💾 Archived View for gem.benscraft.info › mailing-list › messages › 247 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- nervuri <nervuri at disroot.org>
@ Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:23 +0000
Reply to Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org>
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
https://gitlab.com/gemini-specification/protocol/-/issues/33
See makeworld's comments. It looks like "no SNI" is the right answer
for IP addresses.
On Fri, 2021-04-16, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> gemini://2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1/
> gemini://[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]:1965/
No. The first one is not a legal URL.
Thanks, I stand corrected. Indeed, Agunua points out that the first URL
is invalid, but connects to the second one.
The clients I tested which didn't accept the second URL are:
- Lagrange
- gmni
- bombadillo
- Mozz web proxy - https://portal.mozz.us/gemini/%5B2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1%5D:1965/
- gemini://celehner.com/proxy/ - https://celehner.com/gemini://[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]:1965/
- https://gemini.susa.net:1993/proxy.html
However, most clients accept the host without the scheme and behavior is
sometimes inconsistent. For instance, in Amfora:
- "89.47.164.70" works
- "[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]" works if it is supplied from the
command line, but not from within the program.
- "2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1" - same as the above
Agunua and Kristall adhere to the RFC, so they connect to the first two,
but not the third.
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════