💾 Archived View for gem.benscraft.info › mailing-list › messages › 207 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net>
@ Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:56 -0400
Reply to Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com>
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Michael Lazar writes:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:59 AM Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net> wrote:
>
> Stéphane Bortzmeyer writes:
>
> > So I do not really see why someone would like to use exotic TLS
> > libraries without Ed25519.
>
> Do we have a list of which libraries do not include Ed25519?
portal.mozz.us is using openssl 1.0.2k from the Centos 7 repo [0],
which is still supported, but old enough that it doesn't include
ed25519.
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me too much. I am a little surprised that
it's newer (1.1.1d) in Debian stable, but it's probably just a release
cycle thing. It looks like ed25519 support appears in OpenSSL 1.1.1.
--
Jason McBrayer | “Strange is the night where black stars rise,
jmcbray@carcosa.net | and strange moons circle through the skies,
| but stranger still is lost Carcosa.”
| ― Robert W. Chambers,The King in Yellow
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════