💾 Archived View for gemini.spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › magazines › HAROLDHERALD › harold.hera… captured on 2022-06-12 at 12:11:29.

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

=====================================================================
                            ________
                           /_  __/ /_  ___
============================/ / / __ \/ _ \=========================== 
 ==========================/ / / / / /  __/==========================      
                          /_/ /_/ /_/\___
    __  __                __    __      __  __               __    __
   / / / /__ __________  / /___/ /     / / / /__  _______ _ / /___/ /
 =/ /_/ / __` / __/ __ \/ / __  /=====/ /_/ / _ \/ __/ __` / / __  /=       
=/ __  / /_/ / / / /_/ / / /_/ /=====/ __  /  __/ / / /_/ / / /_/ /===
/_/ /_/\__,_/_/  \____/_/\__,_/     /_/ /_/\___/_/  \__,_/_/\__,_/
                             
       All the News About Hal that Hal Deems Fit to Print
=====================================================================
NOV/DEC 1994      ~ Ite in Orcum Directe ~        Volume 3, Issue 7
_____________________________________________________________________

	The Best Non-cooking, Non-Gardening, Self-Published Newsletter 
		in New England  -  Some Guy at the Boston Globe
       
                   Publisher: Harold Gardner Phillips, III
                        Editor-in-Chief: Hal Phillips
			General Managing Editor: Lou Gorman                                                      
                     Deputy Managing Editor: Don Knotts
                    Virtual Editor: Dr. David M. Rose, Ph.D. 
                        Paranoia Editor: Howard Giske
                      Production Manager: Quinn Martin
                     Weapons Consultant: Kirby Dar-Dar
                    Spiritual Consultant: William Bennett
   
  
                Editorial Offices: The Harold Herald
                                   30 Deering St.
                                   Portland, ME 04101
                                 
                Satellite Office: c/o Golf Course News
                                   38 Lafayette St.
                                   P.O. Box 997
                                   Yarmouth, ME 04096
   
                              ARCHIVE SITES:

       
                    fir.cic.net (pub/Zines/Harold.Herald)
              etext.archive.umich.edu (pub/Zines/Harold.Herald)
	
               Subscription requests to drose@fas.harvard.edu

                           Submissions welcome

THIS ISSUE: Bob Dole Becomes a Moderate!
	    The Herald Seeks 1000 Points of Light!
	    Housing Subsidy Subsides in Cambridge!
	    READER SURVEY: You're a Statistic!
	    Morocco/Orland Junket!
	    And, of course, your letters...	    


                           /-/  \-\
NEWT WORLD ORDER	     
By MARK SULLIVAN

A flood of post-election commentary has been devoted to the "precision 
surgery" voters administered on Nov. 8 to the American body politic.

Democrats great and small were put to rout, like first-born sons 
targeted by a noxious Old Testament plague that stopped at every home 
with an "R" swabbed in lamb's blood on the door. Republican incumbents 
were spared, and the GOP captured both houses of Congress.

Yet voters were discerning enough, pundits observe, to reject certain 
big-spending, high-profile Republican newcomers - Iran-Contra felon 
Oliver North and vacuous, cult-connected California millionaire 
Michael Huffington - who were patently unsuited to positions of public 
trust. 

This talk is all well and good.

Perhaps Maine voters, who for the second time in a generation elected 
an Independent to the governor's office, were demonstrating their 
surgically precise-mindedness when they rejected the bid of an obscure 
third-party candidate named Plato Truman for the U.S. Senate.

Perhaps civic religion was thereby served. But think how much fun it 
would have been to have a member of the Senate named Plato Truman.

Voters in Massachusetts' 3rd Congressional District may have acted 
short-sightedly, from a cosmic perspective, when they took a scalpel 
to the candidacy of Dale E. Friedgen, owner of a Maynard auto-parts 
store and candidate of the Natural Law Party, founded on the 
principles of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. 

The bespectacled 45-year-old Friedgen, who looks rather more like a 
stamp collector or Baptist Sunday School instructor than a dealer in 
brake pads and CV joints, cited studies showing that violent crime 
decreases significantly in cities where large numbers of people 
practice transcendental meditation. He called for government funding 
into further studies of this phenomenon.

