💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3423.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The yuan is still a long way from being a reserve currency, but its rise is
overdue
Sep 24th 2011 | from the print edition
AT THE FLAGSHIP store of Yue Hwa Chinese Products in Hong Kong customers can
find exotic and everyday items from mainland China without having to cross the
border. The offerings include silk brocades, sandalwood carvings, Sichuan
peppers and traditional Chinese remedies such as ribbed antelope horns. Horn
shavings, boiled in water, are said to quieten the liver and quell fevers.
Feverish visitors from the mainland can even pay for their shavings in their
own currency, the yuan. The store charges 2,660 yuan ($416) for a whole horn,
at an exchange rate of 1.1 Hong Kong dollar per yuan. Nearby money-changers
offer a better rate, but some Chinese visitors prefer the convenience of using
their own money. That way they can still get a late-night snack at the 7-Eleven
after the money-changers have closed.
That is how, not long ago, the yuan set out on its career as an international
currency. It crept into Hong Kong in the wallets of mainland visitors. The
trickle across China s borders quickened last year when the government allowed
a broader range of Chinese firms to settle imports and exports in yuan. In the
same year it set these offshore yuan free. Outside the mainland, the yuan could
be transferred between banks, borrowed, lent and invested, just like any other
currency.
This offshore experiment is, for many forecasters, a first tentative step
towards making the yuan a fully fledged reserve currency to rival the dollar
and the euro. But China s policymakers are in two minds, as they tend to be
when it comes to freeing finance. Restricting the flow of money into and out of
China protects the country s immature banking system. When Japan sanctioned the
international use of the yen in the 1980s it set the stage for a damaging
property bubble.
On the other hand China hates having to rely on the dollar. Officials are
troubled by the Federal Reserve s notably loose monetary policy and by America
s rapidly rising public debt. They fear that stimulus measures put in place to
revive America s flagging economy will sooner or later generate a burst of high
inflation and weaken the dollar. That would hurt holders of US government
bonds, including China. Around $2 trillion of its currency reserves of $3.2
trillion are in dollars, mostly in bonds. On August 5th America lost its
triple-A credit rating from Standard & Poor s because it had failed to come up
with a credible plan to cap its public debt. China s official news agency,
Xinhua, immediately called for a new reserve currency.
Such calls have been made before, during bouts of dollar weakness in the late
1970s and mid-1990s, but the dollar still holds the privileged position in the
world s monetary system it has occupied since the second world war. It faces no
immediate challenge to its status, notwithstanding the debt downgrade, because
there are few good alternatives. Despite a long and steady decline in its value
against other currencies, it still accounts for 60.7% of the world s $9.7
trillion of currency reserves. That is around three times America s weight in
the world economy as measured by GDP. The dollar s closest rival, the euro,
accounts for 26.6% of the world s reserves.
How does one currency maintain such dominance? Textbook economics says domestic
money has three uses: as a unit of account against which the value of goods is
measured; as a medium of exchange; and as a store of value used to conserve
spending power for a rainy day.
The won fulfils these roles in South Korea; the yuan does the job in China; and
the dollar provides these services in international markets as well as in
America. It is the unit of account for commodities such as crude oil that are
traded globally. Most trade that is invoiced in a currency other than those of
the trading partners is quoted in dollars. And because the dollar is the
benchmark for world prices and is used to settle cross-border trades, it makes
sense for countries to keep stores of dollar reserves, both as a float and to
bolster confidence in their own currencies.
The demand for reserve currencies is a boon to their issuers. Around $500
billion of America s currency is used outside the country s borders. Some of
this cash is used to lubricate dollar-based international trade. But much of it
greases the wheels of cross-border crime such as drug trafficking: crooks need
a unit of account, a medium of exchange and a store of value just like
legitimate businesspeople.
Indeed, a reserve currency might almost be defined by its appeal to criminals.
