💾 Archived View for gemini.spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › politics › SPUNK › sp001114.txt captured on 2022-03-01 at 16:47:39.
View Raw
More Information
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- ********** Columbus: whats behind the fuss? **********
from Workers Solidarity No 35
[1992]
THIS YEAR sees the celebrations of the
'discovery' of America in 1492 by Columbus.
The celebrations have generated some
debate about the rights and wrongs of the
events which followed the discovery. In
Spain itself, Seville has seen riots as
marches protesting at the celebration have
been broken up by the police.
America was not discovered, it was already populated
by many nations of people. Some of them were
composed of primitive communistic societies of hunter-
gathers. It was these peoples that the European
merchants first found and exploited to extermination.
In Mexico and Peru two military empires were in
existence, the Azetcs and the Inca's
A TIME AND A PLACE
America was 'discovered' at a time when Europe was
entering a period of rapid change. The merchants
were gaining more power and coming into conflict
with their feudal rulers. It would take 200 years for
the merchants to settle the conflict in the French
revolution of 1788 but the seeds were growing. Part
of this expansion of early capitalism was based on the
search for the source of the spices and metals that
international trade was based upon. The direct trade
roots having been cut by the Turkish empire. The
"discovery's" of this period were driven by this
historical process.
When Columbus reached the Caribbean in 1492 he
had little interest in the new plants and animals of
this land. Instead he was confident that the Spanish
crown could make the Arawaks and Caribs collect and
give "what was needed". He established a system by
which the Arawaks were required to produce a certain
quantity of gold every three months or have their
hands cut off. The survivors of this period were
worked to death on the sugar plantations.
The empires on the American mainland also fell before
the Spanish expansion. The Aztecs at the time ruled
over central Mexico but their empire was
overstreched and full of internal divisions. The
ruling class was divided along religious lines but in an
echo of the process occurring in Europe these was
also conflict between the Empire and the merchant
class. The Inca's ruled the length of the Andes, some
5000 kms but they too were internally divided. By
allying with the enemies of these two empires and
making use of these internal divisions the Spanish
were able to overthrow and enslave both nations with
comparatively few men.
Both these empires were class societies whose
development was halted by their destruction at the
hands of the Spanish. The suffered a similar fate to
the primitive communist societies of the Caribbean.
Within a single generation 80% of the Aztec
population had been worked to death in the mines or
on the land. They had died of torture and because of
the destruction of the infrastructure that had
supported them.
Throughout this period the Catholic church was
involved with the carnage, Colombus himself was
deeply religious and the slogan of the conquistadors
was "God, gold and glory". Forced conversions were a
policy of the time, commonly as a preliminary to
execution. One of the few to publicly argue against
the brutal treatment of the Americans was a priest
however he was rapidly shut up by the Vatican. The
church produced an ideology of conquest designed to
provide moral right to the brutal oppression of the
native people.
SPANISH GOLD
The wealth that was generated by the Spanish
conquests was enormous. This wealth and the trade
it generated within Europe was the backbone around
which capitalism was built. As the native populations
of the Americas were wiped out merchants made more
profits by kidnapping Africans and selling them to the
sugar plantations and mines of America as slaves.
This along with the earlier barbarities required
capitalism to develop a racist ideology as a
justification for its brutality.
The Colombus debate is important because it exposes
the brutal basis on which capitalism was built. There
is however another argument that sees the pre-
Colombus societies as perfect societies which would
have remained so were it not for European
interference. Could these societies have developed
without going through all the horrors imposed on
them by the European bosses?
History can not be re-played but we do know that
these societies were already going through a process
of change. Both the Azetcs and Inca's were military
empires based on conquest of other peoples. The
Aztecs also carried out ceremonial murders on a mass
scale, in 1486 for instance 20,000 captives had their
hearts cut out during a temple dedication. They were
societies with class and caste divisions. Those peoples
who still lived in primitive communist societies did so
because these societies were not capable of
generating any surplus for a minority to take.
The 500th anniversary serves as a remainder of how
barbaric capitalism as an economic system is. It is not
Colombus who should be celebrated but rather those
millions of native Americans on whose lives modern
society was built. There is no finer monument that
can be raised to them then the creation of a society
based on satisfying need, not greed.
Joe Black