The mantra-and-levitation approach was lost on blue-collar voters in 
the 3rd District, an oddly-cobbled swath of bleak Central 
Massachusetts mill towns jokingly called the "Ivy League District" 
because it stretches from Princeton to Dartmouth. Friedgen received 
2,382 votes, to the 116,286 garnered by the victorious incumbent, 
Peter Blute, a hail-fellow Republican whose Joey Heatherton-esque 
wife, Robbi, does a mean Marjorie Claprood imitation and gives Hal's 
favorite drunken misanthropic Marlboro newspaper columnist, Ed 
Bridges, the hots.

Discriminating Bay Staters, in returning the Republican team of Gov. 
William Weld and Lt. Gov. Paul Cellucci to office with a hefty 71 
percent of the vote, rejected an arguably more colorful alternative, 
the wild-eyed, beam-weapon-loving ticket of Jeffrey Rebello and Howard 
Giske of the LaRouche Was Right Party.

The oddball, intensely paranoid cult followers of millionaire crackpot 
visionary Lyndon LaRouche are big on conspiracies, seeing the world 
abound with evil international intrigues involving Swiss bankers, 
Freemasons, the genocidal World Wildlife Fund, Prince Philip and his 
drug-smuggling wife, Queen Elizabeth. 

My favorite campaign-year LaRouchisms: The ominous 1984 headline in a 
LaRouche cult newspaper, "John Glenn visits Pittsburgh, noted hotbed 
of Freemasonry," and the 1980 charge by LaRouche, a perennial 
presidential candidate, that he was being targeted for assassination 
by a sinister cabal consisting of the Ayatollah Khomeini, The Boston 
Globe and then New Hampshire Gov. Hugh Gallen. 

Weld, who as U.S. attorney prosecuted LaRouche for financial 
chicanery, is particularly despised by cult members, who have accused 
the Massachusetts governor of inheriting a family fortune made in the 
19th century opium trade, and maintaining current drug-smuggling ties 
with the queen of England.

While the 37-year-old Giske lists a chemical engineering degree from 
Penn, the would-be lieutenant governor claims to have worked full-time 
the past 15 years as a LaRouche activist, which presumably entails 
spending one's days handing out pamphlets to unwitting travelers in 
airport terminals and baiting Trotskyites at the adjacent table in the 
BU student union. 

Giske and Rebello, for the foreseeable future, will continue in this 
line, having logged just 3,930 votes in the recent election, to the 
1.5 million for Weld and Cellucci.

Surgical precision? Conspiracy is more like it.

	Mark Sullivan's family fortune was made smuggling wide-wale 
	corduroys out of Winchester, Mass., where he still resides. A 
	freelance writer and devoted Whig, Sullivan has contracted with 
	Putnam to publish the unauthorized biography Massachusetts 
	Congressman Peter Torkildsen, due out when ex-con/congressman 
	Nicky "Pockets" Mavroulas decides to run again.



                           /-/  \-\


HAROLD NOTEBOOK
BY HAROLD GARDNER PHILLIPS III

Hey, kids! How 'bout a little political humor to lighten the mood 
following a most rancorous political season? All in good fun, of 
course. We're all friends here in America - that is, if your white and 
believe in the one, true God:


as "All Liberal Things Considered") has been shortened from 90 to 60 
minutes. Seems there just aren't enough liberal things to consider 
anymore... Budda-boom.


White House? Well, you can land a plane at the White House... Hoo-Hoo! 
I got a million of 'em.


Committee and Al D'Amato will head the Senate Banking Committee...

AAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

But seriously folks, as a member of the media, I have to call a spade 
a spade: For months, we heard Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw and all of 
mainstream punditry drone on about the strong "anti-incumbent" feeling 
among the electorate. Well, not a single incumbent Republican was 
voted out of office.

Hard to refute those Republicans who've complained for years about the 
left-leaning, liberal-sympathizing media.



I've just returned from Phoenix and Scottsdale, where many of golf's 
luminaries gathered at the tony Scottsdale Conference Resort for Golf 
Summit '94, a biennial strategic planning seminar. Pretty boring 
stuff, but I did play a fantastic golf course - The Boulders in 
Carefree, where managed to shoot an 83 while three-putting five times 
(!?!).

