💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001460.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:17:48. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

A client SHOULD NOT send the fragment part of a URL to the server?

James Tomasino tomasino at lavabit.com

Tue Jun 9 21:20:57 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On 6/9/20 8:12 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:

Perhaps. How would that work?
=
gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.gmi#5.4+Core+line+types
vs.
=
gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.gmi
With the first link, a client could indeed scroll to the relevant header, if so inclined.
How does the second scenario works?

Wouldn't it be infinitely easier and less vague to just use a linenumber for the fragment? Everything else is line based, so it fits thatmindset well. It's also less likely to run into issues when someone hasodd characters or multi-character emoji in a heading.