💾 Archived View for gem.benscraft.info › mailing-list › messages › 193 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [spec] A possible client-side, community-based solution to the

drawbacks of TOFU authentication

- Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org>

@ Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:17 +0200

Full Thread

Reply to Benjamin Cronin <bcronin720 at gmail.com>

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 04:12:30AM -0400,

Benjamin Cronin <bcronin720@gmail.com> wrote

a message of 89 lines which said:

a server's long-term certificate to be registered in a public place
for new visitors of a site to check against.

The main issue with your proposal is "who will check that this

registration is done by the rightful [for some definition of rightful]

holder, and how will they do this check?"

Instead of saying:

I have put a lot of thought and effort

I suggest that it would be better to give the answer to the above

issue. I do not find in your email even one line of technical

explanation about your invention.

This means no blockchain based technology or other popular
distributed system of trust, due to the computing requirements that
their proof of stake require.

You mean proof of work? Because proof of stake does not have such

computing requirments.

Anyway, even blockchains, as demonstrated in the last ten years with

Namecoin, still have the problem of initial enrollment. How do you

address it? [Namecoin is strictly first-come-first-served, with zero

recourse in case something goes wrong.]

At the current moment, I have not found any specific research along
these lines,

Without specific requirments, it is hard to say if there is something

similar. For instance, do you plan to do something similar to

Certificate Transparency, or will you envision something different?

Other relevant stuff may include CoDoNS

<http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/egs/beehive/codons.php> ConfiDNS

<https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/worlds06/tech/prelim_papers/poole/poole_html/>

ENS <https://ens.domains/> or the many others "distributed trust"

systems now buried under 404 error codes.

Sorry if I'm harsh but, as you know "I have designed a secure,

efficient, cheap system of distributed trust and naming over the

Internet" is in computer networks what the "I have deciphered the

Phaistos disk" is in linguistics. We are cautious.

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════