Anyway, the course is carved from a bizarre landscape where condos 
reminiscent of suburban Bedrock blend surprisingly well with tractor-
trailer-sized boulders that sit precariously atop one another. All 
manner of fauna skitter back and forth across the immaculate fairways. 
We saw a family of four coyotes on the 12th hole, while the rabbits 
and lizards were too numerous to count.

On that same 12th hole, I happened upon another rare species: The 
Octogenarian Wesleyan Grad.

I had just hit my second shot on the par 5 when an elderly couple 
interrupted their walk to say hello. This old dude noticed my Wesleyan 
golf bag on the cart and smiled ear to ear.

"John Andrus '33," he said.

"Hal Phillips '86," I answered, quickly adding: "Andrus of Andrus 
Field?"

"The same."

We chatted for a while, as he seemed genuinely pleased to find a 
fellow Cardinal so far from beautiful Middletown, Conn. He also left 
me with some advice.

"Don't ever go to your 60th reunion," he warned. "I just went to mine. 
There were about seven of us, and all we did was talk about who died."



I was upgraded all the way to Phoenix. So, in the plush confines of 
first class I enjoyed a knock-down-drag-out political argument with a 
middle-aged conservative female from San Francisco's East Bay. 
Basically, we didn't agree on a damn thing. But the banter was 
reasonably good natured, as I bludgeoned her with the full weight of 
my multi-faceted libertine/liberal philosophy and she retaliated with 
her "that's not government's role" mantra. 

"I don't meet too many people with your political views in first 
class," she observed after two hours of defending Clinton.

"Well," I responded, "Feinstein bought me the ticket to prove you 
wasted your vote on Huffington."



                           /-/  \-\


PAY UP
By HAL PHILLIPS

PORTLAND, Maine - In keeping with the rising tide of conservatism, the 
management team here at the Harold Herald has come to a troubling but 
nevertheless monumental decision. In stark contrast to the millions of 
deadbeat orphans and welfare mothers who selfishly drain the country's 
coffers of your tax money, the Harold has chosen to refuse all 
government assistance and appeal directly to the charitable conscience 
of its readership.

We're serious. Give us some money.

The Herald has been published for the better part of three years with 
the shaky financial backing of Editor/Publisher/All-Being Hal Phillips 
(that's me) and a handful of readers who've sent me stamps. Don't get 
me wrong. Nothing in life, save a cheese steak and fries from 
Genovese's, has given me more pleasure than sharing the riveting 
details of my life with you, my loyal, fawning readership. But the 
Herald's growing circulation costs are breaking me. 

This is one of those classic "good news, bad news" situations: While 
it's gratifying to see the circulation list expand, the larger it 
becomes, the more it costs me.

Internet subscribers aside, the Herald readership has tripled this 
year. More than 110 folks now receive it via the U.S. Postal Service, 
which I refuse mock. [In terms of public opinion, the Post Office gets 
a raw deal. If you discount its slow, discourteous service and the 
rather aggressive behavior of certain employees in fast food joints, 
the Post Office does a creditable job. I mean, you can't buy a 
freakin' Hershey bar for 29 cents in this day and age.]

Anyway, do the math. It costs me a bundle to send this finely crafted 
newsletter to every damn one of you. But don't think of me. Think of 
the lovely Sharon Vandermay, who is showered with gifts and finery on 
a scale inversely proportionate to the Herald circulation list.

The central question is, "What's the Herald worth to you?" 

Consider your narrow, hopeless life; then consider it without the 
Harold Herald, your monthly ray of clever, free-thinking sunshine. Can 
you afford to let your pathetic existence become any more dreary, any 
more... common?

While there will be no mandatory subscription price, any contribution 
of $3 or more will earn you a lifetime subscription to the Harold 
Herald. 

As God is my witness and the Democrats keep control of the House, I 
assure you the Herald will never force readers to pay for each 
scintillating issue. However, any contribution to the Herald's newly 
formed Circulation Endowment - be it money or stamps - will be 
graciously accepted... well, the Herald staff isn't big on grace. In 
any case, you can rest assured we'll take the money and run.



