💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1867.gmi captured on 2021-12-05 at 23:47:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Dotcom bubble burst: 10 years on

By Jorn Madslien

Business reporter, BBC News

On 10 March 2000, the Nasdaq index of leading technology shares spiked,

bursting the Dotcom bubble.

At the time, I thought 'there's got to be a way of making money here', but of

course I was wrong'

Mark Simon, chief executive, The Chemistry Club

The decade that has passed since has brought a new realism to the internet

economy.

The Nasdaq has failed to recover and currently trades at less than half its

peak value on 10 March 2000 as investors are once again looking for real

returns and for fundamental underlying value.

But technology is playing a much greater role in most people's lives than it

did when the bubble burst, so clearly many tech firms are thriving.

Some have even grown sufficiently to join blue-chip indexes instead, so the

Nasdaq is perhaps no longer the best barometer of the health of what was once

deemed the "new economy".

What they said then

It may ease off here and there, we may find the Nasdaq being a little

overvalued at some point, but in general it's the way of the future

Analyst comment, 10 March 2000

These days, nobody uses the term.

Indeed, even on 10 March 2000 one analyst said: "A lot of people are tired of

hearing about the new economy versus the old economy".

At the time, the Nasdaq had risen 24% since the end of 1999 while the Dow Jones

index of leading industrial shares had fallen 13%.

And the analyst, who was with Prudential Securities, was convinced the Nasdaq

would smash through the 6,000-level within 12 to 18 months.

"If you're an astute observer, your portfolio will reflect what's new and

exciting and dynamic," he said at the time, insisting that "a lot of those are

the companies that are in the Nasdaq".

Another analyst, from the since collapsed Lehman Brothers, was equally eager to

justify the Nasdaq's strength.

"It may ease off here and there, we may find the Nasdaq being a little

overvalued at some point, but in general it's the way of the future," he said

on 10 March 2000.

Greed and fear

Oh, how wrong he was.

And how we all laugh as we look back at a time when the talk was more important

than the walk, and when scruffy entrepreneurs were courted by greedy venture

capitalists (VCs), their ties hidden in their pockets.

"I remember walking into a First Tuesday event at Lord's Cricket Ground, and

there were thousands of people there creating a very special energy," recalls

Mark Simon, founder of The Chemistry Club, which at the time brought together

VCs with budding entrepreneurs.

"At the time, I thought 'there's got to be a way of making money here', but of

course I was wrong'."

Poor infrastructure

But it is easy to be wise after the event.

And it is equally easy to forget that in fact there were plenty of good ideas

around at the time.

"A lot of the business plans were deeply flawed," acknowledges Mr Simon.

"But a lot of the ideas that were around at the time would have worked had

there been broadband."

A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and

location unless you state otherwise in the box below.

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/8558257.stm

Published: 2010/03/09 23:27:19 GMT