πŸ’Ύ Archived View for gem.benscraft.info β€Ί mailing-list β€Ί messages β€Ί 213 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: JetForce vs. Molly Brown Server: CGI-variable SCRIPT_NAME is

not present

- Omar Polo <op at omarpolo.com>

@ Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:18 +0200

Full Thread

Reply to Frank JΓΌdes <Frank.Juedes at linux4specialists.com>

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Frank JΓΌdes <Frank.Juedes@linux4specialists.com> writes:

Hi Stephane,
Thank you very much for the update. That leaves me with three options now:
1. Try again to install Pythron 3.7+ on my stubborn development machine
(Oracle Lunix 7…)
2. Learn go really quickly and fork the Molly Brown server - i will
call it Β»the sunken Molly Brown serverΒ« in that case
3. Write my own gemini server from scratch in perl
It really looks like only Molly Brown and JetForce have a usable
CGI-implementation. We should call it GGI, btw: Gemini Gateway
Interface to distinguish it from CGI.

They're definitely not the only one: GLV-1.12556 and gmid (disclaimer:

I'm the author) have a complete CGI support. GLV-1.12556 has even more

things, such as SGCI support; and you may want to count vger in that

list too, even it's a little limited in this regard.

Also, why reinvent the wheel and find another name when the CGI

specification, modulo one or two environment variables (REQUEST_METHOD -

and is debatable), maps well to Gemini?

Best regards from Charleston (WV),
Frank/2
On 2021-04-13 03:09, Alexis wrote:
>
> Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane@sources.org> writes:
>
>> I did not find a public issue tracker for MollyBrown, and the one patch
>> I sent to the author went unanswered.
>
> i.e. one you don't have to register for? Because otherwise:
>
> https://tildegit.org/solderpunk/molly-brown/issues
>
> Still, yeah, Solderpunk isn't around much nowadays; i sent a patch
> for the telem BBS in September last year, and i believe it's not yet
> applied ....
>
> (i also submitted a couple of patches for Elpher seven months ago,
> adding link numbering, but Elpher's maintainer doesn't seem to be
> active either.)
>
>
> Alexis.

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Replies

Reply from Frank JΓΌdes <Frank.Juedes at linux4specialists.com>