                           /-/  \-\

SURVEY SAYS!
By DAVID ROSE, PhD

BOSTON - As our loyal readers will recall, the Harold Herald began 
world-wide distribution via the Internet in spring of this year. Since 
then, 40-odd souls on four continents have requested electronic 
subscriptions; hundreds less committed folks have casually browsed 
through the Herald at various archive sites; and many millions of 
people have ignored us entirely. 

The birth of the electronic Harold Gardner Phillips III, or e-Hal as I 
like to call him, marked a turning point in the publication's 
evolution. Our audience, once comprised entirely of friends, family 
and unwitting Boston Globe columnists, expanded to include... well, we 
knew not what. 

Who were these people? What were their interests? What did they look 
for in an electronic, quasi-monthly monument to self-absorption?

Hell-bent on finding out, we planned a reader survey, a list of 
questions so painstakingly crafted that it would both entertain our 
readers and lay bare their deepest and most embarrassing thoughts, 
fears and aspirations. Unfortunately, our work on the survey consisted 
almost entirely of drinking beer, smoking cigarettes and repeatedly 
chanting the mantra, "Boy, we should really work on that survey."

Well, we may yet write a survey that will shake our readership to its 
very foundations, a survey that will force them to question their most 
strongly held precepts. But to fill the gap in the meantime, I sent 
out a mini-survey to our electronic subscribers to get some hint of 
with whom we are dealing. The answers were most revealing:

Some numbers: Interestingly, 66 percent of Herald readers don't 
respond to even the most witty reader surveys - meaning that only 12 
people wrote back. The math is quite complex, so I'll just ask you to 
accept my assertion that this gives our survey a .000023 percent 
margin of error. In other words, it's pretty fucking accurate.

Geography: The whole point of going electronic was to go global, so 
it wasn't surprising that responses flew in from far-flung locales 
with exotic names like Swansea, Jacksonville and Minnetonka. What was 
unexpected was the preponderance of responses from that green and 
pleasant land, Great Britain; a full 41 percent of respondents are 
citizens of that once-great nation. There are several explanations for 
this result. First, we've stacked the deck by employing three British 
contributors, one of whom is named Trevor - you don't get much more 
British than that! Second, relieved of such tiresome burdens as 
learning to cook or playing a meaningful role in world affairs, Brits 
may simply have more time on their hands than citizens of other 
nations. Finally, having been schooled in the finer points of 
etiquette such as throwing their cloaks over mud puddles, they may 
simply be too polite to ignore correspondence of any kind.

Occupation: It's difficult to discern any pattern in the occupations 
of respondents. Such wide-ranging trades as computer technician, 
computer officer, computer programmer, software designer, software 
engineer, quantitative systems analyst, and programmer were 
represented. Other disparate job titles included student, law student, 
high school student, student and high school teacher. With such varied 
demographics, it won't be long before we're selling our mailing lists 
to advertising agencies for big bucks.

Music: Hal's single contribution to the survey was probably the most 
interesting question of all*: "What was the first album you purchased 
with your own money?" What could be more revealing? Unfortunately, no 
clear picture of our readership emerges from the responses, which 
ranged from the cool ("Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars," 
Dylan's "Highway 61 Revisited") to the embarrassing (Poison, Tom 
Jones) to the cryptic: Kylie Minogue's "Kiley," and "I'm alone with 
clubhouse" (?!?). Interestingly, exactly 50 percent of our respondents 
expressed remorse over their selections; 25 percent made wise choices, 
while the remaining quarter expressed no remorse but should be very, 
very ashamed. 

The Herald Itself: I couldn't resist asking (somewhat snivelingly) 
for our readers' assessment of the Herald itself. A full 33 percent 
had not received the Herald yet; had received it but not read it; or 
could not remember. Another 25 percent responded positively, if 
vaguely. The remaining readers break down as follows (8.3 percent 
each): Offered us dinner if we are ever in London; noted that the 
publication is free; remarked that the Herald is "bombastic and 
infrequent"; found it "different"; and "Corn Flakes," which I 
interpret as a somewhat obscure Young Ones reference.

