💾 Archived View for dioskouroi.xyz › thread › 29448629 captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
________________________________________________________________________________
My impression of today's web, greater in css/js size, but with reduced creativity.
100% agreed. Most of the things look the same and we just ship more and more code.
It is the same with other software. Why bother thinking and testing ?
Accessible video/audio is pretty much not existing.
He should have read more completely because the almanac notes:
… this figure may not account for video content loaded by a third party <iframe>, such as an embedded YouTube video. It should also be noted that most popular third-party audio and video embedding services include the ability to add synchronized text equivalents.
And that note is off mark as well. Most audio/video players load captions/subtitles out-of-band and do their own rendering or add them to the video element via JS for greater control.
70% of font-size declarations are in pixels.
And all websites must be either scale up or down.
The "top scoring site" loaded over 60mb of CSS.
This is why my 100GB mobile data plan runs out in 3 days.