💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4828.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Motivational Interviewing

Collaboration is a partnership between the therapist and the client, grounded

in the point of view and experiences of the client.

This contrasts with some other approaches to substance use disorders treatment,

which are based on the therapist assuming an 'expert' role, at times

confronting the client and imposing their perpective on the client's substance

use behavior and the appropriate course of treatment and outcome.

The MI approach is one of the therapist's drawing out the individual's own

thoughts and ideas, rather than imposing their opinions as motivation and

commitment to change is most powerful and durable when it comes from the

client. No matter what reasons the therapist might offer to convince the client

of the need to change ge their behavior or how much they

might want the person to do so, lasting change is more likely to occur when the

client discovers their own reasons and determination to change. The therapist's

job is to "draw out" the person's own motivations and skills for change, not to

tell them what to do or why they should do.

Unlike some other treatment models that emphasize the clinician as an authority

figure, Motivational Interviewing recognizes that the true power for change

rests within the client. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to follow

through

with making changes happen. This is empowering to the individual, but also

gives them responsibility for their actions.

Counselors reinforce that there is no single "right way" to change and that

there are multiple ways that change can occur. In addition to deciding whether

they will make a change, clients are encouraged to take the lead in developing

a menu of options as to how to achieve the desired change.

The Principles of Motivational Interviewing

Building on and bringing to life the elements of the MI style , there are four

distinct principles

that guide the practice of MI. The therapist employing MI will hold true to

these principles

throughout treatment.

Express Empathy

Empathy involves seeing the world through the client's eyes, thinking about

things as the

client thinks about them, feeling things as the client feels them, sharing in

the client's

experiences. This approach provides the basis for clients to be heard and

understood, and

in turn, clients are more likely to honestly share their experiences in depth.

The process of

expressing empathy relies on the client s experiencing the counselor as able to

see the

world as they (the client) sees it.

Support Self- ‐Efficacy

MI is a strengths- ‐based approach that believes that clients have within

themselves the

capabilities to change successfully. A client's belief that change is possible

(self- ‐efficacy) is

needed to instill hope about making those difficult changes. Clients often have

previously

tried and been unable to achieve or maintain the desired change, creating doubt

about

their ability to succeed. In Motivational Interviewing, counselors support

self- ‐efficacy by

focusing on previous successes and highlighting skills and strengths that the

client already

has.

Roll with Resistance

From an MI perspective, resistance in treatment occurs when then the client

experiences a

conflict between their view of the problem or the solution and that of the

clinician or

when the client experiences their freedom or autonomy being impinged upon.

These

experiences are often based in the client s ambivalence about change. In MI,

counselors

avoid eliciting resistance by not confronting the client and when resistance

occurs, they

work to de- ‐escalate and avoid a negative interaction, instead "rolling with

it." Actions and

statements that demonstrate resistance remain unchallenged especially early in

the

counseling relationship. By rolling with resistance, it disrupts any struggle

that may occur

and the session does not resemble an argument or the client s playing "devil's

advocate" or

yes, but to the counselor's suggestions. The MI value on having the client

define the

problem and develop their own solutions leaves little for the client to resist.

A frequently

used metaphor is dancing rather than wrestling with the client. In

exploring client

concerns, counselors invite clients to examine new points of view, and are

careful not to

impose their own ways of thinking. A key concept is that counselor s avoid the

righting

reflex , a tendency born from concern, to ensure that the client understands

and agrees

with the need to change and to solve the problem for the client.

Develop Discrepancy

Motivation for change occurs when people perceive a mismatch between where

they are

and where they want to be , and a counselor practicing Motivational

Interviewing works to

develop this by helping clients examine the discrepancies between their current

circumstances/behavior and their values and future goals. When clients

recognize that

their current behaviors place them in conflict with their values or interfere

with

accomplishment of self- ‐identified goals, they are more likely to experience

increased

motivation to make important life changes. It is important that the counselor

using MI does

not use strategies to develop discrepancy at the expense of the other

principles, yet

gradually help clients to become aware of how current behaviors may lead them

away

from, rather than toward, their important goals.

Motivational Interviewing Skills and Strategies

The practice of Motivational Interviewing involves the skillful use of certain

techniques for

bringing to life the MI spirit , demonstrating the MI principles, and guiding

the process toward

eliciting client change talk and commitment for change. Change talk involves

statements or

non- ‐verbal communications indicating the client may be considering the

possibility of change.

OARS

Often called micro counseling skills, OARS is a brief way to remember the basic

approach used

in Motivational Interviewing. Open Ended Questions, Affirmations, Reflections,

and

Summaries are core counselor behaviors employed to move the process forward by

establishing a therapeutic alliance and eliciting discussion about change.

