💾 Archived View for clemat.is › saccophore › library › ezines › textfiles › ezines › ANADA › anada11… captured on 2021-12-03 at 14:04:38.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.
. a n a d a 1 1 8 1 0 - 0 8 - 0 0
.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . "Jason on PETA Again"
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . by Jason
. . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PETA is a terrorist organization.
"Oh great," says the hippy in Row G, Seat 12, "I can't WAIT to hear
how this one turns out."
Ignoring the philistine, I continue.
About a week or two ago, I was making fun of radicals as I often do
when I don't feel like working. Specifically, I was talking about the
psychos who continue to push those idiotic electric cars and try to impose
their radical madness on a saner public. Then a manager of the department
comes walking by and gets involved. Apparently this broad is a fan of 60's
radicalism, who, among other things, said PETA was full of "wonderful
people". She loves radicals, she said, because the bring attention to
causes. Naturally I think of my best counterarguments after it's far too
late.
"Well, okay then," I WOULD have said, "by your definition, those
Muslim extremists who blow up civilian airliners would be justified, since
they are bringing attention cause, right? Timothy McVeigh would be
blameless, too, since he was just calling attention to his cause."
"Of course not," she'd say.
After a little more banter, we'll agree that killing people is not
the hallmark of a good or correct radical.
"Okay," I WOULD have said next, "would it be alright just to beat
somebody up if you didn't like them? Would it be OK for a bunch of
Neo-Nazis to beat up a Jew or a group of religious nuts to beat up a gay
guy, but not kill him? After all, they're just following their beliefs, and
probably think that they're doing good."
I would hope she'd say no to that. If I know PETA fans at all, we'll
be able to agree that it's wrong to physically abuse somebody just because
you don't like what they represent.
Next comes the clincher. "Would it be alright to destroy somebody's
private property?" I WOULD have asked. "Would a bunch of UAW dudes be
justified in smashing some guy's Honda, or would it be okay for a bunch of
Klansmen to burn down a black church? After all, they're only doing what
they think is right."
Ah, the trap is set. Put in those terms, of course you'd have to say
that no, it's not right to destroy private property. If she said something
like, "Well it depends," I would counter with something like "Would it be
alright to destroy YOUR property because somebody didn't like what our
company was doing?" Then she'd HAVE to say no.
"Well, THAT," I would say triumphantly, "is what PETA does!"
Ah, PETA. Made up of morons whose brains have been destroyed by the
complete lack of animal protein. They made themselves infamous by spray-
painting fur coats and breaking into biotech centers to free all of the cute
little animals. They're the ones who insist that we treat animals better
than we treat ourselves by not eating any meat or dairy, not wearing fur or
leather, and not even having PETS.
"Well, that's all fine," says the hippy in Row G, Seat 12, "but that
doesn't make them terrorists!"
Oh yes it does! What do terrorists do? They make the people they
don't like afraid to leave their houses. The PLO scared the hell out of
Israelis because no one knew when they would strike, but they knew that
every Israeli was a target. It was the same thing with the KKK and blacks,
Pro-Life fanatics and abortion doctors, Iranian Muslim hardliners and
anybody with a hint of liberalism, and with PETA and anybody who dares to
not think like they do.
Sure, PETA's weapons are spray paint and pies and not guns and bombs,
but their tactics and intentions are identical. I mean, heck, if you knew
that because of what you believed or what you did for a living that somebody
might spray paint you, throw a pie at you, or just get in your face, you'd
never want to leave the house! PETA is a group interested in FORCING its
views on the rest of us through propaganda and intimidation. It is
therefore, BY DEFINTION, a terrorist organization. They're a low-grade
terrorist organization, certainly, but they're a bunch of terrorists
nonetheless. If it ever comes up again, I'll just say, "I'm not in the
habit of supporting terrorist organizations."
The fact that they rely on celebrity aid doesn't help. Since when
are celebrities the litmus test of responsibility and common sense? Most of
those "cultural elite" would be locked up in the loony faster than you can
say "show us your tits" if they weren't famous. I'm not a Scientologist
because celebrities claim it made them great, and I sure as hell ain't gonna
join friggin' PETA just because THEY say its cool. The fact that that
stupid slut Pamela Anderson is a member REALLY cracks its credibility.
And you, the guy in Row G, Seat 12, I'll remember you.
. . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. anada 118 by Jason (c)2000 anada e'zine .
. . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .