💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 807.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
by Eugene Sandhu
Nov 21st 2008 @ 2:30PM
Filed under: News
clockIn order to conserve energy, President-elect Barak Obama wants to
eliminate daylight saving time.
Twice a year, a bunch of countries, including most of the United States,
practice daylight saving time or DST, shifting one hour ahead in the spring and
one hour back in the fall. While I go through the whole twice-a-year ritual of
looking for clocks, I only vaguely understood the reason behind it. I knew it
had to do with more sunlight during waking hours and I assumed it was to save
energy.
Turns out, according to two academics on the NYT Op-Ed page, there is little
scientific proof that this reduces energy consumption. It also turns out that
this practice could be wasteful, a bit annoying, and a lot of people, including
Obama, want to get rid of it.
A study in Indiana, a state that recently started DST, showed an overall
increase of 1 percent in residential electricity use with occasional increases
of 2 to 4 percent in late spring and early fall. So much for conserving energy.
While DST is great for reducing in-door lighting, the shift in time increases
the demand for air conditioning during hot summer evenings and increased
heating in early spring and late fall mornings. The energy suckers of heat and
A/C could eliminate any savings from reduced lighting and, as the Indiana study
showed, actually increase electricity consumption.
The hot state of Arizona seems to already know this and opted out of the whole
time-shifting practice.
Related Link