💾 Archived View for gemini.spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › politics › SPUNK › sp001131.txt captured on 2022-03-01 at 16:48:17.
View Raw
More Information
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- *****************************************************
** Who are the Travellers? **
ARE TRAVELLERS a distinct "ethnic" group with their own
traditions and customs? Very few people want to accept that
they are. This reflects the widespread racism towards them,
a racism which insists on seeing them as "failed settled
people". They are seen as "problems" rather than a people
who have been denied even the most basic rights.
Irish Travellers are a very small minority group,
constituting less than 1% of the population. Their numbers
currently stand at approximately 23,000 people in the 26
counties and another 1,500 in the North. There are also an
estimated 15,000 Irish Travellers in Britain and 7,000 in
the U.S.A.
The criteria internationally accepted as defining
ethnicity are:
- A long shared history of which the group is aware.
- A cultural tradition of its own, including family and
social customs.
- Descent from common ancestors.
- A common language.
- A common religion.
- Being a minority within a larger community.
Irish Travellers meet all these criteria.
Travellers are often segregated into separate classes
in school. They are banned from almost every pub in the
country. They are routinely refused service in shops,
cafes, cinemas, laundrettes and clubs. Social contact with
settled people is minimal because Travellers have been
denied such contact.
The effects of this racism are not hard to find. Most
Travellers lack self-esteem. Pride in their cultural
identity is a very new experience and confined to the
minority who have had some adult education. For others,
self-destructive and even anti-social behaviour arises out
of this total experience of racism. Less than 14% of
Travellers currently make it into post-primary education and
80% of the adults are illiterate.
Within the EU, Travellers and Gypsies currently form a
population of over one million people. Another million live
in Eastern Europe. These have faced, and still face,
vicious persecution and racism which reached its peak this
century with the murder of over a quarter of a million
Gypsies and Travellers by the Nazis. Today in Eastern
Europe they are experiencing brutal racist attacks.
Over the past decade we have seen the emergence of a
small number of articulate, politically active Travellers.
Until fairly recently, Travellers and their supporters were
essentially fighting for little more than an end to the very
worst forms of discrimination.
However the situation is now very different with
Traveller groups throughout the country asserting their
right to be treated with respect as an ethnic and cultural
minority with their own beliefs, customs and values. By
adopting this strategy, Travellers are finally aligning
themselves with the struggles of nomadic and Indigenous
peoples everywhere. It is this new and very unacceptable
demand for respect as a cultural and ethnic minority that
has fuelled the latest outburst of racism against them.
In recent years, these concepts have gained acceptance
from a growing number of people. Racist descriptions and
abuse on TV and in the newspapers have been challenged, with
the result that Travellers? rights - as a separate minority
group - have begun to gain acceptance in wider circles.
Once it was no longer acceptable to define them either as
objects of charity or as failed settled people in need of
social work and rehabilitation, the alternative was to
accept them as different with all the rights and appropriate
services they require to live decently in accordance with
their cultural values. Such an idea really annoyed the
bigots.
Ironically, settled society has always considered
Travellers to be different. Now that Travellers are
asserting their right to be different but not inferior, they
have provoked outrage. Travellers' struggles for civil
rights should be seen in the context of all the major social
and political movements of the past fifty years and not as
something separate or peculiar to Ireland or Irish
Travellers. Their struggles bear remarkable resemblence to
those of Native Americans and Indigenous peoples throughout
the world.
Anarchists have no great interest in who belongs to
which ethnic group, except in so far as each tradition adds
to a rich cultural diversity. But we do understand that
there will be no real equality until racism is uprooted, and
all people are accorded the dignity they deserve. Equality
is certainly not about trying to make people deny their own
history and heritage.
Patricia McCarthy
- ********* Anti-Traveller racism ************
from Workers Solidarity No 39
ANTI-RACIST work is a major concern of the
left in Europe at the moment. Given the
rise of racist attacks in Germany and
France especially, this is important work.
However very few groups or individuals on
the left in Ireland understand that the
situation of Travellers is the most
explicit form of racism in this country.
Because Travellers are white, people have
difficulty applying the concept of racism
to them. However it takes no more than a
quick perusal of recent press clippings to
gather abundant evidence of the racism
faced by Travellers. A few examples are
as follows:
"A round the clock picket by protesting
residents continued today to prevent a temporary
site being set up for Travellers in Limerick".
Evening Herald.
"The residents of an estate outside Arklow who
are now to undertake a rent strike over the
council decision to house the family of
Travellers......" Wicklow People.
"Residents of a housing estate in Rathfarnham
will this morning place a picket on the entrance
to land which is to be developed by Dublin
Corporation as a halting site for 20 itinerant
families'. Irish Press.
