💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3218.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
By Health and Science Correspondent Kate Kelland | Reuters Mon, Jul 4, 2011
LONDON (Reuters) - If Aubrey de Grey's predictions are right, the first person
who will live to see their 150th birthday has already been born. And the first
person to live for 1,000 years could be less than 20 years younger.
A biomedical gerontologist and chief scientist of a foundation dedicated to
longevity research, de Grey reckons that within his own lifetime doctors could
have all the tools they need to "cure" aging -- banishing diseases that come
with it and extending life indefinitely.
"I'd say we have a 50/50 chance of bringing aging under what I'd call a
decisive level of medical control within the next 25 years or so," de Grey said
in an interview before delivering a lecture at Britain's Royal Institution
academy of science.
"And what I mean by decisive is the same sort of medical control that we have
over most infectious diseases today."
De Grey sees a time when people will go to their doctors for regular
"maintenance," which by then will include gene therapies, stem cell therapies,
immune stimulation and a range of other advanced medical techniques to keep
them in good shape.
De Grey lives near Cambridge University where he won his doctorate in 2000 and
is chief scientific officer of the non-profit California-based SENS (Strategies
for Engineered Negligible Senescence) Foundation, which he co-founded in 2009.
He describes aging as the lifelong accumulation of various types of molecular
and cellular damage throughout the body.
"The idea is to engage in what you might call preventative geriatrics, where
you go in to periodically repair that molecular and cellular damage before it
gets to the level of abundance that is pathogenic," he explained.
CHALLENGE
Exactly how far and how fast life expectancy will increase in the future is a
subject of some debate, but the trend is clear. An average of three months is
being added to life expectancy every year at the moment and experts estimate
there could be a million centenarians across the world by 2030.
To date, the world's longest-living person on record lived to 122 and in Japan
alone there were more than 44,000 centenarians in 2010.
Some researchers say, however, that the trend toward longer lifespan may falter
due to an epidemic of obesity now spilling over from rich nations into the
developing world.
De Grey's ideas may seem far-fetched, but $20,000 offered in 2005 by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Technology Review journal for any
molecular biologist who showed that de Grey's SENS theory was "so wrong that it
was unworthy of learned debate" was never won.
The judges on that panel were prompted into action by an angry put-down of de
Grey from a group of nine leading scientists who dismissed his work as "pseudo
science."
They concluded that this label was not fair, arguing instead that SENS "exists
in a middle ground of yet-to-be-tested ideas that some people may find
intriguing but which others are free to doubt."
CELL THERAPY
For some, the prospect of living for hundreds of years is not particularly
attractive, either, as it conjures up an image of generations of sick, weak old
people and societies increasingly less able to cope.
But de Grey says that's not what he's working for. Keeping the killer diseases
of old age at bay is the primary focus.
"This is absolutely not a matter of keeping people alive in a bad state of
health," he told Reuters. "This is about preventing people from getting sick as
a result of old age. The particular therapies that we are working on will only
deliver long life as a side effect of delivering better health."
De Grey divides the damage caused by aging into seven main categories for which
repair techniques need to be developed if his prediction for continual
maintenance is to come true.
He notes that while for some categories, the science is still in its earliest
stages, there are others where it's already almost there.
"Stem cell therapy is a big part of this. It's designed to reverse one type of
damage, namely the loss of cells when cells die and are not automatically
replaced, and it's already in clinical trials (in humans)," he said.
Stem cell therapies are currently being trialed in people with spinal cord
injuries, and de Grey and others say they may one day be used to find ways to
repair disease-damaged brains and hearts.
NO AGE LIMIT
Cardiovascular diseases are the world's biggest age-related killers and de Grey
says there is a long way to go on these though researchers have figured out the
path to follow.
Heart diseases that cause heart failure, heart attacks and strokes are brought
about by the accumulation of certain types of what de Grey calls "molecular
garbage" -- byproducts of the body's metabolic processes -- which our bodies
are not able to break down or excrete.
"The garbage accumulates inside the cell, and eventually it gets in the way of
the cell's workings," he said.
De Grey is working with colleagues in the United States to identify enzymes in
other species that can break down the garbage and clean out the cells -- and
the aim then is to devise genetic therapies to give this capability to humans.
"If we could do that in the case of certain modified forms of cholesterol which
accumulate in cells of the artery wall, then we simply would not get
cardiovascular disease," he said.
De Grey is reluctant to make firm predictions about how long people will be
able to live in future, but he does say that with each major advance in
longevity, scientists will buy more time to make yet more scientific progress.
In his view, this means that the first person who will live to 1,000 is likely
to be born less than 20 years after the first person to reach 150.
"I call it longevity escape velocity -- where we have a sufficiently
comprehensive panel of therapies to enable us to push back the ill health of
old age faster than time is passing. And that way, we buy ourselves enough time
to develop more therapies further as time goes on," he said.
"What we can actually predict in terms of how long people will live is
absolutely nothing, because it will be determined by the risk of death from
other causes like accidents," he said.
"But there really shouldn't be any limit imposed by how long ago you were born.
The whole point of maintenance is that it works indefinitely."