei] J. Steiner, C. Neuman, and J. Schiller, "Kerberos: An
Authentication Service for Open Network Systems" in "Usenix
Conference Proceedings", Feb 1988.
[X400] International Telecommunications Union--Telecommunication
Standardization Sector (formerly "CCITT"), Recommendation
X.400, "Message Handling Services: Message Handling System
and Service Overview".
[X500] ---, Recommendation X.500, "Information Technology--Open
Systems Interconnection--The Directory: Overview of
Concepts, Models, and Services". (Equivalent to ISO 9594-1.)
[X501] ---, Recommendation X.501, "Information Technology--Open
Systems Interconnection--The Directory: Models".
[X509] ---, Recommendation X.509, "Information Technology--Open
Systems Interconnection--The Directory: Authentication
Framework". (Equivalent to ISO 9594-8.)
[X519] ---, Recommendation X.519, "Information Technology--Open
Systems Interconnection--The Directory: Protocol
Specifications".
[X520] ---, Recommendation X.520, "Information Technology--Open
Systems Interconnection--The Directory: Selected Attribute
Types".
[X680] ---, Recommendation X.680, "Information Technology--Abstract
Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)--Specification of Basic
Notation", 15 Nov 1994. (Equivalent to ISO/IEC 8824-1.)
[X690] ---, Recommendation X.690, "Information Technology--ASN.1
Encoding Rules--Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding
Rules (DER)", 15 Nov 1994. (Equivalent to ISO/IEC 8825-1.)
Shirey Informational [Page 210]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
5. Security Considerations
This document only defines security terms and recommends how to use
them. It does not describe in detail the vulnerabilities of, threats
to, or mechanisms that protect specific Internet protocols.
6. Acknowledgments
Pat Cain, Mike Kong, and Charles Lynn provided meticulous comments on
an early draft.
7. Author's Address
Please address all comments to:
Robert W. Shirey GTE / BBN Technologies
EMail: rshirey@bbn.com Suite 1200, Mail Stop 30/12B2
Phone: +1 (703) 284-4641 1300 Seventeenth Street North
Fax: +1 (703) 284-2766 Arlington, VA 22209-3801 USA
Shirey Informational [Page 211]
RFC 2828 Internet Security Glossary May 2000
8. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Shirey Informational [Page 212]