"A horrific attack involving the spraying of
foul smelling cattle slurry against caravans of
Traveller families has been criticised by a
priest... a Garda spokesman at Tullow described
it as a minor incident." Irish Independent.
The publican who barred 'Glenroe' actor Michael
Collins from his pub confirmed last night he did
so because he was a Traveller" Irish
Independent.
Recently in Clondalkin two Traveller families
have been intimidated out of their houses by
mobs. Traveller camps have been petrol bombed,
families have been physically attacked by
farmers in Galway, all in the very recent past.
Travellers are subjected to the most extreme
forms of social exclusion and segregation which
can only be described as apartheid.
They are refused service in pubs, cafes, many
shops, launderettes, hairdressers, discos,
hotels, cinemas and even some doctors refuse to
serve them. At an institutional level they are
forced to sign on at different times to the rest
of the population and in Dublin all Travellers
who claim Supplementary Welfare have to do so in
one separate health centre, Castle Street,
whether they live in Bray or Balbriggan.
Officially this is done to provide them with a
service that respects their nomadic culture. In
reality nothing could be further from the truth,
which is that it is done in order to
discriminate against them more efficiently. At
school many Traveller children are taught in
totally segregated classes which cater for
Traveller children of all ages in the one class.
Some notorious schools have gone so far as to
paint a white line down the middle of the
playground and Traveller children are not
allowed to cross over it.
Racism is a particular form of domination,
exploitation and exclusion. Racism against
Travellers and Gypsies is rooted in an ideology
of sedentarist superiority. This is the belief
that the settled person's way of life is the
modern norm and that nomadism is a throwback to
less civilised times.
Nomadic people also pose a threat to the values
of property ownership and the accumulation of
possessions. Racism involves power domination
by one group over the other. Because Travellers
are such a small minority of the population
(0.5% approx) they are totally at the mercy of
the settled population. The effects of this
racism and exclusion can be graphically seen in
the health statistics of the Traveller
population.
Traveller infants have three times the infant
mortality rate of the settled population.
Traveller women have a life expectancy that is
fifteen years less than their settled
counterparts and Traveller mens' life expectancy
is ten years less than settled mens'. They
don't fare any better educationally. In 1993
only a handful of Traveller children, about 50
nationwide, have made it into second level
education and there are still only three
Travellers nationwide who have completed a third
level course.
About 80% of the adult population are illiterate
and still only about 70% of the primary school
age children get to school. Schools still
refuse to take them as a school in D?n Laoghaire
did in March. These are the statistics of
racism... a group of the population whose health
and educational standards are at least 50 years
behind that of the rest of the population. But
the best is yet to come as the official response
to these kinds of statistics is to blame this
scandalous situation on Travellers themselves
and on their preferred nomadic lifestyle.
A recent official report from Dublin County
Council is a very good example of racist
thinking. In this report which went to all the
councillors in January, Travellers' lifestyle is
blamed for all the major social problems in the
county, including unemployment! The report
concludes that it is time to break the cycle of
Travellers' culture by discouraging them from
marrying each other and forcing them to adopt a
more responsible (i.e. settled) lifestyle by not
building halting sites. Given that there are
3,000 families already on the housing waiting
lists in Dublin alone it is not clear how
exactly this policy is going to improve anyones'
situation.
Even within liberal and left wing circles there
is a belief that there is nothing wrong with
promoting the idea of quotas when it comes to
Travellers. The idea that only ten families
should be accommodated in an area has been
promoted by everyone from the Labour party to
the 'Militant'. Of course this is an inherently
racist position to adopt. It would not be
acceptable to suggest that only ten black
families should be housed in any one community
and it is no more acceptable to suggest this for
Travellers. Likewise the idea of separate
segregated and inevitably inferior services must
be opposed.
Racism against Gypsies and Travellers goes back
to the time they started migrating from India
around the 11th century. It reached its height
with the extermination of a quarter of a million
Gypsies and Travellers by the Nazis. In Ireland
the racism against Travellers is so deep and so
all pervasive that few people even recognise it
for what it is. In the fight against this
racism Travellers themselves and their
organisations need to be centrally involved.
They must set the agenda, deciding on what
issues and how they want to fight. They need
the active support of the left, and especially
of the trade union movement because they have
very little muscle on their own. There have
been attempts over the past thirty years at
Traveller self-organisation but these
organisations were quickly smashed by the state.
