πŸ’Ύ Archived View for gem.benscraft.info β€Ί mailing-list β€Ί messages β€Ί 131 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [Tech] (?) Let's update the website

- Johann Galle <johann at qwertqwefsday.eu>

@ Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:55 +0200

Full Thread

Reply to BjΓΆrn WΓ€rmedal <bjorn.warmedal at gmail.com>

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

On 01.04.2021 09:43, BjΓΆrn WΓ€rmedal wrote:

I know there's a git repo somewhere with the source for
gemini.circumlunar.space, but where? Who approves PRs to it?

See section 4.2 of the FAQ <gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/faq.gmi>

tl;dr: git://gemini.circumlunar.space/gemini-site, Solderpunk approves patches via email (not public)

Would be nice if we could make a concerted effort to update stuff there.

A problem that I had raised to Solderpunk before multiple times is that the specification and everything else in the repository is not licensed, which is at least a grey area in this case. As more translations are accepted into the repo this would become more problematic since all authors would have to agree to license their contributions under the chosen license.

Other than that, it feels a bit asserting to do this, but I think it should be done.

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Attachments

OpenPGP_signature

OpenPGP_0xA4EFCC5A6174FB0F.asc

Replies

Reply from BjΓΆrn WΓ€rmedal <bjorn.warmedal at gmail.com>

Reply from Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org>