💾 Archived View for gem.benscraft.info › mailing-list › messages › 241 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Tom <tgrom.automail at nuegia.net>
@ Thu, 15 Apr 2021 22:35 -0700
Reply to nervuri <nervuri at disroot.org>
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:51:33 +0000
nervuri <nervuri@disroot.org> wrote:
Indeed, this might require clarification in the spec. There's no
reason to demand SNI if a raw IP address is used - as almaember
points out, RFC 6066 even forbids IP addresses in SNI. If a server
has multiple IP addresses, it can serve different certificates on
each of them without having to use SNI.
If we can going to mandate SNI can we at least mandate ESNI for
privacy? Maybe when we mandate TLS1.3 and drop 1.2.
Also, there's no reason for Gemini to require paying the DNS tax.
People should be able to host capsules without dealing with DNS.
OpenNIC still exists and I run my resolvers off them. No need to pay a
DNS tax.
--
______________________________________
/ <Sanaya> you guys are all sick! sick \
\ sick sick I tell ya ;) /
--------------------------------------
\
\
/\ /\
//\\_//\\ ____
\_ _/ / /
/ * * \ /^^^]
\_\O/_/ [ ]
/ \_ [ /
\ \_ / /
[ [ / \/ _/
_[ [ \ /_/
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════