💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 002423.gmi captured on 2020-11-07 at 02:53:54. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

gemini+stream://

cage cage-dev at twistfold.it

Sat Aug 15 21:31:47 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 07:59:18PM +0000, James Tomasino wrote:

Hi!!

On 8/15/20 6:41 PM, cage wrote:
OK, my honest question is now is: "is the last point true?". Let me
give you an example (sorry i have to talk about my work, i hope you do
not feel this annoying).
This was the original point I missed as well when I first started
talking about streaming in Gemini. According to the specification
section 1.1, here's the transaction summary:

[...]

Notice that final "Closes connection" before "Handles response". If
that were reversed then the protocol would effectively assume
everything was a stream and everyone's clients would be built in the
manner you've been working toward. Since it's explicit that the
connection closes first in the spec it's understandable that client
authors built clients the way they have.

Thank you very much! Now i understand what i was missing andeverything is more clear!

Now i think it is better that i think a bit about all the informationin this thread.

Your technique of treating everything as a stream may "just work"
for gemini:// and gemini+stream:// both, honestly. Time will tell!

And, in the meanwhile, i have a lot of bugs to fix! :))

Bye!C.