💾 Archived View for gem.acdw.net › raw › RE%3A%20ddevault%2C%20Is%20this%20a%20good%20idea%3F captured on 2021-12-03 at 14:04:38.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I want to reply, not to the aggregator idea (I do like it), but to the last paragraph here: => gemini://drewdevault.com/2020/11/15/RE-Is-this-aggregator-idea-good.gmi RE: RE: RE: RE: .... > And an aside: I generally dislike this approach of using our gemlogs to have discussions via "RE: post title" and such-with. Isn't this better suited to the mailing list? I don't think so -- there's a bunch of RE's that aren't about gemini the protocol at all (see: 5Qs, etc). You can always check backlinks to see a "thread" here: => gemini://gus.guru/backlinks?tilde.team/~ew0k/is-this-aggregator-idea-good.gmi for Is This Aggregator Idea Good? Now, that being said, I *do* think that Shannon is (a) a great name and (b) a pretty good idea -- tho we already have CAPCOM and Spacewalk. But . Why not a third?! Eventually I'm going to set up the first two on breadpunk.club (or here?) with GUS's known URLs and known feeds lists. Might as well try a Shannon too :) Stay tuned. # PS :^) Of course, we could reimplement webmentions in gemini ... maybe call them RadioBursts, or why not EMPs?