Of the 900 billion-worth of euro notes in circulation, a third by value comes
in the form of the pink and purple 500 note. Cynics say it was issued to
capture a share of the international black market from the dollar, for which
the largest denomination is $100. An illegal stash of 500 bills would be
lighter, easier to conceal and easier to count. The 500 note was withdrawn by
banks in Britain after police said its main use was in organised crime. That is
a compliment of sorts to the euro. When Somali pirates or Russian gangsters
demand payment in yuan, it will be the surest sign that economic power has
shifted to China.
The cost of printing $500 billion-worth of notes is negligible compared with
the value of the goods and services they can command. In order for those notes
to circulate outside America, they must first have been exchanged for $500
billion-worth of goods and services. They represent a cost in real resources.
The gap between the printing cost of banknotes and their face value is called
seigniorage. Governments that print reserve currencies benefit from extending
seigniorage beyond their own borders.
Issuers of international currencies also enjoy protection from currency
volatility. A Vietnamese exporter selling to China is exposed to exchange-rate
risk: he pays his workforce in dong, the local currency, but receives payment
in dollars. If the dollar falls, so do his earnings, but his labour costs are
unchanged. American exporters do not have to worry about currency mismatch
because both their domestic costs and their export earnings are in dollars.
Nor has America had much need to acquire costly reserves of its own. Under the
Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates that governed rich-country trade
until 1971, members were constantly at risk of running short of dollars if
their exports became uncompetitive, whereas America could always print more
dollars. This was an exorbitant privilege , grumbled France s finance minister
at the time, Val ry Giscard d Estaing.
Exorbitant privilege v original sin
The privileges of reserve-currency status were not confined to the dollar,
though it enjoyed the lion s share. They include being able to borrow cheaply.
The dollars and euros (and, to a lesser extent, the pounds, Swiss francs and
yen) that other central banks keep in reserve are mostly in the form of
government bonds. The extra demand weighs on bond yields and sets a lower
threshold for the cost of credit for businesses and consumers.
This part of the exorbitant privilege contrasts with the emerging world s
original sin , a term coined by Barry Eichengreen of the University of
California, Berkeley, and Ricardo Hausmann of Harvard University for some
countries inability to borrow in their own currencies. Borrowing in foreign
currencies (as Brazil and other Latin American countries had done before the
1980s debt crisis) leaves original sinners at risk of default if their currency
loses value. Trouble-prone countries have often had to keep interest rates
high, even in a recession, to support their currencies and stave off default on
foreign-currency debts. Hungary is a recent example of a country in this sort
of trap. The Federal Reserve has never had to worry about such things.
China hates having to rely on the dollar. Off icials are troubled by the
Federal Reserve s loose monetary policy and by America s rapidly rising public
debt
The divide between the exorbitantly privileged and the original sinners was
especially deep after the East Asian crisis of 1997-98. The lesson from that
crisis was never to be short of reserves. The investment rate in emerging Asia
fell, the saving rate stayed high and the excess saving was sent abroad. It
marked the start of an unprecedented build-up of foreign exchange to insure
against future balance-of-payments problems. The world s currency reserves
increased from $1.9 trillion in 2000 to $9.3 trillion in 2010. Much of the
increase was in China.
The surge in demand for safe and liquid assets in dollars, euros and pounds
pushed down long-term borrowing costs. The savings of the emerging world
allowed the rich world to spend too freely, one of the deeper causes of the
wave of crises that has afflicted the rich world since 2007. America s
financial markets met the global demand for safe dollar assets by repackaging
the mortgages of marginal borrowers as bonds, which turned sour. But the
resulting financial crisis hit mainly the rich world rather than the emerging
markets.
Rich-world banks and investors seeking higher returns when interest rates were
low had bought a lot of the ropy mortgage securities. That made room for
reserve managers in emerging markets to buy more bonds backed by governments or
issued directly by them. Investors were so anxious for yield that they barely
distinguished between good and bad credits. Countries with large public debts,
such as Greece and Italy, could borrow as cheaply as countries with sound
public finances such as Germany. Windfall tax revenue from housing booms
fuelled by cheap foreign credit made the public finances of Ireland and Spain
look sound until recession (and, in Ireland s case, the terrifying cost of bank
bail-outs) caused public debt to explode.
