💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001519.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:20:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Matthew Graybosch hello at matthewgraybosch.com
Wed Jun 10 22:15:38 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:03:37 +0000solderpunk <solderpunk at SDF.ORG> wrote:
I was going to quip that I had already recommended everybody do this
in the Best Practices document and moan once again that nobody ever
reads it...then and checked and, whoops, it's not in there! How'd
that happen?
Maybe you had more pressing concerns?
I think it is definitely polite to explicitly indicate file sizes for
anything larger than, I dunno, 10 MiB or thereabouts?
I'd suggest warning for 1MB because I doubt that most text contentserved on Gemini protocol would exceed 100KB per file, and becausesection 3.3 of the spec explicitly states that servers are not supposedto compress content before sending it down the pipe. I mean, I'd love tosee more writers adopt Gemini for long-form work, but I think mostgemlog posts range from 250-2000 words, which might be 25KB at most.
I looked at the markdown file for my trunk novel, and it weighs in at1.6MB for 289,000 words. I shudder to think of what one might find in atext file weighing 10MB or more. I'm thinking of something like thecollected works of Leo Tolstoy or a partial dump of Equifax's dataas of 2020.
Of course, 1.6MB is fine on a decent broadband connection, and even10MB, but I still remember what it was like to try install Gentoo fromstage one (hundreds of megabytes of code) on a dialup connection. Itwasn't fun.
Relatedly, as of a semi-recent update, the automatically generated
directory listings produced by Molly Brown include file sizes.
That's sure to come in handy.
-- Matthew Graybosch https://www.matthewgraybosch.com#include <disclaimer.h> gemini://starbreaker.orgHarrisburg, PA gemini://demifiend.org"Out of order?! Even in the future nothing works."