💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 2741.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
A patch of east London has quickly become a world-class technology hub. Britain
s government has taken an interest; others might too
Nov 25th 2010 | from PRINT EDITION
AT THE turn of the millennium the most notable innovation emanating from the
modishly gritty streets of east London was the Hoxton Fin, a hairstyle
popularised by David Beckham. London s change-makers have often found a home on
the City s eastern fringe especially immigrants and artists but in recent
decades their wares have usually been cultural rather than commercial. The
first signs that this was shifting appeared, strangely enough, as the recent
recession began.
In 2008 followers of the technology industry began to talk excitedly about a
cluster of internet start-ups in the Shoreditch area, near the ugly Old Street
junction, to the north-east of the financial district. There are now around a
hundred high-tech businesses in what has inevitably been dubbed Silicon
Roundabout.
Measured by the concentration of technology firms and the availability of
generous and informed investors, California s Silicon Valley is still in a
league of its own. But in the second division of hubs, this chunk of east
London is near the top, along with the likes of Boston and Tel Aviv. That its
growth took place so quickly, and during a recession, is remarkable enough: the
high-tech zone in Cambridge has taken decades to evolve. But the fact that
Silicon Roundabout also emerged without government support, or even direct
links with universities, should pique the interest of countries that have tried
to cultivate technology hubs without the same success.
Silicon Roundabout s firms are generally small-to-medium sized and highly
specialised. One makes software for the fashion industry; another runs an
online dictionary. There is a hotel-comparison website, a firm specialising in
3D and interactive content, and several digital-design firms with their own
niches.
The congregation owes something to the advantages of London generally: its
wealth, its appeal to global talent, the English language. But the
entrepreneurs in Silicon Roundabout stress the unique draw of the east of the
city, with its bohemianism and relatively cheap rents, for young, creative
workers. If we were in west London, we would be a completely different type of
business, says Steve Hardman, the co-founder of SocialGo, which helps clients
build their own online communities.
The spontaneous rise of Silicon Roundabout might have persuaded the government
to leave well alone. Instead, David Cameron recently unveiled a plan to support
it. As well as tinkering with the legal framework in which such businesses
operate by creating updated entrepreneur visas to bypass ill-judged new
immigration restrictions, for example the government has persuaded technology
titans such as Google and Cisco to invest. Soon BT will bring super-fast
broadband to the area; McKinsey, a consultancy, will share management
expertise. The aim is to build a Tech City stretching from Shoreditch to the
2012 Olympic games site farther east.
To some, Mr Cameron s sudden enthusiasm looks like straightforward political
opportunism. The government has much less to say about how it intends to
generate economic growth than about cutting public spending: Silicon Roundabout
is a convenient bandwagon to mount. And there are other reasons to be sceptical
about its input. Big technology companies of the kind it is courting often buy
up innovative start-ups. Forging such close links between Silicon Valley and
Silicon Roundabout could make easy prey of the latter.
Still, the work put in by ministers to secure commitments from these outfits
(George Osborne, the chancellor of the exchequer, who has had much else to
occupy him, was the most assiduous), suggests a certain seriousness. The
underlying motive is that the government discerns the outline of a new kind of
industrial strategy.
Jumping on the roundabout
The old approach of favouring certain firms and sectors with protections and
public subsidies revived, if more in word than deed, by the most recent Labour
government is unlikely to come back. Since the country s botched experiments
with corporatism in the 1970s, the idea of the state intrusively shaping the
private economy has tended to lack credibility in a way it does not in, say,
France. In any case, the current government would struggle to afford such
activism. The new thinking is that the most useful thing ministers can do for
emerging sectors is to use the pull and prestige of high office itself.
It is true that Silicon Roundabout s plucky businesses probably could not have
struck such deals with foreign behemoths on their own. Even the rhetorical
support promised by Mr Cameron could help, says one investor, by publicising
quiet success stories and attracting foreign talent and capital. As other
countries struggle with fiscal penury and the need to find new sources of
growth, the government s approach to Silicon Roundabout could become a model to
emulate.
Entrepreneurs in the district welcome the attention. But they all agree that
the main barrier to growth is the scarcity of investment. Britain does not have
a technology-focused venture-capital industry anything like as bounteous as
that which serves Silicon Valley. Glenn Shoosmith, the founder of BookingBug,
which sells online reservation systems, says American investors have expertise
in the sector as well as money, enabling them to act as hands-on angel
investors. In Britain, selling to a giant can be easier than finding cash.
Last.fm, a music website and Silicon Roundabout s biggest success so far, was
bought by CBS Interactive, an American company, for 140m ($280m) in 2007.
Mr Cameron s plan includes measures to help with finance. Silicon Valley Bank,
a Californian lender, will open up in Britain; Vodafone will bring its
venture-capital arm to the area; the government will provide 200m in equity
finance. But this will only go so far. Part of the problem is that venture
capitalists themselves are finding it hard to raise funds. Graham O Keeffe, a
partner at Atlas Venture, which specialises in the technology sector, says this
would change if pension funds (including public-sector ones) took venture
capital more seriously as an investment.
What is needed above all, agree many in Silicon Roundabout, is simply more
success stories. American investors are keen on high-tech start-ups because
they have seen many grow into world-beaters. Until east London produces its own
Facebook or Apple, British investors will be nothing like as bullish.
from PRINT EDITION | Britain