Some believe the exorbitant privilege is really a curse that lures the
reserve-currency country into too much borrowing or printing too much money.
Over time this saps the economic and political strength that was the source of
the privilege. This paradox was first noted in 1947 in a Federal Reserve paper
written by Robert Triffin, a Belgian-born economist.
Under the Bretton Woods arrangement currencies were pegged to the dollar at
fixed exchange rates. The dollar in turn was tied to gold at a fixed price.
Triffin spotted a dilemma. A rising stock of dollars was needed to finance
world trade. The more dollars were supplied, the more the currency s link to
gold would be questioned since America s gold stocks would support an
ever-larger pile of banknotes. This came to a head in August 1971 when heavy
selling forced President Nixon to suspend the conversion of dollars into gold.
The Triffin dilemma is echoed in contemporary worries about the rich world s
public debts and its currencies. Easy access to credit lured the euro zone s
periphery into overborrowing. Greece is insolvent, Ireland and Portugal are not
far off. For reserve currencies, what is safe is in conflict with what is
convenient, argues Stephen Jen of SLJ Macro Partners, a hedge fund, adding that
the euro is efficient but it s not safe. Reliable and liquid repositories for
rainy-day saving are scarce, which is why reserve managers and bond investors
continue to push money into the Treasury market. But this tempts America to
overextend itself, amassing debts it may one day struggle to service.
As America s weight in the global economy drops, supplying the world with most
of its reserve currency needs may become too big a job for the country. In his
recent book, Exorbitant Privilege , Mr Eichengreen argues that a
reserve-currency system will emerge in which the dollar, the euro and the yuan
share the privileges and the responsibilities. That would make the world a
safer place, he reckons, because each issuer would nudge the others towards
financial and fiscal discipline.
It is not obvious that one currency needs to play a pre-eminent part. In its
heyday, sterling was rarely as dominant as the dollar has been since it took
over. On the eve of the first world war the pound accounted for only around
half of all reserves: most of the rest was in French francs and German marks.
By 1924 more reserves were held in dollars than in sterling.
The dollar is flawed, but so are the candidates to displace it. The euro has no
single fiscal authority standing behind it. Nor is there a single issuer of
sovereign debt to match the size and liquidity of the market for US Treasuries
although the bonds issued by the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF),
the euro area s emergency bail-out fund, may foreshadow a single euro bond
backed by all its members. For all its shortcomings, the euro still accounts
for a quarter of the world s reserves. Even as the region s sovereign-debt
crisis has deepened over the past year, its currency has gained ground against
the greenback.
The speed at which the dollar rose to prominence suggests that the yuan might
be an international currency as soon as 2020, says Mr Eichengreen. The
greenback overtook sterling in reserves barely a decade after the founding of
the Federal Reserve in 1913 as the backstop of dollar liquidity. The Fed pushed
the dollar by fostering a liquid market for trade acceptances, the credit notes
used to fund shipments. By the mid-1920s more trade was carried out in dollars
than pounds and more international bonds were issued in New York than in
London.
However, the obstacles to the yuan becoming a reserve currency are bigger than
those faced by the dollar in 1913. At that time America was already a trusted
storehouse for capital, a democracy where the rule of law was firmly
established. China s recent history is less reassuring, so it will take a while
before foreigners feel secure keeping their savings in yuan. The currency would
have to be fully convertible so that investors could park their yuan reserves
in assets of their choosing and redeem them when needed.
