💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001343.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:13:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

content-disposition vs data URI

James Tomasino tomasino at lavabit.com

Thu Jun 4 17:31:08 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On 6/4/20 3:58 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:

On the server side, I presume?
What happened to the notion of client's agency?
5.3.2 Link lines/Clients can present links to users in whatever fashion
the client author wishes./

The clients can present _links_ to users in whatever fashion. Theyshould still be links. If a URL pattern allows for the encoding ofrandom material, that should not be license to inline content. The goalsof the project are clear philosophically that text/gemini represents asingle document format that can hyperlink. Pulling in data in the waysyou are describing is no different from the earlier suggestion of a <=line or frames.

If your client wants to display images inline in the document AFTER auser clicks on a link, that would be within the purview of a clientauthor. A client should not choose to inline images automatically,though, as they would no longer be links.

I think this idea, not the specific technical parts, but the theory andphilosophy, should answer all of the ideas you've been presentingregarding URL hackery collectively in the negative.