💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3966.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

France's future - A country in denial

By ignoring their country s economic problems, France s politicians are making

it far harder to tackle them

Mar 31st 2012 | from the print edition

VISIT the euro zone and you will be invigorated by gusts of reform. The Save

Italy plan has done enough for Mario Monti, the prime minister, to declare,

however prematurely, that the euro crisis is nearly over. In Spain Mariano

Rajoy s government has tackled the job market and is about to unveil a tight

budget (see article). For all their troubles, Greeks know that the

free-spending and tax-dodging are over. But one country has yet to face up to

its changed circumstances.

France is entering the final three weeks of its presidential campaign. The

ranking of the first round, on April 22nd, remains highly uncertain, but the

polls back Fran ois Hollande, the Socialist challenger, to win a second-round

victory. Indeed, in elections since the euro crisis broke, almost all

governments in the euro zone have been tossed out by voters. But Nicolas

Sarkozy, the Gaullist president, has been clawing back ground. The recent

terrorist atrocity in Toulouse has put new emphasis on security and Islamism,

issues that tend to favour the right or, in the shape of Marine Le Pen, the far

right.

Yet what is most striking about the French election is how little anybody is

saying about the country s dire economic straits (see article). The candidates

dish out at least as many promises to spend more as to spend less. Nobody has a

serious agenda for reducing France s eye-watering taxes. Mr Sarkozy, who in

2007 promised reform with talk of a rupture, now offers voters protectionism,

attacks on French tax exiles, threats to quit Europe s passport-free Schengen

zone and (at least before Toulouse) talk of the evils of immigration and halal

meat. Mr Hollande promises to expand the state, creating 60,000 teaching posts,

partially roll back Mr Sarkozy s rise in the pension age from 60 to 62, and

squeeze the rich (whom he once cheerfully said he did not like), with a 75% top

income-tax rate.

A plethora of problems

France s defenders point out that the country is hardly one of the euro zone s

Mediterranean basket cases. Unlike those economies, it should avoid recession

this year. Although one ratings agency has stripped France of its AAA status,

its borrowing costs remain far below Italy s and Spain s (though the spread

above Germany s has risen). France has enviable economic strengths: an educated

and productive workforce, more big firms in the global Fortune 500 than any

other European country, and strength in services and high-end manufacturing.

However, the fundamentals are much grimmer. France has not balanced its books

since 1974. Public debt stands at 90% of GDP and rising. Public spending, at

56% of GDP, gobbles up a bigger chunk of output than in any other euro-zone

country more even than in Sweden. The banks are undercapitalised. Unemployment

is higher than at any time since the late 1990s and has not fallen below 7% in

nearly 30 years, creating chronic joblessness in the crime-ridden banlieues

that ring France s big cities. Exports are stagnating while they roar ahead in

Germany. France now has the euro zone s largest current-account deficit in

nominal terms. Perhaps France could live on credit before the financial crisis,

when borrowing was easy. Not any more. Indeed, a sluggish and unreformed France

might even find itself at the centre of the next euro crisis.

Browse our slideshow guide to the leading candidates for the French presidency

It is not unusual for politicians to avoid some ugly truths during elections;

but it is unusual, in recent times in Europe, to ignore them as completely as

French politicians are doing. In Britain, Ireland, Portugal and Spain voters

have plumped for parties that promised painful realism. Part of the problem is

that French voters are notorious for their belief in the state s benevolence

and the market s heartless cruelty. Almost uniquely among developed countries,

French voters tend to see globalisation as a blind threat rather than a source

of prosperity. With the far left and the far right preaching protectionism, any

candidate will feel he must shore up his base.

Many business leaders cling to the hope that a certain worldly realism will

emerge. The debate will tack back to the centre when Mr Sarkozy and Mr Hollande

square off in the second round; and once elected, the new president will ditch

his extravagant promises and pursue a sensible agenda of reform, like other

European governments. But is that really possible? It would be hard for Mr

Sarkozy suddenly to propose deep public-spending cuts, given all the things he

has said. It would be harder still for Mr Hollande to drop his 75% tax rate.

1981 and all that

Besides, there is a more worrying possibility than insincerity. The candidates

may actually mean what they say. And with Mr Hollande, who after all is still

the most likely victor, that could have dramatic consequences.

The last time an untried Socialist candidate became president was in 1981. As a

prot g of Fran ois Mitterrand, Mr Hollande will remember how things turned out

for his mentor. Having nationalised swathes of industry and subjected the

country to two devaluations and months of punishment by the markets, Mitterrand

was forced into reverse.

Mr Hollande s defenders say he is a pragmatist with a more moderate programme

than Mitterrand s. His pension-age rollback applies only to a small set of

workers; his 75% tax rate affects a tiny minority. Yet such policies indicate

hostility to entrepreneurship and wealth creation and reflect the French

Socialist Party s failure to recognise that the world has changed since 1981,

when capital controls were in place, the European single market was incomplete,

young workers were less mobile and there was no single currency. Nor were

France s European rivals pursuing big reforms with today s vigour.

If Mr Hollande wins in May (and his party wins again at legislative elections

in June), he may find he has weeks, not years, before investors start to flee

France s bond market. The numbers of well-off and young French people who hop

across to Britain (and its 45% top income tax) could quickly increase.

Even if Mr Sarkozy is re-elected, the risks will not disappear. He may not

propose anything as daft as a 75% tax, but neither is he offering the radical

reforms or the structural downsizing of spending that France needs. France s

picnickers are about to be swamped by harsh reality, no matter who is

president.

from the print edition | Leaders