💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5497.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Aug 1st 2015, 10:46 by D.D. | LONDON
ON FRIDAY, the Swiss National Bank (SNB), Switzerland s central bank, reported
second quarter losses of SFr20 billion ($20 billion). Following an equally bad
first three months of the year, the SNB s losses so far for 2015 now amount to
a whopping SFr50.1 billion, equivalent to 7.5% of Switzerland's GDP.
The SNB's losses were large but not unexpected. For years, the Bank has
intervened in foreign exchange markets to prevent the Swiss franc from
appreciating above its euro exchange rate cap, set at 1.20 francs per euro in
September 2011. In January, the SNB abruptly abandoned its currency peg as the
European Central Bank geared up for its 1.1 trillion quantitative easing
programme. That caused the franc to immediately jump in value by more than 20%
against the euro.
Scrapping the currency peg has had two nasty consequences. First, the
appreciation of the franc made Swiss exports more expensive for foreigners,
prompting the Swiss economy to start shrinking in the first quarter of 2015.
Second, the depreciation of the euro against the franc led to significant
currency losses on the SNB s $550 billion foreign-exchange reserves, of which
some $230 billion is held in the single currency. This alone accounted for 94%
of the central bank's losses in the first half of the year.
The SNB must now strike a delicate balance. On the one hand, the Bank says that
the Swiss franc is still significantly overvalued and has shown that it is
willing to use a variety of tools, including buying foreign exchange and
negative deposit rates, to keep its currency in check. On the other hand, with
$230 billion in euro-denominated reserves, any depreciation of the euro
translates into billions in losses on the SNB s balance sheet. This could mean
lower dividends for Switzerland's central and regional governments, which could
land the Bank in political hot water. And it yet again opens up the nasty
question of whether central banks should be allowed to make big losses on their
balance sheets.