💾 Archived View for gem.benscraft.info › mailing-list › messages › 196 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [tech] support for Ed25519 in clients

- Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com>

@ Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:55 -0400

Full Thread

Reply to Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net>

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:59 AM Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net> wrote:

Stéphane Bortzmeyer writes:

> So I do not really see why someone would like to use exotic TLS

> libraries without Ed25519.

Do we have a list of which libraries do not include Ed25519?

portal.mozz.us is using openssl 1.0.2k from the Centos 7 repo [0],

which is still supported, but old enough that it doesn't include

ed25519.

- Michael

[0] https://centos.pkgs.org/7/centos-updates-x86_64/openssl-1.0.2k-21.el7_9.x86_64.rpm.html

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Replies

Reply from Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net>