💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001542.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:21:17. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Petite Abeille petite.abeille at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 13:37:19 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Jun 11, 2020, at 14:03, James Tomasino <tomasino at lavabit.com> wrote:
A 'spirit' is intentionality, the heart of what a spec is trying to communicate. The tools and syntax serve this end.
I would venture only concrete implementations have actual intentionality. On the other hand, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
If you are referring to yourself with the why_specs_matter link, then I would suggest a useful "asshole" would identify these concepts that are contrary to the intentions of gemini and recommend solutions in the spec to prevent them rather than circumventing those intentions.
Exactly.
[2020-06-11T11:55:23.337Z] <@tomasino> ugh, Petite Abeille again
Did I overdo it? Apologies.
Still, shooting the messenger do not change the facts on the ground.
Gemini has 3 basic moving parts: URI, MIME, and TLS.
To be useful -as in actionable- the spec should be cognizant of their reach and define clear boundaries if necessary.
A prescriptive specification is fine, a touchy-feely one less so.