Hazel: Perhaps the most shocking result of the survey was that 83 
percent of respondents had never heard of the television show, Hazel. 
One is tempted to attribute this anomaly to the high percentage of 
Europeans surveyed, but when you break it down the incidence of Hazel-
literacy is just 17 percent in the U.S. and abroad. Shocking.

We look forward to querying a better-informed readership in the mega-
survey to follow.







                           /-/  \-\

Hal, Ink.
(A regular feature chronicling the media frenzy surrounding our 
Editor. - V.Ed.)


Slow period on the publicity front, but my ever-growing cult of 
personality did receive a pair of influential shots in the arm:


an anti-golf piece on page 3, "FORE! Golf in Asia Hits Environmental 
Rough." After trashing the Asia-Pacific golf industry for 15 
paragraphs, reporter Philip Shenon saw fit to "balance" the story with 
a quote from yours truly:

"Because golf is seen as a rich man's sport, it's an easy target for 
environmentalists," said Hal Phillips, editor of Golf Course News 
Asia-Pacific, an industry journal. "At least with golf, it's open 
space that's being developed. Would you rather have a golf course or a 
strip mall? A golf club or a 400-room hotel? If you want to compare 
the environmental impact, it's really no contest."

My interview with Shenon, the Times' Bangkok bureau chief, lasted some 
45 minutes and he complimented GCN Asia-Pacific on its lack of 
industry sycophancy. Nevertheless, I could tell he was preparing to 
write what we in the trade call "a hatchet job," which he delivered.

"You won't like the story," he called to tell me, before the story was 
published. "But you come out sounding pretty good."

Hey, I wouldn't have it any other way.

The reaction here was somewhat mixed. My mom, a Times devotee, was 
well pleased. Poor Tim Dibble woke up Saturday morning in San 
Francisco and nearly wretched. "I can live with your inherent 
arrogance," Dibble explained to my answering machine. "But getting up 
on a Saturday morning and reading you quoted in the Times - that's 
more than I can take."

Full-time anti-golf zealot and sometimes Boston Globe columnist Alex 
Beam read the piece and called asking for names of stupid, 
inarticulate golf industry pundits he could quote for his forthcoming 
anti-golf piece in Forbes FYI. This guy's got a lot of nerve. First, 
he steals the story idea from the Times and Wall Street Journal. Then 
he pitches it to an unsuspecting editor at Forbes, where they've 
probably no idea how many times they've already been beaten on the 
story. Then Beam wants me to do the legwork for him.

That's it! He's off the masthead!



From the highest highs...

A story and accompanying column I published in Golf Course News (Aug. 
'94) was reprinted by the Biwabik Times, a weekly newspaper serving 
the Iron Range Region of Northern Minnesota, near Duluth. 

The story details the bureaucratic hoops a golf course architect named 
Jeffrey Brauer has jumped through to gain approval for an 18-hole 
project called Giants Ridge. Basically, Brauer's project is caught in 
a cat fight between two agencies - one state, one county - both of 
which feel they have environmental jurisdiction. 

The column was a fairly inspired bit of government bashing: "It's easy 
to get discouraged when a conscientious, quality project like Giants 
Ridge can by stymied by a bunch of hypersensitive DNR engineers who - 
had their turf not been infringed upon by county counterparts - might 
instead be fumbling around their St. Paul offices, admiring each 
other's pocket protectors and obsessing over the office shortage of 
four-color pens."

The good folks of Biwabik reprinted everything word for word, even the 
headline, one of my personal favorites: "Red tape in Minnesota... 
Weenies on parade."  



When I toiled for the Town Crier, Hudson Sun and Marlboro Enterprise, 
we entered piddling little newspaper contests sponsored by the New 
England Press Association (NEPA), the trade group for piddling little 
newspapers like ours. The big boys (i.e. the Globe, Herald and 
Courant) belonged to the New England Newspaper Association, or NENA.

So it gave me great pleasure to draw a mention in NENA's September 
Bulletin under the headline, "All about himself." Much of story - 
actually, it was more of a blurb - was reprinted from the Portland 
Press Herald feature that ran in August. However, the NENA folks did 
write the Herald is "funny, irreverent, cutting and opinionated."

