💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006280.gmi captured on 2021-11-30 at 19:37:34. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
nervuri nervuri at disroot.org
Mon Apr 5 16:43:04 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Sat, 2021-03-27, nervuri wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, Drew DeVault wrote:
BearSSL is compelling for many reasons
I agree.
and though work is slow, it is definitely underway. We'll get there.
Ah, so you've been in contact with the developer. Good to hear.
Thanks!
I shouldn't have assumed this. So, just to check: how do you know thatwork on BearSSL "is definitely underway"?
Judging by the commit log, development has just about ground to a halt.Since 2019 there have only been bug & typo fixes and commits have beengetting rarer.
Also, BearSSL has no external audits and doesn't seem to have many eyeson it. The author claims it's beta-quality software. It also lacksed25519 support:https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/gmni-discuss/%3C20210316075714.091701CC0043%40dd49836.kasserver.com%3E
I hope it picks up again, but would avoid it in its current state. Forvery low spec systems, Mbed TLS might be a better way to go:https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls