💾 Archived View for tanelorn.city › ~vidak › old-blog › hegel-wikipedia-article.gemini captured on 2020-10-31 at 01:47:28. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
---
generator: pandoc
title: Current Hegel Wikipedia Article
viewport: 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes'
---
2020-06-18T14:35:00+08:00
I just read the current wikipedia article on Hegel.
I think it has recently swung, or been massively rewritten, to follow
the faction in Hegel scholarship that sees Hegel as a major spiritual
successor to Kant---following Pinkard, Pippin, and Karen Ng
This particular view of Hegel is not uncontroversial. I do not think
that the article properly reflects what I think is the true nature of
Hegel's philosophy; which I believe stems from Aristotle and Spinoza,
and not, really, in any fundamental way, the philosophy of Kant.
Just a little heads up for those interested in reading Hegel.
Some great scholarship that /i/ agree with are the following secondary
source materials:
(fred beiser) https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/hegel/
(franz knappik)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejop.12129
(heikki ikaheimo)
https://www.academia.edu/263374/Holism\_and\_Normative\_Essentialism\_in\_Hegels\_Social\_Ontology
(alison stone)
https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/petrified-intelligence-nature-in-hegel-s-philosophy/