I would never have known about the NENA mention had seven association 
members not subsequently asked for Herald subscriptions. 

What price fame? Well, it's $2.03 per month in stamps. 



                           /-/  \-\

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Dear Harold,

Alex Beam selected Owens as the premier self-published newsletter in 
New England, giving the Harold Herald second place, for valid reasons:


that you or any member of your generation in your wildest dreams could 
be as self-absorbed as I am, or anyone else born in the golden years 
after World War II? You lack a complete focus on your own navel. You 
betray yourself by writing about other people as if they mattered.

I and fellow Boomer Alex Beam, well, it's an extremely uninteresting 
day when we even notice that you exist. To think that you have 
something to say is preposterous, unless you were writing about us. 
But, of course, I can't explain this - you weren't there.


for losers. A simple "yes" will do if you know the truth. 
Consequently, it's Owens because I don't need to say it twice. Owens 
is Zen. Harold Herald is mumbling. 

Suppose you asked Bridget to sleep with you. If she answered, "Yes," 
would you ask her a second time, or would you start removing your 
shirt and head for the bedroom?

"Yes" always means yes, and "no" can mean anything... but now I'm 
talking about women.

Good luck and don't quit.

Fred Owens

Newton, Mass.



Ed. Self-parody is always the most cutting, so I defer to Fred on this 
count and thank him for doing my bidding. As for Bridget, I find it 
heartening that a man of Fred's advanced age still exhibits such a 
healthy sexual interest, at least in print. The implication that he 
prefers a partner (at least metaphorically) tells me that self-
absorption has its limits, even for Baby Boomers.o

                           /-/  \-\

The following appeared on the Reader Bulletin Board in The Highly 
Esteemed Howl (vol. 4, no. 5), a Portland, Maine-based newsletter 
published by a remarkably articulate but nevertheless thoroughly 
adolescent group of, well, adolescents:

The Howl is proud to announce... Immortalization in someone else's 
publication!

The Harold Herald calls it, "Interesting;" and it has "Literary pluck 
and plain ol' enterprising spirit;" and "The Howl is well ahead of us" 
(taking things out of context is fun).

Thanks Hal, except for the part where you called us "little fucks." 
It's a good thing I don't have PMS right now. I might have to crank up 
my raging "Boomer Envy," listen to "Helter Skelter" a couple times, 
head over to the building where my parents lived when they were first 
married, and kill you (tee-hee).

Elise Adams

Portland, Maine

Ed. I took liberty with the attribution here. The above entry was 
unsigned. However, because of the PMS reference, it's almost certainly 
the work of Elise, the Howl's distaff co-founder. Two questions: Did 
your parents really live in Thomas Brackett Reed House? If so, were 
you conceived there? 

                           /-/  \-\

THROW THE BUMS OUT	
By JOHN LAMONTAGNE

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. - As too many commentators and reporters have pointed 
out on too many occasions, Election Day 1994 signaled an end to the 
policies of the 1960s.

Mario Cuomo, the eloquent spokesman for old-fashioned liberalism and 
progressive government, tossed out of office by an unknown. Anne 
Richards, Texas' popular governor, sent packing by a man whose sole 
qualification for office is the fact that he is son of a former 
president and owns a notoriously bad baseball team. Hundreds of 
Democrats thrown our of Washington and (gasp!) Newt Gingrich to be 
installed as Speaker of the House.

But more telling, still, is the death of rent control in 
Massachusetts.

For most, Election Day '94 was either a terrible end to Democratic 
control of Congress or a glorious conservative victory.

For me, it means I look for a new home.

The last vestige of left-wing, 1960s housing policy in Massachusetts - 
rent control - died a narrow death here on Nov. 8. Now I'm homeless, 
as of Jan. 1, 1995.

Yes, I'm a rent control tenant and not ashamed to say it. I've got a 
nice little one-bedroom apartment just outside Harvard Square, here in 
the home of counter-culture elitism. I pay a relatively paltry $545 a 
month rent, heat included.

Sure, it has a few drawbacks. It's admittedly not huge; the traffic on 
Massachusetts Avenue is a little loud; and parking is pretty 
impossible to find. But heck, for $545 a month, I can deal with it.