This in turn would require China to allow capital to move freely across its
borders, which it has been reluctant to do. In recent years it has eased
restrictions on residents taking capital out of the country; for example, more
foreign takeovers by big Chinese firms have been allowed to go ahead. But
foreigners face formidable barriers to bringing money into China because the
government is reluctant to cede control of the yuan s value or of domestic bond
yields to the ebb and flow of foreign capital.
China has taken some baby steps toward setting the yuan free. It has allowed
trade in goods to be invoiced and paid in yuan. The proceeds can be put to work
in a fledgling offshore yuan market in Hong Kong with restricted links to the
mainland. Trade settlement in yuan has grown rapidly, reaching 600 billion in
the second quarter of 2011 (around 10% of total trade), according to the People
s Bank of China.
It is a big leap from being a currency in which your own trade is settled to
being a fully fledged international currency, and a further jump to
reserve-currency status
So far such trade settlement has been a rather one-sided affair: most has been
for imports (ie, Chinese firms paying foreigners in yuan for supplies). Few of
China s exporters are willing or able to demand yuan from foreign customers,
though those customers should not find it hard to get hold of the currency.
China s central bank has set up swap agreements with the central banks of many
of its emerging-market trading partners, ranging from Singapore to Kazakhstan,
allowing foreign banks to supply yuan to their customers.
By the end of July yuan deposits in Hong Kong had swollen to 572 billion. The
IMF said in July that 155 billion of yuan-denominated bonds (so-called dim sum
bonds) had been issued in Hong Kong since the market was set up, many by
branches of mainland banks. Issues by non-financial foreign companies are less
common, in part because firms still need permission to bring the cash raised
into China. There have been some high-profile deals, though the bonds have
short duration. McDonald s sold a three-year bond last year. Caterpillar, an
American maker of earthmoving equipment, has issued a couple of two-year bonds
so far. A recent sale in Hong Kong of 20 billion yuan of government debt was
heavily oversubscribed.
The offshore yuan market has quickly come up from nowhere and China s central
bank has continued to strike bilateral swap deals to keep it growing. But it is
a big leap from being a currency in which a chunk of your own trade is settled
to being a fully fledged international currency, and a further jump to
reserve-currency status. Only a small fraction of the world s $4 trillion in
foreign-exchange deals each day are for trade settlement. The bulk of currency
dealing is for hedging or related to trading in stocks, bonds and other assets.
The dollar is one side of 85% of all currency trades, according to the Bank for
International Settlements (see chart 2). The yuan accounts for just 0.3% of
turnover.
Yet the exorbitant curse will catch up with the dollar one day and the yuan is
its most likely replacement. China s economy is second only to America s in
size and is likely to overtake it soon. It is already the world s largest
exporter. And it has net foreign assets of $1.8 trillion, whereas America owes
a net $2.5 trillion to foreigners. Only Japan is in a stronger position.
A global yuan?
Reserve-currency status depends on these three gauges of economic dominance
size of economy, exports and net foreign assets says the Peterson Institute s
Arvind Subramanian. By 1918 America had the world s biggest economy and would
soon be its largest creditor and exporter; within a few years the dollar also
had the lion s share of the world s foreign-exchange reserves. If that
precedent is anything to go by, the yuan should soon become the main global
reserve currency, and not merely a junior alternative to the dollar or the
euro.
The rewards to China of opening up fully to foreign capital trump the risks,
reckons Mr Subramanian. Turning the yuan into a reserve currency offers China a
way out of its mercantilist growth model, which has run its course. Demand for
yuan reserves would push up the exchange rate, discourage exports and give
China s consumers greater purchasing power. A push for reserve status for the
yuan would go hand in hand with the development of China s financial system a
necessary step to support the small- and medium-size businesses it needs to
serve its domestic market, and for many other reasons. For China to escape the
middle-income trap, it will have to let go of the yuan.
The rich world s monopoly on reserve-currency privileges has given it first
call on the world s precautionary savings. For now, it is clinging on to its
privileges. But rivalry from developing countries in the markets for oil and
commodities is already exacting a price from the West.
from the print edition | Special report