Open- ‐ended questions are those that are not easily answered with a "yes/no"

or short

answer containing only a specific, limited piece of information. Open- ‐ended

questions invite

elaboration and thinking more deeply about an issue. Although closed questions

have their

place and are at times valuable (e.g., when collecting specific information in

an assessment),

open- ‐ended questions create forward momentum used to help the client explore

the

reasons for and possibility of change.

Affirmations are statements that recognize client strengths. They assist in

building rapport

and in helping the client see themselves in a different, more positive light.

To be effective

they must be congruent and genuine. The use of affirmations can help clients

feel that

change is possible even when previous efforts have been unsuccessful.

Affirmations often

involve reframing behaviors or concerns as evidence of positive client

qualities. Affirmations

are a key element in facilitating the MI principle of Supporting Self-

‐efficacy.

Reflections or reflective listening is perhaps the most crucial skill in

Motivational

Interviewing. It has two primary purposes. First is to bring to life the

principle of Expressing

Empathy. By careful listening and reflective responses, the client comes to

feel that the

counselor understands the issues from their perspective. Beyond this, strategic

use

reflective listening is a core intervention toward guiding the client toward

change,

supporting the goal- ‐directed aspect of MI. In this use of reflections, the

therapist guides the

client towards resolving ambivalence by a focus on the negative aspects of the

status quo

and the positives of making change. There are several levels of reflection

ranging from

simple to more complex. Different types of reflections are skillfully used as

clients

demonstrate different levels of readiness for change. For example, some types

of

reflections are more helpful when the client seems resistant and others more

appropriate

when the client offers statements more indicative of commitment to change.

Summaries are a special type of reflection where the therapist recaps what

has occurred in

all or part of a counseling session(s). Summaries communicate interest,

understanding and

call attention to important elements of the discussion. They may be used to

shift attention

or direction and prepare the client to move on. Summaries can highlight both

sides of a

client s ambivalence about change and promote the development of discrepancy by

strategically selecting what information should be included and what can be

minimized or

excluded.

Change Talk

Change talk is defined as statements by the client revealing consideration of,

motivation for, or

commitment to change. In Motivational Interviewing, the therapist seeks to

guide the client to

expressions of change talk as the pathway to change. Research indicates a clear

correlation

between client statements about change and outcomes - ‐ client- ‐reported

levels of success in

changing a behavior. The more someone talks about change, the more likely they

are to

change. Different types of change talk can be described using the mnemonic

DARN- ‐CAT.

Preparatory Change Talk

Desire (I want to change)

Ability (I can change)

Reason (It s important to change)

Need (I should change)

And most predictive of positive outcome:

Implementing Change Talk

Commitment (I will make changes)

Activation (I am ready, prepared, willing to change)

Taking Steps (I am taking specific actions to change)

Strategies for Evoking Change Talk

There are specific therapeutic strategies that are likely to elicit and support

change talk in

Motivational Interviewing:

1. Ask Evocative Questions: Ask an open question, the answer to which is likely

to be change

talk.

2. Explore Decisional Balance: Ask for the pros and cons of both changing and

staying the

same.

3. Good Things/Not- ‐So- ‐Good Things: Ask about the positives and negatives of

the target

behavior.

4. Ask for Elaboration/Examples: When a change talk theme emerges, ask for more

details.

In what ways? Tell me more? What does that look like? When was the last

time that

happened?

5. Look Back: Ask about a time before the target behavior emerged. How were

things better,

different?

6. Look Forward: Ask what may happen if things continue as they are (status

quo). Try the

miracle question: If you were 100% successful in making the changes you want,

what would

be different? How would you like your life to be five years from now?

7. Query Extremes: What are the worst things that might happen if you don t

make this

change? What are the best things that might happen if you do make this change?

8. Use Change Rulers: Ask: On a scale from 1 to 10, how important is it to you

to change [the

specific target behavior] where 1 is not at all important, and a 10 is

extremely important?

Follow up: And why are you at ___and not _____ [a lower number than stated]?

What

might happen that could move you from ___ to [a higher number]?

Alternatively, you could also ask How confident are that you could make the

change if you

decided to do it?

9. Explore Goals and Values: Ask what the person s guiding values are. What do

they want in

life? Using a values card sort activity can be helpful here. Ask how the

continuation of target

behavior fits in with the person s goals or values. Does it help realize an

important goal or

value, interfere with it, or is it irrelevant?

10. Come Alongside: Explicitly side with the negative (status quo) side of

ambivalence.

Perhaps _______is so important to you that you won t give it up, no matter

what the cost.