As of January, however, it's history. Now my landlord can charge 
whatever he wants, and that will run somewhere in the range of $800 a 
month. 

Gulp.

By casting their votes for the evil landlords who control our lives 
and checking accounts, the voters of Massachusetts effectively tossed 
thousands of elder Americans from their homes and evicted scads of 
young, immigrant families. 

Worse yet, I may have to live with my parents for a few months. 

You bastards!

So, now I scan the Want Ads and hope the whole process is held up in 
the courts. The mayor of Cambridge (who, by the way, has a $400-a-
month, two-bedroom rent-control apartment) swears he'll fight to pass 
a Home Rule Petition, which would effectively keep the 1960s system 
alive and well in the People's Republic.

But chances are slim the petition would give young people with jobs 
and a decent income (i.e., me) much of a break. Instead, the elderly 
and low-income families will get them - truly an outrage, if you asked 
me. 

Sadly, Cambridge will be flooded with even more yuppies and the multi-
cultural flavor of this unique city will be squelched. But in today's 
age of liberal-bashing, an old and somewhat unsuccessful policy like 
rent control was doomed.

Anyone need a roommate?

John Lamontagne, a.k.a Paul Lefreniere, is yet another Marlboro 
Enterprise refugee who's discovered life outside daily journalism. He 
now works for Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger, one of 
the few liberal Democrats to survive the purge of Nov. 8. So while 
Lamontagne is a lame duck renter, his job is safe.



                           /-/  \-\

PEJORATIVE CORNER 
BY HAL PHILLIPS

THIS ISSUES TARGETS: MOROCCO AND ORLANDO


Morocco is a bad place to be a sheep. 

First and foremost, you're liable to be eaten at any time. During my 
week-long visit to North Africa's sole remaining monarchy in early 
November, I was served lamb on at least 12 occasions. I love lamb, but 
these people need to diversify their eating habits. Because sandals 
are popular in this desert climate, it's apparent that nearly two-
thirds of male Moroccans have developed cloven hoofs.

Further, I wouldn't want to be a sheep in Morocco because you'd never 
be sure when some horny Bedouin would lure you away from the herd for 
a cross-genus quickie. Having picked up on several sly references from 
natives, I gathered this peculiar form of inter-office romance is all 
too common in Morocco, a Muslim nation where women don't sleep around 
and men are forced to find alternative, oftentimes woolly outlets. 
Come to think of it, this may explain the cloven hoofs.

Other observations:


over into popular culture, and Morocco is no exception. Night after 
night, various lounge singers at the Hyatt Rabat paid homage to a 
series of 1970s relics, Eric "I can't live" Carmen foremost among 
them. When feeling particularly hip, they might throw in some 
Christopher Cross. The situation was no better at an otherwise hoppin' 
party thrown for and by the young, idle rich of Morocco. A quick 
survey of the CD collection showed an unhealthy preponderance of 
French disco, not to mention (gasp!) Barry Manilow and more Eric 
Carmen.


everything, including cab fare. Further, nothing is complementary, 
especially if you happen to be American. If you want to take a picture 
of a snake charmer, for example, it'll cost you 10 dhiram (8.5 to the 
dollar). Young men are always eager to guide you around the shopping 
area - called the medina - in exchange for 10 or 20 dhiram. They're 
very persistent, dragging you to one tannery after another. When you 
can't get rid of them, you can be sure it's gonna cost you a bundle. 



Always a pleasure to visit Orlando, the only city in America where 
surly behavior can land you in the slammer on misdemeanor charges. The 
sickly sweet, vacuously pleasant ideology of Disney World has 
permeated Greater Orlando. Oh, to have the lithium concession in this 
town! Every restaurant is filled with families of four, shamelessly 
decked out in Mickey Mouse garb, smiling relentlessly. We had dinner 
one night in a place called the Crab House, a seafood place complete 
with substantial salad and raw bars. My meal was good, but the 
atmosphere was marred considerably by legions of kiddies high on 
Disney smarm, rhythmically banging their crab mallets on the tables. 
Fuck the raw bar - this place could have used a Ritilin bar.


copyright 1994 the harold herald all rights reserved for what it's 
worth