💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4977.gmi captured on 2021-12-03 at 14:04:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Unfair advantage at the office

This is a column for the disgruntled. It s easy to get disheartened as we watch

colleagues sail through a three-hour presentation on no sleep after running a

marathon over the weekend and coaching their child s pre-school dance class

before work.

What s their secret?

Not wishing to sound bitter BBC Capital feels there may be a pattern here a

combination of advantages giving some people the competitive edge. We went to

question-and answer-site Quora to find out what its users believed to be the

biggest innate skill someone could have that provides an unfair advantage at

work.

Sleepless in

One of the most popular answers, receiving a staggering 2,000-plus votes, came

from Ivan Mazour, founder of Ometria, who simply wrote: Not needing a lot of

sleep.

This is a genuine and unfair advantage over others, he said, since it is

almost entirely genetic and not based around lifestyle or nutrition.

He added: Some people Margaret Thatcher, Napoleon were able to function

very effectively on just four hours of sleep, leaving them 20 hours in the day

to be productive. Others need eight hours just to feel normal and that is four

hours that they fall behind every single day, with no way of changing that.

What are you smiling about?

Sondra Webber, who works in marketing, wrote optimism as her pick for the

biggest unfair advantage. She said studies show optimistic people are more

successful, and happier, because they believe in themselves and more or less

make it happen.

Maybe it s not the caffeine

A baffled and frustrated Andy Warwick, who edits online learning materials for

the Sochi Olympic Games, picked energy.

He wrote: Some people have higher natural levels of energy than others, and

it's no coincidence that such people are often high achievers. Those of us who

are more laid-back or innately lethargic tend to progress more slowly.

He describes a friend who zips around as though he has an intravenous energy

drink drip permanently pumping him full of caffeine . The colleague checks off

tasks and attends meetings throughout which he is always alert and

contributing without a moment s rest. He often skips lunch, too. Myself, I get

exhausted just watching.

He wrote despairingly: I'm sure you all know people like this, those annoying

ones who need little sleep and have seemingly boundless physical and mental

energy. It's your co-worker who studies for [an advanced degree], plays in

weekend sports leagues, learns a language, reads a book a week and still has

time when they get home to cook, help the kids with the homework and work on

the car. I hate these people.

He wrote: They have the endurance to outlast everyone else and the energy and

focus to be more productive, thus they tend to advance more quickly through the

ranks.

Just like it happened yesterday

Software engineer, Tushar Mahule, picked memory as the most significant

unfair advantage. He wrote that a great memory can contribute to professional

excellence . A lot of that comes from experience, which eventually boils down

to remembering your mistakes and learning from them.

A good memory benefits your people skills significantly, he wrote, since this

enables you to recall tiny details about other people's lives. Bring up those

topics, inquire about them and you connect instantly! He also added

self-belief to the mix: Being able to recall your achievements, big or small,

in full H-D can do wonders to one's confidence at critical junctures.

And he also added efficiency: Just imagine being able to keep a track of all

the things that you want to do without recording them externally likes on a

paper. He wrote: Eventually, having a great memory can potentially lead to a

very satisfying and happy life.

Born lucky?

On a more serious note, and well worth considering after feasting on too much

food over the festive period, author, Aman Anand pointed out that a lot of

answers will relate directly to first world advantages.

He wrote: The answer is simple access to an ample supply of food. In 2010,

there were 925m people who were hungry and malnourished. He added: Why is

this unfair? Because it is well within the capabilities of global capitalism to

bring this figure down to zero.