💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 002670.gmi captured on 2020-11-07 at 03:03:59. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sean Conner sean at conman.org
Fri Sep 11 08:34:05 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It was thus said that the Great Stacy Harper once stated:
Hello,
On the other hand, I think there’s a fairly, if not fully, general
counterargument to all sorts of additions that we might want to make to
the spec:
I think if you want additions, just use WWW. Gemini focus on content and
not formating.
If gemtext was focused on content and not formatting, it wouldn't haveheaders, lists, or pre-formatted areas.
My own websites:
http://www.conman.org/ http://www.conman.org/people/spc/ http://boston.conman.org/
uses straightforward HTML (4.01 if anyone cares), and while I do use someCSS for formatting, it still has a structure that is visible if you stripaway the CSS (on Firefox, if you go "View → Page Style → No Style" it isstill readable). And you would have to really hunt about my websites tofind the Javascript (it's there, just a very little bit of it).
WWW decadence was fun, let's never do it again :)
I think I'm one of the few left that actually like hypertext quahypertext. Sad. It's a neat concept.
-spc