In 1963 the Gardai planted explosives on Gratton
Puxon, the organiser of the Irish Traveller
Community which was becoming a force to be
reckoned with. Nearly twenty years later they
planted stolen jewellery on Nan Joyce, a leading
member of the Traveller-only organisation
Minceir Miscli. Nan ran against a racist
candidate in Tallaght in the General Election of
1982 and got twice the number of votes as he
did. Currently the Irish Traveller movement is
organising around the country. It remains to
be seen if it will become a fighting body or
confine itself to lobbying. For left wing
activists concerned about racism there is plenty
of it to fight in relation to Travellers.
- *********************************************************
** Moate mimics Mississippi **
** Stand up for Travellers Rights **
WS 47
THE PROTESTS against the housing of a Traveller
family in Farnagh near Moate were racist. The
organisers deny this but then go on to say that
their main objection is that they "were not
consulted" by the Council about rehousing the family
of Alice and Joe Joyce. Do these same people expect
to be "consulted" everytime a settled family is
given a house? Of course not.
One of the ringleaders, local priest Fr Liam Farrell,
even claimed that the protesters were concerned for the
family, worried about their transition from an urban to a
rural area! More honest was the one who told journalists
that he did not want "inferior people" in his town.
This gang of racists held their meetings in St
Patrick?s Hall (which is under the control of Fr Liam
Farrell, who also represented the racists at meetings with
Westmeath County Manager Jack Taaffe), and in a room
attached to the Auld Shebeen pub. Knowing full well they
were doing nothing to be proud of, they organised everything
anonymously.
At their meetings they threatened to withdraw children
from the two national schools if any of the Joyce children
were admitted. Similar threats worked at nearby Clonbunny
recently when locals heard that Traveller children were to
be admitted.
The mob blocked the main Dublin-Galway road for two
hours but, despite this being illegal, there was no garda
action. And given the way the ruling class treats
Travellers that was no surprise.
Antagonism towards the Joyces was whipped up with
claims that "Travellers contribute nothing to society" and
"wherever there are Travellers there is trouble". Exactly
the same kind of hatemongering that was used against blacks
in the American deep south thirty years ago.
Scapegoats are great for diverting attention away from
problems like unemployment, low wages and poor housing.
When you look closely you will usually find wealthy vested
interests behind racist agitation.
Who was behind all the trouble in Moate? Who was on
the secret committee? Alongside the priest were stud farm
owner Michael Scott, shopkeeper Mary Flynn, Fine Gael
councillor Tom Flanagan, restaurant boss John Joe Claffey,
supermarket owner Seamus Dolan and farmer Mick Kelly. In
other words the type of people who live the good life at the
expense of both Travellers and working class people.
Even middle class liberals get sucked into seeing
Travellers, rather than the discrimination they face, as the
"problem". Nell McCafferty writing in the Sunday Tribune on
June 11th said "there has been, equally, no official
acknowledgement from government about the way a national
social problem has been landed in dark of night - without
warning or attempt to prepare opinion - upon the people of
Moate".
Would she have come out with the same crap if it was
another group of people who were being picked on by the
bigots, if it was Bosnian refugees, or Pakistanis or Jews?
Of course not.
We can protest against racism in other countries (and
we should protest against it) but we also need to confront
it at home. It is not enough to decry the electoral success
of the fascist National Front in France or the murderous
anti-black attacks of the British National Party if we stand
aside and ignore the problem on our own doorsteps.
Anti-racists have to take a stand in their own
communities when the racists and their politician pals try
to stir things up. In Ireland's wealthiest constituency it
is ?liberal? Progressive Democrat TD Liz O?Donnell who is
stirring up opposition to the temporary halting site in
Sandyford. In Navan it is Democratic Left?s Christy Gorman
who objected to the extension of the only official halting
site in County Meath, and labelled Travellers "brutal,
savage and threatening".
It is well past the time when these bullies in suits
were told where to get off. In opposition to their bigotry
we have to publicly support Travellers rights to appropriate
housing and services, we have to recognise that they have a
cultural tradition that is as valid as any other.
We start by taking a stand every time we witness
discrimination. If a shop, cinema, disco or pub refuses to
serve somebody because they are a Traveller we make sure the
management knows they won?t get our custom and we walk out.
Inside the MANDATE and SIPTU trade unions we should fight to
commit our unions to defending any worker who refuses to
operate blanket bans on any group of customers because of
their race or ethnicity. In the local authority trade
unions we should work to get the same protection for workers
who refuse to be involved in evictions.
Three decades of polite appeals to ?liberal?
politicians have changed little for Travellers. It is up to
anti-racists, trade unionists and other ordinary working
class people to join with Travellers and deal a crushing
blow to the politics of discrimination. As Jim Larkin was
fond of saying, "an injury to one is the concern of all".