💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 2384.gmi captured on 2021-12-03 at 14:04:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Obese But Healthy? Gray Area Confounds Science

Is it possible to be fat and fit? Perhaps, researchers say, but losing weight

may make you even better off.

A new study, published in the September issue of the journal Diabetes Care,

finds that people who are obese but metabolically healthy (meaning they have

healthy cholesterol and blood sugar levels as well as normal blood pressure),

can still improve their health profile by dropping a few pounds.

The study contradicts an earlier finding that people who are obese and yet

healthy may actually be worse off if they lose weight. What the new study can't

do is explain why some people manage to be both obese and healthy - or whether

there's really such a thing.

"Right now, we are in a gray zone. Is it really protective to be metabolically

healthy?" said Martin Brochu, an obesity researcher at the Universite de

Sherbrooke in Quebec. "There's a huge debate in the scientific literature right

now."

Obese, but healthy

Researchers have long known that excess weight doesn't affect everyone the same

way. Obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or over, a

measure that includes height and weight but not other related measures like the

ratio of muscle mass to fat. At the population-wide level, BMIs over 30 are

associated with numerous health problems, including cardiovascular disease and

diabetes. But the measurement is less sensitive when it comes to predicting

individual health.

Starting in the 1960s, researchers noted that some obese individuals didn't

have the hallmarks of weight-related illnesses. Some had normal blood

cholesterol and normal insulin sensitivity, meaning they lacked risk factors

for heart disease and diabetes.

In the last decade, research on these metabolically healthy obese individuals

has ramped up. In 2001, Brochu and colleagues tested 43 obese, sedentary and

post-menopausal women and found that 17 of them qualified as metabolically

healthy. The key difference between the healthy and unhealthy groups? Where

they stored their fat. Those who were healthy had half the visceral fat, or

deep belly fat, of those who weren't. Other studies have shown that visceral

fat, which packs around the organs in the abdomen, is more detrimental to the

body than the subcutaneous fat found just beneath the skin.

"The fat cells in the visceral depot tend to be a lot more likely to sort of

spew out excess fat into the bloodstream," said Peter Janiszewski, an obesity

researcher and recent Ph.D. graduate from Queen's University in Toronto.

Janiszewski, who blogs about obesity research on the Public Library of Science

website, added that metabolically healthy obese individuals are usually more

active than those who are obese with poor metabolic profiles.

Dueling studies

There's no universal definition of metabolic health in obese people, but

researchers estimate that between 25 percent and 30 percent of the obese have

normal metabolic profiles. Now they're struggling to understand what that

means. Why do some people resist packing on bad belly fat? And if they're

already healthy, should they bother to lose weight?

A 2008 study published in the journal Diabetologica suggested the answer to

that second question is "no." In that study, 20 metabolically healthy obese

women and 24 metabolically at-risk women went on a six-month diet to lose

weight. Results showed the women who were metabolically healthy actually

experienced a 13 percent decrease in insulin sensitivity after losing about 6

percent of their body weight. Since decreased insulin sensitivity is a risk

factor for heart disease and type 2 diabetes, the findings suggested that

losing weight made the metabolically healthy obese women less healthy.

One study isn't cause to skip your gym appointments, however. Last month,

Janiszewski and his Ph.D. adviser published a study attempting to replicate the

2008 study's results. They included other weight-loss methods, like exercise,

and studied both men and women.

After six months, the researchers measured the participants' insulin

sensitivity. The results failed to match the findings of the previous study:

Regardless of how the metabolically healthy obese people lost weight, their

insulin sensitivity improved by 18.5 percent. Metabolically unhealthy people

improved more, perhaps because they had more to gain.

"There should be no fear, regardless of what your metabolic status is, of being

active," Janiszewski told LiveScience. "You certainly won't get any worse with

exercise and diet, and you have a likelihood of improving some metabolic risk

factors."

Antony Karelis of the University of Quebec at Montreal, the author of the 2008

study, said that the two studies were hard to compare, because the two groups

of researchers used different measurements and methods. But, he said, more

studies are needed that take metabolic health into account.

"I think we should actually promote weight loss in these individuals, but we

need to find out, what is the best way to do it?" Karelis said.

What is health?

Obesity researchers are quick to note that this academic gray area is no excuse

to pack on the pounds. Obesity is a major public health issue, responsible for

9 percent of total U.S. medical expenditures in 1998, including out-of-pocket,

insurance and Medicare/Medicaid, according to the Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention. And good metabolic indicators may not capture the full picture

of what it means to be healthy. Even the metabolically healthy obese are at

higher risk for health problems like joint pain, and obesity has been linked

with depression.

There's also no guarantee that being obese but metabolically healthy reduces

the risk of dying sooner than metabolically at-risk individuals. A study

published last year in the journal Diabetes Care found there was no difference

in the age of death between metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy

obese people over a follow-up of nine years.

Part of the reason, said Jennifer Kuk, a professor at York University in

Toronto who led the study, seems to be that obese people are more likely to die

of cancer and trauma-related causes regardless of their metabolic status.

Cancer may claim lives, because obese people are more reluctant to see their

doctors, Kuk said, and trauma injuries may be more difficult to treat in people

with greater body mass.

The bottom line: diet and exercise

Kuk's findings suggest weight loss might be beneficial no matter what your

cholesterol levels tell you. But given research showing that most people fail

to maintain weight loss (and findings that yo-yo weight loss and gain may be

psychologically and physically harmful), the best message for the metabolically

healthy subset is unclear.

"Whether we should be actively promoting weight loss knowing that over 90

percent of these individuals are going to fail is a question that I don't think

anyone can answer at this point," Kuk said.

At least some clinicians are considering increasingly sophisticated screening

procedures to separate metabolically healthy from metabolically unhealthy

patients in the doctor's office. In 2009, researchers proposed a new scale in

the International Journal of Obesity that would take into account metabolic

risk factors. Under that scale, metabolically healthy obese patients would be

counseled to maintain their weight by eating well and exercising.

Amid the debate over the benefits of weight loss, one thing is certain,

Janiszewski said: The "eat well and exercise" message is good for everyone.

"Weight isn't maybe the most important thing you should look at," he said. With

a healthy diet and exercise, "even if the scale says zero change, you're still

getting a lot healthier and reducing your risk of disease."